Arthur Barrett

637 posts

Arthur Barrett banner
Arthur Barrett

Arthur Barrett

@Ayyyyybeeeee

I run a small but global software biz. On X looking for stories to tell my girl (9) - she’s mad about: rockets, dance, craft, dogs, science, unicorns & books.

Northern Beaches 🇦🇺🦘 Katılım Ekim 2020
170 Takip Edilen7 Takipçiler
Arthur Barrett
Arthur Barrett@Ayyyyybeeeee·
And don’t even get me started on the folk whose $100k+ incomes are dependent on internet and phone who don’t invest in an alternative like Starlink, NBN or even just a competitors SIM. abc.net.au/news/2026-07-0…
English
0
0
0
7
Arthur Barrett
Arthur Barrett@Ayyyyybeeeee·
Here in Australia we’ve got the semi-annual hand wringing over cellular carriers and emergency calls - is it time to ditch SS7 for VoIP/SIP and switch from single operator SIM from Telstra/Optus to multi-operator SIM like SimBase or ThingsMobile?
Arthur Barrett@Ayyyyybeeeee

Cell phone networks are yesterdays tech - if an Optus subscriber had a VoIP app on their phone & an Australian number allocated they could have phoned 000 via the Internet connection on their phones and skipped the buggy outdated last century tech of the cellphone network. 5/6

English
2
0
0
40
Arthur Barrett
Arthur Barrett@Ayyyyybeeeee·
@DJSnM How fantastic, and what a gift! I find it much more fun launching with a club. Hope your friend finds a way to continue the hobby. 🚀
English
0
0
0
53
Scott Manley
Scott Manley@DJSnM·
Introduced my friend, and organizer of our pub quiz team “It’s not rocket science”, to model rockets today. I send her home with a kit to build a cooler one.
English
8
4
236
15.9K
Arthur Barrett
Arthur Barrett@Ayyyyybeeeee·
@AnDuong_91 @Morethan3D_Ltd Yes, this makes sense, but I guess I assumed that at 1:200 scale that the ‘standard’ v3’s will all look extremely similar. HLS and tankers are another matter.
English
0
0
0
23
An Duong
An Duong@AnDuong_91·
Hi Arthur, I would definitely make a 1:200 V3 Ship & Booster, but not sure if it would be based on the S39/B19. Because there will be only one 1:200 V3 Ship & Booster (since these small models won't get updated as regularly as the 1:96), I kinda want to see which V3 Ship/Booster will have the most successful flight and design the 1:200 models based on those
English
1
0
1
57
An Duong
An Duong@AnDuong_91·
1:96 scale SPACESHIP-S10 (S39) is now officially available to download from @Morethan3D_Ltd website via: morethan3d.com/product/spacec… You can either purchase the STL's directly from the website, or subscribe to save 40% off 🤑 Happy printing!!! 😊 _________ Join Morethan3D community on our Discord (discord.gg/morethan3d) to get regular update about our upcoming models, discuss 3D printing hints & tips, ask questions, and get help if you come across any printing issues. #3DPrinting
An Duong tweet media
English
5
4
88
3.3K
Arthur Barrett
Arthur Barrett@Ayyyyybeeeee·
@Erdayastronaut @NominalJoe @thejackbeyer Macellaio means "butcher" in Italian, and the t-bone on the menu is Marango Beef from Italy: “a refined crossbreed of Black Angus and Maremmana cattle. Marango beef is distinguished by its darker colour, rich fat content, and a complex, savoury flavour profile w subtle sweetness”
English
0
0
1
303
Arthur Barrett
Arthur Barrett@Ayyyyybeeeee·
@CSI_Starbase I had assumed they needed more data, or were tuning something (which requires more data). Do u think this will affect the current launch date?
English
0
0
0
1.4K
Zack Golden
Zack Golden@CSI_Starbase·
The fact that SpaceX is testing their new deluge system twice a day, everyday for the past 4 days is a very odd sign to me. I get the feeling they are still trying to verify a specific issue has been resolved and are not yet happy with what they are seeing.
English
88
38
2.3K
162.9K
Arthur Barrett
Arthur Barrett@Ayyyyybeeeee·
@WilmsRolf @spdbt Good choice 😁 - yes, meaningful interaction is better. In English we say “two wrongs don’t make a right”. I hope that ‘real people’ stay, because they see that whilst we may disagree, we don’t even like their arguments, but we value hearing their voice.
English
0
0
1
17
Rolf Wilms 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
In principle I agree with you, and I deleted my grumpy post. However, check how one of the larger accounts, @spdbt, is justifying their exit and compare it to what they have been doing with the reply function of almost any of their posts. The MSM, many of which are owned by the SPD, will ensure their viewpoints remain omnipresent.
English
1
0
1
21
Arthur Barrett
Arthur Barrett@Ayyyyybeeeee·
@WilmsRolf Ok, wow, interesting. Thanks. I disagree with you though that the platform is better off without them. I don’t care if it’s Facebook, X or bluesky, I believe that people are better off encountering people who have dissimilar viewpoints. Being isolated from each other is bad.
English
1
0
0
38
Arthur Barrett
Arthur Barrett@Ayyyyybeeeee·
@CSI_Starbase 1. There are some “proposed” community notes, as yet none are shown. 2. I think the right thing to do is simply edit the original post for clarity - but maybe you don’t have the “edit” feature enabled/available 3) replies vs. community notes has been a thing forever.
Arthur Barrett tweet media
English
0
0
0
16
Zack Golden
Zack Golden@CSI_Starbase·
As much as I hate to stir this up again... this is my first time ever being community noted so I feel obligated to acknowledge it. To be clear, I think community notes are a super helpful feature and in this case seems to have been necessary for a good number of people. No arguments there. What I find extremely disingenuous about this note is that it portrays the post as intentional miss information, instead of clarifying the intended meaning behind it. This would make sense had I simply posted it and walked away, but instead I spent half of my Sunday responding to nearly everyone who replied for the explicit purpose of eliminating confusion. A proper community note would have mentioned the facts about F9, and followed that up with a clarification about what I was actually trying to say...but instead purposefully phrased it in a manner that is an attack on my character and credibility. The idea that a SpaceX/Starship content creator would be stupid enough to intentionally ignore the existence of F9 is absolutely ridiculous. In some ways, you could consider this to be countering perceived misinformation with willful misinterpretation. I think many would argue this community note is a form of disinformation in itself. So to those of you who have submitted ratings or suggestions to improve the note, I appreciate you for being a real one. BUT, As someone who has NEVER posted for the purpose of engagement farming (which is why you will rarely, if ever see me tag certain high profile accounts in hopes of receiving a boost), what ever effect this has on monetization does not bother me in the slightest. I'm simply not here for those reasons as many have suggested. A majority of my posts can be grouped into four categories 1. Informing my followers of Starbase related events that I find interesting, with occasional mentions of other space related content 2. Providing updates on investigations we are working on, and directly interacting with MY audience outside of YT 3. Posting episode announcements for the purpose of driving traffic to those videos. 4. Occasional venting about world events that I feel should not be ignored. With that said, going forward I will take more care to make sure I phrase things in a way that leaves no room for ambiguous interpretation. ✌🏾
Zack Golden@CSI_Starbase

