Alexandre Variengien

215 posts

Alexandre Variengien banner
Alexandre Variengien

Alexandre Variengien

@A_Variengien

Wrap and extend

Estonia Katılım Haziran 2021
217 Takip Edilen266 Takipçiler
Alexandre Variengien
Alexandre Variengien@A_Variengien·
I was about to beat gemini 3.1 pro at tic tac toe but it refused to loose
Alexandre Variengien tweet media
English
0
0
1
65
Alexandre Variengien
Alexandre Variengien@A_Variengien·
@dabgorilla @exgenesis Yes! Whereas AI sees all tokens on after the other. If we give them physical sensors, this is still a concatenation of bits. Of course you can do filtering, preprocessing, summarizing But you don't have this fluid dance across scales to find the diagonal relevant shapes
English
0
1
2
58
realitycheck
realitycheck@dabgorilla·
Yes, we have parallel functions, but cannot execute intentions in parallel, we have to do that linearly... except for folks with ADHD lol For example you don't "feel" eveytime a cell divides in your body. And everytime you act on an intention you are collapsing other options, kind of like the wave-particle duality
English
1
0
0
28
Alexandre Variengien
Alexandre Variengien@A_Variengien·
How I'm thinking about the substrate difference between AIs and humans
Alexandre Variengien tweet media
English
1
3
23
670
Alexandre Variengien
Alexandre Variengien@A_Variengien·
@dabgorilla @exgenesis Interestingly I'd say the opposite. Humans have access to very strong parallelism (every cell in your body is used for computation)
English
1
0
2
30
realitycheck
realitycheck@dabgorilla·
@A_Variengien @exgenesis Hmm, could this be because the AI can harness parallel solutions? While humans can only do this linearly?
English
1
0
0
31
christine
christine@christineist·
Serendipity/social aliveness metrics: 1. Thread Spark: A writes a thread and B make a good reply 2. Shared Arena: A and B meet in the replies to a third thread 3. Help Gateway: A asks for help and B offers help
❤️‍🔥 xiq@exgenesis

how do you measure how well an online community is doing? I say it's how much serendipity is happening. And we can get at it by measure how many new long-term relationships are starting at any given point (new epistemic garden lab note, link below)

English
3
2
12
1.7K
❤️‍🔥 xiq
❤️‍🔥 xiq@exgenesis·
insane how I now understand 40% of D&G a thousand plateaus from a 2h card game @A_Variengien ran that can be played for any book
English
3
0
8
693
Alexandre Variengien
Alexandre Variengien@A_Variengien·
For people out there that want to setup openclaw using cloudflare's moltworker I tried to set it up for 2 hours without luck * I jungled tokens and dashboard interfaces left and right getting inconsistent error * My telegram token was setup, but the connection didn't work * No support for whatsapp as a backup * No support for using auth-token from Anthropic I'm sure it's skill issue on my side, but might be good to know for ppl that wan to try github.com/cloudflare/mol…
English
0
0
1
245
William MacAskill
William MacAskill@willmacaskill·
Almost no one has articulated a positive vision for what comes after superintelligence. What should we be trying to aim for? Utopias from history look clearly dystopian to us, and we should expect the same for our own attempts. We don’t know enough to know what utopia looks like. The main alternative framework is “protopianism”: solving the most urgent problems one by one, not guided by any big-picture view of society’s long-run course. I prefer protopianism to utopianism, but it gives up too much. The transition to superintelligence will present many problems all at once, and may need to choose between very different solutions to the same problems. We need a way to prioritise and plan. So I want to introduce a third framing: viatopia. A viatopia is a state of society that is *on track* for a near-best future, whatever that might look like. A teenager might not know what they want to do with their life, but know that a good education keeps their options open. My current guesses for what viatopia looks like: material abundance, technological progress, coordination to avoid conflict, low catastrophic risk—plus preserving society-wide optionality, cultivating reflection, and structuring deliberation so better ideas win out. I have a new essay on this idea — link in reply.
William MacAskill tweet media
English
43
39
359
41.5K
Alexandre Variengien
Alexandre Variengien@A_Variengien·
Yep, the vision is to use automation as a mortar Rn we are forcing our thoughts / skills to be compatible with systems outside of ourselves, e.g. having to learn english, programing languages. It's like forcing all the containers to be the same shape so they can be piled up In the future, we can do what we are best at, no matter if it takes a weird, wobbly shape. The infra will make it legible to the rest of the world The key skill becomes authenticity
English
0
0
1
16
vals🔸
vals🔸@ValsTutor·
@DefenderOfBasic @A_Variengien curious if u already have a response here :) (I'm guessing that ur vision is *not* automate "everything", but only some things, with co-creation taking greater part of our future lives)
English
1
0
3
69
Defender
Defender@DefenderOfBasic·
to what end are we trying to automate everything for
English
429
53
1.1K
92.4K