Holden Alexander

@Timcast My new favorite conspiracy is your retarded

My new favorite conspiracy is that Candace Owens is working for the deep state to get section 230 overturned and then big tech will ban anyone they want under the guise of "defamation"

@Timcast Loosen that beanie, Dude.

Tim. Take your family and your earnings get that van and find a river bro. If you don’t course correct soon you will be back to doing IRL alone and have proven your self to be another useful idiot attempting to sway the market place of ideas for people that hate you and will laugh while you fail even tho you were faithfully commited.

Candace's weird connections to Israel and Zionists getting weirder Wtf is going on with these people

STEW PETERS: “Dan Bongino is the human equivalent of that faint, lingering fart in an elevator that everyone smells but nobody claims, and by the time you reach your floor, it’s already dissipated into the HVAC system of history like it never existed.” Nobody cares, Dan.

@Fair_and_Biased @benshapiro I have no shame or guilt I voted for Trump 3 times to fuck me financially worse the Biden Obama bush or Clinton

.@benshapiro has a message for Candace’s followers today: “If you are an audience member of Candace who foments this sort of evil… She makes money off of you… …If she is monetizing your gullibility, then you are complicit in this nonsense.” Every person attacking Erika in Candace’s name is equally responsible. You’re not guiltless because your name isn’t in the podcast title. 🎥: youtu.be/pN_JQkvhcMM?si…

@Harvos_Marvos @DefiyantlyFree @marklevinshow Bazinga!

@Aherb_IRL @DefiyantlyFree @marklevinshow Didn't really think before you posted this, huh. Might want to try being a bit more coherent next time, pal.

Tucker’s long-form episodes and interviews on X dropped l right after his June 2023 launch. From 2024 through early 2026, every major post has stayed flat in the 2 to 5 million cumulative view range. No growth, no comeback, just a steady plateau that anyone can check for themselves on his feed. The big X revolution peaked the day he left Fox and has been stuck there ever since. Now @TCNetwork suddenly drops some new 56.8 million “per episode” number for the first time ever. They have never posted internal metrics in the three years since he left Fox. But now that Trump trashed him and that there is pushback on all sides on the propaganda he passes off as a podcast, he all the sudden released an insane internal number that cannot ever be independently verified. His X feed already tells a much different story. By the way that number includes a mixed bag of 2-second partial views, YouTube clips, 34 million monthly podcast downloads, shorts, and heavy international traffic from places like Russia, Iran, and Pakistan. There are no audits and no real breakdown and just one big unverified total they decided to release today. The replies are full of accusations that his audience is foreign and that he is turning anti-American. So they flood the zone with global stats to shift the story and cover the up for the domestic backlash. It is textbook propaganda. He has to make domestic audiences believe that he’s so popular. Why else release data exactly once, now? Just like Rachel Maddow, The View and the Atlantic, he thinks you’re stupid.

