Ash Roy

@theallinpod I love @friedberg This is horse shit. Most humans are mediocre at best. They will get eliminated. So who will buy services and products?

David Friedberg: The AI Jobs Panic Is a Crock of Sh*t Why? The revenue potential outweighs the cost savings by 100x. “There is no job loss with AI. I've said it a thousand times, and I will say it again, and again, and again. What I see on the ground, and what I've seen at dozens of companies, including my company that I run, there are two sides to a business. There is revenue and there’s costs. On the cost side of the equation, AI can be used to reduce humans doing things that cost money, to some extent. The effect there, I would argue, is nominal. The real opportunity with AI is on the revenue side, where suddenly one engineer can do 100x or 1000x what they used to be able to do, meaning you can make more products at your company, whether those are agricultural seed products, or boats and ships, or software for companies, or clothing, or what have you. Because of AI, everyone has the ability to expand their revenue base to create more products, and that is the foundation of good economic prosperity. It is called productivity. We can grow productivity in this country with AI. So where I see AI being used is on the revenue side 100x more than the cost side. And in that equation, people are hiring like crazy. We cannot hire enough people. I just had a review meeting with my product and engineering team two days ago, and they're like, ‘We want to add an extra 15 headcount to our engineering squads because we have all this opportunity to do stuff that we couldn't otherwise do.’ So we are going to hire more people. And to Sacks' point, we are seeing that show up in the jobs numbers. The idea that AI is going to destroy jobs is a Luddite idea that is being disproven every single day, and I see it on the ground. It is only a matter of time before people wake up to this and they realize that this narrative that they've all been sold is a crock of sh*t.”

@eng_khairallah1 He is basically saying spend on tokens

Anthropic engineer: "You're not supposed to prompt Claude. You're supposed to build a system that prompts itself." this is one of the best workflows I've seen in a long time in this video he breaks down exactly how most people are using Claude: - the 14% you lose to CLAUDE.md before typing a word - the plugins that 95% of users have never installed - the caching setup that keeps it at 95% hit rate and almost free - why starting every chat from zero is the slowest way to use Claude if you've been using Claude for more than a month and never left the chat window, you've been using one project when you could be running a team of them instead of another show tonight, watch this make sure to bookmark it before it gets lost in your feed full guide in the article below

@elonmusk EXPLANATION

SpaceX has almost finished writing V1.0 of an in-house AI training stack in C that exact-maps to 220k GB300s with 800G NICs, making heavy use of pipeline parallelism and getting as close to bare metal as possible. The potential speed improvement vs JAX for large training runs is over an order of magnitude.

@fermatslibrary 3 problems dude. Periodic Table is OLD, like Newtonian stuff J is just an roman alphabet. Think like Chinese or any other language. Question for you -- do you know where in table in takes more to stay put that split?

J is the only letter that has never appeared in the periodic table

@elonmusk @grok how is SpaceX involved?

Time to build major base on the Moon!

@TaraBull The kid in the baseball cap is quintessential Gen Z — he didn’t even try to finish with five seconds left. A lot of them seem quick to give up when the odds are against them instead of pushing through anyway.

Parents gave their kids just 4 minutes to figure out how to use a rotary dial phone. The confusion was instant. Gen Z vs old school tech is pretty hilarious

@MsMelChen He assumes ministers and lawyers are still necessary features of society and governance in 10 years.

Singapore’s Foreign Minister, Dr Balakrishnan casually explaining how he built his own AI agent (a 2nd brain for diplomacy) using Claude & WhatsApp integration etc. on a Raspberry Pi “You cannot govern a technology you have only been briefed on.” 🇸🇬

@brivael @elonmusk this is why western civilization is fucked. So myopic. What happened to the Chinese, Indians and others?? How do endorse this idiot @brivael ??

