Advance Munyepere

166 posts

Advance Munyepere banner
Advance Munyepere

Advance Munyepere

@AdvanceCera

Managing Partner : Advance Analytica Inc Co Founder : Mosi Oa Tunya Chartered Accountants, Mosi Oa Tunya Actuaries and Consultants & MOT Unlisted Investments.

Katılım Şubat 2013
179 Takip Edilen42 Takipçiler
Advance Munyepere retweetledi
Chirenje Mzukuru WeTongwe
Chirenje Mzukuru WeTongwe@Devro_Amplified·
CAB3 Objection Officially Submitted To Parliament By Retired DIO Shepherd Mpeswe (1) Debunking Official Reasons & Justification For Constitutional Amendments Bill No. 3 Honourable Members, permit me at the outset to address the two principal arguments advanced in support of Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 as the basis for altering our Constitution. Firstly, it is argued that frequent elections engender a divisive political atmosphere & leave the nation in a continual state of electoral contestation. Secondly, it is contended that the incumbent President has performed commendably & should therefore be afforded an extended tenure in order to complete his developmental programme. Honourable Members, with the utmost respect, I submit that these arguments are profoundly weak & cannot, by any measure, justify the extension of terms for the President or other elected officials from five to seven years. The assertion that Zimbabwe is in a constant state of electioneering is simply not true. That concern belonged to another era, an era now far behind us. Before the harmonised elections of 2008, it is true that the nation had to endure multiple, staggered polls, parliamentary elections in one year, presidential elections in another & local council elections yet another year later. For instance, Zimbabwe held parliamentary elections in 2000, presidential elections in 2002 & council elections in 2003 whilst preparing for yet another parliamentary election in 2005, a pattern that indeed fuelled national fatigue and political toxicity. However, since 2008, our electoral system has been harmonised & up to today, every citizen casts their vote for President, Member of Parliament & Councillor in one unified electoral process, once every five years. There is no prolonged campaign season, no endless cycle of contestation. The claim of toxicity born from frequency is therefore baseless. What truly poisons our political atmosphere is not the ballot but the betrayal of its sanctity. It is the failure of those in power to uphold the Constitution, to respect the freedoms & rights of those who disagree. It is the failure of Zimbabwe to abide by SADC & AU guidelines & principles on election conduct. Where elections are neither free nor fair, toxicity is inevitable not because of how often the people vote but because their will is not honoured when they do. Furthermore, the conduct & behaviour of the incumbent government, the ruling party & its cadres during the post-election period bear directly on whether or not the nation remains perpetually in an election mode. The continued politicisation of important state functions such as Heroes Day, Independence Day, Unity Day & the 21st February Movement, only serves to deepen toxicity within our political environment. It is also a matter of public record that the ruling party often sustains internal factional conflicts by keeping the country in a constant state of political mobilisation. This, therefore, cannot be credibly advanced as a justification for amending the national Constitution. The remedy lies not in constitutional alteration but rather in the exercise of discipline within party structures and a fundamental change in political conduct by the governing party. As for the argument that the current President is performing well & therefore deserves an extended term, that too, is a deeply flawed & self-serving justification. Constitutional amendments cannot rest on the subjective assessment of one leader’s performance. Indeed, not all citizens share the view that governance has improved. Many argue that corruption has worsened, public accountability has declined & that economic hardships faced by our people have deepened under this current administration. I therefore urge this august House to let us safeguard the integrity of our country by defending the people’s Constitution, resisting any attempt to dilute it & recommitting ourselves to the ideals that gave birth to our freedom.
Chirenje Mzukuru WeTongwe tweet mediaChirenje Mzukuru WeTongwe tweet mediaChirenje Mzukuru WeTongwe tweet mediaChirenje Mzukuru WeTongwe tweet media
English
5
27
75
11.5K
Advance Munyepere retweetledi
Namatai Kwekweza🇿🇼
