Justin Murphy

30.7K posts

Justin Murphy banner
Justin Murphy

Justin Murphy

@jmrphy

Writer. Author of The Independent Scholar (2026), a history from Plato to Nietzsche.

Austin, TX Katılım Kasım 2010
603 Takip Edilen51.7K Takipçiler
Justin Murphy
Justin Murphy@jmrphy·
As I get older, I’m increasingly impressed by psychoanalysis as a school of thought, and Freud’s accomplishment in particular. Probably the most underrated body of ideas in 2026. Its stock price has never been lower because it was gradually dominated in terms of therapeutic efficiency for mentally ill people. But modern man has plenty of psychological problems that are not quite clinical illness. Psychoanalysis was the most learned and courageous attempt to think about this larger class of problems, which are serious and real, but more philosophical than clinical.
English
48
38
602
129.1K
Justin Murphy
Justin Murphy@jmrphy·
@thrialectics @modal that’s interesting. I’ve done quite a few weekend projects with the oai fine-tuning and I don’t think I ever got anything noticeably better
English
0
0
2
36
Marianne
Marianne@thrialectics·
@jmrphy @modal For my purposes — and maybe I'm telling on myself here, future employers please look away — I can't get a many-example prompt to do what I want. Fine-tuning is the only way to approach capturing my je nais se quois
English
2
0
0
65
Marianne
Marianne@thrialectics·
Finetuning a new Mariannebot using @modal since OpenAI is deprecating their fine-tuning API and platform.
English
1
0
8
704
Steve Sailer
Steve Sailer@Steve_Sailer·
@annakhachiyan When talking to Steven Pinker or Charles Murray for the first time, after about 15 seconds I said to myself, "Oh, wow, this guy is smart."
English
9
0
194
13.5K
Justin Murphy
Justin Murphy@jmrphy·
this is all fake and wrong lmao. I put it in GPT5 Pro with a link to the GitHub. people just make stuff up and everyone believes it
English
0
0
5
1.6K
Justin Murphy
Justin Murphy@jmrphy·
The Great Books trend of the past 5 years has been a total catastrophe. The simple fact is that Plutarch and Homer and Virgil et al. do have radical insights buried in there, but at the same time most of these books are truly boring and lame and most people pretend to like them, cannot really digest anything, and get absolutely nothing from them! The trend is overwhelmingly powered by these books' aspirational quality; it's like a luxury heritage brand that conveniently only costs $15 a pop. The people on social media who've made brands around how great all these books are, often they are trying to *express* something about *themselves*, which is nice, but does not change how lame and boring the lion's share of these books are! You don't have to pretend to love them! If you're teaching undergrads that's great, or doing real research, fine. But this in no way means that everyone should read these books; it does not even mean that the smartest and most educated adults today need to read these books. The bits of radical alpha in them are great to find, explore, and write about if you are in the .01% of people who are called to do such things, but there is really zero reason why anybody else should read any of these books. Frankly, many of these authors are even somewhat primitive and infantile compared to the best thinkers of modernity. Plato and Aristotle have tons of provocative alpha worth getting, but also they were retarded on many topics, especially religion. The Romans were even worse in many ways. But all of this gets shrouded in the cult of Great Books. There have never been more people professing to love the Great Books, and mass public culture has never been lower brow than it is today. A ton of larping and precious little education, virtually zero novel insight, has come out of this movement.
English
125
12
152
101.3K
Seth Brodsky
Seth Brodsky@BrodskySeth·
@jmrphy @TuttReal Stephanie Swales is brilliant and located in Dallas (far, I know). But she might have recommendations, and does phone/tele-analysis, which can be realy transformative.
English
1
0
4
251
David Decosimo
David Decosimo@DavidDecosimo·
In one breath, dismissing great books education. In the next, showing what it looks like both to lack a basic understanding of such a book and to be clueless about one's ignorance.
Justin Murphy@jmrphy

This is Augustine's view I think (and mine). The City of Man is the basin described below, the City of God is exactly the same kind of basin (but good). People can move between but history is the accelerating divergence between the two, and the end times is just the long-run equilibrium.

English
2
0
6
785
Alien
Alien@alienorg·
@jmrphy the ideas got discredited as clinical tools and that discrediting spread to the whole framework, including the parts that were never making empirical claims
English
1
1
16
3K
gorbonic
gorbonic@gorbonik·
@jmrphy Freud was a fascinating thinker, and he's kind of fun to read, too.
English
1
0
1
1.4K
Justin Murphy
Justin Murphy@jmrphy·
I'm sorry but you can live a brilliant, highly educated, and even intellectually productive life without ever reading many of these books. In fact, do people understand that many top working scholars today never read off these lists and often have never read huge slices of them? It's because real work has you focused on particular materials that are immanent to the work (which is almost never outdated chemistry). It's only bourgeois aspirants and bookish college kids who have this cinematic idea that reading all these books is what educated and successful intellectuals do. People who read off these lists do so precisely because they are not working on any serious project. Which is beautiful, it's much better than most hobbies. And if your identity is that you went to St. Johns or teach there, I'm happy you have a nice little community you're proud of. I'm just saying that the trend has gotten out of hand. Reading books like these is a niche hobby and a luxury good (and a wonderful luxury indeed!). We should stop pretending every item on these lists has magical value, or even much to do with being well educated. I promise you can learn the Farenheit scale and its origins just fine from ChatGPT. In fact, you can learn it much, much better from ChatGPT.
Justin Murphy tweet media
English
7
5
30
6K
Justin Murphy
Justin Murphy@jmrphy·
This is Augustine's view I think (and mine). The City of Man is the basin described below, the City of God is exactly the same kind of basin (but good). People can move between but history is the accelerating divergence between the two, and the end times is just the long-run equilibrium.
Marianne@thrialectics

Had an epiphany about the structure of "coordinated" evil — it's more like an attractor basin, where people from very different initial conditions converge on it. Individuals are constantly entering and exiting the basin, so it's not actually this stable group of "evil people."

