
Timothy Mulligan
2K posts

Timothy Mulligan
@AnathemaZed
Orthodox Christian | attorney | melancholic/choleric | strictly meat-and-potatoes | sincere, wholesale, ongoing repentance | the remembrance of God, OrthoPeeps!



One of Trump's persistent personality problems is that he has no category for someone who disagrees with him in good faith, or to uphold a higher ideal. Every last person in his way is simply dismissed as evil, corrupt, or an idiot. Personal loyalty is the measure of all things.



"Acquiring the Orthodox Phronema" by Eugenia Constantinou, Ph.D. youtu.be/WuDz_hd2SdE We are happy to share an excellent lecture from a Holy Transfiguration Greek Orthodox Church event. The speaker is Eugenia Constantinou, Ph.D. This is the first part of a two-part series.





As long as it’s for YouTube, it’s apparently completely fine for the OCA to allow a guy that blasphemes the icons, the mother of God, and is less than a layman, into the Holy of Holies, the Altar of the Church :













There are no examples of fasting for 40 days anywhere in the Bible


As usual, @austeni misleads and plays by an arbitrary double standard. What I have said is that the revision to 2267 is ambiguous insofar as it could be read as saying that the death penalty is intrinsically wrong – but that since this would contradict scripture and the previous magisterial teaching of 2,000 years, it is better to read it as a prudential judgment. I have argued (e.g. here: catholicworldreport.com/2020/10/07/thr… ) that there is no third alternative reading, and for many years now, people like Ivereigh have never answered my arguments but simply hurl abuse. In any event, I am in no way “at odds with the magisterium.” I simply disagree with the interpretation people like Ivereigh put on the teaching of the magisterium. Since seminary faculty are academics (as opposed to hack journalists with an agenda), they understand the distinction and thus see no problem in inviting me. Meanwhile, Fr. Martin has for years now openly criticized the Catechism’s teaching at 2358 that a homosexual inclination is “objectively disordered” (ncregister.com/features/fathe…) and he has urged that this language be removed. Oddly, Ivereigh does not criticize him for this or say that it puts him “at odds with the magisterium.” So, Ivereigh’s concern with fidelity to the Catechism and Catholic teaching is phony, a mere rhetorical ploy he deploys against enemies but not friends. Everyone already knew that, of course, but it is useful for him to provide yet another illustration of it. The reason for the screencap below, by the way, is that Ivereigh has blocked me, so that I can’t comment on his tweet directly. He prefers to do his sniping from behind the safety of the block, rather than directly. It seems he has as much courage as he has consistency.




