Arromenth

@Erolingian @AddisonSmithTV @farmingandJesus You are just wrong, I don't know how else to say it. Circumcision was never a means of salvation, but to set the people of God apart from other nations. That's why the Jewish children, even back then, we're not responsible for their sins. It was on the parents.

@Arromenth1 @AddisonSmithTV @farmingandJesus First generation, yes, of course they have to believe and repent before the sign. Abraham believed and it was counter to him as righteousness (Gen 15:6) After was given the sign of faith (circumcision). And commanded to give the sign to his kids. Just like Acts!

This is why I’m a baptist🤓

@WindermereLarry @BibleInContext1 Jesus disagrees with you on the law. They never mentioned it because it was understood to be symbolism.

@Arromenth1 @BibleInContext1 It wasn’t mentioned because they all believed it and that’s what breaking bread meant in Acts. Justin Martyr, Polycarp, Irenaeus, and other folks living in the first 200 years wrote about it. Justin Martyr was very clear. Jesus replaced Old Testament ritual and law, absolutely.

The Roman Catholic transubstantiated Eucharist is another Jesus! The Eucharist does not exist without the Mass. The claim that Jesus can wholly and entirely be present, even in the smallest element of a crumb (1377), is utter blasphemy, degrading the King of Kings, the Lord of Glory, down to a crumb. If Jesus is wholly present in each individual wafer, then how many Jesus's does Catholicism have? But it gets worse. They believe that by consuming their consecrated host, it actually removes sin & preserves you from sin (CCC 1393-95). In the Presbyterorum Ordinis, it says this: That, "The priests must instruct their people to offer to God the Father, the divine victim in the sacrifice of the Mass..." So they're instructing people to join to the offering of Christ on the cross their own lives. Then in the Catholic Catechism 1368 it says "...the Eucharist, the sacrifice of Christ becomes also the sacrifice of the members of his body, and that Christ's sacrifice present on the altar makes it possible for all generations of Christians to be united with his offering." The Christian does not offer themselves along with Christ on the cross. There's nothing we can do to add to the finished work of Jesus on the cross two thousand years ago. So not only is the Roman Catholic transubstantiated Eucharist blasphemy, but the entire Mass itself is heresy. Jesus himself was never a victim, but a victor on the cross, and at the Last Supper, he said, "Take and eat," not, "Make more offerings and sacrifices to the Father" #bible #christianlife #theology #christianapologetics

@AddisonSmithTV @farmingandJesus Do you believe babies can repent? Do you believe babies can rationalize the difference between good and bad? No, they cannot make that choice. Even in the OT children were not responsible for their own sin until the ages of 12 to13. When did God change that?

@farmingandJesus Really the argument boils down to: If it's true that the sign across OT and NT points to the same thing, why wouldn't it follow that the only thing about it that changed was the mode (circumcision-->baptism), and not what it signifies/who it belongs to?

Catholics don’t actually know history!

@WindermereLarry @BibleInContext1 So you think Jesus is telling the disciples to beak an old testament law? The Bread being the actual body of Christ is not something that popped up until after 150AD. it is never mentioned by the apostles.

@Arromenth1 @BibleInContext1 Unless the bread were the body the breaking of bread would be meaningless. It is mentioned as a part of early Christian worship because they believed it was the body of Christ. 1900 years later, things haven’t changed. There are still people who walk away for lack of faith.

@8hmed_ @CarlZha More evidence that she is not 3. She is described as filling Jars of water from a well, enough for 10 camels. This would have been hard labor for grown woman. so you think a 3 year old ran down to a well, lowered the jar all the way down, pulled it filled with water...

@Arromenth1 @CarlZha You people so stupid that you even believe in the holocaust. You believe th3 Rebecca was 3 years old! Develop some critical thinking and go read. I gave one of American idiots more time than what they deserve already. Go read you brainless terrorist.

Why did he do that in a children's museum???

@8hmed_ @CarlZha haha no one actually believes that Rebeca was 3, it is something your people made up to refute your prophet being a pedo. The bible calls her a young women. I know you think girls become women at 3, so you can sleep with them. however no one else does.

@8hmed_ @CarlZha I mean.... you accept a pedo leader... He was so proud of it that he wrote it down. Or when he lusted after his own adopted sons wife, or when he died in the exact way he said false prophets would die.

@Arromenth1 @CarlZha Oh, back to the idiots lies about the pedo prophet. Do you really think that any group of people will accept a pedo as a leader unless they are satanic Americans? Also my words are just thoughts not real executions, sane people check everything before applying a penalty/rule.

