Sebastian Gorka DrG

166.7K posts

Sebastian Gorka DrG banner
Sebastian Gorka DrG

Sebastian Gorka DrG

@SebGorka

Deputy Assistant to the President Senior Director for Counter Terrorism National Security Council WWFY&WWKY

The White House Katılım Mart 2014
7.5K Takip Edilen1.9M Takipçiler
Sebastian Gorka DrG retweetledi
Batya Ungar-Sargon
Batya Ungar-Sargon@bungarsargon·
The gunman's manifesto is indistinguishable from the views promoted by the mainstream Left, the Democrats, the liberal media every single day. Stop saying we have a political violence problem in America. We have a Left-wing political violence problem in America. batya-us.com/p/we-dont-have…
BNO News@BNONews

NEW: Cole Allen wrote a manifesto saying he was targeting Trump officials: "I am no longer willing to permit a pedophile, rapist, and traitor to coat my hands with his crimes."

English
314
2.9K
8.7K
377.6K
Sebastian Gorka DrG retweetledi
Batya Ungar-Sargon
Batya Ungar-Sargon@bungarsargon·
Debunking the Data That Claims to Show Most Political Violence Comes From the Right: There's a lot of funky data out there being compiled by nakedly partisan organizations and spread as though it's factual by the liberal media. My column: batya-us.com/p/debunking-th…
Batya Ungar-Sargon tweet media
English
143
1.2K
4.2K
849.2K
Sebastian Gorka DrG retweetledi
Batya Ungar-Sargon
Batya Ungar-Sargon@bungarsargon·
Here’s what we learned about America this week: The media is lying to you about where political violence in America comes from. Cole Allen isn’t an aberration. He epitomizes the kind of person likely to defend and commit political violence: smart, highly credentialed, left wing.
English
92
982
5.2K
76.9K
Sebastian Gorka DrG retweetledi
Jonathan Turley
Jonathan Turley@JonathanTurley·
They are the enfants terribles of the American left, young influencers rallying to the cause of America's enemies...and they are being replicated in the thousands in our educational system. The question is whether some have strayed into criminal conduct...jonathanturley.org/2026/07/13/teh…
English
41
508
1.9K
62.2K
Sebastian Gorka DrG retweetledi
Sebastian Gorka DrG retweetledi
Sebastian Gorka DrG retweetledi
Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao
I recently shared my vision for the future with our DoN civilian leaders, who play critical role in delivering results and driving the organizational changes we need.    We will break down institutional barriers to achieve three core priorities: take care of our people, accelerate shipbuilding, and protect the homeland.   Together, we will build a stronger, more agile @USNavy - @USMC team.
Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao tweet media
English
23
79
432
16.9K
Sebastian Gorka DrG retweetledi
Dan Scavino
Dan Scavino@Scavino47·
Just now at the @WhiteHouse, @POTUS Trump holds a @FREEDOM250 GRAND PRIX SHOWCASE, which will be taking place here on the streets of Washington, DC on 8/22 & 8/23…
English
187
1.6K
7.2K
132.9K
Sebastian Gorka DrG retweetledi
Seth Dillon
Seth Dillon@SethDillon·
They’re losing so they’re regrouping and trying to distance themselves from . . . themselves.
Seth Dillon tweet media
English
175
379
3.7K
110K
Sebastian Gorka DrG retweetledi
