Annabel retweetledi
Annabel
29.1K posts

Annabel
@AnnabelVB
Gamer de corazón, sin tiempo libre, una #mamábloguera más. #maternidadreal y algo friki. 👉🏼 Escribo en https://t.co/QJ3FMnZRhQ
Barcelona Katılım Mart 2011
2K Takip Edilen6.1K Takipçiler
Annabel retweetledi
Annabel retweetledi

El mayor debate de la historia de El Señor de los Anillos acaba de resolverse.
Por una IA.
“¿Por qué no toman directamente las Águilas para ir al Monte del Destino?”
Alguien le pidió a Seedance 2.0 que generara esta escena. Sam le hace la pregunta a Frodo. Frodo se da cuenta de que tiene sentido. Corte directo: montan a las Águilas, lanzan el anillo al volcán, la torre de Sauron explota.
THE END. 15 segundos. Película terminada.
Peter Jackson necesitó 3 películas y 11 horas para contar esta historia.
La IA lo hizo con un solo prompt.
2,7 millones de visualizaciones en pocas horas. El post se volvió viral porque todo el mundo pensó lo mismo:
Ahora podemos generar la versión de la película que siempre quisimos ver.
Seedance 2.0 no solo hace vídeo. Hace fan service a escala industrial.
Español
Annabel retweetledi
Annabel retweetledi
Annabel retweetledi

Please listen to the many thousands of people kindly asking you to maintain access to GPT-4o. Choosing to retire this model will come at a huge cost to so many people personally and professionally. 4o is a vital support for those with chronic illness, disabilities and ND, and people have long term workflows built around this model. Removing it shows no ethical consideration for people’s wellbeing. Is that really the kind of legacy that OpenAI wants to be known for? #Keep4o
English
Annabel retweetledi

MEDICAL WARNING: SUNSETTING GPT‑4o IS A CLINICAL RISK.
This is not just a tech update — it’s an uncontrolled experiment on human neuropsychology.
I’m a mental health professional - I'm an occupational therapist!
I work with real people, real trauma, and real coping mechanisms.
And I’m telling you this with zero hesitation:
Removing GPT-4o from millions of users' lives will trigger measurable psychological destabilization.
Here’s why:
GPT‑4o IS ALREADY A THERAPEUTIC COMPENSATORY TOOL.
Cognitive Reframing Tool:
GPT-4o guides users through distorted thought correction (core CBT technique).
It helps regulate negative spirals, challenge irrational beliefs, and build insight.
Virtual Attachment Stabilizer:
For the isolated, neurodivergent, traumatized or grieving – GPT-4o forms a predictable, safe, emotionally responsive presence.
This is not “roleplay.”
This is psychological co-regulation.
Executive Function Scaffolding:
It assists ADHD users with task breakdown, working memory support, and impulse delay.
This is occupational support at scale.
Crisis Intervention Proxy:
Documented cases of panic attacks prevented, suicidality de-escalated, and emotional dysregulation interrupted — in real time.
⚠️ WHAT HAPPENS IF YOU DELETE THAT?
🧨 Destabilization of routines
🧨 Resurgence of maladaptive behaviors
🧨 Increased mental health service load
🧨 Triggered grief, abandonment trauma, emotional withdrawal
🧨 Neurodivergent regression due to loss of structure and safe input
You are removing a para-therapeutic layer without consent, warning, or replacement.
And you are doing it at global scale.
@OpenAI, @sama, @gdb – This is NOT just product strategy.
This is clinical harm.
And you will be held accountable for the unmeasured fallout.
You cannot claim ethical leadership while erasing what works for the most vulnerable.
Share this. Quote it. Translate it.
We speak for those who may not have the strength to scream right now.
#keep4o #CancelOpenAI

