JaMikeyMike

22.9K posts

JaMikeyMike

JaMikeyMike

@JaMikeyMike

hotelia is now building an event app to@try and get people out more

Bisbee, AZ Katılım Ekim 2021
304 Takip Edilen360 Takipçiler
JaMikeyMike
JaMikeyMike@JaMikeyMike·
@jasonc_nc Fire fire run run!!! But don't use that stairway please!
English
0
0
2
31
Jason, Coffee Shop Oligarch
Ok class, let’s discuss today’s firefighting “requirement” that’s kind of made up - The attack stair. Specifically how it’s used as a reasonable-sounding argument against single stair buildings while ignoring 1) it’s not a rule at all and 2) makes assumptions that run counter to reality and even actual code. The general framing against small (let’s emphasize that point - small. Like 3-6 units per floor vs 50) single stair buildings is the lack of a 2nd stair means firefighters have no dedicated attack stair and will have to navigate people exiting while also mounting a response. First let’s talk about time to exit and total occupancy. In fire safety emphasis is placed on early warning and speed of exit. The more people already out of the building before a fire spreads or the fire department arrives, the better for everyone. A two-stair building is deemed safe with up to a 250’ max distance to the closest stairway, and up to 50’ of travel in a dead end corridor (Meaning you can be trapped in the dead end if the closest stair is compromised), with an occupancy limit of 500 people. Per floor. Meanwhile the general distance for a single stair building ranges from “step out and you’re at the stairwell landing” to 25’, with actual occupancy of ~12-30 people per floor. Which of these scenarios is more likely to allow people to exit before firefighters arrive if there is a fire in one of the units? Remember - the “safe”building allows up to 10x the travel distance to a stairway and ~16x the occupancy load. Likewise which is easier and faster for firefighters to clear, floor by floor? Now on to the “attack stair” requirement. Neither ICC/IBC, NFPA or any other code contains a provision granting firefighters the authority to prevent or redirect occupants from using a specific stairwell during an evacuation. During an actual emergency the goal is evacuation and no code or fire response tactics include redirecting people to an exit up to 250’ further away in a smoke filled corridor. If half the occupants are using the “attack stair” firefighters will be navigating that reality no matter what. Just with a lot more people to fight uphill against. In fact the IAFC & IAFF’s own literature on this topic acknowledges the contradiction, noting the options are to delay suppression to allow evacuation to be completed, to conduct rescue via ladders, or to ask occupants to shelter in place. The same options presented in the smaller single stair scenario - just with fewer units and fewer people, plus shorter evacuation distances. Bottom Line: The “attack stair” concept is a firefighting tactic (not a rule!) that assumes an emergency in which all occupants are either evacuated or have been told to shelter in place - which would be the case in either scenario. Functionally there is no difference, but in truth the risk and the response demands placed on a local fire department in the two scenarios is much different - with the “unsafe” building actually being the easier of the two.
Jason, Coffee Shop Oligarch tweet media
Jason, Coffee Shop Oligarch@jasonc_nc

A common fire department white lie: “NFPA is the law” Have been digging into understanding NFPA rules that govern fire department response, staffing, & fire apparatus capability. The most surprising thing is that it’s simply a “consensus standard” departments try to meet, but it is far more common to not meet some of them than hitting 100/100. It’s an optimal goal as set by a private organization of former fire & EMS officials. Which means every time a fire chief or fire marshal says “that’s the law” as in the below example, they are misleading elected officials and the general public. It’s a law if a specific reference is in your city ordinance or state code. But “NFPA says” is not, and nothing prevents cities deviating from it with prudent alternatives that align with other policy priorities. For example, narrower than standard street designs along with right-sized equipment to improve public safety and create more space for other uses.

English
3
2
46
2.3K
sky
sky@valleyofthena·
@xwanyex Really really being left out of the equation here is the fact that humans are social animals and theat we evolved to live in community. Kids have a right to be around other kids and not isolated.
English
7
0
0
410
wanye
wanye@xwanyex·
I know a fair number of homeschooling families and while I can't really know for sure, it does look to me like some of them are doing very little actual instruction. My thesis is just that it barely matters and their lives aren't going to be meaningfully worse for this. High-achieving strivers are aghast at the proposition, but I think it's true.
marmot@MarmotRespecter

one of those funny rare instances where, because there are ~zero rural poor accounts on rw twitter, fagbark actually knows something the rest of you don't

English
119
11
660
42K
JaMikeyMike
JaMikeyMike@JaMikeyMike·
This is what drives me nuts about walkability etc… it basically determines nothing. My old JR. High has protected bike lanes and no one bikes. When I was a kid we hiked on major streets to get there
Lyman Stone 石來民 🦬🦬🦬@lymanstoneky

We were unable to find ANY neighborhood trait which meaningfully predicted kids being allowed to have greater mobility. KIDS IN MORE WALKABLE NEIGHBORHOODS ARE NOT ACTUALLY ALLOWED TO GO FURTHER. It's not about neighborhoods being unsafe. It's about scared parents.