U.S. Central Command
At 4:45 p.m. ET today, U.S. Central Command began launching the third consecutive night of strikes against Iran, at the Commander in Chief's direction. These strikes will continue imposing a heavy cost on Iranian forces and degrade their ability to attack innocent civilians and commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.
English
1.2K
3.1K
16K
1.6M
Sebastian Gorka DrG retweetledi
Michael Bruno
Michael Bruno@brubarian·
I’m ded. The Secretary of State wrote this in the Wall Street journal. “International law” Howling
Michael Bruno tweet media
English
50
455
6.2K
201.7K
Sebastian Gorka DrG retweetledi
Tommy Pigott
Tommy Pigott@statedeptspox·
The United States is holding ransomware enablers accountable: we sanctioned First VPN Service, its administrator Dmytro Rashevskyi, and Yegeniy Vladimirovich Silayev for providing critical support to groups attacking American hospitals, schools, and businesses. Together with our partners we are dismantling the networks that sustain cybercrime.
English
5
93
397
12.4K
Sebastian Gorka DrG retweetledi
Ambassador Yechiel (Michael) Leiter
Let's not lose our grip on the facts - instead of recriminations and accusations - just the facts. 1) Congressman @RoKhanna was offered to coordinate his visit with the State of Israel - this goes beyond notifying of his presence in the country. He was offered in-depth coordination of his schedule to avoid misunderstandings, and he chose to ignore that offer. He also chose not to coordinate his visit with the U.S. embassy in Jerusalem. 2) He chose to conduct his visit accompanied by Palestinian activists, and, for some reason, @nytimes journalists with cameras at the ready. With him was also a person affiliated with @jstreet, an organization that actively lobbies against the government of Israel on Capitol Hill. 3) Mr. Khanna and his entourage entered what was believed to be a closed military zone without permission. The military had no prior knowledge of him going there, due to his refusal to coordinate with them. The vehicle they stopped was unknown to them and therefore provoked suspicion. The moment details of the Congressman's identity were cleared, he was free to go. At no point was the congressman, or any member of his party, threatened by the soldiers, or civilians bearing arms. 4) To add insult to injury - the Congressman used this instance as an opportunity to tout "genocide" and "apartheid" libels to the press, propelling himself to the center of yet another anti-Israel media frenzy. The facts don't lie - this was a cheap, anticipated provocation, that could, and should have been avoided. 5) Calling me a liar won’t change the facts. I’d be happy to host Congressman Khanna at our embassy for an in-depth conversation on his grievances regarding Israel.
English
760
3.7K
14.4K
850.9K
Sebastian Gorka DrG retweetledi
Rapid Response 47
Rapid Response 47@RapidResponse47·
.@SecDuffy: "Not only did he not speak English. When he took the test to get his [CDL], he took it in English and allegedly 'passed.' So this reeks of fraud, and we are now digging in to figure out where he went to school, who gave him the test, how did they pass him."
Libs of TikTok@libsoftiktok