Les vrais génies de l'histoire. 108 milliards d'humains ont vécu sur Terre. La liste ci-dessous en contient ~100. Soit environ 1 sur 1 milliard. C'est ça, le « autre chose » que les gens cherchent quand ils refusent d'admettre que Jobs ou Einstein étaient hors-norme. Une conjonction rarissime de cognition + obsession + timing + courage cognitif + santé mentale juste-assez-stable. Critère retenu : saut non-substituable. Sans cet individu précis, la chose n'arrive pas, ou arrive 30 ans plus tard sous une forme dégradée. J'exclus les agrégateurs (Edison), les opérateurs talentueux (Altman), les copieurs brillants et les figures dont la réputation vient surtout du PR. — PHYSIQUE — Newton — synthèse mécanique + optique + calcul, refonde la science occidentale seul Maxwell — unification électromagnétique, prédit les ondes EM avant qu'on les mesure Einstein — relativités restreinte et générale, photoélectrique, base de la quantique Dirac — équation relativiste de l'électron, prédit l'antimatière par pure beauté mathématique Heisenberg — mécanique matricielle, principe d'incertitude Schrödinger — mécanique ondulatoire Bohr — modèle atomique, interprétation de Copenhague Pauli — principe d'exclusion, postule le neutrino sans preuve Feynman — électrodynamique quantique, diagrammes, refonte pédagogique de la physique Boltzmann — fondations statistiques de la thermodynamique, seul contre tous Planck — quantum d'action, déclenche tout Galilée — méthode expérimentale + héliocentrisme défendu Kepler — lois du mouvement planétaire, abandonne les cercles parfaits par pure honnêteté empirique Faraday — induction, champs, sans formation mathématique Fermi — physique nucléaire théorique ET expérimentale, premier réacteur Landau — quasiment tous les sous-champs de la physique théorique — MATHÉMATIQUES — Euclide — axiomatisation de la géométrie, modèle de toute pensée déductive Archimède — calcul infinitésimal 1800 ans avant Newton Gauss — théorie des nombres, géométrie différentielle, statistiques, le plus polyvalent de l'histoire Euler — productivité et profondeur jamais égalées, fonde des champs entiers Riemann — géométrie qui rendra possible la relativité, hypothèse encore ouverte 170 ans après Galois — théorie des groupes à 19 ans, mort à 20 Cantor — théorie des ensembles, infinis actuels, seul contre l'establishment Gödel — théorèmes d'incomplétude, casse le programme de Hilbert Grothendieck — refonte de la géométrie algébrique, niveau d'abstraction inégalé Ramanujan — autodidacte indien, formules tombées « du ciel » qu'on prouve encore Poincaré — topologie, systèmes dynamiques, chaos avant l'heure Hilbert — formalisation, programme qui domine les maths du 20ème Leibniz — calcul (en parallèle de Newton), logique, monades — INFORMATIQUE / LOGIQUE — Turing — calculabilité, machine universelle, cryptanalyse d'Enigma, morphogenèse Von Neumann — architecture des ordinateurs, théorie des jeux, automates cellulaires Shannon — théorie de l'information, fondation de toute communication numérique Church — lambda-calcul Kolmogorov — fondations des probabilités modernes, complexité algorithmique Dijkstra — fondations de l'algorithmique structurée — BIOLOGIE / MÉDECINE / CHIMIE — Darwin — sélection naturelle, refonte de toute la biologie Mendel — génétique, ignoré 35 ans Pasteur — théorie microbienne, vaccins, refondation de la médecine Watson + Crick + Franklin — structure de l'ADN Mendeleïev — table périodique, prédit des éléments inconnus Lavoisier — refonte de la chimie moderne, méthode quantitative McClintock — éléments génétiques mobiles, ignorée 30 ans — PHILOSOPHIE — Platon — fonde l'idéalisme, tout l'Occident en discute encore 2400 ans après Aristote — fonde la logique, la biologie, la métaphysique, l'éthique, en parallèle Kant — refonte de la métaphysique post-Hume, synthèse critique Nietzsche — généalogie de la morale, mort de Dieu, transvaluation Wittgenstein — refonte deux fois de la philo du langage, seul Hegel — dialectique, philosophie de l'histoire Spinoza — Éthique géométrique, expulsé pour son courage cognitif Hume — empirisme radical, réveille Kant Descartes — cogito, géométrie analytique Heidegger — refonte de l'ontologie — ÉCONOMIE / SCIENCES SOCIALES — Adam Smith — fondation de l'économie moderne Hayek — connaissance dispersée, ordre spontané, prix comme signal Mises — calcul économique, action humaine Keynes — refonte macro (qu'on aime ou pas, le saut est réel) Schumpeter — destruction créatrice, entrepreneur comme moteur Girard — désir mimétique, bouc émissaire, refonte de l'anthropologie Weber — éthique protestante, sociologie de la rationalisation — MUSIQUE — Bach — architecture contrapuntique inégalée Mozart — synthèse mélodique et structurelle, mort à 35 ans avec 600 œuvres Beethoven — refonte de la forme symphonique, pont classique/romantique Wagner — refonte de l'opéra, harmonie qui ouvre la modernité Stravinsky — refonte du rythme, Sacre du Printemps comme rupture Schoenberg — atonalité, dodécaphonisme — PEINTURE / LITTÉRATURE — Léonard de Vinci — peinture + ingénierie + anatomie Michel-Ange — sculpture + peinture + architecture, au sommet de chaque Picasso — cubisme, refonte du regard pictural Cézanne — pont vers la modernité, structure géométrique du visible Dostoïevski — psychologie du sous-sol, profondeur métaphysique Tolstoï — synthèse romanesque inégalée Shakespeare — refonte de la langue anglaise et du théâtre Dante — Commedia, fonde l'italien littéraire Homère — fondation de toute la littérature occidentale Proust — refonte du temps romanesque Kafka — anticipe le 20ème siècle bureaucratique Borges — refonte du conte philosophique — INGÉNIERIE / TECH — Tesla — courant alternatif, moteur induction, fondations de l'électrotech moderne. Vrai génie, scammé par Edison Frères Wright — vol motorisé, contrefactuel solide Shockley + Bardeen + Brattain — transistor Noyce + Kilby — circuit intégré Engelbart — souris, hypertexte, visioconférence dans une seule démo en 1968 Berners-Lee — Web, donné gratuitement Linus Torvalds — Linux + Git, deux infrastructures civilisationnelles, seul au début John Carmack — moteurs 3D temps réel, refonte du jeu vidéo — ENTREPRENEURS (critère strict) — Jobs — synthèse design/produit/écosystème non-substituable Musk — SpaceX seul justifie l'inclusion : NASA avait abandonné le réutilisable. Tesla a forcé la transition EV mondiale Bezos — AWS spécifiquement, pas le e-commerce (qui arrivait quand même) Walt Disney — synthèse animation + parc + IP, modèle qu'on copie encore Henry Ford — chaîne de production Rockefeller — intégration verticale poussée à un niveau jamais vu — EXCLUSIONS VOLONTAIRES — Edison — agrégateur, marketeur, voleur de brevets Sam Altman — opérateur talentueux, pas inventeur. Le saut technique c'est Sutskever, Radford, l'équipe DeepMind avant Zuckerberg — exécution brillante mais Facebook arrivait quand même Gates — bon stratège, OS arrivait de toute façon Hewlett / Packard — grands constructeurs, pas génies au sens fort — LE PATTERN — ~100 noms. 2500 ans d'histoire. Un génie non-substituable tous les 25 ans en moyenne, tous domaines confondus. Sur 108 milliards d'humains ayant jamais vécu : ratio ≈ 1 pour 1 milliard. C'est l'empirique qui désarme définitivement le « biais du survivant ». Ce n'est pas que les génies sont rares. C'est qu'ils sont rarissimes — et que le monde avance malgré tout à coup de ces gens-là.

