AfterBlip

11K posts

AfterBlip banner
AfterBlip

AfterBlip

@AfterBlip

Katılım Şubat 2023
50 Takip Edilen28 Takipçiler
AfterBlip retweetledi
Football Time | 𝐅𝐓
Football Time | 𝐅𝐓@FootbalTimeX·
🚨| CRAZY STAT: Messi has donated 47 penalties in his career, while Ronaldo has done it only twice.😳 Messi could've scored 1000 goals much earlier.🐐
Football Time | 𝐅𝐓 tweet media
English
72
653
6.8K
138.4K
AfterBlip retweetledi
Mahua Moitra Fans
Mahua Moitra Fans@MahuaMoitraFans·
The one behind you is often the first to stab you.
Mahua Moitra Fans tweet media
English
22
389
2.1K
25.5K
AfterBlip retweetledi
Saurav Das
Saurav Das@SauravDassss·
This is hypocrisy at best! If the Supreme Court has held that the Speaker of a House becomes a “Tribunal” while deciding disqualification petitions and is therefore subject to its judicial orders and contempt jurisdiction, then, by the same logic, West Bengal’s judicial officers ought to cease to act as “judicial officers” when functioning as Election Registration Officers (EROs). So why should objections to the conduct or tactics of EROs be treated as contempt of the Supreme Court? The Court cannot curtail citizens’ right to peaceful protest after stepping into the field and simultaneously claim that protests against these officials---who are, in this context, performing executive functions---amount to contempt just because they are judicial officers in another capacity. And why is Chief Justice Surya Kant’s bench administering the SIR process in this manner at all, when it is not even the Court’s constitutional responsibility? The entire state judiciary has been thrown into this deeply political exercise, just days before the election! thehindu.com/news/national/…
English
45
418
905
25.8K
AfterBlip retweetledi
Saurav Das
Saurav Das@SauravDassss·
The manner in which Chief Justice Surya Kant’s bench is handling the #BengalSIR matter does not augur well for the institution at all. The apex court is increasingly being perceived as an active player in West Bengal’s politics, especially after today’s order directing an NIA investigation. Instead of deciding the constitutionality of the SIR process and laying down clear limits on the powers of a clearly partisan Election Commission, Chief Justice Kant’s bench appears to have taken a keen interest in ADMINISTERING the process itself, effectively ensuring that the SIR proceeds without any hindrance. The companion judges on the bench, Justices Joymala Bagchi and Vipul Pancholi, have taken no objection to this approach, which is all the more disquieting. Certain observations from the bench, for instance, one not able to vote in this election can vote in the next, reflects a totally cavalier approach to serious allegations of mass disenfranchisement. These have only deepened concerns and invited further criticism of the court. At a time when the capture of a constitutional institution like the Election Commission is complete, the manner in which the Supreme Court has proceeded in this politically fraught matter raises dangerous questions about the role it is choosing to play. The Court’s INACTION and delay in the AAP-Delhi constitutional crisis created conditions that enabled a political outcome favourable to the BJP. In the Bengal matter, however, the Court is not inactive, but ACTIVELY engaged in a manner that may have significant political consequences for yet another opposition-led government. The Supreme Court’s role is to create a just, fair, and equal level playing field to the greatest extent possible. In the Bengal SIR case, the Court is being seen as creating something totally opposite. Chief Justice Kant’s bench ought to have confined itself to deciding the legality of the SIR process, particularly given that it was initiated just months before an election with great hurry, leading to mass disenfranchisement