@imelizabethlane @MrsErikaKirk @Timcast take notes

Dear @MrsErikaKirk Honestly, I didn’t feel the need to make a big post or comment about your attendance at the correspondents’ dinner. Where you go or what you do isn’t really something I focus on unless it has a direct impact on things I care about. That said, there’s a pattern that’s hard to ignore, whenever you’re called out for something people perceive as inappropriate, your response tends to be to insult your critics or position yourself as above them, while dismissing others as malicious. At some point, it may be worth recognizing a simpler reality. Many people just don’t like you. And that’s their right. People are free to form their own opinions, even when those opinions aren’t favorable. Maybe you genuinely don’t see what you’re doing wrong and maybe the criticism you receive feels completely unfair. But have you ever taken a moment to ask yourself, - What part am I playing in this? If you truly aren’t doing anything wrong, then why do the reactions you get seem so consistently at odds with what you expect? Guess what, there could be a hundred Candaces in the world criticizing you and it still wouldn’t move people unless what they’re saying actually resonates. People don’t just fall for narratives that easily especially today. You cannot force someone to see something they fundamentally don’t see or don’t believe. That kind of influence is incredibly difficult to manufacture just ask the CIA they will tell you all about it. Quick history lesson, even organizations like the CIA with billions in funding, massive infrastructure, coordinated networks and thousands of operatives have had to invest enormous effort over long periods to shape public perception in any meaningful way. And even then, results are never guaranteed. So the idea that one commentator (Or two or three) no matter how skilled, can single-handedly turn people against you just doesn’t hold up. The reaction you’re getting isn’t because of Candace, it’s because of you. Your own actions are what people respond to. That’s the uncomfortable reality, wake up to it already, I say this with no hate. At some point, you have to stop deflecting and ask yourself an honest question: why does this keep happening to me? Why do people consistently react this way? We’re not living in North Korea, people are allowed to form and express opinions freely and as long as America is America they will do just that, it is their right, just like it is yours to be unhappy about it. Dismissing all criticism as manipulation avoids the real issue here. And let’s be clear: you’re not some untouchable public figure in the mold of Jacqueline Kennedy. That comparison doesn’t land the way you think it does. Whoever told you, you could be her is not your friend, get rid of him/her. Curve your own path. Again I don’t say this to be disrespectful. This isn’t coming from a place of hate, not at all, it’s frustration. A lot of people are tired of the constant back-and-forth, the blame-shifting and the refusal to reflect. You are clearly bothered by all of this, but I don’t see you saying, ''Oh, you know what? These people don’t like me no matter what I do. It’s so unfair, but maybe I should step out of the limelight for a while and see if things change. So it doesn’t hurt the company.'' No, instead, you come out and you have no problem attending parties, dinners and opening events with Nicki Minaj, holding hands, even though your husband clearly didn’t like her. I’m guessing he didn’t like her because most of her songs start with a dick and end with a pussy, or one inside the other (should I tag the songs?). I’m sorry for the expression, but it’s not mine, it is the woman’s you chose to have on stage next to you. Then, at that same event, you’re going to mention the Lord like 50 times and have a literal former stripper speaking in front of students about how they should live. Then you go ahead and criticize the students and everyone else who judge you for this. Do you see the problem? As Leo Tolstoy wrote, ''All happy families are alike, each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.'' And while you can understand it as - everyone grieves differently, the point he made was actually much simpler, dysfunction is usually self-generated and unique in its causes. And if Tolstoy were around today, he might put it even more bluntly: no one creates their own problems quite like you do… I assume you’ve seen my post, most people have, so you’re aware that my opinion of you is far from favorable. That said, in my capacity as a journalist, I haven’t made a habit of targeting you or spending weeks analyzing your every move, event, or speech. I only comment on matters where you have influence over issues I care deeply about. Quite frankly, I’m not extremely interested in you, especially when our country is facing serious challenges. But what’s actually concerning to me is watching you come out and double down on claims that are demonstrably false. Saying things like, ''Candace Owens is accusing me of murdering my husband,'' or that people who criticize you are evil or something similar, this is simply not accurate. She has not accused you of murder. Not publicly anyway. So why say it? Because you're reframing the criticism into something more extreme than it is. You’re acting as if anyone who questions you must believe you were involved in your husband’s death and that they must be all evil, while you must be a constant victim of this supposed malice. That’s not what’s being said here at all. Let’s be clear: The issue people have with you is different, it’s behavioral, not criminal. I’ve described you as a person exhibiting traits of psychopathy and I stand by that as my opinion. Again I’m allowed to have one, just like you are allowed to disrespect it. I’m not saying this to be cruel, I mean it seriously. Psychopathy reflect something deeply complex and very difficult to deal with in life, not something trivial so trust me when I say, I do not say this with hate at all. It ’s a simple observation. You may disagree, that is your right. And it is my right to expressing my opinion on a public figure that has made herself a target by refusing to leave the spotlight and cameras even when she gets a negative feedback constantly. Constantly! And to be precise, if you go back to what @RealCandaceO actually said, her claim was that she intends to prove that something is off about you. She did not say she intends to prove you killed your husband. Those are two completely different arguments and conflating them only distorts what’s actually being discussed. It also should be noted that Charlie Kirk’s investigation is ongoing for Candace and for most of us, and the “Charlie’s Bride” series Candace produced is separate from that ongoing investigation. That is why it is placed separately as an 8-episode series on her YouTube. It is a standalone thing. I kindly invite you to check it out. So to put it plainly, someone could lose a spouse in a completely unrelated event, like a car accident and still face criticism if their behavior afterward appears detached, performative, or inconsistent with what most people understand as grief. Being criticized for how you act is not the same as being accused of murder. And if Charlie had died in a car accident and you behaved the way you are behaving now, the reaction would be the same (I can speak for myself her). So no, this is not about Charlie or Candace, it’s about you. People are questioning your behavior and what it suggests about your character. That’s the real issue, not murder. You can keep saying that everyone grieves differently, but apparently this nation and others as well has never seen anyone grieve the way you do that is why they keep talking about it. So maybe you should take a step back and reflect. When millions of people (And they are in millions, this is why it got to the point where it bothers you and your organization) are telling you something feels off, you don’t lash out. You take time to ask yourself why people perceive you that way, especially if you believe that perception is absolutely incorrect. That’s the mature response. Rolling your eyes at people and calling them names isn’t the answer, especially if you want a public career or hope to lead others. And if you don’t want that scrutiny, then walk away. The spotlight is not for everybody. Or take an example from your husband, who was a warrior, he handled it perfectly. He faced being hated all the time and he still engaged them and accepted them he didn’t tell them to shut up. If he thought people who criticized him were evil, he wouldn’t be sitting in front of them trying to understand their point and help them. You have the money, you’re taken care of thanks to Charlie. If the spotlight is a burden, step aside and let someone else take on the role, someone the public will accept. If you do that, you’ll likely be forgotten in six months and you won’t have to deal with criticism anymore. You will be able to finally live privately, attend events all day long and no one will care. But when you say that 'evil people won’t stop you from having it all or what your husband built for you or whatever idea is driving your actions and you say you’ll continue regardless of what people think, great, good for you - but then you should expect people to do exactly that: THINK. And their opinions may not align with what you want. That’s life. Get over it. You claimed you attended the dinner not to mingle with influential people or enjoy the spotlight, but to meet some journalists who have written negatively about you, to put faces to names. Well, let’s put a face to the name. I’m ready to sit down with you any day, at your convenience, even in your own studio if you prefer. You’re not the only one who values being direct. So here I am, willing to have a genuine conversation. The offer stands. No hate, no disrespect. Just a difference of opinion. Let’s see if what you say is true. And if you can’t handle an interview with someone who disagrees with you and doesn’t like you,then that’s fine. I totally understand that. Not everyone can do what Charlie did - engaging directly with critics instead of avoiding them. In that case, you can always put a face to a name in Utah court. Come see me in court, where your husband’s supposed killer is on trial, I'm always there. I suggest you bring a pre-prepared lunch, it can be an absolutely grueling ordeal. Sometimes it goes on for 6+ hours with only 15-minute breaks, with no time to go out and eat. But we sit through it because it’s important. It’s Charlie Kirk! We are interested in who killed Charlie Kirk and whether we have the right guy and if we do, we want to see that the process goes exactly how it should. So yes, you can find me there. I haven’t seen you even once, not once attending the hearing. Maybe one day you can show up. I bet it will help with the criticism part of things :)). You said you like directness, so do I. So here you go. I’ll leave my invitation open for you to sit down with me.

