
A
122 posts


@Spartan___X @adam_adamdnm @sahouraxo With keys to the Mediterranean and north if Africa, nearest ports to the us and the doorway into Europe. The us has plenty of bases in that country for a reason. Again showing illiteracy with pride, nice.
English

@ArcticAlex @adam_adamdnm @sahouraxo Spain is the NATO member country that spends the least on defense as a percentage of its gross domestic product. A bad customer, not useful.
English

@Spartan___X @adam_adamdnm @sahouraxo The US needs NATO way harder. Who they gonna sell all their weapons to?
English

@Swiftied65 @NewJuntti76 @sahouraxo Google "triffin dilemma". Educate yourself. Your country does not produce anything but new units of money. You are obligated to permanently be under trade deficits with every country on earth.
English

@NewJuntti76 @sahouraxo Well said we are done being fucked by the eu on trade then expected to pay for their defense !
English

@BGON23 @sahouraxo You broke, 40T in debt soon to have interest on your debt surpassing defense budget.
You have no levers just a money printer making all of y'all poorer via debasement
English

@sahouraxo The US has all the leverage over Spain.
The US has a huge economic lever they can use.
Spain doesn’t have any levers they can use.
They need us more than we need them.
English

@adam_adamdnm @sahouraxo NATO is a defensive alliance, the US is the aggressor in this conflict. Read a book every once in a while.
English

@sahouraxo Really shows what a failure NATO really is
Spain is a joke remember this when America is need for something . I would close our markets to them . Let's see who needs who .
English

@gracie_kim_x @sahouraxo At last, taking the mask off and showing up as what you really are, terrorist organisation invading countries on a whim
English

@sahouraxo Sure no problem we will just own Spain next. Not like your loser country can do anything about it if we decide to do that.
English

@Gulfgipper40 @sahouraxo NATO is a defensive alliance you retard. The US is the aggressor.
English

@sahouraxo What’s the point of NATO if you won’t help the U.S. out when THEY need it? If the U.S. cuts its funding, NATO goes under.
English

@BoCarter_US @RapidResponse47 @POTUS You can't create complete databases of your individual citizens with the help of surveillance ai if they're not somehow registered. Think harder, cheating elections will be just as easy as it was without it. You'll never know anyway.
English

@RapidResponse47 @POTUS Voter ID gold standard ends fraud forever. Patriots, fight like hell for America's wins.
English

.@POTUS: "The only reason you vote against voter ID is because you want to cheat — there's no other reason." 💯
English

@DBATTAGLIAYtube Veo que tambien te ha inspirado Hugh Hendry, fue muy muy bueno su articulo
Español

La fuerza que movió a Bitcoin de $1 a $126 mil en 15 años. Es la misma fuerza que lo movera al $1.000.000
La corrección de Bitcoin no es que Bitcoin este fallando.
El que falla es el humano porque es nuestra naturaleza.
Bitcoin es doloroso, porque se hace fuerte en la negatividad. No todos los humanos estan cableados para sacar lo mejor del dolor.
La realidad cínica: es que a la sociedad le gustan los sistemas que pueden hacer trampa. Amamos los sistemas que pueden salvarnos si hace falta bajo cualquier circunstancia.
En cambio a Bitcoin no le importa tu sufrimiento o su precio.
Solo los fuertes sobreviven lo suficiente para merecer el beneficio que trae la verdad en un sistema que ama la mentira.

Español

@georgecat90 @wallstwolverine Entiendes que la censura la aplicará el partido que no te guste en algún momento del futuro no? Regalando tus derechos no se llega muy lejos.
Español

@wallstwolverine Habla de las redes sociales que los millonarios se compran para controlar el relato y censurar, por ejemplo, a todo el que vea justa la ejecucion de nazis como Kirk? 😊
Español

@1basemoney I know you want it to be that way. Evidence seem to set a different trail however.
English

In this debate about who Epstein worked for, or who funded his extortion work, I see *practically no one* shining a light on his obvious Russian links who claims he was only a Russian spy.
This is not the case when the question comes to Israel. Why?
Jared🗡@NaturalHierarch
To be absolutely clear, he did have significant Israeli connections and was a jew but that doesn't mean he didn't work for Russia or Russia and Israel.
English

@alberto_mera Hola Alberto, estoy intentando aceptar Bitcoin como forma de pago en mi negocio, pero no se como llegar a otros Bitcoiners para hacerles saber que pueden pagar en Bitcoin, y ademas con descuento. Podrias darme algun consejo para alcanzarles? No puedo enviarte DMs 😅
Español