BREAKING: DOT confirms to us that the truck driver who allegedly kiIIed 21-year-old UMass goalie and rising soccer star Tobias Forsythe, FAILED AN ENGLISH PROFICIENCY TEST. The driver was Uzbek national Bekhzod Asrarov. DOT tells me he FAILED an English language proficiency test and couldn’t understand officers when they arrived at the scene of the crash. He was granted a CDL in Ohio.

English
240
6.1K
23.5K
788.7K
Sebastian Gorka DrG retweetledi
The White House
The White House@WhiteHouse·
Lindsey Graham was a great patriot and true statesman. His colossal impact and remarkable legacy will never be forgotten. 💙🇺🇸
The White House tweet media
English
2.8K
2.5K
15.8K
310.2K
Sebastian Gorka DrG retweetledi
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱
Jean-Jacques Rousseau – the original Woke He invented it. Every premise of contemporary progressive ideology traces directly back to one man who had never met a "noble savage", never raised a child, and never lived according to a single principle he preached. 1. His foundational claim: man is naturally good and civilization corrupts. This sounds compassionate. It is the most dangerous idea in Western political thought. Because if man is naturally good, then every failure, every crime, every inequality is caused by the system – never by the individual. Responsibility evaporates. The oppressor is always external. The victim is always pure. This is the complete architecture of Woke in one sentence, written in 1755. 2. The "Noble Savage" is Rousseau’s Form – his version of Plato’s ideal. The uncorrupted man, untouched by property, competition, and civilization, living in natural harmony. Rousseau had never met one. He invented him from an armchair in Paris, extrapolating from travel accounts of peoples he had never visited. The Noble Savage is not an anthropological observation. He is a political weapon – a club to beat civilization with, wielded by someone living comfortably inside it. 3. The "General Will" is the most dangerous concept in modern political philosophy. Not the actual expressed will of actual people – but the deeper will, the will people would have if they were "properly enlightened". Whoever claims to know it can do anything in its name. Robespierre knew it. Every revolutionary vanguard since has known it. Today’s progressive institutions know it – which is why they can override democratic majorities, suppress dissent, and compel speech, all while insisting they represent the people’s true interests. The General Will is the intellectual license for every tyranny that calls itself a liberation. 4. The chain from Rousseau to today is unbroken. Rousseau to Robespierre and the Terror. Robespierre to Marx, who secularized the General Will into historical necessity. Marx to every "liberation" movement that ended in a gulag. And today: replace civilization with white supremacy, replace the Noble Savage with the marginalized community, replace the General Will with lived experience – and you have the complete operating system of contemporary progressivism. The software is the same. 5. Voltaire, his contemporary and rival, saw him quite clearly: Rousseau made primitivism intellectually respectable. He gave the comfortable classes of every generation a way to signal virtue by denouncing the civilization that produced them, from inside it, without cost. The French Left Bank intellectual denouncing capitalism from a café. The Harvard professor deconstructing Western civilization from a tenured chair. The hedge fund billionaire funding the abolition of meritocracy. All of them are living in Rousseau’s armchair. 6. He sent all five of his illegitimate children to a Paris orphanage. Then wrote Émile – one of the most influential books on education in Western history, a detailed guide on how to raise a virtuous child in harmony with nature. He did not find this contradictory. This is not hypocrisy in the ordinary sense – this is obłuda (remember the obłuda of communism?👇🏻). The defining structural feature of the ideology he invented: the sermon is inversely proportional to the practice. The performance of virtue replaces the exercise of it. Naming the oppressor substitutes for personal accountability. Rousseau didn’t just invent Woke – he lived it, in every detail, before anyone had the word. 7. The original Woke was woke about a fiction he invented – and spent his life performing outrage about a civilization he depended on and never left. Two and a half centuries later, the performance is the same. The noble savages have been updated. The General Will has new names. The orphanages are metaphorical. But the man who sends his children away and then lectures everyone else on how to raise theirs – that man is everywhere.
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱 tweet media
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱@Kristof_Poland

