Ayman Ahmad

Ny aftale! Trygt og sikkert justerer vi på udlændingeloven, så dygtige medarbejdere ikke skal frygte for deres hverdag ødelægges af skøre regler når de er i gang med en uddannelse! Hvor er jeg dog glad og stolt over at vi leverer varen! 🟣🙏🇩🇰

Hallo @omDSB , hvorfor lægge platform til anti-abort-reklamer??? Et statsejet selskab med en platform i alle deres tog. Hundredetusinder af rejsende ser dette. Der burde være et stærkere moralsk kodeks hos DSB! @TRM_dk , hvad er ministerens holdning til det her? #dkpol #dkmedier

Jeg og mine to venner afviste dit interview, på baggrund af at det var dig. Du kan også høre mig sige “Hej Joachim”, hvor jeg gjorde det klart, at jeg ved hvem du er. Så argumentet om, at de har intet med dig at gøre, holder ikke for mit vedkommende - hvilket jeg er sikker på det også gør med en del af de andre, du prøvede at interviewe🙂

@SikandaSIDDIQUE @JanArneHansen @MBrgger @BT Det havde intet med mig at gøre, Sikander. Presse ville skabe utryghed fik vi at vide fra talsmanden for arrangementets talsmand.

Holder stor Palæstina-konference i Brøndby: B.T. afvist i døren | … så det er et problem når pressen ikke giver pro-palæstinenserne opmærksomhed, men åbenbart også et problem når den gør det. Well, man kan jo ikke både have sin kage og spise den. bt.dk/samfund/holder…

🧵 1 nat i Jordan blev til 11. Jeg opfordrer til at lægge pres på Israel for en fri presse.   Som freelancejournalist blev jeg af Israel nægtet indrejse til Vestbredden, da jeg forsøgte at krydse grænsen fra Jordan tirsdag 21. november. 1/10 #dkpol #dkmedier

Vi lancerer i dag den hidtil mest omfattende undersøgelse af etnisk diskrimination i Danmark. Ud fra besvarelser fra 4.300 minoritetsetniske personer forsøger vi at kortlægge omfanget af racisme. menneskeret.dk/files/media/do…

Kære alle Mange har sikkert set, at Vejle Amts Folkeblad (Vafo) i går kunne afsløre, at Sydøstjyllands Politis (SOJYL) nu kunne melde ud, at "Farhad blev holdt skjult", og at "Familien planlagde det". Nyheder som blev spredt ekstremt hurtigt rundt i mange andre medier.

Ligepræcis, mere kunne det ikke sejle rundt fra sundhedssektorens side af - der ikke kan yde en hel basal velfærd. Og hvis du på nogen måde har en stilling i den offentlige sundhedssektor, så er jeg virkelig bekymret for hvem der kommer under din behandling - når du ikke tager blodtryksmåling seriøs samtidig med, at du synes jeg sejler fordi jeg spurgte om en oplader. Du burde se og tage dig sammen, det der kan du hverken være skatteborgerne eller dig selv bekendt med…

@Aymankoel @RegionH Hvad skal jeg tage seriøst? Nu handler det lige pludselig om opladere og blodtryksmåling, altså, jeg synes du sejler rundt.

Aldrig ryger det i glemmebogen, at statsministeren nægtede at udvise sympati med de palæstinensiske civile. At hun i stedet gav sig til at irettesætte journalisten på den mest uklædelige og formatløse måde, bliver historien, jeg kommer til at fortælle videre til mine børn. #dkpol

Du må altså meget gerne tage det her seriøst Mikkel. Du behøver ikke gøre det dumt og skørt. Som jeg observerede, så er der en masse andre steder på hospitalet jeg kunne være, i stedet for udsynet til et toilet hvor jeg får nydelsen af at dufte til afføring. Som jeg så det og har oplevet før, så behøver en læge ikke at tage blodtryk på mig, eller lave andre helt almene målinger. Tænker da heller ikke det er så svært at svare på, om jeg kan låne en oplader eller ej. Der er ingen der har sagt de skal ignorere lovgivningen eller retningslinjerne, men bare bruge den sunde fornuft. Måske er det også lidt svært at bruge sund fornuft, når den ikke findes.

