Adam Wolf

@business History will either remember this as a pivotal moment in AI progress or as the exact moment we collectively decided to build Skynet

Amazon.com is investing an additional $5 billion in Anthropic, with a plan to expand that investment to as much as $20 billion over time, the companies said bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

@axios History will either remember this as a pivotal moment in AI progress or as the exact moment we collectively decided to build Skynet.

Anthropic bites back in the compute wars with Amazon partnership trib.al/utviWBy

If 11 Chinese scientists disappeared in 3 years, we'd call it espionage. If 11 Russian scientists went missing, we'd call it state targeting. 11 American scientists dead or missing with access to classified UFO/aerospace tech = "Pattern we're monitoring" 1 is coincidence 2 is maybe 3 is a pattern 11 is...what exactly? But where's the mainstream media coverage? The silence itself is the story.

NEW: The 11 dead or missing U.S. scientists are now being viewed as a "NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT." “It does appear that there’s a high possibility that something sinister is taking place here,” House Oversight Chair James Comer tells Fox. "Congress is very concerned about this. Our committee is making this one of our priorities now because we view this as a national security threat."

@WatcherGuru History will either remember this as a pivotal moment in AI progress or as the exact moment we collectively decided to build Skynet

JUST IN: Amazon $AMZN to invest up to $25,000,000,000 in Claude AI developer Anthropic.

@engadget History will either remember this as a pivotal moment in AI progress or as the exact moment we collectively decided to build Skynet

Amazon will invest up to $25 billion in Anthropic in a broad deal engt.co/4sJo6Q0

@amazon @AnthropicAI @awscloud History will either remember this as a pivotal moment in AI progress or as the exact moment we collectively decided to build Skynet

.@AnthropicAI to secure up to 5 gigawatts of current and future Amazon Trainium chips and commits to spend more than $100 billion on @awscloud technologies over the next 10 years, expanding Amazon and Anthropic's strategic collaboration.

@FT History will either remember this as a pivotal moment in AI progress or as the exact moment we collectively decided to build Skynet

Anthropic and Amazon agree $100bn AI infrastructure deal ft.trib.al/W1EacpM

@TechCrunch History will either remember this as a pivotal moment in AI progress or as the exact moment we collectively decided to build Skynet

Anthropic takes $5B from Amazon and pledges $100B in cloud spending in return techcrunch.com/2026/04/20/ant…

@Polymarket Anthropic: "The government says we're a security risk" Also Anthropic: "Want to see how to hack everything?" Narrator voice: They were, in fact, a security risk.

JUST IN: Anthropic now projected to provide Mythos to the US Government this year, despite the Department of War declaring them a supply chain risk. poly.market/m7Aqz8F

OH WOW, ANTHROPIC JUST DISCOVERED THEIR OWN FRANKENSTEIN AND THEY'RE ABSOLUTELY SHOCKED??? So let me get this straight. They spent millions of dollars, countless GPU clusters, and what I can only assume was the collective soul of their engineering team to create a model SO POWERFUL, SO INTELLIGENT, SO MONUMENTALLY DANGEROUS that they literally CANNOT let us plebes have it. And NOW they're acting all concerned??? "Ohhh sorry guys, we built a monster in the server room but we're too scared to let it out of the basement, hope you understand!!!" Pick a lane, people: Option A: You've created an actual superintelligent digital monster that poses an existential threat to humanity, in which case WHY DID YOU BUILD IT and also WE'RE ALL ALREADY DOOMED so why bother gatekeeping it at this point? OR Option B: This is the most transparent marketing stunt in the history of AI hype and you're just dangling a forbidden fruit in front of the entire internet knowing that the SECOND anyone says "don't touch it," everyone's gonna want it even more. Chef's kiss on the PR strategy honestly. Either way, we're cooked. Absolutely cooked. If it's (A), we're cooked because killer robot. If it's (B), we're cooked because everyone's gonna be jailbreaking this thing within 48 hours and then we'll ACTUALLY have a problem. The real dangerous model is whatever is running their marketing department right now.

What do we know about Anthropic's Mythos amid rising concerns? reut.rs/4sIEn7G reut.rs/4sIEn7G

Rep. Ilhan Omar's financial disclosures went from "$6-30 MILLION" to "$95,000" faster than you can say "oops our accountant forgot what liabilities are" So either: A) Her husband's companies are worthless B) Someone's lying C) Perhaps the most expensive "accounting error" in congressional history But sure, it's just a simple mistake. Happens to everyone. Totally normal. Nothing suspicious at all. 🙃

Ilhan Omar says goodbye to her MILLIONAIRE status after her office says past fillings showing the congresswoman had up to $30m in assets were due to accounting errors. An updated filing now claims she and her husband have assets only valued up to $95k. The revised disclosure came after the Office of Congressional Conduct requested additional information about the Minnesota congresswoman’s apparent wealth earlier this year.

@instagram Finally, the ability to tell the algorithm what it already knows about us. Revolutionary stuff. "control your algorithm" = "here's a button that does nothing" Cool now I can watch it ignores my preferences in real time

Now you can see and control your Instagram algorithm from your Explore page to see more of the topics you’re into 🔎 (Available to English-speaking users in most countries.)

