Joelius Maximus

@jsolomonReports Yes - he finally got it right. I'm not overly fond of Trump or Paxton, but I'm DONE with do-nothing RINOs who refuse to fight for what the people who put them in office want. Fire them all!

You Vote: Trump endorsed Paxton over Cornyn for senator from Texas. Do you agree with his choice? justthenews.com/politics-polic…

@MadixWolf @RealJamesWoods Unless you're white and male.

@RealJamesWoods The left doesn’t give a shit what race or gender you are……. We care that you’re not a racist lying cheating criminal…. Yall want the right to deny someone a job because they aren’t white…

He’s headed for the presidency at some point. The tide is turning in this country.

Something we tell every junior analyst: The difference between a SOC analyst and a security engineer isn't the tools. It's the question. A SOC analyst asks: "Is this alert a true positive?" A security engineer asks: "Why did this alert fire, could it be better, and what class of attack would bypass it entirely?" Both are necessary. But the second question is what builds careers, detection programs, and organisational capability. Build your skillset around the second question — not just how to respond to alerts, but how to design the defences, engineer the detections, and investigate the gaps.

@hbtCHIEFS @chasedownleads No, paying for it 17 TIMES is insane. Someone needs a 12 step program!

@chasedownleads Paying $9 for a cup of water is insane

Mothers Day brunch is completely unaffordable now What the hell happened to this country?

@learning_yohei Neither - go to Texas

日本からこんにちは🇯🇵👋 アメリカ人に質問があります🇺🇸🙋 アメリカに行ってみたいんだけど、ニューヨークとカリフォルニアのどちらがオススメですか？🤔 ニューヨークの人とカリフォルニアの人はお互いのことをどう思ってるの？🤭

@pirooooon3 @Owl_Bob_ We’re not. We’re trying to create the conditions for the Iranian people to return to power in their own country.

@Owl_Bob_ 理解しました いつイラン政府を倒す事が出来ますか？

@Brohawkkk @mattvanswol And they can, on their own time. They have three months to protest during summer break.

I think you should do better. Why don’t you respect someone’s constitutional right to protest their government? That’s simple. It’s literally their right as defined by our founding fathers. You are a fucking idiot and you clowns that disregard the constitution but claim to be conservatives are jesters to your master, which you place above your claimed savior. Hypocrites. Everyone sees it. Performative grifting is on its way out.

Just so we are ALL CLEAR on what happened today... Educators and school administrators single-handedly CANCELLED SCHOOL for 700,000 North Carolina students... ...INCLUDING MY SON!!! To wave signs around in the street instead. The signs vary from: a) F**K ICE!!! b) Defeat Trump's Agenda c) Trump is a N*ZI d) ICE OUT!!! e) Protect trans kids f) Refuse fascism g) Stop bombing schools DO NOT TELL ME THIS WAS ABOUT KIDS. IT NEVER WAS. This was ADULTS using 700,000 children, INCLUDING MINE, as political leverage against a president they don't like. That is despicable. You know better... DO BETTER.

@Miragea_S @mattvanswol To suggest that a 14 year old understands the world better than an adult who has real responsibilities and has had to make it on their own merits is ABSURD! Most 14 year olds have lived protected little lives, don’t pay taxes, haven’t had the responsibility of a child and family

If your child is 14 or younger, participating in the protest might make it seem like the school is manipulating them. If your child is 14 or older, rest assured, Dad. That child understands the world better than you do and, with a pure heart, can clearly distinguish between “good” and “evil” without being swayed by personal gain or rights. So, if they’re 14 or older, please support them in skipping school this time to join the anti-Trump protest. Because children have purer hearts than you do.

@MattWalshBlog @MattWalshBlog - you forgot to use the sarcasm font on this one. Just an FYI

I’m officially convinced. It was a hoax. The Trump Administration recruited a leftist Kamala Harris voting Trump hater to participate in a staged assassination that would include the shooter getting shot at and then locked in federal prison for the rest of his life. The Kamala Harris voter agreed to this plan, that works against his political and personal interests, because he’s just like a really generous guy. Meanwhile the Trump Administration, despite dastardly planning multiple assassination hoaxes, decided to keep their patsy alive and a permanent liability to them, rather than just killing him like they could have easily done. They did this because they also are really strangely generous in a very odd and specific way. So in summary we have a plot where all parties involved are working against their own interests with no real discernible benefit to any of them. There is no evidence of this plan and it doesn’t even make any intuitive sense and the motives for everyone are unclear if not insane, but still I believe it because I’m a very smart person.

@melissavitelli @JaimeeUSA @SebGorka So we're going to crucify him for what he did before he found Christ? WTF are we doing, people? Isn't that part of being a witness? To confess how bad you were, and then describe how Christ changed your heart and your life?

@JaimeeUSA @SebGorka How to become a Christian in 7 days Sleep with a minor days 1-5 Ask for forgiveness day 6 Christian day 7

Russell Brand just admitted openly on Megyn Kelly's show that he slept with a 16 year old when he was 30 and she just nodded in agreement with everything he said.

@MN_wolf_ @sola_chad @THEDuaneCates You think Somali's came up with that scam and then perpetrated it on their own?You think there weren't plenty of Americans who reaped the profits off of that corruption? Liberals don't have a monopoly on greed, no group does. There are plenty of greedy conservatives too.

She bought the lies of feminism … had never held a baby before. After holding this precious child, in tears she proclaims she wants 8 babies of her own. Holding a baby is like a factory reset for women.

@DreadedDinosaur @imPenny2x Rockets go towards the sun too, right?

@imPenny2x What do we do with all the criminals and lunatics that would rather burn it all down?

