Argonaut

There is eventually a fundamental difference between those who saw DAOs as a regulatory shield in uncertain times and those who saw them as the end state of coordination and transparency

@SkyEcosystem Are you sure the sky-atlas powerhouse link is working?

Sky Protocol’s decentralized buyback mechanism and parameters are defined in the Sky Atlas, as approved by Sky Ecosystem Governance. For full details, see: sky-atlas.powerhouse.io/A.3.6_Surplus_…

Last week, Sky Protocol bought back 32.3 million SKY using 1.9 million USDS. Total buybacks since the program began have now exceeded 94 million USDS.

One thing we haven’t seen discussed about @eboadom’s proposal: Does a governance proposal actually have the power to enforce an offchain IP rights transfer? What happens if the IP owners don’t want to cooperate? @aave @AaveChan

Drop the hyphen, it's cleaner

@haydenzadams Omg! He followed back. Screenshotting this for future generations. Much respect🫡😎🦄

@haydenzadams First delegate to vote, I think that deserves a follow back! 🥹

Just submitted the UNIfication proposal for temperature check 🦄 If this vote passes, the only step left is the full onchain vote snapshot.org/#/s:uniswapgov…

Today, I’m incredibly excited to make my first proposal to Uniswap governance on behalf of @Uniswap alongside @devinawalsh and @nkennethk This proposal turns on protocol fees and aligns incentives across the Uniswap ecosystem Uniswap has been my passion and singular focus for the past 8 years. What started as a small side project is now global financial infrastructure powering thousands of applications with ~$1.8 trillion in annual trading UNI launched in 2020, but for the past 5 years Labs has been unable to meaningfully participate in Uniswap governance, and has been greatly restricted in the ways it can build value for the Uniswap community. That ends today! This restriction was in great part due to a hostile regulatory environment that cost thousands of hours and tens of millions in legal fees. Fortunately, the regulatory environment has shifted This proposal comes from a strong desire to see the Uniswap protocol win as the global decentralized exchange for tokenized value At a high level, the proposal: 1. Turns on protocol fees and uses them to burn UNI 2. Sends @unichain sequencer fees to the UNI burn 3. Burns 100M UNI from the treasury representing the protocol fees that could have been burned if fees were turned on at token launch 4. Introduces Protocol Fee Discount Auctions, a new way to improve LP outcomes and internalize MEV to the protocol 5. Introduces "aggregator hooks” which will turns Uniswap v4 into an onchain aggregator that collects protocol fees on external liquidity sources 6. Focus Labs on driving protocol growth and adoption, including a contractual agreement to only pursue initiatives that align with Uniswap governance interests ^ As part of this, Labs will stop collecting fees on its interface, wallet, and API to supercharge distribution and adoption of the Uniswap protocol 7. Moves Foundation employees to Labs with a shared goal of accelerating protocol growth, under a growth fund from the treasury 8. Move governance-owned Unisocks liquidity to v4 on Unichain and burn the LP position I believe Uniswap protocol can be the primary place tokens are traded. This proposal sets the stage for the next decade of its growth @Uniswap will ship relentlessly over the coming years and supercharge the ecosystem of developers, LPs, and traders building on top I'm so grateful to the community that has made this all possible, and excited for what's next 🦄

1/ Futarchy: The Future of Governance! 🗳️ Futarchy gives voting signals AND lets you hedge your position ! With @VeloraDEX adopting @_futarchy thanks to a @SEEDGov proposal, let’s see how this works🧵

7/ Bonus🙌: Conditionally sell your position to exit a DAO if you strongly oppose a proposal or want to mitigate risks. For PIP-59, @ArgonautGov and others noted that not passing it could have legal risks for Delegates.

Arbitrum Everywhere 🌌 And now on Velora Delta 🐆 Arbitrum One is now live in our intent-based trading solution, Velora Delta. We’re excited to welcome the Arbinaut community 👩‍🚀👨‍🚀 Traders can now route and execute intents directly on Arbitrum’s fast and secure network. Powered by @Arbitrum ⚡️

The term "DAO" has been aggressively eroded over the last five years. Virtually no DAOs are decentralized or autonomous at this point (shout out to Arbitrum for bucking the trend). The Community Proposal Factory (CPF) will make it much easier for new contributors to propose ideas, thereby promoting the meritocracy that DAOs should embody, rather than relying on the social influence of the proposer. GFX will continue to fight for DAOs and token holders, regardless of the cost to us.

Excited to share that $VLR will be featured on @BinanceWallet Alpha starting September 16 🎉

Whispers become roars. $VLR is on its way 🐆

VLR is coming. The jungle is about to roar. Are you ready?

This ETH the way 🐆

@SEEDGov Governance Token Utility ⬅️

Happy Monday, Govnerds ☀️ We’re kicking off the week with fresh ideas and the drive to keep building 🧠 Which topic should we explore next? 🗳️ Vote below 👇 💬 Got another idea? Drop it in the comments.

Introducing Velora, the new era of ParaSwap. An intents-based crosschain protocol designed for fast and efficient DeFi. Trade faster. Everywhere 🐆

@paraswap 🐾

🐆

Is @arbitrumdao_gov's Gaming Catalyst Program in trouble? The "RFC: GCP Clawback" proposal by NathanVDH and @labsGFX is shaking things up, aiming to reclaim unutilized funds and restore community trust after the GCP's struggles. With major backers like Treasure DAO exiting and transparency issues looming, the proposal calls for halting non-essential spending and revoking unvested compensation. While some, like @ArgonautGov, support learning from past mistakes, others like DavidBolger emphasize the strategic importance of gaming for @arbitrumdao_gov. The community is divided, with calls for evidence, restructuring, and a more professional approach. Will this proposal be the reset @arbitrumdao_gov needs, or will it disrupt ongoing projects? The debate continues. @arbitrumdao_gov