Angry Porcupine

1.7K posts

Angry Porcupine

Angry Porcupine

@AngryPorc123

Opinions are personal and do not reflect the position of DOD or the Marine Corps

Katılım Ağustos 2021
3.7K Takip Edilen86 Takipçiler
Martin Heinrich
Martin Heinrich@SenatorHeinrich·
I'm a NO on the administration's $200 billion war supplemental.
English
368
152
687
15.5K
Angry Porcupine retweetledi
Dr. Annie Andrews
Dr. Annie Andrews@AnnieAndrewsMD·
Lindsey Graham wants to send your sons and daughters to war. Your sons and daughters are the reason I am in this fight.
English
121
1K
3.3K
24.7K
Angry Porcupine
Angry Porcupine@AngryPorc123·
@SecVetAffairs @depvetaffairs Doug Collins works for the billionaires who never served. He thinks disabled veterans are moochers spending money billionaires should be getting in tax cuts
English
1
0
1
47
VA Secretary Doug Collins
VA Secretary Doug Collins@SecVetAffairs·
I’m tired of a society that looks at Veterans as victims. We are not victims; we are warfighters and heroes. The @DepVetAffairs is refocusing our suicide prevention and mental health efforts to honor that warrior spirt. You have the discipline and heart. We’re here to provide the resources you need.
English
224
325
1.9K
68.5K
Angry Porcupine
Angry Porcupine@AngryPorc123·
@jbarro Connecting political beliefs to physical appearance is playground level analysis
English
0
0
0
54
Angry Porcupine
Angry Porcupine@AngryPorc123·
@BeshearStan I like Beshear but it seems like he’s spending a disproportionate amount of time hitting up billionaire donors. I’m becoming less and less convinced he would fight the problematic parts of the Democratic Party
English
1
0
0
34
Angry Porcupine
Angry Porcupine@AngryPorc123·
@SenTimKaine failure of leadership supporting Chuck Schumer. Virginia Democrats don’t want him as leader, so why is Kaine fighting for him? On top of constantly voting for Trump’s nominees. Tim Kaine has really failed to meet the moment wsj.com/politics/polic…
English
0
0
0
9
Angry Porcupine retweetledi
Acyn
Acyn@Acyn·
Question: I'm a waiter at a local restaurant in Queens, a full time college student who sleeps an average of four hours a night and is still thousands in debt. How is a war in a country half the world away funded by the taxes pulled from my check, helping me in any way?
English
1.7K
8K
64.4K
3M
Angry Porcupine retweetledi
Rob Freund
Rob Freund@RobertFreundLaw·
More lawyers in trouble for AI misuse today: Attorney represented a criminal defendant and filed an application to reopen an appeal. The application alleged prosecutorial misconduct and cited quotes attributed to the prosecutor. Only problem was the quotes were completely made up. "The page Appellant cites to on page 4 for the 'legally inflammatory' statement by the prosecutor- is, in fact, the court reporter’s signature page, with no statements of any type by the prosecutor." The fake quotes came from ChatGPT. A paralegal uploaded case materials to ChatGPT and pasted the output into the application. The lawyer didn't catch it. But it gets worse: after the application was denied, the lawyer appealed the denial to the Ohio Supreme Court anyway. And when he submitted his firms "AI Policy" to show he was taking corrective action, the court determined that the policy itself was AI-generated and was incomplete. "The proffering of an AI-generated AI policy as a remedial measure in a case involving the submission of AI-generated fabrications to this court is, at best, ironic." And two months after the sanctions hearing in this case, the attorney did it again, in another case. He submitted a filing with the ChatGPT prompt embedded in the filing itself: "Would you like me to draft the next argument section (e.g., argument 1 – B on the 'nature of the charge' omission) in the same tone and format so your brief reads as a seamless multi-print memorandum?" Sanctions: -$2,000 fine -Referral to Ohio Office of Disciplinary Counsel -Must serve copy of judgment on judge of every court in which he makes an appearance, for 2 years -Must include certification that all cases are real and verified, for 2 years -6 hours mandatory CLE about AI ethics -Must write apology letters to prosecutor, trial judge, trial defense counsel, and prior appellate counsel who were defamed by fake quotes.
Rob Freund tweet media
English
70
336
1.3K
113.2K
Angry Porcupine retweetledi
Jonathan Norris
Jonathan Norris@jonnorris12·
I think that the biggest difference between the Iran war and the Vietnam war is Donald Trump knew how to get himself out of the Vietnam war.
English
96
1.5K
9.1K
225.8K
Angry Porcupine retweetledi
PBS News
PBS News@NewsHour·
Factories continue to shed workers, with 98,000 manufacturing jobs lost during the president's first full 12 months back in the White House. to.pbs.org/3NwD8dl
English
109
1.4K
2.1K
293.5K
Angry Porcupine
Angry Porcupine@AngryPorc123·
@policytensor Lift sanctions in a way that allows IGRC leaders to become insanely wealthy (more than they already are)
English
0
0
0
275
Policy Tensor
Policy Tensor@policytensor·
Least bad outcome is ceasefire. But what makes you think the Iranians will just accept one? This is wishful thinking: “The U.S. declares that Iran’s military capabilities have been significantly degraded, which is how the Pentagon always saw the purpose of the war. Iran declares victory for surviving and demonstrating it can still threaten regional actors.”
Ilan Goldenberg@ilangoldenberg