@8hmed_ @CarlZha Im just turning your words back on you! May your fake god and Pedo prophet forgive you.

@Arromenth1 @CarlZha All Americans are shit. You are the last people to talk. You literally are killing innocents around the world while you are typing.

@8hmed_ @CarlZha im the dog, when you call for execution with no knowledge of the situation. You seem like the rabid dog. Imagine what people who call for execution so easily do with an army or power.... I judge people on what they would become in an apocalyptic world.

@Arromenth1 @CarlZha Ok dog, now with the context he doesn't deserve to ve executed but still he is an idiot and doing it in a disrespectful way.

@8hmed_ @CarlZha It a puzzle for children...... idiot

@CarlZha I truly believe that the kind of those people should be executed, imagine what would they do when no one can see them or when they have power & army. I judge people based on what they would become in an apocalyptic world.

@WindermereLarry @BibleInContext1 Yeah Luke constantly talks about it, because Jesus said "do this in remembrance of me." It is a part of fellowship described in Acts 2. The breaking of bread is again mentioned again in Acts 20, accompanied with the fellowship of believers. The bread being the body isnt there.

@Arromenth1 @BibleInContext1 In Acts. Luke constantly talks about the breaking of bread. Why would he emphasize breaking of bread if not to practice the distribution of the Eucharist? And it was that way for 1500 years until the reformation.

@WindermereLarry @BibleInContext1 No it was to gather together and honor and contemplate Jesus's sacrifice.

@Arromenth1 @BibleInContext1 Two separate thoughts 1. This is my Body. 2. Do this in remembrance of me. So in Acts. Luke talks about how the Disciples saw the situation- They concentrated on “the breaking of bread” Why? Just to have a meal and remember. No, rather to internalize what Jesus said in John 6.

@JupiterKunt @JamesDueck Yeah Idolatry is such a small issue!

@JamesDueck If you read the list of grievances of Luther, like half of them are about the church selling indulgences, which stopped. Other than that, it’s really just celibate priests and Mary. Which is dumb to make those thing such a big issue.

The “Reformation” protest is over. 500 years was enough. Time for everyone to come home.

@xBallisLife31x @whooptywho2025 @TomatheHawk Did you not get mad over her Rachel calling you an idiot? Now you go and call people "dumb bitch"? I wonder what Jesus would have said?

@whooptywho2025 @TomatheHawk A pastor and priest isn’t even the same thing you dumb bitch 😂😭 Being married to them has nothing to do with anything, a person you have children with that you’re no longer with is considered a baby daddy/baby momma. So she in fact has MULTIPLE baby daddies bitch.

@xBallisLife31x She did. But you clearly didn't see that part of the exchange.

@WindermereLarry @BibleInContext1 No it is a representation of his body, when he says "do this in remembrance of me." It is something we do to honor Jesus and gift he gave us.

@Arromenth1 @BibleInContext1 You just don’t get it. The breaking of bread explicitly means repetition of the events of the Last Supper when Jesus said “This IS my body” That’s what it means, they were not talking about just having a meal.

@WindermereLarry @BibleInContext1 No one is against the breaking of bread..... it is the fact that you believe you are eating the flesh of Jesus....

@BibleInContext1 The facts: Jesus performed the first Mass at the Last Supper; told his disciple to do it in remembrance of him; spent most of the first Easter with the two Emmaus disciples, reenacted the process then disappeared. Acts speaks of “breaking of Bread” as the center of Worship.

@WesJB82 @needGod_net Even your own church says that Highly favored is not a wrong translation....

@Arromenth1 @needGod_net The definition you show says it literally means “you have been graced” It is the feminine singular perfect passive participle of the verb charitoō so “gracing” was completed in the past, with ongoing, enduring results into the present. i.e., she has been graced and remains so

Conversation with a Catholic

@TradCathGuy @TheophorusJB @truehopeist @needGod_net No, she is blessed among women. However, saying she is blessed different than Queen of Heaven....

@Arromenth1 @TheophorusJB @truehopeist @needGod_net Was it wrong for Elizabeth to call her blessed among women?

@TradCathGuy @TheophorusJB @truehopeist @needGod_net But I'm going to say it again. Prayer is only to God by the example of all the disciples and Jesus himself. You can't give me one example of Jesus or the disciples praying to anyone or thing other than God.

@Arromenth1 @TheophorusJB @truehopeist @needGod_net Asking for their intercession. Not praying to them and asking them to forgive our sins, save us, or offer them any form of worship.