🚩🚩Young voices are speaking out against Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3. Young people, whether in Zimbabwe or abroad, are saying that taking away the right to vote is a no-no! #OneManOneVote is what people want, and it is clear that the 2030 agenda is not welcomed by the people, except for the direct beneficiaries of ongoing corruption and inequalities. #2030Musipo #NoTo2030
English
2
37
98
4.5K
Advance Munyepere
Advance Munyepere@AdvanceCera·
@ProfJNMoyo My worry about you comes from the fact that as a professor you are not a good judge of the environment , you dismally fail at reading the room and here you are repeating exactly the same thing that put you in exile. As a human start learning from your mistakes.
English
0
0
2
316
Prof Jonathan Moyo
Prof Jonathan Moyo@ProfJNMoyo·
Debunking a Persistent and Dangerous Myth: Zimbabwe’s Constitution Contains Only One Presidential Term Limit Provision: In the intense public debate over the Constitution of Zimbabwe (Amendment No. 3) Bill, an utterly false claim is being repeated relentlessly and without a single shred of evidence: that the Constitution contains two separate presidential term limit provisions—sections 91(2) and 95(2)(b). This assertion is not merely incorrect; it is constitutionally impossible. No constitution anywhere in the world has ever created two distinct term limit provisions for the presidency. Section 95(2)(b) is not—and, according to the Constitution’s own crystal-clear definition in section 328(1), read with section 328(7), cannot possibly be—a term limit provision. A genuine presidential term limit provision restricts the total or maximum length of time any individual may hold or occupy the Office of President. Section 95(2)(b) does nothing of the sort. It simply defines the length of each presidential term as five years, running coterminous with the life of Parliament. In straightforward language, section 95(2)(b) regulates the office itself, not the person who holds it, and says absolutely nothing about how many terms or the length of time any one individual may serve. The Constitution of Zimbabwe (2013) contains only one term limit provision: Section 91(2). This clause is unequivocal and ironclad. It prohibits any person from serving more than two terms as President, with the vital safeguard that three or more years in office counts as a full term. It is only this single provision—and this provision alone—that actually limits the total time any individual can occupy the highest office in the land. Nothing illuminates this fundamental distinction more powerfully than comparative constitutional analysis—the gold standard for both public education and responsible policymaking. As the ancient wisdom has it, there is truly nothing new under the sun. A careful examination of proven global practice, vividly illustrated in the attached infographics, reveals three clear and time-tested approaches that nations around the world have taken when designing presidential term rules: Case 1 – Term length only (unlimited re-election permitted) Constitutions in this category have a single provision that simply defines the length of each presidential term, leaving the number of terms entirely open. This constitutional model operated successfully for decades—for example—in Botswana (31 years, 1966–1997), the United States (163 years, 1789–1951), and Zimbabwe itself (23 years, 1987–2013). Case 2 – Two separate provisions Here constitutions have two separate provisions: one that sets the length of each presidential term; and a second, entirely distinct clause that limits the total time any person may serve as President. This is precisely the framework that has—for example—operated in Botswana since 1997, South Africa since 1996, the United States since 1951, and Zimbabwe since 2013. The first infographic displays this clear separation of the two provisions across all the four countries. Case 3 – Combined in one elegant clause Constitutions in this category have a single constitutional provision that seamlessly merges both term limit concepts—defining term length while simultaneously imposing the limit. This approach has—for example— stood the test of time in Argentina (since 1994), Chile (since 1980), France (since 1958), Mexico (since 1917), the Philippines (since 1987), and South Korea (since 1987), as shown in the second infographic. The historical record is especially telling. Botswana introduced its separate term limit provision only after 31 years of independence, the United States after 163 years, and Zimbabwe after more than two decades of operating under a pure term-length provision. South Africa, by contrast, enshrined both provisions, separately, from the very first day of its democratic Constitution in 1996. These facts drive home an irrefutable truth: a provision that merely defines the length of a term has never been—and can never be—a term limit provision. The distinction is not a technicality; it is the bedrock of constitutional integrity. Recognising it clearly ensures that public discourse and debate on constitutional amendments is anchored in facts, logic, and proven international best practice, rather than convenient fiction to advance nefarious political agendas. Zimbabwe and Zimbabweans deserve nothing less!
