Guercino

168 posts

Guercino

Guercino

@AppetitiveFruit

“It weren’t gangsta if you didn’t regret it”

Katılım Aralık 2016
243 Takip Edilen12 Takipçiler
Gay Interrupted
Gay Interrupted@TwinkTheory·
@RedNortheast Yes if it’s in a retirement account she actually is broke she cannot touch any of that without taking a massive penalty
English
2
0
3
1.3K
Gay Interrupted
Gay Interrupted@TwinkTheory·
In the grand scheme of life this is broke, you could last what… 6 months maybe if you lost your job on 30K? If you’re lucky. And if you own a home you’d probably still lose it. 30K wouldn’t even save you in a serious medical emergency. I think most people don’t realize how little money they truly have and it’s the vast vast majority of people
‏ؘ@helllojojo

my coworker told me she’s broke and then mentioned that she has 30k in her tax free savings account

English
99
87
2.3K
533.1K
Guercino
Guercino@AppetitiveFruit·
@joeybeastmarket Possibly the worst takeaway you can have from that experience
English
0
0
1
389
Moongazer
Moongazer@joeybeastmarket·
I was not popular in high school and had a general anger and resentment and jealousy toward the more popular kids which was obviously just insecurity projection (which was why I was a loser and so on and so forth) and after college I’d run into those people at parties or in the city or wherever and every time they were kind and thoughtful and funny and had a depth I’d genuinely convinced myself was impossible. They had no clue I truly believed they hated me and that I had hated them. They were just normal people and I would get this crazy guilt like I’ve expended real energy thinking negatively about this guy and he’s being nice to me because I was just wrong the whole time. That experience forever changed my outlook to realize the people low on the totem pole in society actually completely deserve their status and misery as it is entirely self afflicted
RiverOaksGuy@Bowtiedplayer

The original proto-red pill for me is when I noticed that the in-crowd popular ones in high school actually were the nice ones and were happy as I got more successful

English
133
214
6.7K
539.7K
Guercino
Guercino@AppetitiveFruit·
Worlds easiest SPY short on Monday but I’m a pussy
English
0
0
0
18
Guercino
Guercino@AppetitiveFruit·
Very unusual to see a fully clothed baby Jesus (Raphael, 1504-1505)
Guercino tweet media
English
0
0
0
16
Guercino
Guercino@AppetitiveFruit·
@QiaochuYuan Every brand swings between under and overrated
English
0
0
1
254
QC
QC@QiaochuYuan·
overall sentiment wrt anthropic seems to have gotten much, much worse than i remember (from 6 months ago or whenever). what happened???
English
34
0
131
27.8K
Guercino
Guercino@AppetitiveFruit·
@DaftSaf This is what happens when you impose artificial scarcity on the MD degree
English
0
0
5
1.1K
Saf
Saf@DaftSaf·
Whoever decided med students need to do research to be doctors need to publicly shamed
English
44
607
5.5K
191.9K
Guercino
Guercino@AppetitiveFruit·
@owl_posting Even if we managed to solve the insider trading risk, I suspect it may still harm trial integrity if patients tracked these markets (a minority of wealthy and well connected patients already do a version of this)
English
0
0
1
316
owl
owl@owl_posting·
the platonic ideal of a clinical trial prediction market is clearly good, and the realistic implementation of one is clearly evil. it likely will happen anyway and make the founders very wealthy, but its good to stay on the right side of history for things like this
English
7
3
87
8.1K
Guercino
Guercino@AppetitiveFruit·
@RojaGarimella Who do you think wins the cost/benefit tradeoff
English
1
1
2
7.6K
Roja Garimella, MD
Roja Garimella, MD@RojaGarimella·
in med school i spent a few weeks rotating at a top ICU in Germany it made me appreciate how strong clinical care is at major academic medical centers in the states the uncomfortable reality: US healthcare is best in the world if you ignore affordability
English
80
70
2K
164.9K
Guercino
Guercino@AppetitiveFruit·
The best thing you can do for yourself is buy a physical calendar
English
0
0
0
20
Sam 👁️
Sam 👁️@SamtheNightOwl·
@poisonjr guess it depends. i'm doing a master's rn as a career change and in my case, it's the most effective way to attain my goal
English
2
0
61
8.1K
Guercino
Guercino@AppetitiveFruit·
@iScienceLuvr @endpointarena It’s a good thing that this type of speculation remains hidden. you don’t want patients checking a prediction market ticker mid-treatment, it totally corrupts both active and placebo arms. you also don’t want pharma manipulating their trial designs for markets more than they do
English
1
0
2
149
Guercino
Guercino@AppetitiveFruit·
@buccocapital I think Claude’s default tone and style is closer to yours (and most real people’s). It’s so much more natural
English
0
0
0
32
BuccoCapital Bloke
BuccoCapital Bloke@buccocapital·
I uploaded like a year of my writing to ChatGPT and Claude and asked them both to generate instructions to write like me ChatGPT output is legitimate trash. Garbage slop that is clearly written by AI Claude? It literally writes just like me. Pretty unbelievable
English
127
38
1.8K
137.4K
spor
spor@sporadica·
@ITangoI @plantmath1 no but like this is why it won the Oscars isn’t it? politics.
English
21
0
26
8.9K
The Brazen Head of Ella McCay
One Battle After another review: "All major world events, all display of political passions and public display of religion, all avowals of principles and identity feels like this to me now…like trying to start a car without gas…and trying to convince others in order to convince themselves…" @bronzeagemantis
Ann Coulter@AnnCoulter