English
0
1
9
3.7K
Justin Murphy
Justin Murphy@jmrphy·
@TuttReal Funny enough I was recently looking into it seriously for the first time in my life. I found one Lacanian in Austin who seems serious. I'm considering it!
English
1
0
9
1.5K
Daniel Tutt
Daniel Tutt@TuttReal·
@jmrphy You should considering trying psychoanalysis. I'd be happy to recommend a few options if you're interested.
English
1
0
9
2.1K
eburke
eburke@JamesWHankins1·
Not a single sentence in this attention-begging post would have met the standards for clarity, beauty, and elegance of the least of the canonical writers of antiquity.
Justin Murphy@jmrphy

The Great Books trend of the past 5 years has been a total catastrophe. The simple fact is that Plutarch and Homer and Virgil et al. do have radical insights buried in there, but at the same time most of these books are truly boring and lame and most people pretend to like them, cannot really digest anything, and get absolutely nothing from them! The trend is overwhelmingly powered by these books' aspirational quality; it's like a luxury heritage brand that conveniently only costs $15 a pop. The people on social media who've made brands around how great all these books are, often they are trying to *express* something about *themselves*, which is nice, but does not change how lame and boring the lion's share of these books are! You don't have to pretend to love them! If you're teaching undergrads that's great, or doing real research, fine. But this in no way means that everyone should read these books; it does not even mean that the smartest and most educated adults today need to read these books. The bits of radical alpha in them are great to find, explore, and write about if you are in the .01% of people who are called to do such things, but there is really zero reason why anybody else should read any of these books. Frankly, many of these authors are even somewhat primitive and infantile compared to the best thinkers of modernity. Plato and Aristotle have tons of provocative alpha worth getting, but also they were retarded on many topics, especially religion. The Romans were even worse in many ways. But all of this gets shrouded in the cult of Great Books. There have never been more people professing to love the Great Books, and mass public culture has never been lower brow than it is today. A ton of larping and precious little education, virtually zero novel insight, has come out of this movement.

English
15
7
194
12.2K
Justin Murphy
Justin Murphy@jmrphy·
@JoshHochschild Fair! I feel the Greeks on truth and philosophy are much closer to the truth of Christianity than anything in ancient Greek religion, which is fascinating but infantile.
English
1
0
3
682
Josh Hochschild
Josh Hochschild@JoshHochschild·
Some reasonable counterbalance to performative Great Books advocacy, but the greatest Christian theologians have always found some of the most “radical alpha” in Plato and Aristotle on religion
Justin Murphy@jmrphy

The Great Books trend of the past 5 years has been a total catastrophe. The simple fact is that Plutarch and Homer and Virgil et al. do have radical insights buried in there, but at the same time most of these books are truly boring and lame and most people pretend to like them, cannot really digest anything, and get absolutely nothing from them! The trend is overwhelmingly powered by these books' aspirational quality; it's like a luxury heritage brand that conveniently only costs $15 a pop. The people on social media who've made brands around how great all these books are, often they are trying to *express* something about *themselves*, which is nice, but does not change how lame and boring the lion's share of these books are! You don't have to pretend to love them! If you're teaching undergrads that's great, or doing real research, fine. But this in no way means that everyone should read these books; it does not even mean that the smartest and most educated adults today need to read these books. The bits of radical alpha in them are great to find, explore, and write about if you are in the .01% of people who are called to do such things, but there is really zero reason why anybody else should read any of these books. Frankly, many of these authors are even somewhat primitive and infantile compared to the best thinkers of modernity. Plato and Aristotle have tons of provocative alpha worth getting, but also they were retarded on many topics, especially religion. The Romans were even worse in many ways. But all of this gets shrouded in the cult of Great Books. There have never been more people professing to love the Great Books, and mass public culture has never been lower brow than it is today. A ton of larping and precious little education, virtually zero novel insight, has come out of this movement.

English
8
3
42
5.2K
Justin Murphy
Justin Murphy@jmrphy·
@somewheresy I know exactly what you’re talking about and that is definitely a thing
English
0
0
1
356
∿
@somewheresy·
Writing an article about how younger Millennials have built worldviews around fashionable/aesthetic delusions and glitch the fuck out the minute that you push back even slightly on their materially disconnected epistemics
English
1
0
23
1.1K
Justin Murphy
Justin Murphy@jmrphy·
@MatjazLeonardis and Freud’s ideas unlocked the concept of back propagation for LLMs, this is actually documented in the literature
English
3
1
14
3.8K
Matjaž Leonardis
Matjaž Leonardis@MatjazLeonardis·
@jmrphy Yeah it’s underestimated. Ultimately unclear if its conceptual framework is the right way to think about things, but it actually tries to explain where the present-moment appearances in the mind come from.
English
2
0
16
4.9K
Justin Murphy
Justin Murphy@jmrphy·
@kendrictonn The idea that everyone will be famous for 15 minutes was incredibly prescient, non-obvious, and significant
English
1
1
15
983
Kendric Tonn
Kendric Tonn@kendrictonn·
Coming to the uncomfortable realization that, in the age of AI, I should probably actually sit with & think about Andy Warhol
English
32
12
244
84.1K