Airbare

14.9K posts

Airbare

Airbare

@Airbare40

no party or religious affiliation. father to one son and one angel. climate - economics - justice

Katılım Eylül 2021
1.2K Takip Edilen357 Takipçiler
Timothy B. Lee
Timothy B. Lee@binarybits·
@0xTosk By this definition literally no building is carbon-free. Doesn't seem like a very useful way to think about it.
English
2
1
67
1.9K
Timothy B. Lee
Timothy B. Lee@binarybits·
It's wild that we are having an environmental panic about data centers — a carbon-free industrial facility that during ordinary operation consumes no natural resources besides electricity and water and emits no waste products besides heat.
English
85
95
893
85.2K
Airbare
Airbare@Airbare40·
@Twolfrecovery @debora_allen1 The US is the world's largest economy and is broke despite not giving healthcare to immigrant workers. Care to explain how the US pulled that off?
English
0
0
0
176
T Wolf 🌁
T Wolf 🌁@Twolfrecovery·
Just a reminder that part of the reason California is broke despite being the world's 4th largest economy is we gave 2 million+ undocumented immigrants full-scope medi cal health coverage at no cost to them. Not even a co-pay while we pay $1,200-$2k per month. That the truth.
English
159
1K
7.5K
90K
Airbare
Airbare@Airbare40·
@JaMikeyMike @jasonc_nc Yep. It's just not possible to keep things from burning when there are narrow streets and wood or bamboo buildings. It's not like 1/2 the world's population lives in places like that. If they did, they would have devastating fires like Lahaina. Thank God big trucks protect us.
English
1
0
1
12
Jason,
Jason,@jasonc_nc·
A conversation in which a fire marshal demands street trees be removed, responds to studies showing they improve life safety with “I don’t agree. I am not here to debate that”. Hostile to outside perspectives, dismissive of statistics and the desires of people they serve.
Jason, tweet media
Jason,@jasonc_nc

It’s sounds harsh but reality is we sacrifice people on US urban streets every day because asking a fire department to drive a slightly shorter truck is simply a bridge too far. Unsafe street design kills more people than fires. By a lot.

English
19
81
1K
87.7K
Airbare
Airbare@Airbare40·
@nicksummy @jasonc_nc I wonder if we could use the same concepts to reduce traffic fatalities. Some guidelines on how to design the environment to slow down the progress of fire / cars - and in some cases extinguish the threat sprinklers / trees.
English
1
0
1
11
Nick Valentine
Nick Valentine@nicksummy·
@jasonc_nc I personally look for speed limit signs, only an idiot would look at trees as an indicator of speed limit. And less people die in fires because of advances in building safety and fire fighting technology
English
1
0
1
213
critical urbanism
critical urbanism@criticalurban·
The space taken up by automobiles is more than commensurate to their high utility. Cars allow people to drive anywhere they want on demand. Mass transit limits mobility to the fixed times and locations and makes you dependent on a third party.
Rei Samuelsson Saito@konichivalue

@criticalurban How is this efficient?

