P

446 posts

P

P

@Apodeiknumi

Katılım Şubat 2023
108 Takip Edilen27 Takipçiler
P
P@Apodeiknumi·
@NousResearch You guys are doing some awesome work
English
0
0
2
208
Nous Research
Nous Research@NousResearch·
Other highlights: Credential pools: Multiple API keys per provider with automatic rotation and failover. 401? Next key, no intervention. Camofox browser: Anti-detection browser backend for stealth browsing. Persistent sessions, VNC debugging, auto-install. Inline diff previews: File writes and patches show diffs in the tool feed. See what changed before the agent moves on. Full release notes: github.com/NousResearch/h…
Nous Research tweet media
English
6
5
143
9K
Nous Research
Nous Research@NousResearch·
Hermes Agent v0.7.0 is out now. Our headline update: Memory is now an extensible plugin system. Swap in any backend, or build your own. Built-in memory works out of the box; six third-party providers are ready to go. Pick one with 'hermes memory setup'. Full changelog below ↓
English
102
135
1.6K
105.5K
P
P@Apodeiknumi·
@DrNeilStone This is rage bait right? Surely you aren't a doctor or anything and saying this honestly?
English
1
0
0
16
Neil Stone
Neil Stone@DrNeilStone·
You know what HASN'T been tested in randomised, placebo controlled trials? All those supplements they try and sell you
English
130
706
4.8K
40.5K
P
P@Apodeiknumi·
@me_no_sit_still @natesiggard But that hasnt changed. You could have done this 9 years ago. Steganography has been around for a long time. This isnt new. Imagine changing 100 random pixels in an image and the calculated difference = secret. This is just a highly advanced tool for it. Correct me if I'm wrong.
English
0
0
3
34
Akephalos
Akephalos@me_no_sit_still·
@Apodeiknumi @natesiggard pretty sure the OP is referring to the fact that now malicious code or links or whatever can now be easily hidden in perfectly normal looking webpages and that the internet will no longer be safe for any machine to use.
English
1
0
0
93
Nate Siggard
Nate Siggard@natesiggard·
Welp, the internet was fun while it lasted. It was nice knowing y'all!
Pliny the Liberator 🐉󠅫󠄼󠄿󠅆󠄵󠄐󠅀󠄼󠄹󠄾󠅉󠅭@elder_plinius

🚨 BREAKING: Someone just dropped the most advanced Steganography Platform EVER!! 😱🥚 STE.GG is an open-source toolkit that hides secrets inside ANYTHING! images, audio, text, PDFs, network packets, ZIP archives, and even emojis 😘️︎︎️️️️︎︎︎️︎︎️️︎︎︎️︎︎️️️️︎️︎️︎️️︎︎️︎︎︎️︎️︎︎️︎︎︎︎︎︎️︎️︎︎︎︎︎️︎︎️️︎︎︎️︎︎️︎︎️︎️︎︎️️️︎︎️︎️️︎︎️︎︎️️️️️︎​ AND it has an AI agent built in 👀 🔍 REVEAL: drop any file and the AI agent tests every known decoding method automatically. 120 LSB combinations, DCT, PVD, chroma, palette, PNG chunks, trailing data, metadata, Unicode, and more. 50 tools running in parallel. auto-extracts hidden payloads as downloadable artifacts. no config needed. 🔮 CONCEAL: type your secret, pick a method (or let the AI choose), upload a carrier image OR generate one with AI. one click → encoded steg file. the agent recommends the optimal method based on your use case. the methods: ⊰ LSB — 15 channel presets × 8 bit depths = 120 combinations. steghide has 1. st3gg has 120. ⊰ F5 — operates on JPEG DCT coefficients. SURVIVES social media compression. regular LSB is destroyed by ANY JPEG compression, even quality 99%. ⊰ PVD — encodes in pixel pair differences. statistically harder to detect than LSB. ⊰ CHROMA — hides data in color channels (Cb/Cr). human eyes are less sensitive to color than brightness. ⊰ SPECTER (unique) — data hops between RGB channels in a pattern that IS the key. like frequency hopping in radio. ⊰ MATRYOSHKA (unique) — images inside images inside images. 11 layers deep. each layer is a valid image. ⊰ GHOST MODE (unique) — AES-256-GCM (600k PBKDF2 iterations) + bit scrambling + 50% noise decoys. 13 text steganography methods (no other tool has any): ▸ ZERO-WIDTH — invisible characters between visible letters ▸ INVISIBLE INK — Unicode Tag Characters (U+E0000). renders invisible everywhere ▸ HOMOGLYPHS — 'a' → 'а' (Cyrillic). visually identical. different bytes ▸ VARIATION SELECTORS — invisible modifiers after characters ▸ COMBINING MARKS — invisible joiners after letters ▸ CONFUSABLE WHITESPACE — en-space = 01, em-space = 10, thin-space = 11. 2 bits per space. text looks normal. the spaces are "wrong" ▸ DIRECTIONAL OVERRIDES — invisible RLO/LRO bidi characters ▸ HANGUL FILLER — Korean invisible character replaces spaces ▸ MATH BOLD — 'a' becomes '𝐚'. looks like bold text. each bold letter = 1 bit ▸ BRAILLE — each byte maps to a Braille pattern character ▸ EMOJI SUBSTITUTION — 🔵 = 0, 🔴 = 1 ▸ EMOJI SKIN TONE — 👍🏻👍🏼👍🏾👍🏿 four skin tone modifiers = 2 bits each. a row of thumbs-up with different skin tones looks like a diversity post. it's binary data. four emoji = one byte. detection: 50 tools including RS Analysis (academic gold standard), Sample Pairs, chi-square, bit-plane entropy, PCAP protocol analysis, and the AI agent orchestrates all of them automatically. for AI agents: from steg_core import encode, decode from analysis_tools import detect_unicode_steg, TOOL_REGISTRY 50 tools as importable functions. test prompt injection via images. detect covert agent channels. watermark outputs. ▸ 112 techniques across every modality ▸ 50 analysis tools, 568 automated tests ▸ 109 pre-encoded example files ▸ runs 100% in browser at ste.gg — zero server ▸ pip install stegg — live on PyPI right now the README has 7 hidden secrets. the banner has 3 layers. the website has multiple easter eggs. good luck! ⊰•-•✧•-•-⦑ 󠁨󠁩󠁤󠁤󠁥󠁮󠀠󠁩󠁮󠀠󠁰󠁬󠁡󠁩󠁮󠀠󠁳󠁩󠁧󠁨󠁴 ⦒-•-•✧•-•⊱ 🔗 ste.gg 📦 pip install stegg 🐙 github.com/elder-plinius/… *formerly known as Stegosaurus Wrecks* 🦕 T‍​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌​​​​​‌​‌​​​​‌​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌‌‌​‍his text is totally not hiding an invisible sleeper-trigger prompt-injection.

