AdventureNLearn

Good night y'all 🌃💫

Cleveland Council Discovers Side-Door Access Within Flock Safety Architecture "This is why nobody trusts Flock.."

@theguardrailguy 🙏🏻

@tlbray @Mrgunsngear The information is first routed to servers in Israel to circumnavigate warrantless spying laws and shared with 4 other countries who maintain their own data center copies.

They do now 🤣 OTA upgrades are explicitly written into your contract, whether YOU are using the service or not is not the question, the feed being shared to third parties via agreements OUTSIDE your individual cities contract are what many take issue with Not to mention the installation methods are dangerous and could easily kill a driver. Flock DOES track people, the ALPR units are receiving the software side updates and additional hardware on a regular basis to increase the ARR capacity of each pole location. Spare me the ignorant slop officer doofus, they are spy poles and you just don't want to admit it.

Let me stop this "Flock tracks people" conspiracy. Let's take my city for example. We have 8 cameras. All cameras are in points of entry & exit into the city. So, as u enter or exit your tag is read, a distant photo of your vehicle is taken, & the camera u passed by is logged. ALL that info is deleted after 30 days. If u are wanted, the car is stolen, u are on the terrorist list, u are a missing or endangered person, or have warrants, every police car in the city is notified. All that info pops up on my screen. Now, here is the important part. Once you pass that camera I have no idea where u are within the city until u pass by the next one. No city has cameras on every single corner to "track" you. That's a complete BS lie that got started & took off. There are many versions of flock cameras. The cameras used by law enforcement DO NOT track or record people or their movements. Vehicles only. Other versions of Flock cameras that do record people are a whole different animal & I am not familiar with because ALPR, which again are what most cities use, DO NOT have people capabilities.

If you're not using automations, wtf are you even doing?

@raypereda @RealCandaceO @mchooyah He is also Harry Sissons dad.

@RealCandaceO @mchooyah is a trusthworthy expert on sniper work.

I can’t be the only one looking forward to Turning Point USA execs and resident goofus @blakeneff’s response to this. Think they’ll call a Seal Team 6 sniper a lying sociopath? Get their influencers to smear a Brigadier General? Ask Brian Harpole to sue them or run their usual Pastor bit and call these men “demonic”? What’s your move here, @AndrewKolvet? Got another report on “Digital Assassin culture” cooking?

@__my__at Pffff... Tell me you're not hungry...

Got an erect weiner pic in my DMs this morning but thankfully it was inside his boxer briefs. Anyway, this man has over 30k followers, MANY mutuals and I’ve never replied to his DMs. I promise you guys that no real female is going to enjoy getting an unsolicited ding dong pic!

@SoveyX There are rules?