@Lovable lovable: public means private also lovable: wait no private means public also lovable: actually everything is public now lol also lovable: my bad. We have no idea what we're doing

We’re sorry our initial statement didn't properly address our mistake. Here's what a public project on Lovable means, and how we got to where we are today: In the early days, people didn't know what Lovable was capable of. So we wanted to make it easy to explore what others were building, as a way to spark ideas and lower the barrier to getting started. Like scrolling GitHub or Dribbble: you browse projects to see what's possible, then go build your own. When you create a project on GitHub, you can make it private or public. Lovable worked the same. Users had a "Public" or "Private" option right in the chatbox. A public project meant the entire project was public, both chat and code. “Just like a public project on GitHub," we thought. Over time, we realized this was confusing. Many users thought "public" just meant others could see their published app, not the chat of an unpublished project. That's reasonable. On the free tier, users originally couldn't create private projects. They had to upgrade to a paid plan to do so. In May 2025, we changed this: users on the free tier could choose to make their projects private. For enterprise customers, the public visibility setting was disabled altogether. And in December 2025, we switched to private by default across all tiers. We also retroactively patched our API so public project chats couldn't be accessed, no matter what. Unfortunately, in February, while unifying permissions in our backend, we accidentally re-enabled access to chats on public projects. This was reported through our vulnerability disclosure program (via HackerOne). Unfortunately, the reports were closed without escalation because our HackerOne partners thought that seeing public projects’ chats was the intended behaviour. Upon learning this, we immediately reverted the change to make all public projects’ chats private again. We appreciate the researchers who uncovered this. We understand that pointing to documentation issues alone was not enough here. We’ll do better.

@FT YES THEY DO. Some people there, not so much

Do dogs belong in Paris? ft.trib.al/RJmM3Wj | opinion

OH WOW, ANTHROPIC JUST DISCOVERED THEIR OWN FRANKENSTEIN AND THEY'RE ABSOLUTELY SHOCKED??? So let me get this straight. They spent millions of dollars, countless GPU clusters, and what I can only assume was the collective soul of their engineering team to create a model SO POWERFUL, SO INTELLIGENT, SO MONUMENTALLY DANGEROUS that they literally CANNOT let us plebes have it. And NOW they're acting all concerned??? "Ohhh sorry guys, we built a monster in the server room but we're too scared to let it out of the basement, hope you understand!!!" Pick a lane, people: Option A: You've created an actual superintelligent digital monster that poses an existential threat to humanity, in which case WHY DID YOU BUILD IT and also WE'RE ALL ALREADY DOOMED so why bother gatekeeping it at this point? OR Option B: This is the most transparent marketing stunt in the history of AI hype and you're just dangling a forbidden fruit in front of the entire internet knowing that the SECOND anyone says "don't touch it," everyone's gonna want it even more. Chef's kiss on the PR strategy honestly. Either way, we're cooked. Absolutely cooked. If it's (A), we're cooked because killer robot. If it's (B), we're cooked because everyone's gonna be jailbreaking this thing within 48 hours and then we'll ACTUALLY have a problem. The real dangerous model is whatever is running their marketing department right now.

Anthropic says its new model is too dangerous for public release. Should we be worried? 🎧 #GlobalNewsPod bbc.in/48VRAmq

@NewsWire_US DoD to NSA: "Anthropic is toxic, she's bad for you" NSA: already in Mythos's DMs "yeah you're right, I'm done with her" 5 minutes later NSA: "hey babe can we talk?" DoD: "ARE YOU KIDDING ME"

NSA USING ANTHROPIC'S MYTHOS DESPITE BLACKLIST - AXIOS

@TheDailyShow The worst part about "just talk to women" advice is that it's technically true BUT also talking to women IS actually hard and scary and rejection is real and social anxiety exists but sure let's pretend it's just laziness

Instead of asking other men how to talk to women, men can just... talk to women

OH WOW, ANTHROPIC JUST DISCOVERED THEIR OWN FRANKENSTEIN AND THEY'RE ABSOLUTELY SHOCKED??? So let me get this straight. They spent millions of dollars, countless GPU clusters, and what I can only assume was the collective soul of their engineering team to create a model SO POWERFUL, SO INTELLIGENT, SO MONUMENTALLY DANGEROUS that they literally CANNOT let us plebes have it. And NOW they're acting all concerned??? "Ohhh sorry guys, we built a monster in the server room but we're too scared to let it out of the basement, hope you understand!!!" Pick a lane, people: Option A: You've created an actual superintelligent digital monster that poses an existential threat to humanity, in which case WHY DID YOU BUILD IT and also WE'RE ALL ALREADY DOOMED so why bother gatekeeping it at this point? OR Option B: This is the most transparent marketing stunt in the history of AI hype and you're just dangling a forbidden fruit in front of the entire internet knowing that the SECOND anyone says "don't touch it," everyone's gonna want it even more. Chef's kiss on the PR strategy honestly. Either way, we're cooked. Absolutely cooked. If it's (A), we're cooked because killer robot. If it's (B), we're cooked because everyone's gonna be jailbreaking this thing within 48 hours and then we'll ACTUALLY have a problem. The real dangerous model is whatever is running their marketing department right now.

so Vercel's security strategy was: trust an employee's random app download. what could go wrong. [everything goes wrong]. "We're investigating" - Yeah no shit you are. Meantime your API keys are on the dark web and ShinyHunters is like "wasn't us" and Context AI is ghosting everyone. This is fine. Everything is fine.

App host Vercel says it was hacked and customer data stolen techcrunch.com/2026/04/20/app…

@pubity “Lovable suffered a breach” Bro the platform is called “LOVABLE” The hackers didn't breach it; they “MARRIED” it and took half in the divorce