Sabitlenmiş Tweet
🇬🇭 #NPPNeverAgain
12.5K posts

🇬🇭 #NPPNeverAgain
@Aim4power
Focus on yourself. And aim for Power. #Wood
Accra, Ghana Katılım Ekim 2017
906 Takip Edilen640 Takipçiler

@owoahene23 @_nsagh It's a bad deal. The Authority and Absa want to make money off your money, without giving you a share. You should be getting lawyers to at the very least, negotiate an interest rate for period of withholding the 15% for you. You barb
English

The National Service Authority (NSA), in partnership with Absa Bank Ghana and the National Service Personnel Association (NASPA), has introduced an overdraft facility for all active National Service Personnel.
This strategic initiative is designed to cushion personnel against delays in monthly allowance disbursements, providing timely financial support and easing economic pressure nationwide.

English

@_Queen_suzy Relationships are tough. If you find someone uou vibe you who respects you, don't lose that person. Cus that's rare
English
🇬🇭 #NPPNeverAgain retweetledi

@Aim4power @_nsagh Totally agree. Covered your exact thoughts here. Please check it out and share.
Masoûd A.@_nursing_guy
English

@iamopsy_ I will ask you out today. Tommorrow. Yesterday. Tommorrow next. Next year. Anytime! I can ask whoever the fuck I want to ask out. No matter my fin state. If it's water at my house, we'll drink and I'll find out more about you and if I want to date the fuck out of you, I will!
English

@Itz__Priscy I learnt the hard way never to use my money help a woman with her rent ever again. Unless she's my wife. That way I don't need permission. Women are very very selfish people
English

@Op_lanre @Itz__Priscy @deman_005 Or let him know the terms before agreeing to have him rent for you
English

@Itz__Priscy @deman_005 As a lady, if you don't want that, don't let them rent an apartment for you. It's wrong for him to visit uninformed, but a guys ego won't agree.
English

@blvck_griffin_ @Taiwo_junzi Dude, I'm a man. And I understand what's going on with those who do pay for it. Not saying I would.
English

@Oluwasnoopy007 @Taiwo_junzi I'm Ghanaian o. I don't know what is ogun
English

@adeewunmii I'm not yet married, but I'm not sure if I do I'd be wearing the ring 24/7. I would only if marital status matters where I'm going, like certain social programs
English

@blvck_griffin_ @Taiwo_junzi How am I a finished man? Because I answered a question?
English

@TayProcess @Taiwo_junzi You people are some way o. A question was asked and I provided an explanation. Some of you are dull on this app o. Ah😂
English

@Aim4power @Taiwo_junzi No wonder u no use ur real pic
This thing wey u type dey reasonable to u??
English
🇬🇭 #NPPNeverAgain retweetledi

🚨BREAKING: Two researchers from UPenn and Boston University just published a paper that should be uncomfortable reading for every CEO automating their workforce right now.
The argument is straightforward. Every company replacing workers with AI is also eliminating its own future customers. Laid off workers stop spending. Enough of them stop spending and nobody can afford to buy anything. The companies that fired everyone end up selling into an economy with no purchasing power left.
Every executive can see this. The math is not complicated. But here is why nobody stops.
If you do not automate, your competitor does. They cut costs, lower prices, take your market share, and you collapse anyway. So every company automates knowing it is collectively destructive because the alternative is dying alone while everyone else survives. The researchers proved this is a Prisoner's Dilemma playing out in real time.
The numbers are already moving. Block cut nearly half its 10,000 employees this year. Jack Dorsey said AI made those roles unnecessary and that within the next year the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion. Salesforce replaced 4,000 customer support agents with AI. Goldman Sachs deployed a coding tool that lets one engineer do the work of five. Over 100,000 tech workers were laid off in 2025 and AI was cited as the primary driver in more than half those cases. 80% of US workers hold jobs with tasks susceptible to AI automation.
The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income does not change a single company's incentive to automate. Capital income taxes adjust profit levels but not the per-task decision to replace a human. Collective bargaining cannot hold because automating is always the dominant strategy.
They also identified what they call a Red Queen effect. Better AI does not solve the problem, it accelerates it. Every company chases faster automation to gain market share over rivals but at the end everyone has automated equally, the gains cancel out, and the only thing left is more destroyed demand.
The one thing the math says could work is a Pigouvian automation tax. A per-task charge that forces companies to account for the demand they destroy each time they replace a worker.
The conclusion is that this is not a transfer of wealth from workers to owners. Both sides lose. Workers lose income. Companies lose customers. It is a deadweight loss with no market mechanism to stop it on its own.

English

@therookie The last episode wasn't so good. Me of all people I was dozing off while watching and I had to switch and watch something else. Y'all went on break or something. I'm talking to the creative team 😂
English













