Anti

4.7K posts

Anti banner
Anti

Anti

@Antiverta

你好!!! I can talk in American English or Chinese (Traditional) Confucian Scholar 3x Liberal Arts School Reject : ( Certified Plants Right Activist

6 sided in a 10x6 meter box Katılım Mayıs 2019
316 Takip Edilen58 Takipçiler
Anti
Anti@Antiverta·
@BartHomersson @astraiaintel Nero had intentions to expand into Sudan, not just for trade; he also did that with Yemen, but lost.
English
0
0
0
8
Astraia Intel
Astraia Intel@astraiaintel·
Who should own Constantinople? 1. Greece 2. Ukraine 3. Turkey 4. Italy 5. Bulgaria
Astraia Intel tweet media
English
2.5K
29
666
206.5K
Anti
Anti@Antiverta·
The original post literally asks who should own istanbul for nations other than Turkey, this post is just a joke response. The original post literally ask if Ukraine should own istanbul, i am not advovating for your land to be taken away especially when Istanbul is Turkish Majority.
English
0
0
1
136
Selim Kartal🦅🦅🦅
Selim Kartal🦅🦅🦅@bjk1903_eagle·
@Antiverta @astraiaintel Rüyalardan uyanmalısın. Faşist Mussolini’nin hayalleri 1943’te son buldu. İnsanlara demokrasi havariliği yaparsınız ama en büyük faşist 2026’da hala senin gibi insanlar. İstanbul bizimdir ,götünüz yanıyor onu biliyoruz ama yapacak bir şey yok. Ha , isterseniz almayı deneyin!!!
Türkçe
3
0
3
192
Anti
Anti@Antiverta·
Why would China bomb Jakarta and the rest of SEA, there simply isn't enough planes to do that or even the effective range. This is militarily suptid and idiotic. The Chinese warplanes are also designed to favor a defensive military doctrine and interception rather than for offensive purposes.
English
0
0
0
168
林 Linnamon
林 Linnamon@_linnamon_·
Mallaca strait blockade is the most retarded wishcasting 1. China is Indonesia (and ASEAN for that matter) largest trading partner, by far 2. If Indonesia tries to blockade it for whatever stupidfuck reason, it wouldn’t be just China that bomb Jakarta, but also the rest of SEA
James E. Thorne@DrJStrategy

Food for thought. Trump’s Deal With Indonesia: Mahan at the Strait of Malacca Hu Jintao warned China about this moment more than twenty years ago. In 2003, the then Chinese president coined the phrase “Malacca dilemma” to describe a simple, brutal fact: the country’s economic rise depended on foreign oil sailing through a narrow strait that other powers could, in a crisis, choose to close. Most of China’s imported crude and gas still squeezes through that same bottleneck between Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore. The US has just moved to wire that vulnerability, and it is no accident this is happening on Donald Trump’s watch. Washington’s new Major Defense Cooperation Partnership with Indonesia is being sold in the usual diplomatic euphemisms: capacity building, maritime security, joint training. Strip away the boilerplate and you see something far sharper. The agreement’s focus on maritime domain awareness, subsurface and autonomous systems, and special forces training is about giving Indonesia and by extension the U.S. and its allies, a far richer picture of everything that moves between the Indian Ocean and the South China Sea, and greater ability to shape it in a crisis. As with Trump’s broader Indo‑Pacific posture, this is one more move to reassert the US as the pre‑eminent maritime power of the age, and to ensure China feels that reality every time a tanker clears the Strait. Hu’s “Malacca dilemma” was never only about a single shipping lane. It was about the geometry of China’s energy dependence. Oil from the Gulf and Africa has to arrive by sea. The shortest, cheapest route runs past India, through Malacca and adjacent Indonesian straits, and then up into waters where the U.S. Navy and its partners have operated for decades. A coalition that can see, track and, if necessary, interdict that flow holds a lever over China’s economy that no amount of rhetoric about multipolarity can wish away. More than a century ago, Alfred Thayer Mahan argued that sea power, fleets, chokepoints and maritime commerce, would decide the fate of great powers. The Malacca dilemma is Mahan’s theory rendered in modern energy terms: a continental power whose trade and fuel move by sea lives or dies by access to narrow maritime bottlenecks policed by others. Trump’s Indonesia move is pure Mahan: rather than chasing dominance on land, Washington is tightening its grip on the sea lanes and straits through which China’s economic lifeblood must flow. Beijing has spent two decades trying to escape this trap with pipelines from Central Asia and Russia, a corridor through Myanmar and a “string of pearls” of ports from Gwadar to Djibouti. Yet the volumes tell a less reassuring story: overland routes move at the margin, while the bulk of China’s energy still comes by tanker and still passes through Southeast Asian chokepoints. The dilemma has been managed, not resolved. That is why Indonesia matters. Jakarta insists it is not choosing sides and will continue to balance between Washington and Beijing. It doesn’t have to do more than that for this pact to bite. As Indonesian officers train with American counterparts and integrate U.S.‑supplied surveillance and patrol systems, the operational environment quietly changes. Chinese planners contemplating a crisis over Taiwan, the South China Sea or even a clash around Hormuz now have to assume that traffic through Malacca and its alternatives will unfold under a web of sensors and partnerships that lean, in practice if not in rhetoric, toward Washington. Another move by President Trump, in other words. From rebuilding American shipyards to pouring money into Indo‑Pacific maritime forces, the pattern is clear: the United States intends to remain a maritime superpower, and to make China live with Hu Jintao’s old nightmare instead of escaping it. Mahan would have recognised the logic instantly: in the end, it is the power that commands the sea, and the straits, that sets the terms for everyone else.

