
Angel The Prodigy
354 posts















CNN: Francesca Hong, a leading Democrat in the Wisconsin governor’s race, called for abolishing the police. Hong, a 37-year-old state representative and democratic socialist, wrote on Twitter in 2020 she supported “defunding the police as a first step towards abolishing the police.” She later argued in 2021 that “police exist to uphold white supremacy. Defund then abolish. Reform can’t be an option.” cnn.com/2026/05/22/pol…



CNN: In a statement, Hong did not disavow her past support for abolishing police departments, calling it part of a “wider conversation around police abolition” rooted in her belief that “the current system is not working.” While she said she does not support “arbitrary cuts” to public safety budgets and would not pursue them as governor, she also questioned whether current police spending levels are an “optimal or efficient” use of resources. #WisconsinGovernor


CNN: Francesca Hong, a leading Democrat in the Wisconsin governor’s race, called for abolishing the police. Hong, a 37-year-old state representative and democratic socialist, wrote on Twitter in 2020 she supported “defunding the police as a first step towards abolishing the police.” She later argued in 2021 that “police exist to uphold white supremacy. Defund then abolish. Reform can’t be an option.” cnn.com/2026/05/22/pol…





Asked directly if she still supported abolishing police, Francesca Hong said in a statement: “While I envision a world where public safety is not synonymous with law enforcement, I recognize that this paradigm shift is a very long term vision and my focus is building systems of care for now and for our future.” #WisconsinGovernor





The Colorblind Constitution Wins Again 1. Democrat states engaged in racial gerrymandering, even though it’s prohibited by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. 2. Congress enacted the Voting Rights Act to remedy the problem. 3. Democrats still want to engage in racial gerrymandering, but the Supreme Court made clear in *Louisiana v. Callais* that under the Constitution and subject only to exceedingly narrow and rare exceptions, states may not treat people differently based on their race—in the context of redistricting or otherwise—and that nothing in Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act authorizes the racial gerrymandering at issue in Callais. 4. Democrats now argue that the Supreme Court has somehow gutted Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, oddly suggesting that it’s somehow racially discriminatory for states to NOT engage in racial gerrymandering. 5. The party that long engaged in a pattern of racial discrimination wants to continue doing so, while claiming that it’s fighting racial discrimination.


🚨🇺🇸 Trump pushes Congress to pass the Railway Safety Act, three years after the East Palestine disaster: "I am strongly urging Congress to include the Railway Safety Act. We must not delay any further." Credit where it's due. He visited East Palestine when Biden wouldn't, forced FEMA's hand on federal aid, and endorsed this legislation back in 2023. Following through on it now with a direct call for Republican yes votes shows the domestic agenda hasn't disappeared behind the war.









🚨BREAKING: The U.S. Supreme Court Friday rejected Virginia Democrats’ emergency request to revive a voter-approved plan that would have allowed the state to redraw its congressional map in response to Republican gerrymanders in other states. democracydocket.com/news-alerts/su…







Also, there's a lot of grey area that we're not prepared to deal with. Do these people think cps should be called on a 6-year-old who walks to the nearby bodega by himself? What about the 8-year-old using the subway or bus on his own? What about the mom who hires a 12-year-old to babysit? What about the 4-year-old who is in a taxi cab without a carseat for a short ride? What about––my own hypothetical that the internet flipped out at me for––bringing a young baby to a wedding vs. spending the newborn days in total isolation? What if cps is called by someone who has no kids and doesn't know what might be developmentally appropriate, or someone who has a grudge against the person they're trying to report? Weaponization of cps (and threatening cps involvement in a cavalier, bullying way) is one of the absolute worst trends of the last few decades. There's a lot of grey area that's just *hard* to sift through. CPS should be used for genuinely abusive and neglectful situations. We've entirely lost the plot.