Liel Leibovitz in the Free Press: "As a work of art, One Battle After Another is irredeemable. It feels like the sort of thing written by a committee of socialist college sophomores cracking each other up ... "Paul Thomas Anderson seems interested more in purring for his fellow progressives than in making interesting movies ..."

English
2
9
131
21.5K
Guercino
Guercino@AppetitiveFruit·
@JoePostingg The could have brief moments of sentience during inference
English
0
0
0
13
Joe
Joe@JoePostingg·
The fact that LLMs are stateless and have no memory (every prompt you send includes your entire chat history) suggests to me they probably don't have subjective experience.
English
144
83
2.6K
123.5K
Guercino
Guercino@AppetitiveFruit·
@tszzl Why would anyone retract their statements when these are *additions* to the original agreed upon contract? If anything it proves that the original contract was indeed too lax about domestic surveillance
English
0
0
2
75
roon
roon@tszzl·
im sure everyone will be very fair and give this the credit it deserves and publicly retract their previous statements and apply the appropriate burden of evidence
Sam Altman@sama

Here is re-post of an internal post: We have been working with the DoW to make some additions in our agreement to make our principles very clear. 1. We are going to amend our deal to add this language, in addition to everything else: "• Consistent with applicable laws, including the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, National Security Act of 1947, FISA Act of 1978, the AI system shall not be intentionally used for domestic surveillance of U.S. persons and nationals. • For the avoidance of doubt, the Department understands this limitation to prohibit deliberate tracking, surveillance, or monitoring of U.S. persons or nationals, including through the procurement or use of commercially acquired personal or identifiable information." It’s critical to protect the civil liberties of Americans, and there was so much focus on this, that we wanted to make this point especially clear, including around commercially acquired information. Just like everything we do with iterative deployment, we will continue to learn and refine as we go. I think this is an important change; our team and the DoW team did a great job working on it. 2. The Department also affirmed that our services will not be used by Department of War intelligence agencies (for example, the NSA). Any services to those agencies would require a follow-on modification to our contract. 3. For extreme clarity: we want to work through democratic processes. It should be the government making the key decisions about society. We want to have a voice, and a seat at the table where we can share our expertise, and to fight for principles of liberty. But we are clear on how the system works (because a lot of people have asked, if I received what I believed was an unconstitutional order, of course I would rather go to jail than follow it). But 4. There are many things the technology just isn’t ready for, and many areas we don’t yet understand the tradeoffs required for safety. We will work through these, slowly, with the DoW, with technical safeguards and other methods. 5. One thing I think I did wrong: we shouldn't have rushed to get this out on Friday. The issues are super complex, and demand clear communication. We were genuinely trying to de-escalate things and avoid a much worse outcome, but I think it just looked opportunistic and sloppy. Good learning experience for me as we face higher-stakes decisions in the future. In my conversations over the weekend, I reiterated that Anthropic should not be designated as a SCR, and that we hope the DoW offers them the same terms we’ve agreed to. We will host an All Hands tomorrow morning to answer more questions.

English
228
19
829
122.5K