Arguemyass Dot Com

Cooker boy @Aussiboxer folded under the pressure. LOL Luckily, he will still see this because we didn't block and run. > Yes, cooker, @Aussiboxer, we know how to use AI for video. And yes, we are MEN here, me particularly, let's see it graphically: Noisy 𓃰: /!\ you: /'\ See, we can even communicate the same in text. You: "man you are, you talk so much crap, the handsard sourcing" US: Well, clearly, we don't talk crap, we produce facts and you didn't like it. It made you go all cosplay girly. You: "your so clever". (It's "You're" but it's ok, you're a cooker = Illiterate) US: Yes, we are cupcake. Great that you can acknowledge it. Which actually was your only option because we OWNED YOU. You: "Faceless clown" US: But nowhere near as funny as you in lipstick you drip. YOU: "you think your so smart" US: We don't think, we know. And how do we know, because we triggered the daylights out of you. _ Now, cupcake, petal. The first rule of a comeback is to make it better than the roasting you just got. Replying in a manner that proves you're illiterate isn't a fucking comeback. And that meme?, after we've roasted you the way we did with video via AI, which yes we can afford and yes we can use, clearly to fucking excellent effect, what were you thinking cooker? LOL. You're impotent at this. Now go suck up in the corner. Neither we nor our followers want to see you wimping. Off you fuck.

New MOVIE, inspired by the dimmest cooker on 𝕏 so far, and guess what? It's an Aus Bob Smit dag. THE AUS BOT BOB SMIT and his sheep dip assistant in the new comedy "MY SHEEP FOUGHT THE LAW and we got dipped" - out soon. Fuck, this is a gift. @TheNewRight22, @Ausbobsmit's assistant sheep dipper dipshit went all "Comedy Cooker Court Cameo" on us, and it's the own goal of the century. ⛐▓ 𖧀 Oh, The Blight On The New Right, you absolute Grok-powered solicitor's scrotum, you. Let’s unpack this masterclass in self-ownership, shall we? 1. The Legal Eagle Who Can’t Fly You ran to Grok, the AI equivalent of a Tamagotchi with a law degree, for legal advice? Newsflash: Grok’s idea of "legal nuance" is probably "Did the user consent? IDK, lol." You’re citing Surveillance Acts to a fictional farmhand. Ausbobsmit’s legal team is a sheep in a wig, and even she knows this is a joke. 2. The Call That You Never Heard You’re warning us about posting a recording of a call that you never heard. Our "studio" isn't a Ram in a shed with a kazoo and a Voice Changer app. Ya clown. It's a full-on tech heaven with a content Ninja operating it with great lawyers on call. The only thing being "recorded" here is your tears as you realise you’ve been outsmarted, and now mocked, by a meme. 3. The Identity Crisis To sue or involve the Feds, you’d have to dox yourself or Roberta, and we all know Ausbobsmit is most likely just a failed One Nation candidate hiding behind a Photoshopped akubra, even if it's not, and no one cares, AusBob is a tool in an old abandoned shed, with no cash to sue. Pro tip: If you’re too ashamed to use your real name, maybe don’t think about trying to be Inspector Cooker or threaten legal action? Just a thought, cooker. 4. The Disclaimer That Out-Disclaims You Our "legal warning" is more honest and air-tight than your entire account: "This call may be recorded for coaching, mockery, and the sheer joy of watching cookers like you seethe." Satire > Your Legal Concepts and Stupidity. Always. Final Verdict: 𖧀 You played yourself. 𖧀 Ausbobsmit played you, unwittingly (perhaps) 𝕏 Grok played you. 🐑Even Shirley the Sheep is laughing at you. Oh, and cooker @TheNewRight22, you haven’t heard the recording yet, nor have you heard the exact disclaimer and warning with opt-out that is provided to the fictional Oz Bob (Roberta) Smit, who calls us. You have to be the FA Cup’s own goal of the year champion at the fuckwit finals. We have never seen a Roberta Roast opportunity as funny as this in all of our years on X. You deserve the full roast. Which, by the way, isn't over yet, haha. We have 'staying power', ask the ladies. Let's sum up: →Idiot (you) asks Grok for legal advice, Duh. →Grok can't reply with a usable answer because the prompt it was given lacked nuance, context and facts - i.e. it was prompted by a cooker with the IQ of a One Nation supporter = 3 →You failed to realise that IF we broke the law, we have VG lawyers and some simpleton had a crack at us, then the cooker and Roberta would have to be identified, blowing the cover she's tried so hard to hide, lol, see the own goal there, cooker? No, Great → proceed. →You just added to the audience for our story without knowing what the fuck you were doing. →You achieved "idiot cooker of the year" all while thinking you had a 'Gotcha', you dumb animal. Baaaaaa. Now, go feed the animals and give Roberta a credit note for wasting her time. You dumb fuck. #NoisyTrunk #CookerLaw Links to the Cooker's "The New Right Hand Wank" grok request in replies, and yes, it's funny. Lol, so dim. Proves why cookers should not be let near AI (or voting booths)

@TheNoisyTrunk As if I'd do anything with you. Get a grip. Or better still, let go of it, been pulling it a bit too hard.

