Aradhna Krishna
480 posts
@AradhnaKrishna
Prof. @MichiganRoss. Observer, researcher, writer, professor, who ponders puzzles on the senses, consumption, health, equity issues. Hiker, cook, friend.
Join us in congratulating our Communicator of the Year Award recipients! The award recognizes the extraordinary dedication of USC Dornsife scholars for their success educating and engaging the public.
I'm thrilled to announce the new Psych Science editor team! We'll start handling manuscripts on Jan 1, 2024. Check us out here: psychologicalscience.org/publications/p… We're spread across 15 countries in 5 continents 🌍🌎🌏 Here’s a thread to introduce the team!
Consider for instance the standard pattern of “risk aversion” (e.g., people prefer a certain $50 to a 50% chance of $100). This pattern is traditionally explained by diminishing marginal sensitivity... but might also in part reflect a devaluation of the "uncertain $100"! 8/N
Received an invitation to review a manuscript I rejected for another journal where I gave tons of in-depth comments. The authors have taken exactly 0 of my remarks into account. Should I reject and send the same remarks? Decline to review (because of higher-order reasons)? Other?
@scottcowley If the papers were independently developed and it's a good paper, accept it. We can have more than one paper on a thing and the incentives from rewarding fast work over careful work are not good. This goes triple if the paper was already pretty strong in the first round.