@newstart_2024 This is BS. You never leave your friends.

Chris Williamson dropped a brutal truth on Rogan: Most people only tinker — new haircut, lose five pounds, switch jobs. But real transformation? Rewiring your body, your country, your entire worldview? That’s unicorn-rare. And here’s what almost nobody says out loud: the hardest part isn’t the work. It’s the loneliness that hits when you start moving at a different velocity. You become the weirdo training six nights a week, eating differently, journaling at dawn, chasing something you can’t fully explain. Your self-belief doesn’t stay Hollywood-strong — it flickers hard. You’re scrabbling in uncertainty, wondering if any of this is even working. The old crew doesn’t get it. The pull back to “normal” is magnetic. You might lose entire friend groups… sometimes more than once. That isolation isn’t a glitch. It’s the feature. The price of refusing average. In a world built for comfort and sameness, choosing the uncertain climb is one of the last truly rebellious moves left. It forges depth most people will never touch. I’ve lived those lonely chapters chasing my own new start. The doubt is heavy. The freedom on the other side is heavier. What’s the biggest change you made that left you out of sync with your old circle — and did you ever find your new one?

@ImMeme0 It's so cute

Rep. Ilhan Omar: “The last time the Alien Enemies Act was invoked… during World War ELEVEN.” She must have gotten her education in the Quality Learing Center.

@podcastnotes @marcrandolph This guy is from 20th century

Netflix co-founder and former CEO @marcrandolph says hard work is a myth. Yes, sometimes you have to grind. But 99% of the time it changes nothing. He uses 2 dead-simple examples to prove it: 1. Sprinting in a triathlon (you can't sprint the whole race) 2. Running through airports to catch flights (the plane left anyway) "You don't lose the deal at 2 o'clock that morning because you didn't check the fonts. You lost it four weeks ago when you didn't have the fundamentals right." His answer: stop grinding on the wrong things. Wisely choose your focal points and you make 99% of the difference without the extra hours.

@CSI_Starbase Very different capacity boosters. You are comparing lemon to melon, yeah anagrams. 😂

I don’t think Blue Origin recovering the same booster twice before SpaceX was on anyone’s Bingo card even a year ago. Exciting times!

@JeffBezos @grok give me more details, compare to falcon heavy specs

@NASA @grok Explain how Artemis II sends/received the data to/from Houston, what could wrong.

1972 ➡️2026 Apollo 17 ➡️ Artemis II

@NASA Where is Caymus?

Brisket and cobbler and quiche, oh my! Curious what astronauts eat on a 10-day trip around the Moon? Read about how we design and prepare meal plans for Artemis II: go.nasa.gov/4ceYlSu

@GuntherEagleman We need more women to talk about this issue. Men are just rational pigs.

🚨 BOOM! Sen. Katie Britt just NAILED IT from the Senate floor, PERFECT mic-drop on Democrat hypocrisy! “Democrats are OK with requiring an ID to SHOVEL SNOW and enter their campaign rallies, but NOT to secure our elections!”

@ManusAI @grok Can Manus help organize my google drive, photos and tell me which ones to delete etc

Today, we're taking Manus out of the cloud and putting it on your desktop. Introducing My Computer, the core feature of the new Manus Desktop app. It’s your AI agent, now on your local machine.

@littlebigFM @BarackObama I will pass.

@BarackObama An intelligent, kind, loved and respected man❤️

Reverend Jesse Jackson called on each of us to be heralds of change, to be messengers of hope; to step forward and say “Send me” wherever we have a chance to make an impact. How fortunate we were that Jesse Jackson answered that call. What a great debt we owe to him.

@theepicmap Don't lie. Earth is not flat dummy.

Please explain it to me like I’m 5 years old

@AzeriTimes @BillAckman @grok is this real?

🚨 BREAKING: Armed rioters attempted to seize the U.S. Consulate in Pakistan. U.S. Marines opened fire, leaving 22 attackers dead.