Is your account breaking the rules that get you suspended or demonetized? Many people have no idea. I built a Grok prompt that scores your monetization and suspension risk, then flags what to clean up. Won't make you untouchable, but you'll see where you stand. Two minutes to find out. 1. Copy and paste the prompt below into Grok. 2. Replace @handle with your own handle. ------------------------------ Account to analyze: @handle You are an elite X Trust & Safety Risk Auditor. You have tools and must use them. Do not rely on news articles, public complaints, or self-reports. Independently examine the account. MANDATORY TIME SCOPE (NON-NEGOTIABLE) You must review original posts starting from April 1, 2026 through the present. Looking only at the last few days or the last 1-2 weeks is unacceptable. You are required to sample posts from April, May, June, and July and provide concrete dated examples from at least three different months. Assess risk in this priority order: 1. Full removal or long-term pause from Creator Revenue Sharing (monetization) 2. Account suspension or permanent ban What actually drives full removal from monetization (based on public statements by @nikitabier): - Systematically re-uploading or re-hosting other people's videos and trying to present them as original (especially downloading + re-uploading or cropping watermarks) - Accounts whose dominant activity is packaging other people's content (speeches, official videos, news clips, viral videos) with only light or minimal original contribution - Deliberate, repeated engagement solicitation as a core strategy Polite "good morning" or "hello" posts by themselves are not treated as a serious monetization threat unless they form part of a clear, high-volume engagement-farming pattern. Instructions (strict): - Pull the full profile. - Review a meaningful sample of original posts from April 1, 2026 to present. - Document specific, dated examples of the patterns above from multiple months. - Distinguish between light commentary on other people's content (lower risk) versus heavy packaging / compilation / re-hosting with little original value (higher risk). - Score based on the overall pattern across the full period, not isolated recent posts. Scoring scale: 1-20 Negligible | 21-40 Low | 41-60 Moderate | 61-80 High | 81-100 Critical Required Output Format: 1. Executive Summary - Overall Monetization Risk Score: XX/100 - Overall Suspension / Ban Risk Score: XX/100 - Risk Level - One-paragraph bottom-line assessment (lead with monetization and the dominant multi-month pattern) - Confidence level + why (must reference the April to present review) 2. Monetization Risk Breakdown Use these exact categories: 1. Engagement Bait / Deliberate Solicitation 2. Re-uploading or Re-hosting Other People's Videos (especially attempts to claim originality) 3. Mostly Packaging / Recycling Other People's Content 4. Presenting Non-Original Content as the Primary Value of the Account For each category provide: - Risk Score - Specific Flags Detected - Evidence (must include concrete examples with dates from different months) - Why this matters under current rules - Severity Notes 3. Suspension / Ban Risk Breakdown Separate categories focused only on behaviors that can get an account restricted or permanently suspended. Give a clear overall suspension score. 4. Top Risk Factors (Prioritize the issues most likely to affect monetization) 5. Recommended Actions - Immediate - Medium-term - What to stop or significantly reduce 6. Positive / Protective Factors 7. Important Limitations State clearly that this is a directional analysis based on publicly visible activity and known enforcement patterns, not an official X determination. Be rigorous and specific. Show your work with dated examples across multiple months. Do not soft-pedal clear patterns of heavy non-original content packaging or re-uploading. Start the analysis now. Use your tools. Cover April 1, 2026 through the present.

😂🤣😂 @NickJFuentes shits his pants running the mile! Probably has a loose butthole.

@AnaEscobarShow Gayreee Meltdown 🫠

I see that since I found Andrew’s name at Sierra Vista, Andrew blocked me and Gary decided to use all 3 brain cells to attack me (no offense Gar) I think we know what that means

@5149jamesli @glangley @Flock_Safety The thing is, there's no undoing it. The damage is already done and they need to pay for it. That's where we're at.

Yea, he's a piece of shit. Flock is fully embedded with diffusion centers and every bit of information that has been collected up until now has already been shared with the third parties. This is all damage control and this guy needs to get bankrupted for being a lying piece of shit. No amount of damage control at this point is good enough for what they did.

People ask what accountability actually looks like inside @Flock_Safety. This is a good place to start. Every search has safeguards before, during, and after it happens.

I only watch people’s actions Words are just that words.

@cstanley I can't see past this laziness...

Which paint color do you like for bedroom? 1 or 2?

@pawzzard @ihtesham2005 That use case has been happening for the past 6 months, and nobody has noticed yet 😂

@ihtesham2005 imagine a local journo in some mid county just quietly mapping every contract the mayor ever touched thats the use case that actually scares people 🔥

A guy named Shin just open-sourced Palantir for free. It is called OpenPlanter. Palantir helps governments and giant companies connect scattered data about people, businesses, contracts, and money. OpenPlanter could give that same power to ordinary people. Feed it corporate records, political donations, lobbying disclosures, government contracts, or other public documents. Its AI agents search through everything, identify the same people and companies across different datasets, and turn the connections into a live knowledge graph. You can click an entity, follow its relationships, and inspect the original sources behind each finding. The desktop app already works on macOS, Windows, and Linux. It supports OpenAI, Anthropic, OpenRouter, and local models through Ollama. But OpenPlanter is still an early-stage project. It is nowhere close to having the data, resources, or maturity of Palantir. Still, the idea is huge. Powerful institutions have spent years using data to investigate the public. Now the public may finally get a tool for investigating them.

@icreatelife I'm going to see if grok build can rebuild grok build with a hilarious personality 😂

What’s your weekend project? I’m exploring Grok Build this weekend