This cooker got educated about fuel prices. He then said "Call me what you like", so we did - We are always happy to oblige. Then the fwit said it again → These cookers get dimmer by the day. So, here is our reply, out in the open, because the retread blocked us after crying. _______ Dear Cooker, And we did @petergward2126 , as you requested, you moron. However, cupcake, you have misinterpreted our reply, which was an effort to educate your dimness, as an invitation to engage. It wasn't. What we did was reply, known as "right of reply", give you what you asked for, → called you "whatever we liked" and tried to educate you. The latter part was clearly wasted effort, though we did indeed enter into that with the full knowledge that it would be a waste of time because the universal law "Once a cooker, Always a Cooker" is just that and universally true. So, our part of any bargain has been fulfilled. YOU asked a question. You were flummoxed by the clear and correct answer that made you look dimmer than anyone first thought, and then thought, "Oh, I'll ignore the opportunity to be educated (normal for you), and I'll try to get into a conversation with #Noisy and try to look smart" < That petal was a mistake and ain't never gonna be. You are not on our level, 'chatting with you' would lower our substantial IQ's, and any effort to inform you would be and IS a waste of time. NOW, Cooker, you have been #Trunked and owned, so go sit in the corner, turn Chuck Berry on loud and play with your ding-a-ling like you usually do. PS: Don't flatter yourself, dim head, thinking we spent any time on this reply. It is templated - We get a lot of uneducated, dim-witted cookers like you, so it saves time. Remember: This is NOT an invitation to converse, debate or engage. It is putting you in your place. Off you fuck.

This cooker got educated about fuel prices. He then said "Call me what you like", so we did - We are always happy to oblige. Then the fwit said it again → These cookers get dimmer by the day. So, here is our reply, out in the open, because the retread blocked us after crying. _______ Dear Cooker, And we did @petergward2126 , as you requested, you moron. However, cupcake, you have misinterpreted our reply, which was an effort to educate your dimness, as an invitation to engage. It wasn't. What we did was reply, known as "right of reply", give you what you asked for, → called you "whatever we liked" and tried to educate you. The latter part was clearly wasted effort, though we did indeed enter into that with the full knowledge that it would be a waste of time because the universal law "Once a cooker, Always a Cooker" is just that and universally true. So, our part of any bargain has been fulfilled. YOU asked a question. You were flummoxed by the clear and correct answer that made you look dimmer than anyone first thought, and then thought, "Oh, I'll ignore the opportunity to be educated (normal for you), and I'll try to get into a conversation with #Noisy and try to look smart" < That petal was a mistake and ain't never gonna be. You are not on our level, 'chatting with you' would lower our substantial IQ's, and any effort to inform you would be and IS a waste of time. NOW, Cooker, you have been #Trunked and owned, so go sit in the corner, turn Chuck Berry on loud and play with your ding-a-ling like you usually do. PS: Don't flatter yourself, dim head, thinking we spent any time on this reply. It is templated - We get a lot of uneducated, dim-witted cookers like you, so it saves time. Remember: This is NOT an invitation to converse, debate or engage. It is putting you in your place. Off you fuck.

@TheNoisyTrunk takes crybaby @JohnOSullivan36 down Noisy's takedown is brilliant. x.com/TheNoisyTrunk/… LOL, John frames clickbait, Noisy calls it, Lil Johnny cries - TOO FUNNY: "???? wtf is this? This is my twitter not yours. I can pin whatever i want to my profile?" HAHA

We called cookie boy @JohnOSullivan36 out, and he cried, blubbered and spat the dummy... >>>>>>"???? wtf is this? This is my twitter not yours. I can pin whatever i want to my profile?" - HAHAHA, talk about meltdown <<<< HAHAHAHAHAHAH Poor petal. Taken down with facts he couldn't push back on and TEARS. Oh dear. You can read the reply here (He hid it, ran out of Kleenex) x.com/TheNoisyTrunk/… Here is what Cookie wrote originally: John O'Sullivan # FreePalestine # neveragainisnow Can [@ AlboMP] please confirm the number of Israeli-Australian duel nationals serving in the IDF? Are we talking hundreds or thousands? Will these said soldiers be investigated for potential war crimes if and when they choose to return to Australia? Will a FOl request be required? ____________________ Poor cookie. Thought writing to Albo on X was a thing. FWIT.