English
66
372
2.1K
80.6K
Anti
Anti@Antiverta·
@Artoria2e5 @bolckAshley There has to be a proper balance and I believe that the Singaporean Model should be replicated in 大路 otherwise we will just be foolishly unleashing the 3rd 軍閥時代。
English
0
0
0
47
Mingye Wang 4.0.1(已九价)🏳️‍⚧️🌻
@Antiverta @bolckAshley well, to the average citizen, what are they good for as political parties if they only appear at the highest levels? at that pop% you don't feel their presence in everyday life, only a vague idea of some highly selective clubs of intellectuals and descendants of someone important
English
3
0
0
90
Anti
Anti@Antiverta·
@Artoria2e5 @bolckAshley I agree that the Princelings should have to actually work for office but didn't most of them got sidelined?
English
0
0
0
43
CFC LoneFan
CFC LoneFan@CfcLonefan·
@BRICSinfo The US just pulled the plug on China's favourite energy hack. This is going to get messy
English
4
0
7
3.1K
BRICS News
BRICS News@BRICSinfo·
JUST IN: 🇺🇸🇨🇳 US Treasury Secretary Bessent says China will no longer be able to get oil from Iran.
BRICS News tweet mediaBRICS News tweet media
English
3.3K
3.9K
19.8K
1.4M
Anti
Anti@Antiverta·
@HouseDemocrats The economy isn't going to be bad forever, we must first remove this blight like a surgeon to a dying system. The status quo is nothing but a second gilided age. We made it through the Great Depression and made America Great. We need to do the same and clean off this posion.
English
0
0
0
18
Anti
Anti@Antiverta·
@HouseDemocrats We have been propping up ponzi shemes and unsustainable bubbles for years. Our poorest state has a higher GDP per capita than Western Europe yet we don't experience the same social welfare as them. The house of cards must topple with the total dismantlement of this system.
English
1
0
0
19
House Democrats
House Democrats@HouseDemocrats·
Donald Trump is driving the American economy into the ground.
English
2.2K
854
7.3K
188.6K
Anti
Anti@Antiverta·
@PamphletsY Aw man not again. How many Spanish Civil Wars are gonna happen again? Well you can't have a proper timeline without a Spanish Civil War I guess.
English
1
0
10
2.8K
Civixplorer
Civixplorer@Civixplorer·
Interesting fact: There are more Mongolians in Chinese Inner Mongolia than in Mongolia itself.
Civixplorer tweet media
English
68
109
1.3K
192.8K
RTC
RTC@Roblox_RTC·
Roblox is releasing Roblox Kids (under 9), Roblox Select (9-15), and the standard Roblox (16+). This will roll out in early June and change how parental control works on that platform. Roblox Kids (<9) will have: - access to games with a Minimal or Mild content maturity label. - all communication disabled by default. Parents have the option to enable chat, however, it will be restricted to Trusted Friends & users under 13. Party chat will be unavailable. - a distinctive blue background. Roblox Select (9-15) will have: - access to games with a Minimal, Mild, or Moderate content maturity label. - for ages 9-12, users will have access to see experience chat, but unless a parent permits their child to use chat in-game, it is not enabled by default. If doing so, they can chat with users under 16 & Trusted Friends. They can use Party Chat for Trusted Friends or a group of six after receiving parental consent. Parents have the option to turn this off. - for ages 13-15, chat is enabled by default, text and voice chat options are also available. Users can chat with ages 9-17 or Trusted Friends. - a distinctive visual treatment indicating account type. Roblox (16+) will have: - Visibility into friends, screen time, and spending until the user has reached the age of adulthood, which is 18. - Chat is on by default, unless banned in your region. - All content maturity labels, excluding Restricted. Users will automatically transition from Roblox Kids -> Roblox Select -> Roblox upon reaching the proper age. Roblox will not allow Roblox Kids & Select to feature games with sensitive issues, social hangouts, or free-form drawing games; however, parents can approve specific games that are otherwise unavailable to their child.
RTC tweet mediaRTC tweet media
English
1.9K
1.4K
23.4K
5.3M
Anti
Anti@Antiverta·
Russia wasn't following the continental system, and Russia posed a existantial threat to the Order that Napoleon was building. Therefore the invasion of Russia was militarily justified and reasonable. It was just that Napoleon sought a quick knockout of the Russians but the Russians didn't want to engage in fights with Napoleon while sorching their lands so Napoleon's troops can't resupply through local sources. Napoleon lost because he didn't think long term or about logistics. But invading Russia was a good idea in a strategic standpoint. If Russia had lost and conceded, then Napoleon can turn west secure the rest of Spain and maintain this continential system and eventually the British would just give up. Napoleon would had secured his Empire and holdings.
English
2
0
14
1.1K
Anti
Anti@Antiverta·
@NXT4EU Anything but adding Turkey to the EU
English
0
0
0
62
NXT EU
NXT EU@NXT4EU·
This is the European Union in 2050. The strongest country in the world.
NXT EU tweet media
English
358
232
2.4K
250.6K
Global Index
Global Index@TheGlobal_Index·
There are no Apple Stores in Africa 😳
Global Index tweet media
English
58
36
706
40K