Marcus Aurelius – the most reasonable guy from 19 centuries ago. Perhaps because Rome was roughly at the stage at which we find ourselves now. He was the most powerful man in the world. He wrote the Meditations — his private journal, never intended for publication — to remind himself, daily, not to abuse that fact. Nineteen centuries later it reads less like ancient philosophy than like a letter from someone who understood exactly where we are now. 1. The Meditations were never meant to be read. This is what makes them the most trustworthy document in Western philosophy. No audience, no performance, no system to defend. Just a man at the top of the world’s greatest empire writing notes to himself about how not to become what power usually makes of people. Every other philosopher was constructing an argument. Marcus was conducting a daily inspection of his own character. 2. He ruled at the precise moment Rome peaked and began its long decline. Plague, barbarian pressure on every frontier, economic strain, institutional decay. He spent more of his reign on military campaigns in the mud (remember Gladiator?) than in philosophical contemplation in Rome – which was not what he wanted, and which he did anyway, because duty is not contingent on preference. This is the core Stoic move, and it is the opposite of everything the modern therapeutic culture teaches. 3. His central question is not “what do I feel?” It is “what is required of me?” The distinction sounds simple. It is civilizational. A culture organized around the first question produces Brave New World. A culture organized around the second produces the Pax Romana – and eventually, when it forgets the question, produces what comes after the Pax Romana. 4. You cannot control events. You can only control your response to them. This sounds like a self-help aphorism and is actually a load-bearing philosophical principle. It means: stop organizing your life around the management of outcomes you cannot guarantee, and start organizing it around the quality of the person and the decisions doing the managing. The Stoics called this the inner citadel – the one thing no external force can touch, the one thing worth defending absolutely. 5. He catalogued power’s corruptions with the precision of a man who felt them daily. The temptation to be flattered. The temptation to surround yourself with people who agree. The temptation to confuse your position with your worth. He wrote these down not as warnings to others but as active resistance to his own tendencies. The most powerful man in the world was more worried about becoming a fool than about any barbarian on any frontier. He was right to be. 6. His son Commodus was his civilizational failure – the thing he could not fix. The philosopher-emperor who spent his life practicing virtue produced an heir who made the gladiatorial games his primary occupation and declared himself a living god. No philosophy of personal virtue, however rigorous, solves the succession problem. Institutions must outlast the men who build them or they are not institutions – they are personalities. 7. Rome in Marcus Aurelius’s time was roughly where the West is now: still dominant, still functioning, already hollowing out from within – the institutions still standing, the spirit that built them quietly departing. He saw it. He wrote about it. He held the line for as long as one man could hold a line, knowing that after him came what came after him. His last entry in the Meditations might as well have been written this morning: begin the morning by telling yourself – today I will meet people who are ungrateful, arrogant, dishonest, envious, and unsocial. They are this way because they cannot tell good from evil. But I have seen the good and the beautiful, and I will not be made into them. He failed to save Rome. He left us the notes on how to try.

English
237
1.1K
4K
418.3K
Sebastian Gorka DrG retweetledi
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱
Our Civilization is Nobody’s Department Western civilization has regulators for finance, watchdogs for governments, frameworks for security, international bodies for everything from fisheries to intellectual property. It has no institution tasked with safeguarding the civilization itself. This was not an oversight. It was an assumption – that what had endured would simply keep enduring. Assumptions are not a strategy. Every great system eventually requires conscious stewardship. The Romans assumed the Republic would hold. The Venetians assumed the trade routes would always be theirs. Every civilization that ever declined assumed it wouldn’t – right up until the moment the assumption became obviously wrong, at which point it was already too late to do much about it. What makes this moment different is the paradox: a civilization powerful enough to have shaped the entire world, yet seemingly unable to consciously preserve its own existence. We have built extraordinary mechanisms for managing parts of the system – the financial regulators, the defense alliances, the legal frameworks. The deeper foundations — cultural memory, shared values, intellectual honesty, civic responsibility, the willingness to say what is true in public — are left diffuse, unmanaged, and increasingly abandoned. Nobody’s department. Nobody’s budget line. Nobody’s quarterly report. The result is not collapse. It is drift. Slow, quiet, constant. The kind that shows up not in a single catastrophic event but in the gradual erosion of standards, the slow lowering of expectations, the institutions that stopped reinforcing the civilization’s principles and started undermining them – from the inside, with the best intentions (or not…), in the language of progress. And into that drift, other civilizations are moving. Not always with armies. Often with patience, money, demographic pressure, and the simple advantage of believing their civilization is worth advancing while ours debates whether it deserves to exist. A civilization doesn’t need a single authority to watch over it. That would be its own kind of tyranny. But it needs something harder to build and easier to lose: a distributed sense of responsibility among enough of its people, enough institutions that reinforce rather than corrode its principles, and the willingness to examine itself honestly without dissolving into the self-hatred that mistakes destruction for sophistication. The question is not only who should guard Western civilization. It is whether it still believes it is worth guarding – and whether enough people are willing to take that responsibility personally, seriously, and now. The threat is real. Other civilizations are entering every space we vacate, every institution we hollow out, every conversation we are too afraid to have. They are organized. They are purposeful. They are not confused about what they want. The answer is not one institution. It is many people, in many places, choosing the same thing: tell the truth. Have the courage it requires. And build — the structures, the networks, the institutions, the arguments, the communities — that a civilization needs when it can no longer take itself for granted. Powerful individual men are great – a structure is even better. Tell the truth, have courage and build.
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱 tweet media
Krzysztof Szczawinski 🇵🇱@Kristof_Poland

