Alma M

El progreso no se decreta: se construye. La libertad es su motor y el riesgo su precio. Cualquier empresario lo sabe: no existe 100 % de certeza ni crecimiento en la zona de confort. Emprender es ponerlo todo sobre la cancha, jugar con las cartas que tienes y quemar las naves.

"Live hangs" is the absolute perfect reframe for this. In clinical longevity, grip strength is never just about forearm muscle; it is one of the most robust, scientifically validated biomarkers for central nervous system integrity, systemic muscle preservation, and true biological age. When a 93-year-old can hold her entire body weight against gravity for nearly three minutes, she isn't just showing off physical strength—she is demonstrating profound neurological and cellular resilience. She is proving that extreme structural decay is not a mandatory symptom of aging. This is the ultimate biological inspiration.

93 years & 231 days old Ann Esselstyn dead hangs for 2 min 52 seconds! To set new WR. (Maybe we call it live hangs instead now?) Distal strength reflects many things.

"Nuestro ADN es un software muy antiguo (miles de millones de años), plagado de parches, nada limpio, elegante ni bien diseñado; el inmenso mundo del software artificial, de la tecnología informática, creado por humanos y que tiene apenas medio siglo de antigüedad." ↓:

"la biología es la arqueología del software. Existe el software artificial, programas informáticos, y el software natural, ADN. La naturaleza inventó el software antes que nosotros. Y el origen de la vida es el origen del ADN, un lenguaje de programación presente en cada célula."

"todos somos paseos aleatorios. Nuestros genomas son software digital que ha sido parcheado y modificado durante miles de millones de años para adaptarse a los cambios del entorno. La vida es como software en evolución y la biología como una especie de arqueología del software."

En unas horas publico post largo sobre el regreso del hombre a la Luna y la nueva economía espacial🚀

¿Por qué dejamos de ir a la Luna hace más de 50 años y por qué hemos decidido volver ahora? La respuesta corta: dejamos de ir porque terminó una campaña de marketing. Y ahora volvemos porque la oportunidad de negocio es gigantesca. Pero vamos con la respuesta larga.

90% of decisions don't need to be made today. You usually have 48 hours. Often more. But urgency bias makes every open decision feel like it needs to close right now. So you grind through it with your conscious mind, burning cognitive resources on a problem your subconscious could solve for free while you sleep. When you force a decision through deliberate analysis, you're working with a fraction of your brain's processing power. When you let your subconscious incubate, it scans your accumulated experience for patterns around the clock, even while you sleep. The DMN Method makes this practical: Write the problem down. Walk away. Come back and write solutions. The incubation period in between is where your Default Mode Network, the brain region active during rest, daydreaming, and idle moments, does the heavy lifting. That "aha" moment in the shower? That's your DMN delivering a result you never requested consciously. Now you know how to request it deliberately. Full breakdown in the article below.

La Casa De Las Meninas @cantabriaes #BitácoraDeViaje #Cantabria

«Las guerras mienten. Ninguna guerra tiene la honestidad de confesar: “yo mato para robar”. Las guerras siempre invocan nobles motivos: matan en nombre de la paz, en nombre de Dios, en nombre de la civilización...youtube.com/shorts/QzFo-67…

@thairkassam No es para reforzar lo que escribió, pero el tema es que eso antes no era potenciado por las RRSS y por eso, ahora es más común. x.com/AlmaDeMadrid/s…