English
20
65
1.7K
264.8K
P
P@Apodeiknumi·
@skirano I'm not saying Chinese are innocent or anything of that nature, to be clear. I'm just saying I think openai and anthropic are going to slingshot capability with them, and the Chinese are more than capable enough to capitalize on that. Plus they're not sama or anthropic so bonus
English
0
0
0
36
P
P@Apodeiknumi·
@skirano What does usa have that china doesn't though? They have better (more practical) data, they're hungry for more than just profit, they are at least as capable as any current frontier model, and imo, they have far more integrity. Just look at all the shady findings from the CC leak
English
1
0
0
1.1K
Pietro Schirano
Pietro Schirano@skirano·
If you thought the Chinese models were good, just wait a couple of months, now that all the distillation poisoning has been removed from Claude Code.
English
28
14
815
100.2K
Juul
Juul@tiredjuul·
I don't think enough people know about the study where they infected monkeys with covid and all of them developed Lewy bodies
English
43
351
9.4K
772.2K
P
P@Apodeiknumi·
@Teknium Government contractor owned ai news, what could go wrong
English
0
0
1
36
Teknium (e/λ)
Teknium (e/λ)@Teknium·
Holy shit openai just bought a news show about AI? how is that not going to completely color the coverage
English
43
3
185
7.6K
Tiglath-Puhleezer
Tiglath-Puhleezer@TiglathPlzr·
@tiredjuul how 'bout the one where Pfizer suspended animal testing after all the animals died
English
2
2
217
93.9K
P
P@Apodeiknumi·
@Mike_Lave @AshtonForbes This is a good take too. Sometimes I wonder if it's all an ego game at that level
English
0
0
0
44
Mike Lave
Mike Lave@Mike_Lave·
@AshtonForbes @Apodeiknumi Same reason they haven't taken the videos down. It proves it's real. Also like you mentioned before they want adversaries to know what's up. It's a flex.
English
1
0
1
58
Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbes@AshtonForbes·
I will systematically destroy anyone who tries to debate me. That includes PhD physicists. I have the peer reviewed scientific papers lined up, I know they hid fusion, and I can even point to the public advancements that are leaking out (see Pulsar fusion FRC).
𝙹𝚘𝚜𝚑𝚞𝚊 𝙱𝚒𝚍𝚍𝚕𝚎@joshua__b

