Arianne

🚨 Breaking: Dana Rivers Update from the women inside CCWF Recently convicted of a brutal triple murder, the state of CA wasted no time housing this violent male criminal with women. To put it plainly, the man who stabbed a lesbian in the face until she was unrecognizable & then put on her clothes now sleeps every night in a locked cell with other women. Women in River’s housing unit report he is “very chauvinistic, demeaning to women, and prideful about it.” Rivers has no shame about ogling women when they bend over. He also rudely inserts himself into groups & conversations. In a clumsy attempt to gain clout, Rivers told women he is from a gang called the "Deviants.” Rivers then said he’s still "about it!" while palming his fist in his hand with a loud smack. (The Deviants featured prominently in the trial see @AirDhatu reporting for more details.) While women are concerned about Rivers due to his horrific violence against women & his male strength, women rarely gain power at prison through gangs. And certainly not through an unknown recreational motorcycle club! Rivers may think he’s a women, but he certainly acts like a newly incarcerated man awkwardly trying to make an impression. Despite using a wheelchair during his trial, women have observed Rivers doing push-ups, burpees & jump squats inside his cell. He has also been observed pushing himself all over the yard & intentionally pushing himself in front of women while they are trying to workout, leering at their bodies. Yet other times he insists he is too weak and demands other women push his wheelchair around. Normally considered a decent job assignment, women are resistant to dealing with him and must be coerced. Women report feeling humiliated having to push this monster. It is a humanitarian disaster to house men in women’s prisons. It is a shame on all of us that these women are being harassed by this man and living in perpetual fear. #KPSS #GetMenOut #SexNotGender #WomenAreReal @womaniiwomaninc @ichinita310 @BonitasMomToo @Barbarella451 @yarewe_sf @SF_TERF_CENTRAL

I'm ahead of you @QcWynter 1. The baseline psychiatric morbidity of participants in the study was 47%. This compares to 15% for controls. As the average age of participants was 18, TRAs will say this high figure was because participants did not get puberty blockers. Or, their 'gender dysphoria' was already too advanced. Or some such cobblers. (They can't help themselves. They will never admit they've been horribly and spectacularly wrong). 2. The old chestnut 'minority stress' will be trotted out. But, the authors address this in section 4.2, 'Secular Trends in Morbidity': "With the opening up of society with regard to sexual and gender minorities, a decrease in psychiatric morbidity might have been expected in the later GD (post 2010) cohorts". Instead, those seeking GAC after 2011 had a 61% rate of psychiatric morbidity (compared to 48% before). This shows us that the 'opening up of society' to becoming more 'trans friendly' and 'inclusive' actually made youngsters more psychiatrically unwell. 3. The authors did not analyse why youngsters accessed psychiatric services in the first place. So, in the typical circular, illogical arguments of the TRAs, they will no doubt say this was because of 'gender dysphoria'! 4. The authors did not control for socioeconomic status of the children's parents. Critics will say it is poverty that made the children worse after 'GAC', not the GAC itself. Yep, they're going to nitpick and try pull it apart. But it is a really well-designed study. The authors covered all reasonable bases and it shows that the evidence against 'GAC' is overwhelming and damning.

In my career defending academic freedom and free speech, I never saw anything become as immediately radioactive as views that ran counter to the narrative on trans issues. Papers were retracted, compelled speech was treated as normal, and people were canceled for saying things that would have sounded like common sense just a few years earlier. It seemed to become a kind of secular blasphemy overnight. And usually, that is a sign that the true believers know, at some level, that they are on shaky ground. @hoovlet