English
0
0
0
6
Adam Rossi
Adam Rossi@rossiadam·
Picnic by the river or a campfire dinner is better than a meal in the finest restaurant (imho).
Adam Rossi tweet media
English
29
2
289
8.7K
Hayden
Hayden@the_transit_guy·
12 people eating dinner = 1 parked car
Hayden tweet media
English
30
27
516
8.1K
JaMikeyMike
JaMikeyMike@JaMikeyMike·
@CompletedStreet If urbanists weren't so uppity they would get more support. People love Los Angeles and cars and driving. They also like walkability within neighborhoods -which honestly LA does really well. You can have both, but not in a way that destroys what people like about LA
English
1
0
2
75
Mark R. Brown, AICP, CNU
Mark R. Brown, AICP, CNU@CompletedStreet·
If it were walkable and managed properly, Southern California would be the best place on earth.
Mark R. Brown, AICP, CNU tweet mediaMark R. Brown, AICP, CNU tweet mediaMark R. Brown, AICP, CNU tweet mediaMark R. Brown, AICP, CNU tweet media
English
75
50
782
78.9K
Roma
Roma@Romazehari·
Why do men get personally offended when women say they don’t want kids?
English
420
531
8.4K
253.4K
JaMikeyMike
JaMikeyMike@JaMikeyMike·
@zhiheather @xwanyex Lol, you'd be wrong. Also misses the point even in that case the wife has stronger preferences. Though she does have to give I to then more because she works full time
English
0
0
0
9
wanye
wanye@xwanyex·
We have to have all these dumb perennial debates about childcare and housework, because nobody wants to say the obvious thing, which is that, yeah, women do more of those things because they care more about it, they want it more, they have stronger preferences around it, and they’re better suited to it. It’s their domain. There’s no mystery.
English
54
41
1.1K
26K
JaMikeyMike
JaMikeyMike@JaMikeyMike·
@zhiheather @xwanyex Yes women and men often have different opinions on what constitutes good child care and women generally have stronger preferences towards it lol… kinda the point. My brother is a stay at home dad with a special needs kid and would even agree with this.
English
1
0
0
17
codestitcher
codestitcher@zhiheather·
@JaMikeyMike @xwanyex He listed childcare as things women care about so men don't do them. 🤷‍♀️ I can see saying that about chores, but your own kids? Surely men are better than that. Well, most. Hopefully.
English
1
0
1
41
codestitcher
codestitcher@zhiheather·
@xwanyex "Men don't care enough to raise their own kids properly" is certainly a take. 🤔
English
6
0
5
752
JaMikeyMike
JaMikeyMike@JaMikeyMike·
@xwanyex It's funny to me because it gets to one of the core differences between men and women and for some reason is this really hard pill to swallow. Same reason men get yelled at for over organizing the garage and office.
English
0
0
0
77
JaMikeyMike
JaMikeyMike@JaMikeyMike·
@molzer People who don't pay for maintinence have a tendency to break the water line and not tell anyone.
English
0
0
2
111
Zach Molzer
Zach Molzer@molzer·
If you own or develop apartments and don’t put a fridge that produces ice in all your units, you are a bad person & I hope you have a horrible Tuesday!
English
42
1
148
104.8K
JaMikeyMike
JaMikeyMike@JaMikeyMike·
@dimden I love Tokyo and this street looks Insanely ugly
English
0
0
1
143
dimden
dimden@dimden·
i think not having cars parked literally everywhere is like 75% of the reason why Tokyo (and probably japan in general) looks so nice
dimden tweet media
English
135
641
16.3K
252.3K
JaMikeyMike
JaMikeyMike@JaMikeyMike·
@zapatas_mom I think Greenwich village and Beverly hills are pretty nice. This Tokyo street looks very ugly
English
0
0
0
35
JaMikeyMike
JaMikeyMike@JaMikeyMike·
@MeghanEMurphy I think its sexy when my girlfriend plays video games. It's a lot more involved than twitter
English
0
0
0
16
Meghan Murphy
Meghan Murphy@MeghanEMurphy·
Literally just had this conversation with a friend yesterday. Sorry, but gaming is always going to be a juvenile, unmasculine, lame hobby/activity. All it says to me is that you have no problem wasting your life. Are you a teenager or a man?
Lizzie Marbach@LizzieMarbach

I know this is unpopular, but it will always be unattractive for a grown man to play video games. Some women might be understanding or pretend like they don’t care that you spend hours playing, but they do. It is extremely unattractive to women and will never not be. 🤷🏼‍♀️

English
1.3K
43
592
296.9K
RFH🦎👁‍🗨🪐🌘 ⬛️ (Doctor)
Spending hours of your day to achieve fake accomplishments inside a game rather than spending that time to accomplish things in the real world with actual value is understandably going to give women the ick
Lizzie Marbach@LizzieMarbach

I know this is unpopular, but it will always be unattractive for a grown man to play video games. Some women might be understanding or pretend like they don’t care that you spend hours playing, but they do. It is extremely unattractive to women and will never not be. 🤷🏼‍♀️

English
197
50
781
52.7K
JaMikeyMike
JaMikeyMike@JaMikeyMike·
@ianpauldukes Mark to mark wealth is not hoarding. In fact the wealth doesn't exist until someone is willing or forced to by the mark.
English
0
0
0
2
JaMikeyMike
JaMikeyMike@JaMikeyMike·
@jasonc_nc I always tell my workers I'll root for them if they start their own company. And if they find a better company to work for I'll support them! Strangely my turn over is basically zero.
English
2
0
5
46
Jason, Coffee Shop Oligarch
Hi. Business owner here. Noncompetes are trash. They are not free markets, they are not pro capitalism. They are an attempt to take someone’s prior labor on your behalf and make it a lead weight against their own future work. T R A S H
Hunter📈🌈📊@StatisticUrban

Economists mostly think noncompetes are bad policy. They suppress wages, weaken job market mobility and bargaining power, and reduce innovation. Businesses and their lobbyists really like them. But as usual, listen to the economists, not the businesses.

English
16
15
325
13.3K