Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻

5.8K posts

Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻 banner
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻

Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻

@AnarchistClass

Meme thief. Wobbly. History nerd. Materialist. Non-voter. Geriatric millennial. No war but the class war.

Katılım Eylül 2019
1K Takip Edilen652 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻@AnarchistClass·
Democrats: If you don't vote for Biden you support Trump. Tankies: If you don't support China & North Korea you support US imperialism. George W. Bush: Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists. Darth Vader:
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻 tweet media
English
2
7
26
0
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻@AnarchistClass·
Radical totalitarian environmentalist world tyranny is not a species-saving endeavor.
Simon Roy - KICKSTARTER IS TAKING LATE PLEDGES@simonroyart

@gunburd Sure! I just don’t think being a little pessimistic automatically qualifies as wallowing, or that space travel is necessarily a species-saving endeavour. Radical totalitarian environmentalist world tyranny would definitely do the job better in that regard

English
0
0
1
41
Vladimir Metelkin
Vladimir Metelkin@vldmrmetelkin·
There’s no intellectual gymnastics more pathetic than trying to lecture the people who actually ran the first socialist state, 100 years after the fact. Saying "they were warned" is a joke—they weren't being warned in some Twitter battle. The Bolsheviks were locked in a brutal political struggle in extremely violent times. How can anyone judge history without acknowledging that?
Paul Mason@paulmasonnews

Why are parts of the extreme left suddenly mourning the USSR? Because the whole package of anti-Zionism, rage against workers parties and left Democrats, anti-humanism and "disarm Ukraine" leads to the question of alternatives. You either design one from scratch that can never be realised (cf Benanav in NLR) or you accept "really existing" socialism was better than capitalism. Problem is, it was worse and that's why it collapsed. Male life expectancy was falling in the USSR long before it ended - and yes the price paid for neoliberalism was high and tragic - but the reason the USSR fell apart was that Brezhnev's "solution" to stagnation was to create sectoral and national bureaucratic empires - ie a communist national bourgeoisie in waiting. And the reason for stagnation was that Stalinist planning cannot compete with, or even produce, an economy based on services and information technology. So the catastrophe was forced collectivisation and the resulting famine, the mass murders of the Great Purge and the acquiescence of the Russian working class in these atrocities. But the whole arc of tragedy - from dissolving the Constituent Assembly in 1918 to the crime and chaos I encountered in Moscow in January 1992, can be traced to one monumental act of stupidity: in The State & Revolution Lenin (a lawyer!) insisted that, in a proletarian dictatorship, there can be no law. A fundamental revision of the term as understood by Marx. The Roman Republic invoked "dictatorship" 92 times but in each case reversed it as the law demanded. Hal Draper showed was is this concept of a lawless dictatorship that is the root of Bolshevik self destruction. Allan Weeks showed (and I trace this in more detail in Reds) how he derived this from the first Russian Blanquist, Pyotr Tkachev. The Bolsheviks were warned by everybody - Mensheviks, anarchists, left-social democrats, Left SRs, Luxemburg, Kautsky... but they ignored the warnings. And here's the relevance to today's ultra left shitshow. The people mobilising Soviet nostalgia take the same attitude to human rights as Lenin did to law - they have no means of creating a state that can pursue social justice, they reject the idea of democracy (another Lenin 101 idea) and have decided that the only way forward lies through the acceleration of global catastrophe - and since there is no Soviet Union and the working class lacks agency, China, Iran, their terrorist proxies and global south authoritarian states will have to do the job. At least when there was a proletariat with class consciousness Leninism was a plausible fantasy. Today it's a conceit. One Labour councillor has more power to make change than 00s of masked-up people hyperventilating about decolonisation theory. Same goes for any social activist prepared to work through horizontal and directed network campaigns, and any trade unionist who understands the power of affiliation to Labour. We are all more powerful than the Red-Browns. Basically neo-Stalinism is inculcating the politics of despair among those who embrace it, so it's no wonder they become Soviet nostalgics. And the worst of them - the late Domenico Losurdo and his fans - no longer bother denying the crimes of Mao and Stalin; they justify them on grounds of "economic development". That, in turn, is why they have declared war on "Western Marxism" - whereas the Brezhnev-era USSR tolerated it and Dubček embraced it. All traces of Marxism's origins in liberalism and the Enlightenment have to be eradicated (along with its debt to anarchism) - so that the Nazbols can parade around with Hamas and IRI flags and Soviet memorabilia. Finally why do the Red-Browns command so much attention? Answer: Their milieu is awash with PRC, Russian and IRI cash/reward mechanisms. The anarchists, democratic socialists and genuine Greens they wish to "eradicate" are by contrast generally skint.