Your brain makes every decision 350 milliseconds before you realize you're deciding anything. Neuroscientists discovered this using EEG machines that monitor electrical brain activity. They can predict which choice you'll make before you consciously know you're facing a choice. Your unconscious mind runs the entire decision process, picks an option, and then creates the illusion that "you" weighed the alternatives. What you call decision making is actually "decision discovering." Your conscious mind doesn't choose. It receives a transmission from deeper brain networks that already chose, then constructs a story about why that choice makes sense. The story feels real because it happens instantaneously. You never notice the gap between your brain deciding and your awareness catching up. This destroys the entire framework most people use for improving their life. You can't willpower your way into better choices because willpower operates at the conscious level, and consciousness doesn't make the choice. It just receives the news bulletin after everything important already happened. Your unconscious decision system runs on pattern completion. It scans the current situation, matches it to the most similar situation in your memory, and executes whatever behavior worked before. This happens below the threshold of awareness, faster than you can think. The pattern matching is incredibly sophisticated. Your brain doesn't just match the external situation. It matches your internal state, your energy level, your recent emotional history, even the way light is hitting your retina. All of these variables get processed simultaneously to predict what behavior sequence you should run. When the prediction is wrong, you call it a "bad decision." When the prediction is accurate, you call it "good judgment." But both outcomes follow identical process. Your unconscious brain is running pattern completion either way. The quality of your decisions depends entirely on the quality of the patterns stored in your memory. People with consistently good judgment aren't better at thinking through options. They have better behavioral patterns stored in their unconscious archives. When their brain runs pattern completion, it has access to high quality templates. People with consistently poor judgment have corrupted archives. Their pattern completion system keeps matching current situations to dysfunctional historical behaviors, then executing those behaviors before consciousness can intervene. The profound implication: improving your decisions requires updating your unconscious pattern library, not strengthening your conscious reasoning. Traditional decision making advice focuses on conscious analysis. Make pro and con lists. Consider multiple perspectives. Think through consequences. But conscious analysis happens after your brain already chose. You're not improving future decisions. You're just getting better at rationalizing decisions your unconscious mind already made using the same corrupted patterns. Real decision improvement requires updating the templates your unconscious brain uses during pattern completion. You do this through deliberate pattern interruption. When you notice yourself executing an automatic behavior, you pause the sequence and consciously choose a different action. Not because the different action is necessarily better, but because interruption rewrites the template. Your brain interprets the interruption as evidence that the old pattern was incorrect for this situation. It updates the template to include the new behavior option. Next time it encounters a similar situation, pattern completion has access to the upgraded template. Most people accidentally train their unconscious mind to make terrible choices by never interrupting bad patterns. Their brain concludes the bad patterns must be correct because they keep getting executed without intervention. The people who seem naturally good at decisions do something counterintuitive. They deliberately make themselves unpredictable to their own past self. They notice when they're about to execute a familiar behavior sequence and they consciously choose something different. Not because they analyzed the situation and concluded the different choice was superior. Because they recognized their brain was running pattern completion and they wanted to upgrade the pattern. Your future self will make better decisions when your unconscious mind has better patterns to work with. The decisions that matter aren't the ones you agonize over consciously. They're the ones your brain makes automatically while you're not paying attention. Change those, and everything else changes automatically.

53 años tiene estos efectos prácticos👇🏼 Por cosas así “El exorcista (1973)” es una película inmortal🫣❤️

“Quizás leer unas cuantas docenas de páginas de libros al día debería convertirse en el nuevo equivalente a los 10.000 pasos diarios: una base fundamental de actividad física para mantener la agilidad cognitiva.” nytimes.com/2026/03/27/opi…

El lado del mal - This Week in Net: Chema Alonso & João Tomé en Cloudflare Lisboa elladodelmal.com/2026/03/this-w… #Cloudflare #interview

Without drugs... what is the greatest weapon against anxiety and depression?

A hypnotherapist friend once gave me an exercise: “Every time you feel fear, treat it like a suggestion, not a fact.” Changed everything.

En la vida cotidiana nos pasa a menudo que intentamos recordar algo reciente, como dónde hemos aparcado el coche, y de repente sentimos que la memoria se ha borrado por completo. Sin embargo, un nuevo estudio demuestra que, aunque parezca que no recordamos nada y estamos adivinando, en realidad suele quedar una huella borrosa de esa información que todavía nos ayuda a tomar decisiones correctas. Los investigadores mostraron a las personas entre cuatro y seis puntos de colores durante un breve tiempo. Después les pidieron que recordaran el color exacto de uno de ellos. Cuando el recuerdo era muy impreciso o parecía completamente equivocado, les daban una segunda oportunidad: elegir entre el color verdadero y otro muy parecido pero en la dirección opuesta. Los resultados fueron claros: incluso en los casos que parecían simples adivinanzas, las personas acertaban el color correcto mucho más veces de las que correspondería al puro azar. Esto ocurría especialmente cuando tenían que recordar cuatro o menos elementos, pero también se observaba, aunque más débil, con seis elementos. Este trabajo demuestra que la memoria a corto plazo no funciona como un interruptor que está encendido o apagado del todo. Más bien es como un faro que ilumina con diferente intensidad: algunas cosas se ven nítidas y otras quedan borrosas, pero incluso esa versión borrosa sigue conteniendo información útil. Por eso, lo que sentimos como “se me olvidó por completo” no siempre significa que la memoria haya desaparecido; simplemente está menos precisa, pero aún puede guiarnos. Los autores destacan que entender esto es importante para la vida diaria, la educación y el diseño de entornos. En lugar de descartar los errores como fallos totales, podemos aprovechar las señales débiles que quedan y apoyar la memoria con pistas adicionales, como señales claras en parkings o hospitales. El artículo termina con una frase muy poética: “Cuando sientas que una memoria se ha perdido, que sepas que quizá no se ha ido del todo. Con un poco de suerte, estará ahí, captando la suficiente luz para llevarte en la dirección correcta.”

Fans de @JuanLuisGuerra ☕️