Prof Jonathan Moyo tweet mediaProf Jonathan Moyo tweet media
English
177
146
145
58.8K
Advance Munyepere
Advance Munyepere@AdvanceCera·
@cozwva ZANU PF also thought CCC was their opposition that was wrong the opposition in Zimbabwe is not an institution it is every Zimbabwean who believes they deserve better and are tired of the status quo. Once ZANU PF solves that opposition is no more.
English
0
0
1
96
COZWVA
COZWVA@cozwva·
Pple may shift the blame to ZanuPF for the CCC breakdown. Yet this is far from the truth. The truth is, opposition used to get 80% of funding from US funded organisations. When President Trump took power, he stopped this & it affected not only CCC bt most oppositions in Africa
COZWVA tweet mediaCOZWVA tweet mediaCOZWVA tweet media
English
41
2
22
10.6K
Advance Munyepere
Advance Munyepere@AdvanceCera·
@nickmangwana @InfoMinZW @ProfJNMoyo @DavidHofisi So there is no one with enough intellectual capacity to defend CAB3 within ZANU PF at the moment even in the whatnot4ED structures for you guys to go and look for Jonathan..........interesting we will be in attendance.
English
0
0
1
253
Advance Munyepere
Advance Munyepere@AdvanceCera·
@TembaMliswa There is a first time to do the right thing , even when you are a ZANU PF member there is a first time to say, No things are getting out of order. But you can never do that unomhanya nebhiza riripo so ukumbomhanya nevaripo you said it wani wega Themba takukuziva.
English
1
0
1
1.1K
Sabhuku Temba P. Mliswa
Sabhuku Temba P. Mliswa@TembaMliswa·
Oh so the Youth League can talk? While a naive reading of this scenario can frame the Youth League as protecting the integrity of Parliament this is actually the clearest indication of a factional entity that is frantically fending off what it views as an attack on its ambitions. As the vanguard of the party it has been impotent in the past while the party was being seriously destabilised in explicit ways. It had opportunities to justify its existence and duty but dismally failed. Yet, it has the guts to comment on propositions, assumptions and issues that are still hearsay! Why not allow Parliament to address its own matters in due time as it is run by capable leaders like Hon Mudenda who is also Secretary General of the party, instead of jumping the gun. Parliament has its own structures which can speak for themselves and don't require the excitable and fake integrity of the Youth League to bring moralising statements while perched on a factional ledge. Chivayo has not even donated the said money yet and the Youth League is already throwing tantrums. Why was it silent when party stability was being upended and the VP was plainly undermining his superior the President in the PB? Either the Youth League is now totally a factional arm of the VP or mutori mbwende henyu. You allowed your leader to be undermined by someone he appointed to office and it had to take the likes of Cde Matuke and Mai Muchinguri to stand. This is the worst Youth League in a long time with only a few like Kandishaya displaying enough gravitas to warrant being part of it. nehandaradio.com/2026/04/20/zan…
English
204
10
35
84.5K
Advance Munyepere retweetledi
Namatai Kwekweza🇿🇼
💌Good morning. Here is a Monday reminder: No system can silence a people who have awakened to their own power. #2030Musipo
Namatai Kwekweza🇿🇼 tweet media
English
0
14
35
743
Advance Munyepere retweetledi
Team Pachedu
Team Pachedu@PacheduZW·
We salute every Zimbabwean putting up a fight against #CAB3. You fight with your own resources not expecting to benefit alone but for us all. From the great student movement of @Zinasuzim , NGO groups, political parties, War Vets, Soldiers, to the vendor in the streets of Filabusi. We must never give up the fight and also make it a mission to educate as many people as you can. #OneManOneVote
Team Pachedu tweet media
English
6
120
347
11.8K
𝑲𝒖𝒅𝒛𝒂𝒊 𝑴𝒖𝒕𝒊𝒔𝒊
We still have grown men who think Zimbabwe is a colony of Britain… Those “Lords” were not elected by anyone and have ZERO power over Zimbabwe… even in that United Kingdom they are lame ducks… grow out of this slave mindset folks
Dhara Blessed Mhlanga@bbmhlanga