Three weeks into the war with Iran, a number of observations as someone who spent years war-gaming this scenario. 1. The U.S. and Israel may have produced regime transition in the worst possible way. Ali Khamenei was 86 and had survived multiple bouts of prostate cancer. His death in the coming years would likely have triggered a real internal reckoning in Iran, potentially opening the door to somewhat more pragmatic leadership, especially after the protests and crackdown last month. Instead, the regime made its most consequential decision under existential external threat giving the hardliners a clear upperhand. Now we appear to have a successor who is 30 years younger, deeply tied to the IRGC, and radicalized by the war itself – including the killing of family members. Disastrous. 2. About seven years ago at CNAS, I helped convene a group of security, energy, and economic experts to walk through scenarios for a U.S.--Iran war and the implications for global oil prices. What we’re seeing now was considered one of the least likely but worst outcomes. The modeling assumed the Strait of Hormuz could close for 4–10 weeks, with 1–3 years required to restore oil production once you factored in infrastructure damage. Prices could spike from around $65 to $175–$200 per barrel, before eventually settling in the $80–$100 range a year later in a new normal. 3. One surprising development: Iran is still moving oil through the Strait of Hormuz while disrupting everyone else. In most war games I participated in, we assumed Iran couldn’t close the Strait and still use it themselves. That would have made the move extremely self-defeating. But Iran appears capable of harassing global shipping while still pushing some of its own exports through. That changes the calculus. 4. The U.S. now finds itself in the naval and air equivalent of the dynamic we faced in Iraq and Afghanistan. It’s a recipe for a quagmire where we win every battle and lose the war. We have overwhelming military dominance and are exacting a tremendous cost. But Iran doesn’t need to win battles. They just need occasional successes. A small boat hitting a tanker. A drone slipping through defenses in the Gulf. A strike on a hotel or oil facility. Each incident creates insecurity and drives costs up while remind everyone that the regime is surviving and fighting. 5. The deeper problem is that U.S. objectives were set far too high. Once “regime change” becomes the implicit or explicit goal, the bar for American success becomes enormous. Iran’s bar is simple: survive and keep causing disruption. 6. The options for ending this war now are all bad. You can try to secure the entire Gulf and Middle East indefinitely – extremely expensive and maybe impossible. You can invade Iran and replace the regime, but nobody is seriously going to do that. Costs are astronomical. You can try to destabilize the regime by supporting separatist groups. It probably won’t work and if it does you’ll most likely spark a civil war producing years of bloody chaos the U.S. will get blamed for. None of these are good outcomes. 7. The other escalatory options being discussed are taking the nuclear material out of Esfahan or taking Kargh Island. Esfahan is not really workable. Huge risk. You’d have been on the ground for a LONG time to safely dig in and get the nuclear material out in the middle of the country giving Iran time to reinforce from all over and over run the American position. 8. Kharg Island can be appealing to Trump. He’d love to take Iran’s ability to export oil off the map and try to coerce them to end the war. It’s much easier because it’s not in the middle of IRan. But it’s still a potentially costly ground operation. And again. Again, the Iranian government only has to survive to win and they can probably do that even without Kargh. 9. The least bad option is the classic diplomatic off-ramp. The U.S. declares that Iran’s military capabilities have been significantly degraded, which is how the Pentagon always saw the purpose of the war. Iran declares victory for surviving and demonstrating it can still threaten regional actors. It would feel unsatisfying. But this is the inevitable outcome anyway. Better to stop now than after five or ten more years of escalating costs. Remember in Afghanistan we turned down a deal very early in the war with the Taliban that looked amazing 20 years later. Don’t need to repeat that kind of mistake. 10. The U.S. and Israel are not perfectly aligned here. Trump just needs a limited win and would see long-term instability as a negative whereas for Netanyahu a weak unstable Iran that bogs the U.S. down in the MIddle East is a fine outcome. If President Trump decided he wanted Israel to stop, he likely has the leverage to push it in that direction just as he pressured Netanyahu to take a deal last fall on Gaza. 11. When this is over, the Gulf states will have to rethink their entire security strategy. They are stuck in the absolute worst place. They didn’t start this war and didn’t want it and now they are taking with some of the worst consequences. Neither doubling down with the U.S. and Israel nor placating the Iranians seems overwhelmingly appealing. 12. One clear geopolitical winner so far: Russia. Oil prices are rising. Sanctions are coming off. Western attention and military resources are shifting away from Ukraine. From Moscow’s perspective, this war is a win win win. 13. At some point China may have a role to play here. It is the world’s largest oil importer, and much of that supply comes from the Middle East. Yes they are still getting oil from Iran. But they also buy from the rest of the Middle East, and a prolonged disruption in the Gulf hits Beijing hard. That gives China a real incentive to help push toward an end to the conflict.