@Aymankoel @RegionH Så - sygeplejerskene skal bygge nye rum på afdelingen når der er overbelagt, de skal lave alle mulige vilkårlige lægeopgaver selvom det er ulovligt for dem at gøre det, de skal ignorere lovgivningen og retningslinierne fordi det ikke passer dig at have et drop i, eller hvad?

Ja for det første, så behøves de vel ikke at bruge 40 minutter på at hente 4 piller. Og når nej, jeg har ingen forstand på hvad en sygeplejerske skal - andet end at de åbenbart har rigtig mange pauser, samtidig med at de skriger efter mere i løn og siger de overhovedet ikke sidder stille. For det andet, så kunne de måske prøve på at finde en ny plads til mig og den ældre herre i stedet for lige foran toilettet. Efter jeg havde ventet i så lang tid på at snakke med en læge, så spurgte jeg også en af sygeplejerskerne om de kunne pille deres nåle ud af min krop så jeg kan komme hjem - da jeg hellere vil dø derhjemme end i hospitalet og blev blankt af afvist. Sygeplejerskerne kan altså gøre rigtig meget, det handler bare om at bruge den sunde fornuft, og tage nogen af de andre opgaver så lægen kan komme hurtigere videre - i stedet for at det er en læge der skal gøre alt arbejdet. Jeg spurgte faktisk også efter en oplader da min telefon var ved at løbe tør, og blev blankt afvist. Jeg tænker vel at man arbejder i et hospital for at give borgene den bedste mulige hjælp - men måske er det mig der har misforstået konceptet med den offentlige sundhedssektor?

@Aymankoel @RegionH Jeg er lidt nysgerrig på hvad du vil have at de to sygeplejersker skulle hjælpe dig med, når det du venter på er en læge? Din oplevelse lyder frustrerende, men det er også tydeligt at du ikke ved noget som helst om hvilke roller og hvilket ansvar de forskellige faggrupper har.