English
46
11
122
5K
Christian Heiens 🏛
Christian Heiens 🏛@ChristianHeiens·
I wish @charliekirk11 was here to witness this day. He would be on the phone with guys in Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, Mississippi, Louisiana, Tennessee, and Missouri, working to coordinate redistricting efforts in all Red states as soon as possible. He'd be using his platform both on X and on his podcast to call out Republicans who refuse to immediately redistrict. But Charlie isn't here anymore. We need people to step up and do this work. It doesn't get done on its own unless you have a champion in there to do it himself. Case in point: Ron DeSantis unveiled a new Congressional map, and within 48 hours, it was on his desk to sign. But that kind of leadership is exceedingly rare. Most politicians want to do nothing because doing things creates angry voters. Inertia is the most powerful political force there is, and unless you have a champion already in office, you need activists to get the ball rolling.
English
46
399
3.8K
49.4K
Oliver
Oliver@1730·
@giveashitnature Vision Zero is insane, causes a lot more harm to the population but avoids a handful of deaths. More stress, anxiety isn't worth it.
English
8
0
7
3.7K
Give A Shit About Nature
Give A Shit About Nature@giveashitnature·
Oslo had 41 road deaths in 1975. By 2019, that number was one: a single driver who hit a fence. Oslo effectively ended road deaths by redesigning its downtown for people instead of cars. They removed 700 street parking spaces and replaced them with 37 miles of protected bike lanes and pocket parks. They lowered speed limits inside and outside the city. Many streets to car traffic entirely. They created "heart zones" around every elementary school where cars can't pick up or drop off kids. Did it kill the city? Nope. Retail sales at shops went up. Kids started walking and biking to school unsupervised. Air quality improved measurably and traffic congestion got better because fewer people wanted to drive through a pedestrianized downtown. Every piece of Oslo's strategy is available to any American city that wants it. The problem is solved, now we just need to implement it.
Give A Shit About Nature tweet mediaGive A Shit About Nature tweet media
English
62
513
1.7K
78.2K
Airbare
Airbare@Airbare40·
@schneider Looks great, but most vehicles can roll over a curb as easily as a plastic bollard We need something that will stop a vehicle - rocks, trees, planters or real bollards
English
0
0
6
333
Airbare
Airbare@Airbare40·
@SaltyOldMan_com @iluminatibot As a person who has made solar panels in space for 30 years, that is the dumbest comment I've ever seen. Space is hard of pv
English
0
0
0
1
SaltyOldMan.com
SaltyOldMan.com@SaltyOldMan_com·
@iluminatibot And it only takes 1 or 2 minutes of hail to completely destroy acres of solar panels. We're NUTS to think we can depend on earth-bound solar as our energy source. Solar won't be viable until we get it into outer space.
English
1
0
0
74
illuminatibot
illuminatibot@iluminatibot·
A single hail storm in Damon, Texas, destroys thousands of acres of solar panels. Is it really wise to make ourselves dependent on expensive energy infrastructure that can be rendered permanently useless by a bout of bad weather?
English
651
1.7K
5.1K
144.2K
Airbare
Airbare@Airbare40·
@oddlycomfy @iluminatibot When hail hit denver, solar panel were fine, but roofs had to be replaced. Maybe one developer just bought cheap panels. Isn't Texas the same place where a bit of weather froze up gas wells & NG power plants?
English
0
0
1
18
Uncomfortably Comfortable
Uncomfortably Comfortable@oddlycomfy·
@iluminatibot What’s happening to all the homeowners that bought and had solar panels installed on their roofs? A lot of those solar companies went under after the green credits were ended. So there’s no one to service the warranty on them. Solar companies claimed hail wouldn’t damage them.
English
1
0
2
240
Airbare
Airbare@Airbare40·
@ToriatheistTori @BJChippindale And make all income subject to SSI The richest people mostly have unearned income and so still won't pay, cause they don't work. They should pay more for a system that allows them such leisure
English
0
0
4
55
Airbare
Airbare@Airbare40·
@criticalurban Yep, when I'm stuck in traffic or can't find a place to park, I am often serenaded by fellow drivers bursting out in song at other cars utility
English
0
0
0
42
Airbare
Airbare@Airbare40·
@MyBackyardPara1 @criticalurban That was a choice. For many years Angelenos got along perfectly fine without cars and with the largest light rail network in the world You only like cars cause you are rich & roads are heavily subsidized
English
1
0
0
26
MyBackyardParadise
MyBackyardParadise@MyBackyardPara1·
@criticalurban Cars move more than people. They play an important role in the economy. The plumber isn’t going to take the bus to fix your toilet. Amazon avoids the subway. More importantly, workers at every level in Los Angeles can’t survive with our anemic public transit.
English
5
0
3
211
Airbare
Airbare@Airbare40·
@IanRountree @JigarShahDC Meanwhile unused airplanes sit in huge parking lots across the southwest. Each retired 747 can produce 240 MW
English
1
0
0
201
ian
ian@IanRountree·
I wasn’t concerned about these bottlenecks because I know how supply & demand work, but someone recast it for me recently and now I’m worried… Why won’t suppliers ramp production to meet demand? It’s because they’ve seen this story before. Silicon Valley has some new hotness that’s going to change everything, they invest in it, then the crash happens and they’re in a worse place than before. They won’t be fooled this time. So they hold production steady, enjoy higher prices and operating margins, and assume the party will end soon. The upshot is this creates more room for high-conviction new entrants.
Gaurab Chakrabarti@Gaurab