English
8
5
100
11.2K
Angry Porcupine
Angry Porcupine@AngryPorc123·
@Katagorically @ripplebrain The “good” thing (from a pro-peace perspective) is that we have enough of economic power to make the deal worthwhile for even the most ideological IRGC commander (a group known for corruption). For enough money they would probably agree to not embarrass him.
English
1
0
2
78
Kat
Kat@Katagorically·
@AngryPorc123 @ripplebrain Israel will be a sticking point, but non-negotiable for Trump. If he agrees to foreign oversight of that colony they'll release all his pedo videos & destroy him and his criminal family. At some level of destruction & desperation I'm sure you're correct. Not there yet.
English
1
0
5
138
Angry Porcupine
Angry Porcupine@AngryPorc123·
@Katagorically @ripplebrain I think Trump will lift sanctions and maybe concede more. He’s fundamentally a weak person who fakes being tough. He’ll sell it as “deal making” and his cronies will flip and start calling him a negotiating genius. But he will give the Iranians whatever they want eventually.
English
3
0
5
198
Kat
Kat@Katagorically·
@ripplebrain I doubt TACO will open the Strait. Iran will demand reparations, no US bases in the region, & oversight of Israel similar to that established over Germany after WWII. Until demands are met the Strait is closed. I don't think the markets have grasped that yet.
English
4
0
35
2.1K
Angry Porcupine
Angry Porcupine@AngryPorc123·
@WalshFreedom It’s objectively false that Israel is more careful about civilian casualties than any other country. No serious military professional believes that.
English
0
0
0
29
Joe Walsh
Joe Walsh@WalshFreedom·
I completely disagree with your characterization of Israel. Israel, like no other country in history, has gone out of its way to avoid killing civilians. But even if you believe Israel purposely commits war crimes, to have 67% of Dems stand with Palestinians and only 17% of Dems stand with Israelis when the very mission of the Palestinian ruling regimes has always been terrorism, targeting civilians, and committing war crimes, makes no sense. Unless those #’s are based on just naked Jew hatred/hatred of Israel. And the Dem party will never win a national election in this country with that stance. I respect you & appreciate you @JoJoFromJerz.
Jo@JoJoFromJerz

@WalshFreedom @JoshKraushaar I don’t know how you can come to any conclusions about views on Israel without taking into account the actions of Israel. Look around, Joe. People don’t support Israel because they’re committing war crimes with impunity. Murdering kids. How can anyone support that? How can you?

English
491
71
638
96K
Angry Porcupine
Angry Porcupine@AngryPorc123·
@JimFergusonUK If your friend is drunk and wants to drive home, a good friend takes their keys away. You don’t get drunk and drag race them home
English
0
0
0
7
Jim Ferguson
Jim Ferguson@JimFergusonUK·
🚨 STARMER REFUSES TO BACK U.S. IN HORMUZ Despite rising threats to global shipping, Keir Starmer’s government has refused to commit British warships to help secure the Strait of Hormuz, even as the United States calls on allies to step up. The strategic waterway carries a huge share of the world’s oil, yet London appears unwilling to support efforts to protect it. While Washington pushes for a coalition to defend the route, the UK is still “considering its options.” At a moment when leadership is needed, critics say Britain is choosing hesitation instead.
English
1.8K
808
2.8K
248K
Angry Porcupine
Angry Porcupine@AngryPorc123·
@NadavPollak Maybe you should focus on fixing this. I’m a lawyer and a military veteran. How am I supposed to see a country that does things like this as something the US should support? cnn.com/2026/03/12/mid…
English
0
1
5
229
Nadav Pollak
Nadav Pollak@NadavPollak·
This is depressing. Truly depressing. I would definitely put a significant part of the blame for this trend on the current Israeli government and Netanyahu himself, and at the same time, I think that big parts of the Democratic party lost their way in understanding Israelis and Israel
Jacob N. Kornbluh@jacobkornbluh

NBC poll: 57% of Democrats have a negative view of Israel. 54% of Republicans view Israel positively. Only 17% of Democratic voters sympathize with Israel in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

English
31
3
55
8.8K
Angry Porcupine retweetledi
Center on Conscience & War
We have spoken with the spouse of an infantryman in the 31st MEU currently headed towards Iran. With her permission we are sharing some details of the conversation 👇
English
330
1.9K
7.8K
1.4M