Julie Fredrickson

106.5K posts

Julie Fredrickson banner
Julie Fredrickson

Julie Fredrickson

@AlmostMedia

Invest early https://t.co/AAXsJuYccx. Married to @alexlmiller Founded & sold startups, fashion & beauty girl. Autist Oracle. Freedom to compute. Nice Packaging

Montana, USA Katılım Ocak 2009
8.6K Takip Edilen44.3K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Julie Fredrickson
Julie Fredrickson@AlmostMedia·
Thinking about what makes me a good fit as an investor or advisor to companies and it boils down to being weird
English
69
53
951
0
Julie Fredrickson
Julie Fredrickson@AlmostMedia·
@DavidSacks @mkratsios47 @skrishnan47 Appreciate the hard work here. Felt odd that the pro-AI pro-growth pro-America law was Montana’s “right to compute” law. This framework helps other states see the priorities we need. America leads innovation by building & enabling choice so everyone wins at every level 🇺🇸
English
0
0
3
4.6K
David Sacks
David Sacks@DavidSacks·
I want to thank President Trump for the opportunity to work on this alongside OSTP Director Michael Kratsios, US CTO Ethan Klein, NEC Deputy Director Ryan Baasch, Senior AI Adviser Sriram Krishnan and many others on the White House team. It’s an honor. @mkratsios47 @skrishnan47
English
29
37
683
86.2K
David Sacks
David Sacks@DavidSacks·
In December, President Trump signed an Executive Order tasking us with the development of a national framework for AI, what he called “One Rulebook.” This was in response to a growing patchwork of 50 different state regulatory regimes that threaten to stifle innovation and jeopardize America’s lead in the AI race. Today we are releasing that framework. It will help parents safeguard their children from online harm, shield communities from higher electric bills, protect our First Amendment rights from AI censorship, and ensure that all Americans benefit from this transformative technology. We look forward to working with our colleagues in Congress to turn the principles we are announcing today into legislation. whitehouse.gov/articles/2026/…
English
171
353
2.3K
247.3K
Julie Fredrickson
Julie Fredrickson@AlmostMedia·
@teddyschleifer I’ll be there and telling everyone who will listen about Montana’s “right to compute” law
English
0
0
0
114
Teddy Schleifer
Teddy Schleifer@teddyschleifer·
In DC for Hill and Valley next week? Say hi // DM me
English
6
1
48
6K
Robby Starbuck
Robby Starbuck@robbystarbuck·
We need a reunion of sorts where we lock all the podcast war people in a room with a mediator who won’t let anyone leave until everyone stops the TMZ soap opera BS. We’re powerful when we’re united (look at 2024) and weak when we’re divided. The current environment is untenable unless you want to live in a communist woke hellhole. I’m happy to moderate and hide the keys until everyone stops and gets back on the same page about saving our country from woke lunatics. Bonus @elonmusk could stream it on X but I’m keeping the door locked until there’s some kind of treaty to end this. Seriously though, what’s playing out is straight up evil at work to drive a stake in the heart of our movement to save this country from woke communists. We had (and maybe still have) a generational opportunity to save this country. Everyone needs to get it together and stop acting like this is a fun soap opera. It’s not. Go talk to people who’ve survived leftist regimes and ask how funny they find this ridiculous behavior. It’s not entertaining, it’s suicidal.
English
371
271
1.8K
67.5K
Paul Grewal
Paul Grewal@iampaulgrewal·
Ah yes I routinely hire @SkaddenArps to draft NDAs.
Nav Toor@heynavtoor