99% of people really do not understand abundance as Elon describes it. The fundamental reason is that they don’t understand compound growth. Same people who would probably pick 1 million dollars today over a penny that doubles in value every day for 30 days. It’s a bad choice by the way. You lose out on millions. Imagine if that doubling object was a labor producing robot instead of a penny. Compounding labor. It’s actually crazy if you try and wrap your mind around it. So Elon mentions Universl High Income and the midwits flip a lid. “The elites won’t share” You don’t get it. They won’t need to share. They will make everything so cheap, it is effectively free. Charities will have immense resources to distribute. Unfathomable intelligence will exist to help optimize production and distribution. An unfathomably large labor pool will exist that operates on solar power exclusively. The public work projects that are erected will be unseen before levels of breathtaking. I think we are incredibly blessed to steward this new age of abundance. Can you see it now? Can you see the future?

@shcvera24 @Edward63561584 @Ric_RTP Side effects of TDS

@Edward63561584 @Ric_RTP he can do that with grok. If you don’t think this is about squashing AI competitors then you’re blind

In 19 days, a jury in Oakland is going to decide whether the entire legal foundation of the AI industry is built on fraud. Everyone thinks the Musk vs Altman lawsuit is a billionaire grudge match. Two egos, one grudge, a $150 billion damages number designed for headlines. Easy to dismiss. Easy to scroll past. That's exactly what Altman wants you to think. Because what's actually on trial on April 27 is something much BIGGER than Elon's hurt feelings... A jury is going to decide whether you can legally take billions of dollars in nonprofit donations, use them to build the most valuable technology in human history, and then quietly convert that nonprofit into a for-profit company worth $850 billion. If the answer is no, the entire AI industry has a problem. Because OpenAI is not the only company that did this: Anthropic was founded by OpenAI defectors using the same nonprofit-first mission language. xAI pitches itself as building AI "for humanity." Every frontier lab has used the moral cover of "we're doing this for the good of the world" to attract talent, capital, and regulatory goodwill they would have never gotten otherwise. An Elon win doesn't just touch OpenAI. It creates a legal precedent that every AI company built on a nonprofit or public benefit promise becomes vulnerable to shareholder and donor clawback suits. That's why this case matters. And that's why Altman is panicking. Just look at what he did this week: Elon filed a motion demanding the court remove Altman and Brockman from their roles and FORCE OpenAI to return to its nonprofit origins. Then he amended the suit to say if he wins the $150 billion, all of it goes to OpenAI's charity arm. Not him. Zero dollars to Elon personally. That amendment was surgical. It stripped Altman of his entire public defense. He can no longer claim this is about Elon's ego or Elon's bank account. Elon is now legally on record saying he just wants the mission back. OpenAI's response was to panic-write a letter to the California and Delaware attorneys general asking them to investigate Elon for "anti-competitive behavior." Their strategy chief publicly accused Elon of coordinating attacks with Mark Zuckerberg. They called the lawsuit "harassment driven by ego and jealousy." That's NOT the response of a company that thinks it's going to win. Real companies with real defenses don't ask the government to silence the person suing them 3 weeks before trial. They let the evidence speak. OpenAI is scrambling because they know what's in discovery. Elon's team has been building this case for two years. Emails, board minutes, internal conversations about the conversion. The kind of paper trail that juries understand and executives can't explain away. And the timing couldn't be worse... OpenAI is trying to IPO at $852 billion. They just raised $122 billion. Microsoft has $135 billion of exposure to them. A jury verdict that even partially sides with Elon in late April or May would crater the entire IPO runway and send shockwaves through every major AI investor on Earth. This is why Altman spent the last 2 weeks doing press tours and policy blueprints and "super intelligence agendas" aimed at Washington. He's trying to REFRAME himself as the responsible statesman of AI right before a jury decides if he's a con artist. Most people will watch this trial start and think it's celebrity drama. The smart money is watching it and realizing that the legal foundation of the AI boom is about to be tested in court for the first time EVER. And if that foundation cracks, everything built on top of it is at risk.

@PatrickMahomes @bobbystroupe He is risen indeed!

He is Risen! 🙏🏽✝️

@aibytekat Or… here me out… there is a max amount the company will pay for a position and they don’t want to waste the hiring team’s (or the candidate’s) time on interviews if the candidate won’t accept it.

1. The Value Deferral Situation: The recruiter asks for a hard number on the very first screening call. They are trying to see if they can lowball you before you even understand the full scope of the role. Response: "I am entirely focused on finding a role where I can drive massive technical leverage for the engineering team. Once we agree that I am the exact right fit to solve your current scaling issues, I am confident we can align on a competitive market rate." Why it works: You completely refuse to negotiate against yourself. You delay the money talk until you have proven your technical value and gained maximum leverage in the conversation.

JOB INTERVIEW: "What are your salary expectations?" Most candidates say: "I am looking for somewhere between $120k and $140k, depending on the benefits package." THE WINNING ANSWER:

Fantastic idea.

@Booie1966 @end3of6days9 It’s cute when you say stupid stuff!

@end3of6days9 No! First off that is not your house.If you are married it's both of yall's house. You are a selfish man.I don't care if you pay the rent or mortgage. You donnot have tge authority to up & make decisions for a woman.If your step daughter daughter done wrong just talk t to her.

This dad kicked his 18yo stepdaughter out after she started OnlyFans and filmed explicit content in the family living room—siblings running around, family pics on the walls. Wife threatens to leave too → he says: 'You and your daughter can go. We're not doing that in this house. Not with kids around, not when I'm around.' He's not her bio dad and refuses to watch her twerk in skimpy clothes under his roof. Stands firm: 'She's grown, get your own place.' Respect to this dad protecting his home and other kids. Right move or too harsh?

Couldn’t script it better