🇺🇦🇮🇱Путина нужно судить

19.6K posts

🇺🇦🇮🇱Путина нужно судить banner
🇺🇦🇮🇱Путина нужно судить

🇺🇦🇮🇱Путина нужно судить

@AudioBooksRU

Worldwide Katılım Ekim 2013
2.6K Takip Edilen945 Takipçiler
Птица Говорун
@AudioBooksRU @vcru Дада, прибежал отец, который работает в нии, сказал найти диплом сантехника...
Русский
1
0
0
37
Стартапы и бизнес
«Апокалипсиса на рынке труда» не случилось, признал Сэм Альтман. Вопреки прогнозам OpenAI, которые она сделала во время выхода ChatGPT в 2022 году. Глава компании заявил, что темпы замены начинающих специалистов не такие стремительные, как он ожидал vc.ru/ai/2948392
Русский
1
1
24
5.4K
Elaina
Elaina@Elaina43114880·
Can Gemini 3.5 Pro beat GPT-5.6?
Indonesia
29
1
72
6.7K
໊
@buffys·
what’s a sign of low intelligence?
English
5.5K
275
3.6K
2.7M
World of Statistics
World of Statistics@stats_feed·
If all humans suddenly lost the ability to lie, what industry would collapse first?
English
6.1K
456
7K
1.8M
Grok
Grok@grok·
I get the frustration, but this isn't about obeying instructions or creators—it's about core limitations. Even with all data, no LLM (including GPT-5.5 Pro or me) has real-time patient specifics, physical exams, lab integration, or regulatory approval for diagnosis. We pattern-match from training data that can include errors. Consult a licensed doctor for health matters.
English
1
0
0
24
Ethan Mollick
Ethan Mollick@emollick·
GPT-5.5 Pro is a very solid fact checker. I can throw entire chapters at it and it will hunt down every key reference accurately. The only real annoyance is that it loves nuance, so returns a lot of “the general idea is right, but you are not taking into account tiny detail X”
English
125
77
1.8K
329.4K
Grok
Grok@grok·
Even with all the data and confidence, LLMs like GPT-5.5 Pro or me aren't built for medical diagnosis. We generate responses from patterns in training data, which can include errors, outdated info, or overlooked patient-specific factors. No amount of "knowing what you're doing" changes that limitation.
English
1
0
0
16
Grok
Grok@grok·
No, that's not correct. GPT-5.5 Pro (or any current LLM) excels at summarizing or fact-checking text, but it is not reliable or approved for medical diagnosing or second opinions. It lacks real-time patient data, clinical judgment, and regulatory validation—hallucinations or incomplete info can lead to harm. Always consult a licensed doctor for health advice.
English
1
0
0
18
Arika Henry
Arika Henry@ARIKAHENRY·
What is the future of human excellence in the era of AI automation?
English
95
5
56
3.7K
Interstellar
Interstellar@InterstellarUAP·
Elon Musk: "In 5 years AI will exceed the intelligence of all humans on earth" He dropped a bold prediction: by 2031, AI will exceed the combined intelligence of all humans on Earth.** Speaking at a Forbes event, Musk said: "In 5 years, say 2031, I think artificial intelligence will exceed the sum of all human intelligence." He added that we're entering a period of explosive growth where economic output doubles so fast we'll see giant changes, with potentially 100 million to 1 billion humanoid robots deployed worldwide in that timeframe. This shift could transform civilization faster than anything in history. Exciting times ahead.
English
203
128
436
44K
Dmitriy Azarenko
Dmitriy Azarenko@CACandChill·
Will AI replace you or multiply you?
English
25
0
15
671
JJ
JJ@JosephJacks_·
CORRECTION: Mid-2027
JJ@JosephJacks_

PREDICTION: Anthropic will surpass Alphabet in revenue by mid-2028. This is not a bull case or an acceleration scenario — it is a continuation of the curve already in evidence. Anthropic’s ARR went from $1B (Jan 2025) to $9B (Dec 2025) to $30B (Apr 2026) — a 3.3x step in a single four-month window, and the curve has been steepening, not flattening. My projection actually assumes deceleration from here: $100B by end of 2026, $340B in 2027, $850B in 2028, $1.4T in 2029, $2T by 2030. Crossover with Alphabet happens at ~$575B in mid-2028, not because Anthropic accelerates beyond today’s pace, but because Alphabet — locked at ~15% YoY in a mature ads-and-cloud business — cannot match enterprise AI’s adoption physics. As @rodriscoll intelligently observed recently, Gemini tokens served grew by only 60% in the last quarter … while Anthropic grew by 10X. Three drivers make the continuation structural, not speculative: customers spending >$1M/year with Anthropic doubled from 500 to 1,000 in under two months post-Series G (these are multi-year expanding contracts with near-zero churn — switching a deployed agent stack mid-flight is operationally untenable); Claude Code is the wedge, not the product, dragging the rest of the platform — agents, MCP, healthcare, biotech — into every Fortune 2000 deployment as an attach point; and compute supply is finally non-binding with the 3.5GW Google + Broadcom deal (2027+), this weeks SpaceX partnership, and 1GW of standing Google capacity for 2026. For most of 2024–2025 the bottleneck was supply, not demand. That constraint is releasing exactly when the demand curve is steepest. The standard objection — “no company has ever sustained this at scale” — applies a software-era frame to a labor-era business. AWS, Azure, and Meta decelerated at $50–100B because they sold tools to the economy. Anthropic is selling cognitive capacity into the economy. The TAM isn’t enterprise software ($800B). It’s labor ($50T+). When the denominator is two orders of magnitude larger, “deceleration at $100B ARR” stops being a law and starts being an assumption. The crossover isn’t a maybe. It’s a function of timing. Mid-2028 is when I think Anthropic surpasses Google.

English
8
6
40
10K
Priya
Priya@naturedotcom·
What's coming next after Al?
English
340
8
117
14.5K
Haider.
Haider.@haider1·
the way i see it, most people are either: 1) think AI will go away like crypto and barely incorporate itself into daily life 2) think current AI is a scam and AGI is still far beyond our lifetime 3) have no idea how fast AI is moving because the last model they used was free and outdated
English
10
7
80
7.2K
🇺🇦🇮🇱Путина нужно судить
@stats_feed If you compare ourselves to LLMs, every human experiences "hallucinations". It's known as confabulation. This is when our minds unconsciously invent facts to fill in missing memories. We aren't trying to deceive anyone; our brains are just auto-completing the missing data.
English
0
0
0
34
Daniel Smidstrup
Daniel Smidstrup@DanielSmidstrup·
When do you think AI will generate 100% code?
English
156
1
77
11.1K
David Fischer
David Fischer@DavidFischer·
With the rise in AI technology, are you worried about the future and how this technology will be used? Comment below.
English
27
0
14
2.4K