of citizens, rather than allowing the judiciary, including the state judiciary, to become entangled in the administration of a politically sensitive process. The use of judicial officers for the SIR process, the appointment of High Court judges as appellate authorities, etc. is the greatest sign of how the Supreme Court is being run like a Khap Panchayat. These do nothing but risk doing grave disservice to the institution of the judiciary, whose credibility ultimately rests on public trust and a perception of unimpeachable integrity. Once that image erodes, only chaos reigns supreme. Chief Justice Kant’s bench have totally ignored and disregarded these dangerous concerns. Might I add that equally troubling is the silence of the Bar, which is meant to act as a check on the Bench. Whichever way the Bengal elections unfold, the role of the Supreme Court judges in this episode will not be forgotten.
English
430
1.5K
3.7K
152K
AfterBlip retweetledi
Mohit Chauhan
Mohit Chauhan@mohitlaws·
LPG crisis: SILENT Mass Layoffs: SILENT Foreign policy: SILENT Rising fuel prices: SILENT IT Rules amendment: SILENT SM accounts withheld: SILENT Stock market bloodbath: SILENT Rupee falling against dollar: SILENT FIRs registered against people: SILENT Raghav Chadha is not raising any issue where he needs to question BJP but he is acting like a revolutionary.
Mohit Chauhan tweet media
English
489
2.4K
12.7K
671.7K
AfterBlip retweetledi
India Unfiltered
India Unfiltered@IndiaUnfiltred·
Ban this video. This video is showing Modi ji in a bad taste. #AakhriSawal
English
138
1.7K
7K
236.8K
AfterBlip retweetledi
Bolta Hindustan
Bolta Hindustan@BoltaHindustan·
'राघव चड्ढा' ने ज्ञानेश कुमार के खिलाफ महाभियोग प्रस्ताव पर साइन करने से मना कर दिया था : सौरभ भारद्वाज, आप नेता
Bolta Hindustan tweet media
हिन्दी
51
764
2.6K
22.3K
AfterBlip retweetledi
Atishi
Atishi@AtishiAAP·
राघव चढ्ढा जी से मेरे कुछ सवाल .
हिन्दी
2.6K
3.3K
16.5K
813.4K
AfterBlip retweetledi
The Wire
The Wire@thewire_in·
Family Alleges 'Cold-blooded Killing’ After Army Says Militant Shot Dead in Ganderbal, Kashmir The Army did not identify who it had killed in the encounter, while the family of Arsheed Mughal says it was him and he was not a militant. @Gaamuk✍️ thewire.in/government/fam…
English
34
249
572
25.9K
AfterBlip retweetledi
Kedar Mishra
Kedar Mishra@MishraKedar1·
Hon'ble Chief Justice of India, As a concerned citizen, I seek clarification: If my name is illegally deleted from the electoral roll while elections are underway in my state, will the Supreme Court protect my fundamental right to vote, or will I be labelled a terrorist for raising my voice? I deserve an answer.
English
423
1.5K
4.9K
89.8K
AfterBlip retweetledi
Saurabh Bharadwaj
Saurabh Bharadwaj@Saurabh_MLAgk·
Dictatorship in Gujarat After arresting number of Volunteers of AAP Gujarat, police has arrested Gujarat AAP President @isudan_gadhvi
English
43
770
2K
32.2K
AfterBlip
AfterBlip@AfterBlip·
@xam4396 @Ladakhjobs123 @lg_ladakh Age is different from merit, use common sense. You even know about why students are asking for age relaxation or you just felt like commenting?
English
1
0
0
23
Kd Criz
Kd Criz@xam4396·
@Ladakhjobs123 @lg_ladakh Why are you asking for age relaxation for SI but not 10% relaxation in CTET? Why double standard?
English
2
1
4
120
AfterBlip retweetledi
Ladakhjobs
Ladakhjobs@Ladakhjobs123·
Nobody Is Asking Such relaxation, Ladakh Administration is requested nt to introduced such relaxation @lg_ladakh
Ladakhjobs tweet media
English
4
1
10
732
dr saleem⚕️
dr saleem⚕️@rehanode·
@Ladakhjobs123 @lg_ladakh A permanent 10% relaxation is unnecessary because it risks lowering the minimum competency standards required for teaching, which can directly affect the quality of education. Future of Ladakh depends on the students, senseless to risk it all for a handful.
English
1
0
0
39