Niccolò Machiavelli wrote The Prince in 1513 as a practical manual for power. For five centuries, polite society has pretended to be shocked by it. Meanwhile, every successful political operator — on every side — has been quietly following it. The only people who haven’t read it are the ones who keep losing. 1. Machiavelli’s central insight is not that the ends justify the means. That is the misquote that lets comfortable people dismiss him. His actual insight is simpler and more disturbing: power has its own logic, independent of morality, and those who refuse to understand that logic will be defeated by those who do. The Prince is not a villain’s manual. It is a description of reality that makes virtuous people uncomfortable – because reality doesn’t care about their virtue. 2. The current progressive system applies Machiavelli more fluently than any of its opponents. His first rule: the appearance of virtue matters more than virtue itself. The DEI statement while systematically excluding dissent. The democracy rhetoric while suppressing opposition. The compassion branding while destroying careers. This is Machiavelli’s prince – not good, but performing goodness to maintain legitimacy. The performance is the power. 3. His second rule, which the current system also applies perfectly: cruelty, when necessary, should be delivered swiftly, completely, and early. Cancellation is Machiavellian – total, swift, exemplary. The point isn’t the individual being cancelled. The point is the ten thousand people watching who quietly adjust their behavior. One public destruction purchases a million private silences. Machiavelli would have recognized the mechanism immediately. He invented the theory. 4. Communism applied the fear side of Machiavelli with full conviction – Stalin made the explicit choice Machiavelli described: better to be feared than loved. The show trial is pure Machiavellian theater – a public demonstration of power functioning as a warning to everyone who isn’t on trial. But communism made his fatal mistake: it destroyed the people’s goodwill so completely that it generated not just fear but hatred. And Machiavelli is unambiguous – you can rule through fear, you cannot survive through hatred. 5. His most important democratic insight — the one nobody quotes — is that the prince who builds his power on the people is more secure than one who builds it on elites. Elites are few, demanding, and treacherous. The people are many, ask only not to be oppressed, and are a more stable foundation. The political movement that actually connects with ordinary people against the credentialed elite is applying Machiavelli more correctly than the elite relying on institutional capture alone. 6. What should we do? Stop bringing virtue to a knife fight. The chronic error of the opposition is the naive prince Machiavelli explicitly warns against – the leader who assumes truth wins automatically, who believes that being right is a strategy. It is not a strategy. It is a precondition. Being right gives you something worth fighting for. Machiavelli tells you how to fight: build your own power base, never rely entirely on others, control your narrative before your enemies do, and treat fortune as something to be seized, not waited for. Fortune favors the bold. Not the righteous. The bold. 7. Machiavelli is taught in universities as cynical amoralism – the thing decent people reject. This framing is itself Machiavellian – it keeps the manual out of the hands of the people who most need it. The current establishment didn’t reject Machiavelli. It institutionalized him, rebranded him in the language of social justice, and uses him daily. The opposition reads Augustine and loses. The system reads Machiavelli and wins. Until the side that is actually right decides that understanding power is not a betrayal of principle but a precondition for defending it – the result will be the same. Virtue without strategy is just a dignified way of losing.

English
9
45
189
16.6K
Sebastian Gorka DrG retweetledi
Department of State
Department of State@StateDept·
.@NEWSMAX: "[The ICC] has since turned into an activist tribunal run by a network of leftist governments and globalists that threatens the very sovereignty of the United States."
English
225
503
2.1K
65.8K
Sebastian Gorka DrG retweetledi