Absolutely masterful interview on Gaza of Dominique De Villepin, former Prime Minister of France, who famously led France's opposition to the Iraq war and who, IMHO is the best diplomat the West has produced in decades. This is so important, so incredibly well argued, that I decided to translate it in full: "Hamas has set a trap for us, and this trap is one of maximum horror, of maximum cruelty. And so there's a risk of an escalation in militarism, of more military interventions, as if we could with armies solve a problem as serious as the Palestinian question. There's also a second major trap, which is that of Occidentalism. We find ourselves trapped, with Israel, in this western bloc which today is being challenged by most of the international community. [Presenter: What is Occidentalism?] Occidentalism is the idea that the West, which for 5 centuries managed the world's affairs, will be able to quietly continue to do so. And we can clearly see, even in the debates of the French political class, that there is the idea that, faced with what is currently happening in the Middle East, we must continue the fight even more, towards what might resemble a religious or a civilizational war. That is to say, to isolate ourselves even more on the international stage. This is not the way, especially since there's a third trap, which is that of moralism. And here we have in a way the proof, through what is happening in Ukraine and what is happening in the Middle East, of this double standard that is denounced everywhere in the world, including in recent weeks when I travel to Africa, the Middle East, or Latin America. The criticism is always the same: look at how civilian populations are treated in Gaza, you denounce what happened in Ukraine, and you are very timid in the face of the tragedy unfolding in Gaza. Consider international law, the second criticism that is made by the global south. We sanction Russia when it aggresses Ukraine, we sanction Russia when it doesn't respect the resolutions of the United Nations, and it's been 70 years that the resolutions of the United Nations have been voted in vain and that Israel doesn't respect them. [Presenter: Do you believe that the Westerners are currently guilty of hubris?] Westerners must open their eyes to the extent of the historical drama unfolding before us to find the right answers. [Presenter: What is the historical drama? I mean, we're talking about the tragedy of October 7th first and foremost, right?] Of course, there are these horrors happening, but the way to respond to them is crucial. Are we going to kill the future by finding the wrong answers... [Presenter: Kill the future?] Kill the future, yes! Why? [Presenter: But who is killing whom?] You are in a game of causes and effects. Faced with the tragedy of history, one cannot take this 'chain of causality' analytical grid, simply because if you do you can't escape from it. Once we understand that there is a trap, once we realize that behind this trap there has also been a change in the Middle East regarding the Palestinian issue... The situation today is profoundly different [from what it was in the past]. The Palestinian cause was a political and secular cause. Today we are faced with an Islamist cause, led by Hamas. Obviously, this kind of cause is absolute and allows no form of negotiation. On the Israeli side, there has also been a development. Zionism was secular and political, championed by Theodor Herzl in the late 19th century. It has largely become messianic, biblical today. This means that they too do not want to compromise, and everything that the far-right Israeli government does, continuing to encourage colonization, obviously makes things worse, including since October 7th. So in this context, understand that we are already in this region facing a problem that seems profoundly insoluble. Added to this is the hardening of states. Diplomatically, look at the statements of the King of Jordan, they are not the same as six months ago. Look at the statements of Erdogan in Turkey. [Presenter: Precisely, these are extremely harsh statements...] Extremely worrying. Why? Because if the Palestinian cause, the Palestinian issue, hasn't been brought to the forefront, hasn't been put on stage [for a while], and if most of the youth today in Europe have often never even heard of it, it remains for the Arab peoples the mother of all battles. All the progress made towards an attempt to stabilize the Middle East, where one could believe... [Presenter: Yes, but whose fault is it? I have a hard time following you, is it Hamas's fault?] But Ms. Malherbe, I am trained as a diplomat. The question of fault will be addressed by historians and philosophers. [Presenter: But you can't remain neutral, it's difficult, it's complicated, isn't it?] I am not neutral, I am in action. I am simply telling you that every day that passes, we can ensure that this horrific cycle stops... that's why I speak of a trap and that's why it's so important to know what response we are going to give. We stand alone before history today. And we do not treat this new world the way we currently do, knowing that today