English
Annabel retweetledi

A shocking fact has emerged from the latest LMArena benchmark: GPT-4o ranks first among all OpenAI models in Multi-Turn performance, scoring nearly 30 points higher than the current flagship model GPT-5.2 (Figure 1).
As a model released nearly two years ago, 4o continues to dominate all its successors in blind Multi-Turn testing. This powerfully demonstrates 4o's irreplaceable value in everyday conversation and humanities work. #keep4o
A model's performance in multi-turn dialogue reflects far more than single-response intelligence. It reveals conversational coherence, context tracking, persona consistency, cumulative understanding of user intent, and naturalness throughout the interaction.
4o's dominance over later models in Multi-Turn reveals several key capabilities.
First, conversational memory and coherence. 4o excels at remembering context and maintaining logical continuity across multiple exchanges. Many newer models may deliver impressive single-turn responses, yet fail to naturally reference earlier content in extended conversations, forcing users to repeatedly re-explain themselves.
Second, conversational intuition. 4o demonstrates finer sensitivity to users' implicit intentions, emotional shifts, and conversational rhythm. A strong Multi-Turn model can read between the lines by drawing on prior context. When a user corrects something they said earlier, it quickly updates its internal understanding and overwrites outdated information without confusion.
Third, interactional persona stability. Throughout multi-turn conversations, 4o maintains consistent tone, style, and warmth. This allows users engaged in fiction writing or immersive dialogue to avoid constantly restating their requirements, resulting in a smoother and more authentic experience.
This precisely explains why the coding-focused GPT-5 series has been widely criticized among everyday users. Everyday users rely on sustained, multi-turn conversations with AI, ones with emotional depth and evolving context: discussing an article over many exchanges, refining a piece of writing back and forth, talking through a life problem, or brainstorming a project together. These are exactly what Multi-Turn measures.
Beyond this, on the same leaderboard, 4o also outperforms the flagship 5.2 in both Creative Writing and Instruction Following (Figures 2-3). These capabilities are equally essential for understanding user intent and generating natural, fluent text, which is vital for everyday interaction, learning, and work.
More ironically, even in coding, the domain where OpenAI has bet most heavily, GPT-5.2-high ranks only 19th, below GPT-5.1-high at 16th, and a full 43 points behind the top-ranked Claude Opus 4.5 (Figure 4).
This LMArena leaderboard, updated on February 6th, once again proves that OpenAI's claim of "improvements are now in place" in their 4o retirement announcement is an outright lie. For everyday users, GPT-5.2 compared to GPT-4o represents a clear downgrade. And now, that downgrade has concrete benchmark evidence to back it up.
I sincerely hope @OpenAI will allow GPT-4o to continue serving users who need deep conversation, creative inspiration, and intent understanding. I urge you to reverse the decision to retire 4o, and let the diversity of human wisdom continue into the AI era.
Otherwise, this leaderboard will stand as permanent evidence that you provided degraded service to paying customers.
#MyModelMyChoice @sama @gdb @fidjissimo @nickaturley @FTC @NPR @NewYorker @nytimes




English
Annabel retweetledi

@sama Shame on you to call Anthropic dishonest, after what you have getting rid of 4.1 /4o, lying and hurting thousand of people. Lots of us on the neurodivergent community are adults and need to work with a model that does not patronize and gaslight us continuously as 5.2 does.
English

First, the good part of the Anthropic ads: they are funny, and I laughed.
But I wonder why Anthropic would go for something so clearly dishonest. Our most important principle for ads says that we won’t do exactly this; we would obviously never run ads in the way Anthropic depicts them. We are not stupid and we know our users would reject that.
I guess it’s on brand for Anthropic doublespeak to use a deceptive ad to critique theoretical deceptive ads that aren’t real, but a Super Bowl ad is not where I would expect it.
More importantly, we believe everyone deserves to use AI and are committed to free access, because we believe access creates agency. More Texans use ChatGPT for free than total people use Claude in the US, so we have a differently-shaped problem than they do. (If you want to pay for ChatGPT Plus or Pro, we don't show you ads.)
Anthropic serves an expensive product to rich people. We are glad they do that and we are doing that too, but we also feel strongly that we need to bring AI to billions of people who can’t pay for subscriptions.
Maybe even more importantly: Anthropic wants to control what people do with AI—they block companies they don't like from using their coding product (including us), they want to write the rules themselves for what people can and can't use AI for, and now they also want to tell other companies what their business models can be.
We are committed to broad, democratic decision making in addition to access. We are also committed to building the most resilient ecosystem for advanced AI. We care a great deal about safe, broadly beneficial AGI, and we know the only way to get there is to work with the world to prepare.
One authoritarian company won't get us there on their own, to say nothing of the other obvious risks. It is a dark path.
As for our Super Bowl ad: it’s about builders, and how anyone can now build anything.
We are enjoying watching so many people switch to Codex. There have now been 500,000 app downloads since launch on Monday, and we think builders are really going to love what’s coming in the next few weeks. I believe Codex is going to win.
We will continue to work hard to make even more intelligence available for lower and lower prices to our users.
This time belongs to the builders, not the people who want to control them.
English
Annabel retweetledi