Met with Lord Jonny Oates a member of the House of Lords of the United Kingdom today. Will be speaking to a committee of Lords in the next week before heading back home. My country matters to me deeply.

English
71
13
42
45.3K
Advance Munyepere retweetledi
Forbes
Forbes@Forbes·
Quote of the day. #qotd
Forbes tweet media
English
31
146
627
23.9K
Advance Munyepere retweetledi
Reads with Ravi
Reads with Ravi@readswithravi·
“In order to be successful, you have to make sure that being rejected doesn't bother you at all.” — Bill Ackman
Reads with Ravi tweet media
English
91
1K
8.6K
178.1K
Advance Munyepere retweetledi
CITE
CITE@citezw·
Corporate Communications Manager for the @CityofBulawayo, Nesisa Mpofu, says she hopes @ZITF1 will give international delegates, visitors, and exhibitors the chance to see that Bulawayo is ready for investment opportunities.
English
2
11
37
7.6K
Advance Munyepere retweetledi
Namatai Kwekweza🇿🇼
🚩🚩🚩The message is clear: good governance is not measured by testimonials from people who are given goodies to speak in favor of the ruling elite, while the majority masquerade in poverty. 🎯The water in most communities is not safe to drink, 🎯the roads are in poor condition, 🎯the hospitals lack machines, equipment, and medicine, 🎯nurses are demonstrating, the youth are unemployed, the list goes on! #2030Musipo #NoTo2020
Namatai Kwekweza🇿🇼 tweet media
English
1
33
66
1.5K
Advance Munyepere
Advance Munyepere@AdvanceCera·
@shumbakadzi_zim @zimbabweyauya @Chofamba The narrative ......benefactors of CAB3 can see they are no longer in control of their fabricated narrative .....they can still go ahead with their agenda but the risk it puts Zim back into the frozen state it has been for almost 90% of the time since independence.
English
0
0
0
12
Shumbakadzi👑
Shumbakadzi👑@shumbakadzi_zim·
I HAVE A QUESTION TO THE 13 PEOPLE WHO PROTESTED IN UK YESTERDAY. Saka after mapedza zvamaita nezuro, what will happen? Chi chichachinja? Cc: @zimbabweyauya @Chofamba
English
17
12
14
1.6K
Levison Chambati
Levison Chambati@ChambatiLevison·
People of Zimbabwe, join me in expressing appreciation to Sir Wicknell Chivhayo @wicknellchivayo. Zvakakosha kutenda munhu achiri kurarama. He has demonstrated a remarkable spirit of giving, extending generosity across political lines. Just imagine, a donation of US$3.6 million to be shared among all 360 members of Parliament and Senate. This is truly extraordinary and reflects the unique spirit of our nation, a country known for its faith and unity. As my mother always says, munhu anoramba achipihwa kana achipa, true wealth is sustained by a generous heart. What Sir Wicknell Chivhayo is doing deserves recognition and appreciation from all of us, regardless of political affiliation. Let us celebrate the spirit of giving. @edmnangagwa @ZANUPF_Official @Zinasuzim @DeptCommsZW @SokoCindy @snowballOfficia @ZimFirstLady @ParliamentZim @DinhamercyHon
Levison Chambati tweet media
English
138
4
28
12.2K