You cannot buy a new gas turbine until 2030. Order books at GE, Siemens, and Mitsubishi stretch to 2029. Turbine prices have nearly tripled since 2019. Every AI data center needs power and every gas plant needs a turbine. And every turbine has one part that bottlenecks the entire industry: The blade. It has to survive in gas 500°C above the melting point of the metal it's made from and spin at up to 20,000 RPM under 10,000 g of centrifugal force. Each blade is grown as a single crystal of nickel superalloy, pulled through a vacuum furnace at 3 mm per minute. A set of blades costs $600,000 and takes 90 weeks to grow. The same metallurgy powers modern jet engines. Only 3 companies on Earth can build one. China spent $42 billion trying to catch up. They bought a Russian fighter engine, took it apart, and copied every part. Their copy ran 30 hours between overhauls versus 400 for the original. Modern Western engines run 4,000. You can reverse engineer the shape of a turbine blade. You cannot reverse engineer 60 years of metallurgy.

English
39
48
556
77.3K
Give A Shit About Nature
Give A Shit About Nature@giveashitnature·
The city of Andernach, Germany planted 101 varieties of tomatoes in the town center and told everyone to take whatever they wanted. It was such a hit they did beans the next year, then added onions, fruit trees, lettuce, zucchini, berries, and herbs. All free to the public and maintained by the city. Andernach is now known as the "edible city." Philadelphia has been doing a version of this since 2007. The Philadelphia Orchard Project has helped establish 67 sites across the city with thousands of food-bearing trees. Baltimore is planting fruit trees on sidewalks. Seattle, Boston, San Francisco, and Asheville all have public urban orchards. A mature apple tree produces 400-500 pounds of fruit per year. A mature pear tree can produce for 75 years. We've decided our cities should have trees. We just haven't decided those trees should feed people. Would you support urban fruit trees and vegetables in your city?
Give A Shit About Nature tweet mediaGive A Shit About Nature tweet mediaGive A Shit About Nature tweet media
English
291
3.6K
11.4K
214.7K
Airbare
Airbare@Airbare40·
@Breeauna9 @giveashitnature Haha, of course Breanna is a huge welfare queen herself. Against beautiful & edible public trees while her organization pollutes land, sea & air while benefitting from $ billions in taxpayer subsidies.
English
0
0
1
451
Breeauna Sagdal
Breeauna Sagdal@Breeauna9·
@giveashitnature "All free to public" minus the seeds, the city staff who charge for every watering, the pesticides used to keep fruit flies to a minimum, add costs for digging out the boxes and replanting each year as these are mostly perennials... all of which are taxpayer funded... not free
English
12
0
15
1.1K
Airbare
Airbare@Airbare40·
@Breeauna9 @giveashitnature Maybe we could pay for the food by getting rid of free parking - also paid for by taxes. Or even streets, post office, police & fire. We pay for all of that. How dare they improve lives with our tax $
English
0
0
7
56
Airbare
Airbare@Airbare40·
@dylankendall @CohenSite Sorry, local leaders have lost all credibility with decades of under building & fighting voter approved urbanist active travel & transit funding at every step. Prove yourself by doing all the things you said & after Ca catches up on housing stock you may have earned autonomy back
English
0
0
2
108
Dylan Kendall Ⓥ
Dylan Kendall Ⓥ@dylankendall·
There’s been talk on here and elsewhere about my opposition to SB 79, and an attempt to conflate pushing back on state‑directed control with being anti‑development. So let me set the record straight: As a renter with kids who has lived with encampments outside my own home, I know how little housing choice many of us have, and I’m focused on the full range of housing: from opportunities for first‑time homeownership to market rate apartments to affordable to permanent supportive housing, sited where they support safe and functional neighborhoods, instead of undermining them. SB 79 passed because our city and others across CA failed for years to plan and permit enough housing. But, at this point, I believe upzoning on its own is less consequential than fixing the real barriers to housing development, like ULA, outdated building codes, rules and permit fees that make it hard to rebuild fire-damaged homes, and the general anti-small-business climate fostered by my opponent and others on the city council. I am and have always been an urbanist. And I look forward to working with activists, entrepreneurs, builders and, most importantly, residents who are as committed as I am to adding shade, walkability, local economic activity, and a mix of housing types so we finally get the safe, vibrant, walkable streets all residents of our district deserve.
English
20
5
42
17.9K
Jason Lee
Jason Lee@jasonjosephlee·
The worst decision the city of San Diego ever made was taking away all of the street parking and putting bike lanes that no one uses in several urban neighborhoods. What were you thinking @MayorToddGloria? How do we fix this mistake?
English
96
42
546
22.4K