sam see retweetledi
sam see
131 posts

sam see retweetledi

@thedefivillain @PhoAlpha We as a community should support someone trying this 😂
English

New article on STRC.
I break down:
- how the mechanism works
- why it can scale massively
- what the real risks are
substacktools.com/sharex/e-rbd2Kd
English

@imspeculating @gumsays @saylor @camelfinance can w your opinion on this? Could Saylor force a 4 year cycle low soon by being an extreme buyer?
English

So @saylor is going to pump TENS OF BILLIONS into Bitcoin through $STRC
🟧Stocks Dump → Market runs to yield $STRC → Saylor buys $BTC
🟩Stocks Pump → Market buys $MSTR → Saylor buys $BTC
Just yesterday, STRC had enough volume to buy 2,000 BTC ($139M)
If we start seeing massive adoption of STRC he'll be buying billions per week
We're not even counting the ETF inflows that will inevitably come when Bitcoin turns around
I am convinced bottom callers will all be wrong due to how sticky and strong institutional flows can be
Strategy@Strategy
Record day for $STRC. $409M - Daily Traded Volume (highest ever) 3% - 30D Volatility (lowest ever) $99.78 - 1M VWAP (highest ever)
English
sam see retweetledi
sam see retweetledi
sam see retweetledi

well this is straight up never happening to you is it... dont worry
bawonki@Balarkeuwu
ngl if i spent 6 years with someone, moved in, did everything with em & helped them when they got cancer just to break up bc she “grew out of the relationship” im straight up killing myself
English
sam see retweetledi
sam see retweetledi

I vehemently disagree with this take. $MSTR liabilities are extremely conservative relative to their position size - and becoming less so.
The only scenario in which they “fail” and have to unwind their position is one in which bitcoin itself has already failed, and the most likely scenario for such a failure is a catastrophic software bug.
There is essentially no scenario in which bitcoin succeeds and $MSTR doesn’t.
I also think people are reading far too much into saylor’s comments, given that he has made clear that he would support protocol upgrades if it became clear that there was an actual threat within a meaningful timeframe.
I also think people should be grateful that the guy controlling the largest corporate stash of bitcoin is extremely conservative. Can you imagine the counterfactual wherein the guy managing keys to 700,000 BTC is a total retard backing pre-emptive haphazard hard-forks for every schizo narrative that passes through this app?
Udi Wertheimer@udiWertheimer
apparently sitting on $16 BILLION DOLLARS IN LIABILITIES, with the only asset backing them being 3% of the btc supply (laughably illiquid) is TOTALLY SAFE for bitcoin the REAL RISK to bitcoin is devs posting improvement proposals clown
English

This wasn’t a diss to bsc btw
If anything the past couple months has shown me that interest and volume can kinda exist across chains - perhaps there are indeed more chain agnostic participants, which is overall a good thing
With the penguin leading the way on sol the natural question would then be what about bsc 😳
gake@Ga__ke
bsc:
English