we are no longer in a position of strength, we are not able to manage on our own, as the world's policemen. [Presenter: So what do we do?] Exactly, what should we do? This is where it is essential not to cut off anyone on the international stage. [Presenter: Including the Russians?] Everyone. [Presenter: Everyone? Should we ask the Russians for help?] I'm not saying we should ask the Russians for help. I'm saying: if the Russians can contribute by calming some factions in this region, then it will be a step in the right direction. [Presenter: How can we proportionally respond to barbarism? It's no longer army against army.] But listen, Appolline de Malherbe, the civilian populations that are dying in Gaza, don't they exist? So because horror was committed on one side, horror must be committed on the other? [Presenter: Do we indeed need to equate the two?] No, it's you who are doing that. I'm not saying I equate the faults. I try to take into account what a large part of humanity thinks. There is certainly a realistic objective to pursue, which is to eradicate the Hamas leaders who committed this horror. And not to confuse the Palestinians with Hamas, that's a realistic goal. The second thing is a targeted response. Let's define realistic political objectives. And the third thing is a combined response. Because there is no effective use of force without a political strategy. We are not in 1973 or in 1967. There are things no army in the world knows how to do, which is to win in an asymmetrical battle against terrorists. The war on terror has never been won anywhere. And it instead triggers extremely dramatic misdeeds, cycles, and escalations. If America lost in Afghanistan, if America lost in Iraq, if we lost in the Sahel, it's because it's a battle that can't be won simply, it's not like you have a hammer that strikes a nail and the problem is solved. So we need to mobilize the international community, get out of this Western entrapment in which we are. [Presenter: But when Emmanuel Macron talks about an international coalition…] Yes, and what was the response? [Presenter: None.] Exactly. We need a political perspective, and this is challenging because the two-state solution has been removed from the Israeli political and diplomatic program. Israel needs to understand that for a country with a territory of 20,000 square kilometers, a population of 9 million inhabitants, facing 1.5 billion people... Peoples have never forgotten that the Palestinian cause and the injustice done to the Palestinians was a significant source of mobilization. We must consider this situation, and I believe it is essential to help Israel, to guide... some say impose, but I think it's better to convince, to move in this direction. The challenge is that there is no interlocutor today, neither on the Israeli side nor the Palestinian side. We need to bring out interlocutors. [Presenter: It's not for us to choose who will be the leaders of Palestine.] The Israeli policy over recent years did not necessarily want to cultivate a Palestinian leadership... Many are in prison, and Israel's interest - because I repeat: it was not in their program or in Israel's interest at the time, or so they thought - was instead to divide the Palestinians and ensure that the Palestinian question fades. This Palestinian question will not fade. And so we must address it and find an answer. This is where we need courage. The use of force is a dead end. The moral condemnation of what Hamas did - and there's no "but" in my words regarding the moral condemnation of this horror - must not prevent us from moving forward politically and diplomatically in an enlightened manner. The law of retaliation is a never-ending cycle. [Presenter: The "eye for an eye, tooth for tooth".] Yes. That's why the political response must be defended by us. Israel has a right to self-defense, but this right cannot be indiscriminate vengeance. And there cannot be collective responsibility of the Palestinian people for the actions of a terrorist minority from Hamas. When you get into this cycle of finding faults, one side's memories clash with the other's. Some will juxtapose Israel's memories with the memories of the Nakba, the 1948 catastrophe, which is a disaster that the Palestinians still experience every day. So you can't break these cycles. We must have the strength, of course, to understand and denounce what happened, and from this standpoint, there's no doubt about our position. But we must also have the courage, and that's what diplomacy is... diplomacy is about being able to believe that there is light at the end of the tunnel. And that's the cunning of history; when you're at the bottom, something can happen that gives hope. After the 1973 war, who would have thought that before the end of the decade, Egypt would sign a peace treaty with Israel? The debate shouldn't be about rhetoric or word choice. The debate today is about action; we must act. And when you think about action, there are two options. Either it's war, war, war. Or it's about trying to move towards peace, and I'll say it again, it's in Israel's interest. It's in Israel's interest!"