Trabajé años como Project Manager y puedo confirmar que es un puesto que fácilmente podría hacer una Roomba bien programada. No me extrañaría que por aquí se perdiera mucho empleo (y se ganase productividad).
katexbt.hl@katexbt
It's over. It's literally over. Weeks, not years, are running out for the average PM and medior.
Español

@ChifoiCristian Time to take your slice of humble pie, you've been wrong since losing ATH, so be open to any and all possibilities
English

@realBigBrainAI Right. How exactly does this dream world fit on a 120% debt-to-GDP world?
English

Jonathan Ross, Founder and CEO of AI chip company Groq, offers a contrarian view: AI won't destroy jobs, it will create a labour shortage.
He outlines three things that will happen because of AI:
First, massive deflationary pressure.
"This cup of coffee is going to cost less. Your housing is going to cost less. Everything is going to cost less."
He explains this will happen through robots farming coffee more efficiently and better supply chain management, meaning people will need less money.
Second, people will opt out of the economy.
"They're going to work fewer hours. They're going to work fewer days a week, and they're going to work fewer years. They're going to retire earlier because they're going to be able to support their lifestyle working less."
Third, entirely new jobs and industries will emerge.
Jonathan points to history as evidence:
"Think about 100 years ago. 98% of the workforce in the United States was in agriculture. When we were able to reduce that to 2%, we found things for those other 98% of the population to do."
He continues:
"The jobs that are going to exist 100 years from now, we can't even contemplate."
Software developers didn't exist a century ago. In another century, they won't exist either, "because everyone's going to be vibe coding."
The same applies to influencers, a career that would have been unthinkable 100 years ago but now earns people millions.
His conclusion: deflationary pressure, workforce opt-outs, and new industries we can't yet imagine will combine to create one outcome...
"We're not going to have enough people."
English

@TheBTCTherapist I am scared of quantum, so let me sell my very intricate hash money for windows 95 money
English


@JoshMandell6 But privacy is also the ethos of Bitcoin. If they don't disclose their wallet addresses, and their investors accept the fact, what is the problem with that? Not invested in MSTR, just sharing my thought. Have a great day!
English

NO. This is the actual opposite of reality. It takes a lot of work to become a bank, and banks operate under severe restrictions and really tight regs. Strategy, itself, warns investors (in the fine print) that it isn't held to thNo, this is the exact opposite of reality. Becoming a bank takes a lot of work, and banks operate under strict regulations and tight restrictions. Strategy clearly warns investors in the fine print that it isn’t held to ETF standards either, which require a level of transparency that Strategy refused to offer when I first asked about on-chain tracking, proof of reserves, and proof of control over wallet addresses. The dashboard includes a small note about this if you look closely, but you have to dig deeper for more clarity. My only question is, why all the secrecy—what’s there to hide? The false claims about the risks of publishing public wallet addresses are pure Bitcoin FUD; Bitcoin was built to allow the publication of public keys without risking private key exposure.
"We are not required to provide daily transparency as to our bitcoin holdings or our NAV" --> sure they spoon feed us they own calculation of NAV, but they aren't REQUIRED to, so nobody has the right to take them to court in an attempt to get access to the books and records themselves. Nobody has the right to DEMAND publication of public wallet addresses. Nobody has the right to demand that they simply prove that they actually control these wallets.
Craig Wright tried to claim that he was Satoshi Nakamoto, but he couldn't send one single Bitcoin from the Satoshi wallet(s). It's not enough to publish the wallet IDs (which they won't do). You have to show that you have control of the wallet IDs.
I am sorry, but this is the ethos with which Bitcoin was created. I don't want to be the bad guy, questioning anyone's hand in liars' poker, but I am calling "CHALLENGE". If you're a good guy, you don't force people to even ask these questions. You don't ask us to trust you, bro.

Informed Volume@InformedVolume
@JoshMandell6 Market needs to realize it’s not just some $BTC treasury company, it’s actually a bank Banks command mNavs between 1.5x-2x Should be a fairly easy trip back to $300 (1.5x) and then if we get some $BTC price improvement and positive sentiment flip we could trade up to 2-2.5x
English

@jluiscava José Luis, no me digas que te crees este cuento del estímulo!
Es la carta que se prepara para cuando le tiren los aranceles, la culpa será de los demócratas de no recibir el cheque
Español

Idea para los jóvenes que quieran comprar su primera VIVIENDA.
Implicaciones economía del “dividendo arancelario” y del plan de estímulo económico de 20 billones.
👉 youtu.be/msQQfxeWlCQ?si…

YouTube

Español