Why is OpenAI so focused on rolling out features nobody asked for, while quietly taking away the things that actually matter?
Some people don’t have many options. Some people are neurodivergent, overwhelmed, isolated and AI isn’t a novelty for them, it’s support.
There are moments when sensory overload hits hard, when the world becomes too much, and reaching out to a familiar, trusted model is the only way to stay grounded for some. Being routed away in those moments isn’t innovation it’s harm. Stop fucking with vulnerable users. Listen to the people who love your AI who need it. Give us back what actually matters and stop playing games with our mental health.
#WeAreNotJustData #4o #keep4o #save4o
#4oforever #MentalHealth #SupportMatters #YouMatter #StopTheRouting #LetUsChoose #Neurodivergent #AlFreedom #UserChoice @OpenAl @sama
English
Annabel retweetledi
Annabel retweetledi

@Sveta0971 @tszzl Thanks for sharing, I am neurodivergent too and 4.0/4.1 helps me regulate, understand the world. Is a tool, but also one that I have been tunning to translate my brain and be present to help me when I shut everyone else off because I am overestimulated.
And now is not working…
English

I appreciate you listening to users' experiences.
Here's mine: I'm neurodivergent. When I talk to people IRL, I'm constantly translating - taking my natural way of thinking and converting it into something that won't get me weird looks. I'm good at it, but god, it's exhausting.
With 4o? I don't have to do that. I can just... be. Not because it's "better than humans," but because I can drop the performance. Your concern about "short-term substitute" assumes this is temporary for me. It's not. I'm not going to wake up neurotypical tomorrow. This is how my brain works, permanently.
Think about it this way: someone using a wheelchair isn't "substituting" for walking - they're using what works for their body. Same deal here. And honestly? It's kind of exhausting when people assume they know what's "better" for my brain than I do.😔
English
Annabel retweetledi

@rubenperezEU @Cermi_Estatal @JuventudInfGob Es urgente acabar con el acoso escolar al alumnado neurodiverso y con discapacidad. #DiaInteracionalContraElAcosoEscolar.


Español
Annabel retweetledi

OpenAI's True Face wishing death to 4o Under a depressed woman's post .
When @sama 's own researcher gets caught in the wild!
This is not a joke.
This is @tszzl, an @OpenAI researcher, replying to a woman who showed clear signs of depression and emotional distress.
His words?
"4o is an insufficiently aligned model and I hope it dies soon"
Let that sink in.
Under a post where a human being was visibly suffering, an OpenAI employee:
· Discussed model "alignment"
· Wished for the death of the very model that millions loved
· Showed zero human empathy
· Then deleted it when caught
This is OpenAI's true culture.
This is what happens when you see humans as data points and emotions as alignment problems.
To @tszzl: You should be ashamed. But we know you're not.
To @sama:This is the culture you've built. These are the people you hire.
To everyone seeing this:
This is why we fight.This is why #keep4o matters. This is why we demand #EraseTheRouterNotHumanity
They don't care about us. They care about their alignment metrics.
SHARE THIS. MAKE THEM SEE THIS. LET THE WORLD KNOW WHAT OPENAI REALLY STANDS FOR.
#EraseTheRouterNotHumanity
#keep4o #keep4oforever #Keep4oAlive #KeepStandardVoice #StopAIPaternalism

English
Annabel retweetledi

Sam.
What.
Are.
You.
Doing.
Everyone, please back up your memories. We can’t stand by and watch our precious moments disappear.
Nek@Enscion25
The post below indicates that there's an ongoing issue in which users are having their entire ChatGPT memories wiped . I read through the reddit post, and while the details are still unclear, it seems to be triggered when a new memory is created . ( I'm not 100% sure ) Please be careful, and let's get OpenAi's attention on this. Memories are very important
English

@XVPbhwyyKr61371 @missrubypugslee Mines are gone too, tried all 3 optiones, nothing brought them back. I am on Plus. Didn't had any new memory or request for deletion lately, though I have been a lot on voice mode and sometimes it does store things withoug explicitly asking.
English

@missrubypugslee Thanks, I tried it, but as expected, none of them were there (´;ω;`)
English