@FBIDirectorKash @RigidRocky63 🤣🤣🤣

Virtually every major success you see out of the new FBI today under President Trump is a direct result of Dan Bongino’s work. He didn’t have to do it, but chose to step away from a lucrative career to serve. Now the new FBI is arresting bad guys at a record clip, communicating with the American people more than ever before, breaking down bureaucracy every day, and has an entirely new enterprise operation with more accountability mechanisms and better operations across the board. None of it would’ve been possible without his work. Thank you @dbongino. 🇺🇸

@FBIDirectorKash @Timcast * unless you’re a pedophile, assassin, are rich, have power or influence

Confirming: Today, three individuals have been indicted on charges of assaulting TPUSA reporter Savanah Hernandez. When recent video of individuals assaulting Savanah surfaced out of St. Paul, Minnesota, this FBI immediately engaged and led the investigation - this week landing federal charges supported by our great partners at @TheJusticeDept led by Acting AG @DAGToddBlanche. Above all, we are thankful @Savsays is ok. Let this be a message to others who may try something similar - this FBI will find you. @FBIMinneapolis

@theprofsrecord That guy was fast af boi

Unlocking Trump's Messaging and The Real Enemy. Watch the full episode here: professordavidclements.substack.com/p/trumps-geniu…

@JeremyDBoreing Who the hell is this homo and why should I care that he fallaciates other men

The way a particular cohort of women is treating Erika Kirk is not random cruelty. It's the predictable output of fifty years of cultural rot. The architecture of the negative feminine has captured our institutions, our media, and increasingly our own friends and family—and a thirty-seven-year-old widow with two small children is paying the price for it this week. youtu.be/Uh75v-SAT0s?si…

@Timcast @oliviadasovic You just know that growing up Tim would throw fits until his parents caved. He’s trying the same thing now, if he is passive aggressive long enough his viewers will be like alright already we will watch just stop crying!

UPDATE I HAVE BEEN HACKED THIS IS NOT TRUE THE REAL REBRAND IS THIS

@seanhannity Give us that fed slop daddy bongina 🤤

Dan Bongino joins Hang Out with Sean Hannity for an unfiltered conversation you don’t want to miss. Watch now on YouTube or Spotify

@seanhannity Idk why Dan was worried. With the veracity of which this man protects and defends pedophiles he will surely, live forever.

“I was crying like a kid.” Dan Bongino on his cancer diagnosis. Full episode releases tomorrow on YouTube and Spotify.

@CinemaShogun @ChrissyJzvee Because nowhere on earth is a Jew paying a Muslim

@ChrissyJzvee Candace Owens pays Zionists thousands of dollars and hour.

Candace Owens canceled her show again today. She still refuses to tell anyone where she was the night of the White House Correspondents Dinner attack. She still hasn’t denied possibly knowing Cole Allen. This just keeps getting weirder. The vibes just keep not vibing.

@MattWalshBlog Told you love her so much why don’t you just marry her. You could have just said nothing, but thank you for doing so as you have removed any doubt that I had that ur a cuck

Erika Kirk seen crying: “She’s so performative! Look at those fake tears!” Erika Kirk seen not crying: “Wow looks like she’s moved on pretty fast! Why isn’t she more upset??” Erika Kirk seen laughing: “What’s so funny? Her husband just died!” Erika Kirk seen frowning: “Why’s she scowling like that? What’s she so angry about???” Erika Kirk seen existing in public: “She should be home with her kids! She’s abandoned them!” Erika Kirk not seen existing in public: “Where is she? What is she hiding??? Why is she being so suspiciously quiet????” Erika Kirk seen eating pancakes: “Look at this stupid bimbo eating pancakes! Too good for waffles huh?” Erika Kirk seen eating waffles: “Really INTERESTING that she chose waffles of all things! Kind of suspicious if you ask me!”