English
5
7
119
6K
Cartwright
Cartwright@cartwright_qr·
@wesyang I can't find details about this particular case, but usually if someone is found incompetent to stand trial they are forced to be treated in a secure psychiatric facility until they are competent enough for trial. They wouldn't just let a criminal go free over it
English
9
0
5
885
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻@AnarchistClass·
@specifism @AnarkYouTube @Sanyi1665349 It would have looked a lot better. Anarchists hypocritically taking seats in the government is why the revolution was defeated, & the fascists won. Marxists also worked with the liberals, so us doing the same as them actually hurt us.
English
1
0
1
95
sanyi
sanyi@Sanyi1665349·
Probably my biggest unpopular opinion is that anarchists implicitly believe in the necessity of the dictatorship of the proletariat
English
22
12
282
11K
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻@AnarchistClass·
@specifism @AnarkYouTube @Sanyi1665349 It's not what dictatorship of the proletariat is. Marx was a centralist, as was Blanqui. Dictatorship is top-down, hierarchical, based on domination. Things that are different should be called different things. Anarchism & Marxism are incompatible, like anarchism & capitalism.
English
1
0
2
165
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻@AnarchistClass·
@aer21598794 @markets92 @EcoTechBro Conquest of Bread by Peter Kropotkin Mutual Aid by Kropotkin. Debt: The First 5000 Years by David Graeber Freedom, Equality & Solidarity by Lucy Parsons Anarchism & Other Essays by Emma Goldman The Unknown Revolution by Voline Dreams of Freedom by Flores Magon
English
1
2
6
157
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻@AnarchistClass·
@EcoTechBro In the Spring of 1918, before the civil war started in May, the Mensheviks and SRs started winning local Soviet elections so the Bolsheviks disbanded Soviets where they didn't have majorities and started gerrymandering them to insure they'd stay in power.
English
0
0
1
54
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻@AnarchistClass·
@elisha1542 It highlights how hypocritical they are that none of them have endorsed joining the Iranian military and fighting for the Iranian state.
English
0
0
14
183
Elisha Moon Williams 🚩
Elisha Moon Williams 🚩@elisha1542·
Anybody who's still defending the 'anarchists' fighting in the ranks of a bourgeois government in Ukraine in the name of 'fighting against Russian imperialism' need to just get the hell away from me lol.
English
6
9
124
2.8K
Super Humanity
Super Humanity@superhumanity·
@soshbill @benigma2017 @AOC Has a chance of being the deciding vote as opposed to WAS the deciding vote or would have been the deciding vote if she did vote present. Has the chance? What does that mean
English
3
0
3
204
🅲🅷🆄🅲🅺
🅲🅷🆄🅲🅺@benigma2017·
The left does not have @AOC's back because she hasnt kept ANY of the promises she made to them when she ran, and they backed her overwhelmingly, back in 2018. She has voted like a typical neoliberal putting her own career first and never risking any political capital to try and further the causes the left holds dear.
yeet@Awk20000

AOC has privately been “fuming” over the left’s criticism of her as she contemplates running for President “Unfair and counterproductive for the progressive movement” One liberal strategist said that AOC has “lamented that the left was not there for her, that they are never pleased” (Via Axios)

English
39
214
943
15.1K
madeline ⚧ 🇵🇸
madeline ⚧ 🇵🇸@forces_at_work·
I mean if you strip the word "revolution" of communist content and look at it in a technical sense, all kinds of things can be called revolutionary. Iran's "revolutionary" character is not in any way aligned with communism, however. These are two things that are deeply at odds.
VPol@VocalPolitics1

“There's no doubt that the most revolutionary theoretico-praxis that exists today is Shia Islam. There's no way that you could ever try to counter that as an assertion,” said Evan Katsounis, a US-Greek anti-imperialist organizer, in an interview with VPol journalist @CallaWalsh. ■ Katsounis critiqued the colonial and imperial arrogance displayed by much of the Western “left,” which tends to “villainize or demonize those we consider to be religious or sacred as being under some sort of opiate or backwards.” ■ “Even the notion of secularity in many ways professes or enacts itself in religious ways, right? Secularism is even a kind of religion in its own way.” ■ “We have to be learning from” the Islamic Republic of Iran and other members of the Axis of Resistance, instead of arrogantly critiquing them, which is “an exhibition of ultimately the coloniality that many people aren't even aware of that they contain.” #VPol

English
2
8
53
1.4K
Glenn Greenwald
Glenn Greenwald@ggreenwald·
Iran has been vehemently clear for decades that it would never renounce the same right every country on earth has under the NPT: to enrich uranium for nuclear energy, but not for nuclear weapons. No country would ever give up that right. Trump never demanded this ludicrous concession until Israel ordered him that this has to be the red line. I still think Trump doesn't understand the difference bewteen "no nuclear bomb" and "no nuclear program." But either way, any "negotiations" based on a demand that Iran give up the right to enrich uranium even to 3.67% is designed in advance to fail, and instead to re-start the war so that Israel's ultimate aim can be achieved: shattering Iranian society and turning it into Libya and Syria.
Bannon’s WarRoom@Bannons_WarRoom

TRITA PARSI: If JD Vance is right that the U.S. went in demanding zero enrichment, then of course this blew up. That was Israel’s red line, not Trump’s original red line of no nuclear weapons. Push for surrender, and you guarantee escalation.

English
535
1.6K
5.9K
348.7K
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻@AnarchistClass·
@Koba_Kulaks @StephenElsberry Agricultural collectivization looks an awful lot like enclosures to me. The Gulags - convict labor system - has parallels to the use of forced labor (slavery & convict labor) in early capitalist history.
English
1
0
0
28
Man of Steel
Man of Steel@Koba_Kulaks·
@StephenElsberry I don't know who Goran Therborn is, turns out he's some scholar. But do you any other credible evidence of "primitive accumulation" in Stalin's USSR ?
English
3
0
2
129
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻
Class Struggle Anarchist 🔻@AnarchistClass·
@BadMouse101 Remember when the Communist party of Greece physical defended parliament from a black bloc. Greece is a NATO member, BTW, defending its parliament is defending NATO.
English
2
1
38
922
arctotherium
arctotherium@arctotherium42·
The thing I most viscerally resent about the welfare state is that worthless bums get professionals to fill out paperwork for them for free (social workers) and I don't.
English
14
47
1.4K
25.2K