Al8800
3.4K posts












$ASTI If adversaries are shooting down satellites with ASAT weapons, the DoD/Space Force needs resilient, proliferated constellations of cheaper smallsats that can be rapidly replenished instead of relying on a few big, expensive ones that take years and huge rockets to replace. Ascent’s panels enable exactly that: far lower launch mass and cost, faster integration into smallsat hardware, and quicker manufacturing. This lets the U.S. rebuild orbital capability fast after losses while keeping power reliable in a contested space environment.






“Blimps (with solar) are going to be a key player as a (data) relay tool and if satellites go out in any conflict you can send a High Altitude Platform Station (blimp) much faster than you can a satellite” $ASTI new April interview clip (Also see the related quote tweet below)



Just 1 month ago, journalists and media tried downplaying my $SOI and $RPI thesis. As “meme stocks that were set to crash” citing my WSB tag without analyzing the underlying thesis. They’re both up 100% and held their gains. Same is happening to companies like $SIVE. I never argue from authority… but since they’re going that route: I’m curious why… in their narratives they just leave out the fact I published fundamental AI papers in places like Nature with thousands of citations? Other the fact other analysts on X positive about $SIVE today have Ph.Ds from places like UC Berkeley and publish in the photonics space? It’s always the English or non-technical graduates that go out in the media and have the strongest opinion about CPO hyperscaler qualification cycles and supply chain mapping. It just feels like institutions hate it when a retail investors on X know what they’re talking about. A thesis should live and die based on merit, not the authority of who is comes from.




$SIVE / $SIVEF should I keep holding $SIVEF stock more? it is at its 52-week high right now





















