Alan Pearlstein
9.4K posts




At Sarah Lawrence College, the Student Senate rejected the application of J Street U, with student senators comparing recognizing the group to approving “a white supremacist organization.” According to JTA, one senator remarked that they were concerned about “the whole Zionist language” of the group “that’s still furthering the same logic of Israeli sovereignty and self-determination when there is no existence or security for Israel that’s not contingent on Palestinian displacement, on apartheid, on genocide.” Senators told J Street U, "What the students here are invested in is Palestinian liberation. And there’s no existence or advocation for Israeli or Zionist security that can co-exist with Palestinian liberation. The normalization of Zionism and of Israel is what students are opposed to.” The senators further asked whether J Street U “would fulfill a unique political/cultural space on campus that doesn’t already exist across different clubs [referring to the anti-Zionist Jewish Voice for Peace, Hillel, and the campus chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine]." When J Street U appealed the decision, the senate rejected the appeal as well. At the March appeal meeting, a faculty member who wanted to attend was told that at the last minute, the senate decided only two people would be permitted at the appeal, and they would only be granted 10 minutes to make their case. The administration, despite being lobbied by a faculty petition signed by more than 20 faculty members, has refused to intervene, with the school’s dean of students, Dave Stanfield, telling the JTA that Sarah Lawrence’s administration “does not intervene in the process unless there is a clear violation of policy.” Read more: jta.org/2026/05/13/uni…


Thousands of videos from Gaza in the last few days depict parties, nightlife, and normal life - way beyond just marathons, football, and restaurants. The mainstream media is utterly broken.




Five months ago, I argued against the President's $4 trillion tariffs at the Supreme Court. In 237 years, the Court had never struck down a sitting President's signature initiative. Legal scholars said it was impossible. Some of my own colleagues said it was impossible. We won. 6-3. But the real story isn't what happened in that courtroom. It's what happened in the months before. And its the subject of my TED talk, coming out tomorrow. I had the best legal team in the nation, especially Colleen Roh Sinzdak, the most outstanding legal strategist I know. Huge thanks, too, go to the Liberty Justice Center (and in particular its fearless and hyper-intelligent leader Sara Albrecht), who organized the client small businesses, as well as to the brave small businesses themselves. I also had four teachers preparing me. A mindset coach who'd worked with Andre Agassi. An improv coach who taught me that "Yes, and" works in Supreme Court arguments the same way it works everywhere else. A meditation coach who taught me stillness. And Harvey. Harvey predicted many of the questions the Justices asked — sometimes almost word for word. Brilliant. Tireless. Occasionally insufferable. Here's the catch: Harvey isn't a person. Harvey is a bespoke AI I built over the last year with a legal AI company, trained on every question every Justice has asked in oral argument for 25 years, and everything they've ever written. Tomorrow, TED releases my talk about what really happened — and what I learned standing at that podium. AI can predict. AI can analyze. What AI cannot do is the one thing that actually won the argument. Connect. Read the room. Hear not just a Justice's words, but her worry — and answer the worry. That is the irreducibly human skill. Find yours. Go deeper. In this age of AI, that's where your edge lives. The talk goes live Thursday, May 7 at 11am ET: go.ted.com/nealkumarkatyal What's the irreducibly human skill in your work — the thing AI can't touch?




46 years ago today: Billy Sims was drafted No. 1 overall by the Detroit Lions. The 1980 NFL Draft was the first to be televised, meaning Sims was the first player to ever be drafted on live television. This run in 1983 was voted the No. 98 play in the NFL 100 Greatest Plays on NFL Network. @RealBillySims


NEW @TheAthleticCBB: Here’s what a 76-team March Madness field looks like — and why it should worry you: nytimes.com/athletic/72392…



Not even May 1st and we’re already missing: - Reese Olson - Troy Melton - Jackson Jobe - Justin Verlander - Casey Mize - Parker Meadows - Zach McKinstry - Javy Báez ..and more that I’m sure I’m forgetting. Damn.