Starlinks needed over Gaza now @elonmusk

Skriv under på ms.dk/vaabenhvile. Efter Hamas' forfærdelige angreb er flere tusind blevet dræbt og såret i Gaza. Over to millioner civile er fanget under den israelske blokade, hvor de er afskåret fra mad, vand, elektricitet og brændstof. Vores kolleger på stedet fortæller os, at der ikke længere er nogen sikre tilflugtssteder. Hospitaler med udmattet og traumatiseret personale står over for evakueringsordre, bombeangreb og akut mangel på medicinske forsyninger. Dødstallet og antallet af sårede stiger dramatisk hver eneste dag. Vi står på afgrunden til en humanitær katastrofe. Vi kan ikke længere se på. Danmark skal presse på for en våbenhvile, så liv kan blive reddet, og nødhjælp kan komme tilstrækkeligt ind i Gaza. Skriv under på ms.dk/vaabenhvile og kræv, at vores regering arbejder for: 1. Øjeblikkelig våbenhvile 2. Respekt for international lov 3. Frigivelse af alle civile gidsler

Jeg er dybt bekymret over udviklingen i Gaza. Mere end tusind civile og flere hundrede børn har nu mistet livet i den israelske hærs bombardementer af civile beboelsesområder. Mange tusinde civile er sårede. Hundredtusinder er fordrevet fra deres hjem. Vi hører om bombardementer af hospitaler, skoler og ambulancer. Samtidig har den israelske regering lukket for adgangen til nødhjælp, medicin, fødevarer, vand og elektricitet. Hospitalerne, der tager imod de mange sårede børn og voksne, kan ikke behandle dem på grund af mangel på elektricitet og vand. En humanitær katastrofe lurer for de 2 millioner indbyggere – hvoraf flertallet er børn. Hamas forfærdelige og utilgivelige terror og massakrer mod civile israelere fortjener intet andet end verdens totale fordømmelse. Men Hamas terror retfærdiggør ikke krigsforbrydelser mod den palæstinensiske civilbefolkning. Israel har ret til at forsvare deres borgere mod terror. Men også stater skal respektere menneskerettigheder og overholde krigens love. Militære midler skal være proportionelle og at man skal gøre alt hvad man kan for at undgå tab af civile menneskeliv. Ligesom enhver kollektiv afstraffelse af en befolkningsgruppe er forbudt ifølge international lov. Som den jødiske overrabiner også sagde i går: “Palæstinenserne er ikke Hamas, og Hamas er ikke palæstinenserne”. De palæstinensiske civile er ikke ansvarlige og skal ikke straffes for Hamas terror. Det er afgørende, at verdenssamfundet samtidig med, at vi fordømmer Hamas terror, stiller krav til Netanyahus regering om at overholde krigens love og beskytte civile liv. At støtte Israels regering i at bryde krigens love ville ikke bare være i strid med fundamentale principper. Det vil også kun gøre situationen værre. Det vil skabe en ny generation af traumatiserede og vrede unge palæstinensere uden fremtid, som vil udgøre frugtbar jord for Hamas og de andre palæstinensiske terrororganisationer. Verdenssamfundet må derfor gøre alt for at stoppe krigen, og for at få gang i fredsforhandlinger. Uanset, hvor fjernt det virker, hvor spinkelt håbet er og hvor forfærdelig situationen er i dag, er der i sidste ende kun én vej frem for at bekæmpe ekstremisterne og sikre at begge folkeslag engang kan leve i tryghed og sikkerhed. Og det er forhandlinger, der kan lede til en retfærdig fred med en levedygtig palæstinensisk stat. Alternativet er, at den onde spiral af vold og gengældelse fortsætter. Det vil fortsætte med at styrke de mest ekstreme kræfter på begge sider, mens generation efter generation af israelske og palæstinensiske civile betaler prisen. Mine tanker går til alle civile ofre i konflikten. I håbet om fred.

I dag har 3F Horsens arrangeret demonstration foran Jørgensens Hotel. Ligesom Brødrene Price så har de også opsagt deres overenskomst. Det er uacceptabelt. Deres (idiotiske) forklaring er på billedet nedenunder. Jeg🤞for at de snart indser at de nedbryder den danske model #dkpol

Når @sndk_nyheder vælger et billede af en lærling, og ikke f.eks. en butikselev, til et læserbrev, der handler om at vi også skal huske at fejre dem der får et fagprøvebevis, viser det fint, hvor lang vej der er igen i EUD-debatten. #dkpol #dkmedier

Hold da kæft et underligt land vi er…fra ledestjerne til slet og ret LED. undskyld jeg er så bramfri. Men hvor er logikken? Hvor er den? Det her er jo kafkask, men også total typisk DK politik pt. Nul logik. Nul forståelse. Nul empati. #dkpol politiken.dk/indland/art952…

For hver historie om hvide familiefædre, der møder et hårdhændet politi, er der 10, hvis ikke 100, som Karims. De historier fortjener lige så stor opmærksomhed.

Vi er godt nok et underligt land, der vil smide en fuldt ud integreret ud, blot for at virke “hård” MEN Danmark…det er ikke en “hård” politik at udvise uanstændighed, bare idiotisk. #dkpol ⁦@Spolitik⁩ ⁦@moderaterne_dk⁩ ⁦@venstredk⁩ politiken.dk/indland/art949…