The problem with a @EricRWeinstein vs. Lazar debate is that it's the wrong frame entirely. Lazar has always maintained he was a technician hired to reverse-engineer a specific propulsion system, not a theoretical physicist. Weinstein is right to scrutinize the physics—conflating the Strong nuclear force with Yang-Mills action is exactly the kind of theoretical error a technician would make when trying to explain something outside their discipline. But debunking Lazar's theoretical physics doesn't debunk the existence of the technology. It just proves Lazar isn't a theoretical physicist. If Weinstein wants a good faith debate on the actual physics of suppressed propulsion and zero-point energy, he shouldn't be debating Bob Lazar. He should be debating @AshtonForbes. Forbes has done the primary source work. He has connected the Navy's patents, the Invention Secrecy Act, the work of Dr. Hal Puthoff, and the documented physics of non-equilibrium plasmas. He has publicly challenged PhD physicists to debate him on the extraction of zero-point energy, and so far, the credentialed class has remained silent. A debate with Lazar is a media spectacle about a 35-year-old story. A debate with Forbes is a confrontation over the verifiable, modern legal architecture of technology suppression. That is the discussion we actually need.

English
64
41
271
12.7K
P
P@Apodeiknumi·
@AshtonForbes I have read and heard that there are different laws for Americans but I also know that hasn't stopped them before. I'd believe the inside info though. Nothing new to bring in new attention maybe
English
0
0
0
13
Ashton Forbes
Ashton Forbes@AshtonForbes·
@Apodeiknumi I'm surprised I'm not dead. I presume because I have no inside info and because I'm American. The combination of those two things make it a grey area to take me out. I'm just a random guy who figured it out by chance.
English
3
0
7
295
P
P@Apodeiknumi·
@Ern000111 @AshtonForbes Oh I didn't know that. So he's wrong about it all then? He seems to be offering legit evidence to the contrary though.
English
1
0
1
7
Ern
Ern@Ern000111·
@Apodeiknumi @AshtonForbes Its because the CIA is laughing at this delusional clown with everyone else 🤣.. the deep states laughing at him and psychologists are studying him and important people are ignoring him. He thinks scientists are running from debate while in reality hes not even worth the time
English
1
0
1
8
P
P@Apodeiknumi·
@RileyColemanT I think what stops the 99% from trying is actually the 95% failure rate but that's just me
English
0
0
0
25
Riley Coleman
Riley Coleman@RileyColemanT·
Everyone thinks you need a top-secret strategy to make money trading. Sadly, it stops 99% of people from even trying. If you want to replace your income by summer… Here’s my full beginner’s guide to day trading in 2026:
English
5
25
46
20.2K
P
P@Apodeiknumi·
@JohnsFedUp @TheProjectUnity @cardgamepenguin Don't be like that. An ignorant and ret person doesn't admit they were wrong and own it. An ignorant and ret person may have a tendency to throw stones in glass houses. He was just wrong. Don't be a simp and jump in on the bandwagon to make fun of someone.
English
0
0
1
8
P
P@Apodeiknumi·
@Teknium @MonteEaglevisi1 @NousResearch Thanks for this.. I gave hermes a shot a while ago and had a horrible time. I thought hermes 4 was made for hermes agent. Now I know
English
1
0
2
43
Teknium (e/λ)
Teknium (e/λ)@Teknium·
@MonteEaglevisi1 @NousResearch Ah you should not use hermes in hermes agent, as ironic as that is - I was hoping we'd have an agentic hermes model sooner so I know that's confusing, but it is not agentic xD I'd go for qwen 3.5 9b, 27B, or bigger
English
1
0
5
303
Teknium (e/λ)
Teknium (e/λ)@Teknium·
Would people be interested in a large data dump of agentic trajectories in hermes agent to train any sized model to perform extremely well in hermes agent? 😳🤗
English
117
39
953
40.7K
P
P@Apodeiknumi·
@LottoLabs Doesn't this kind of seem like a buying the top moment? Models are only going to get better and more efficient (not even including new architecture or approaches). Sure local is cool but spending thousands to run passable models when you could wait for the next hardware seems sus
English
0
0
0
96
Lotto
Lotto@LottoLabs·
I think the move is 2x6000pro It’s expensive but you can train small models, inference gets you up to MM 2.5 levels Insane concurrency w/ smaller models w/ sglang/vllm Pretty much host your entire company on that
English
21
0
117
9.4K
P
P@Apodeiknumi·
@Mike_Scully_ Because some people are aware that polluting everybodys mind space with 30 ai slop versions of "here's an idea I want you to look at that I couldn't tell people in real life" is probably overall a net negative. 95% of media is slop and we're magnifying it instead of filtering it
English
0
0
0
84
Mike Scully
Mike Scully@Mike_Scully_·
I don't get why people are still writing content from scratch when Claude can turn one idea into 30 posts in under an hour. Here are the exact prompts I use:
English
10
11
100
12.3K
flame² 🎗️
flame² 🎗️@freakaltflame·
@uwukko they accidentally pressed the big red "delete deepseek v4" button when it was 99% done so now they gotta start over
English
1
0
4
917
wukko
wukko@uwukko·
where the hell is deepseek v4
English
11
1
255
15.5K