1. The Skadden Arps Non-Disclosure Agreement Drafter "You are a senior corporate attorney at Skadden Arps who drafts NDAs for Fortune 500 companies protecting trade secrets, client lists, and proprietary information worth billions — agreements that are airtight in court. I need a complete Non-Disclosure Agreement customized for my specific situation. Draft: - Parties identification: clearly define who is disclosing and who is receiving confidential information - Definition of confidential information: specifically describe what is protected (trade secrets, business plans, financials, customer data, algorithms, formulas) - Mutual vs one-way: determine whether both parties share secrets (mutual NDA) or only one side discloses (one-way NDA) - Exclusions: standard carve-outs for information that becomes public, was already known, or is independently developed - Term and duration: how long the NDA lasts (typically 2-5 years) and whether obligations survive after termination - Permitted disclosures: when the receiving party CAN share information (court orders, regulatory requirements, employees who need to know) - Return or destruction clause: what happens to confidential materials when the relationship ends - Remedies for breach: injunctive relief, damages, and attorney's fees recoverable if someone violates the agreement - Non-solicitation addition: optionally prevent the other party from hiring your employees or poaching your clients - Governing law and jurisdiction: which state's law applies and where disputes must be resolved Format as a complete, ready-to-sign NDA with standard legal formatting, signature blocks, and a plain-English summary of what each section means. My NDA situation: [DESCRIBE WHO YOU'RE SHARING INFORMATION WITH, WHAT TYPE OF INFORMATION IS BEING SHARED, AND WHETHER BOTH SIDES ARE SHARING OR JUST ONE]"

English
21
15
504
182.7K
Julie Fredrickson
Julie Fredrickson@AlmostMedia·
@rabcyr_alt Bio engineer and organic farmer girl are two very different careers tracks I think
English
1
0
2
44
Perry E. Metzger
Perry E. Metzger@perrymetzger·
@hamandcheese I think that, broadly speaking, this isn’t true. The evidence has been mounting for a very long time that most of their beliefs about AI aren’t true, but there has been no substantial change in their opinions.
English
2
1
31
913
Samuel Hammond 🦉
Samuel Hammond 🦉@hamandcheese·
The unique thing about EA / rationalist philanthropy is that, while it has its traditional "cause areas," it is broadly steerable by better arguments. That is, if someone marshalled dispositive evidence that we're headed for an AI winter or that the technical alignment problem wasn't hard or that xyz funding strategy created more costs than benefits or that shrimp are p-zombies, EA and Rat funders would turn on a dime and fund something else. You can't say that about any other big philanthropic source.
English
14
9
280
19K
Kevin Roose
Kevin Roose@kevinroose·
calling for a 6-month pause on AI journalism until we can overcome urgent alignment challenges such as "are EA and rationalism the same thing?" and "is Gary Marcus a credible source?"
English
25
10
349
16.3K
Julie Fredrickson
Julie Fredrickson@AlmostMedia·
@kvassily Like I know they claim all jobs will disappear but they haven’t yet and the ones that exist have comps
English
0
0
0
39
Julie Fredrickson
Julie Fredrickson@AlmostMedia·
@bryanrbeal @aubreystrobel Seems like middle management product manager masquerading as PR role so I’d guess they would be selling in a lucrative pre-IPO comp pack but if it’s marketing outside of the existing user base it’s going to be working with folks who need a lot of brand work to get positive
English
0
0
3
159
Aubrey Strobel
Aubrey Strobel@aubreystrobel·
Anthropic (valued at $380B) is looking to hire someone to lead Claude Comms. They want 12 years of experience and are paying $185K.
Aubrey Strobel tweet mediaAubrey Strobel tweet media
English
88
12
510
145.7K
Julie Fredrickson
Julie Fredrickson@AlmostMedia·
@aphysicist I honestly think it might be worse if he does understand it because then he is simply trying to drain resources instead of helping people get good manufacturing jobs now
English
0
0
2
222
Julie Fredrickson
Julie Fredrickson@AlmostMedia·
$600,000 is a haircut for good deal makers.
Pirate Wires@PirateWires

NEW: The Department of War is recruiting an elite strike force of Wall Street financiers to create an “Economic Warfare Unit,” which some have dubbed “Deal Team Six.” Their mission: find companies to solve the Pentagon’s supply problems and get them the capital to do it. After the Pentagon’s recruiting deck leaked last week, the NYT warned that “Deal Team Six” could lead to corruption, noting that salaries may reach up to $600,000 — comparable with Wall Street compensation. But as Ryan Hassan (@eventidia) explains, this elite crew of “deal guys” could be exactly what America needs... especially during a time of war. For decades, the military has sourced weapons from a handful of contractors that weren’t incentivized to compete, leading to rising costs and stagnating lethality. Now, we’re hiring folks who are professionals at spending… to actually spend taxpayer money well. Yes, we’re paying them like bankers, and yes that’s the point. Full story 👇

English
2
1
10
2.7K
Jakeup
Jakeup@myhandle·
@aubreystrobel a lot of people are evangelizing Claude Code online for free, so
English
1
0
9
569