𝙰𝙱𝙰𝙳 🎖️
17.8K posts

𝙰𝙱𝙰𝙳 🎖️
@Ab2dx
I am a person trying to make myself happy in this miserable life ..#محمد_عبده
In your mind 🧠 Katılım Mayıs 2010
580 Takip Edilen1.9K Takipçiler

@HATAN40js @lawAbdulwahab07 انت هالحين بتاكلها دبل ، تدعي ان لك مبلغ يسترد من محامي تروح تحط اصل الحواله واسم المدعى عليه كامل بالسوشل ميديا وتبي حقك يرجع لك بالمحكمة !
صاحي انت ؟
العربية

عشان كذا ما أحب أمسك قضايا للمعارف
هذا واحد من الجيران كلمني أخوي أمسك قضيته بحكم ان علاقتي معه رسمية ويمون على أخوي أكثر مني؛
بلغته بالأتعاب؛ قال كثيرة؛ "وكنت متعمد أرفع المبلغ عشان أصرفه؛ ويشوف محامي غيري" ..
اللي حصل انه وافق وحول لي (جزء) من الدفعة الأولى؛
وقال الباقي من الدفعة الأولى بأحوله إذا تيسرت الأمور ..
تمام ؟ تمام ..
أمس تفاجأت ان أمه كلمت أمي (بحكم أنهم جارات)
يقول ان كان فيه جلسة في 10 شوال وما حضرتها؛
ويبغا يسترجع (الجزء) اللي دفعه من الدفعة الأولى ..
قلت: غير صحيح ودخلت ناجز صورت له الجلسات؛
ارسل الجلسة اللي يقصدها طلعت قضية ثانية في الدوائر المرورية بالمحكمة العامة؛
يوم وضحت له الصورة احسبه خلاص اقتنع؛
(في النهاية قال اني هكرت ناجز وحذفت الجلسة 🤣)


العربية

@idkman6549 @iamufohunter What you doing in Gaza? Make the holocaust is a joke , now I understand why they killed your kind
English

𝙰𝙱𝙰𝙳 🎖️ retweetledi

@TechVoicenet تطور شكلي ولا الخدمة مازالت سيئة بشكل مستفز ، اودي شحنتي ع بعارين ولا اوديها معهم 🙋🏻♂️
العربية

تصرف ذكي
جرب حبه وبعدين اشتري الباقي 👍
سخان HEX الفوري
تحكم بالجوال - امان عالي - توفير الطاقة
alhulafa.com/azyBKmW
العربية

@bitcoin_way ما انصح ابدا تتعاملون مع هالبنك في اي شيء متعلق بالعملات الرقميه / منصات بايننس وغيرها ، حجز علي مبلغ لمده 3 سنين مافكيته منهم الى عقب قضيه بالمحكمه فض النزعات التمويلية والمصرفية - احذرو من واحد مقروص قرصة عليها العلم
العربية

@0AhmedFinance0 ضريبه الدخل ضريبه تمس الجميع صح لكن في الاخير المتضرر الاكبر هم ذو الدخل البسيط لن كلن بيعوض خسارته ، الصحيح ضريبه القيمة المضافة ب اعتدلا
النسبة الحالية غير منطقيه مهما حاول الوزير يجملها
لن حساب المواطن غير فعال بالمعنى الى يقصده هو
الى بالورق غير عن الواقع يتبع 👇🏻
العربية

@altryne @AnthropicAI Well, if that the answer from claude
Im happy to do that , and please all of you do the same , sometimes companies need to understand the customers with a hard ways
it is sad how beautiful product turn like this
#claude


English

Uh Oh... @AnthropicAI official response to everyone burning through their sessions in SessionGate is.. You're holding it wrong?
Come on!
Their recommendation is to:
> Don't use Opus if you're on Pro
> Don't use 1M context (they cost more despite anthropic setting them as default!?)
> Do not resume large sessions after 1hr (not acknowledging the potential cache busting bug?)
> Claim that no-one was overcharged.
> No quotas reset (unlike Codex folks)
I'm sure that this won't go well with the thousands of folks who experience significant decrease in the ability to use their Pro/Max plans and are cancelling in favor of other solutions.
I don't want to dunk on Lydia, she's one of the few folks from Anth who actually acknowledged the community, please don't take this out on her, but continue voting with your wallets and sending them very quick sessions that eat most of your quota with /feedback people!

Lydia Hallie ✨@lydiahallie
Thank you to everyone who spent time sending us feedback and reports. We've investigated and we're sorry this has been a bad experience. Here's what we found:
English

@devneeddev Bro, you’re on the max subscription , Im on Pro one 20$ , a single prompt , consume my 5 hours window completely and 06-10% of my weekly limit , so I decide to cancel my subscription , they’re going crazy , I will not pay for that
English

I tested Claude Code on a fresh account - 1,500 lines of HTML cost me 50% of my window. Full video and summary is here..
I just ran a recorded test on Claude Code with a fresh account (Pro, not Max - my main account was 20x Max) , and the result is honestly insane.
The task was trivial: create 3 simple demo HTML pages, around 500 lines each. Roughly 1,500 lines of code total. Nothing massive. Nothing enterprise-grade. Nothing that should meaningfully stress a premium coding product.
And yet Claude Code burned through 40% of my 5-hour window almost immediately.
I ran the exact same test with Codex, and it consumed only 2%.
Then it got even worse: after the session ended, I did absolutely nothing for 15 minutes, and Claude still ate another 10%. Total: 50% of the 5-hour window gone for a tiny HTML demo.
My weekly usage had already started at 2% before I even really used it, and after this tiny test it jumped to 8%.
Now let us be generous and assume this entire run used around 30k tokens total.
If 30k tokens represents 10% of weekly usage, that implies around 300k tokens per week.
That is roughly 1.2M-1.3M tokens per month, and even if you round up aggressively, you are still in the 1.5M token range.
Using the Sonnet 4.6 pricing you list:
$3 per 1M input tokens
$15 per 1M output tokens
How exactly is this supposed to make sense for a paid coding product?
Because from the user side, this no longer looks like "premium usage protection."
It looks like a quota system that is either wildly inefficient, badly broken, or being accounted in a way users are not being told about.
And that is before I even get to my main account:
my $200 Max plan now dies in a single day.
Just a few months ago, similar or heavier usage would last me about a week.
So no, I do not buy the "maybe you just used it more" excuse anymore.
Something is clearly broken in Claude Code.
Either token accounting is broken, context handling is broken, background consumption is broken, or all three.
@alexalbert__ is this really the experience you want users to pay for?
Just watch the video. I tried to be very transparent and clear for your team! I was fan of Claude but just disappointed!
And if you want, send me the detailed token accounting for this session and let us inspect it together publicly.
Because from where I am standing, this is no longer a small pricing annoyance.
It looks like something seriously wrong is happening, and users deserve a real explanation.
English

@heisredminded @pcshipp Tried GLM-4.7. Good & close to Sonnet but has major flaws:
· Ignores multi-step tasks
· Loses context
· No out-of-box thinking
· Doesn’t follow existing design patterns
Great for simple coding, but falls apart with complex or of design work

English




