I don’t think Blue Origin recovering the same booster twice before SpaceX was on anyone’s Bingo card even a year ago. Exciting times!

English
88
11
492
41K
Sabine Hossenfelder
Sabine Hossenfelder@skdh·
i am become that person who replies to everything with 👍
English
398
30
1.1K
40.2K
Zack Golden
Zack Golden@CSI_Starbase·
Here’s some important food for thought for every human being on this planet. Is it moral to collectively punish an entire civilian population for decisions made by a ruling class that represents less than 0.5 % of their country? The answer matters. Because the precedent we set today becomes the rules of engagement tomorrow. We are actively rewriting the script that could one day be used against our own families, our own cities, our own children. In other words: would dropping 2,000 lb bombs in the middle of New York, Los Angeles, London, Paris, Berlin, Tokyo, Seoul, Sydney, Moscow, Beijing, Tehran, Damascus, Cairo, or any other city on Earth be an acceptable way to force a government to capitulate? The question isn’t about any one conflict. It’s about the standard we are willing to live and die by when the tables inevitably turn.
Trita Parsi@tparsi

A resident in Tehran films the US and Israel bomb densely populated neighborhoods in Tehran. These are clearly massive munitions with little to no regard for civilian casualties. Indeed, the entire neighborhood is engulfed in fire and smoke. Just as Israel did in Gaza.

English
138
23
467
40.3K
Arthur Barrett
Arthur Barrett@Ayyyyybeeeee·
@CSI_Starbase No, but they’re developing a protocol to let the astronauts know if the plants are walking around or if there has indeed been a zombie apocalypse.
English
0
0
7
792
Zack Golden
Zack Golden@CSI_Starbase·
Been a bit out of the loop…has NASA commented on whether the incoming geomagnetic solar storm (X-class flare/CME) is factoring into the Artemis II launch decision for tomorrow?
English
12
4
242
27.1K
Arthur Barrett
Arthur Barrett@Ayyyyybeeeee·
@WilmsRolf And Linus is a very very rare example, whereas on the commercial side, like guys in Atlassian, just employees…
English
0
0
1
20
Rolf Wilms 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
If agentic coding stands on the shoulders of open-source code, wiping out the day jobs of the people who wrote it is a strange way of saying “thanks.”
English
2
1
3
122
Rolf Wilms 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
Only anecdotal, but an important prompt I optimized 2.5 years ago giving barely usable results is now being used unmodified with almost perfect results. Generally, I think we need to distinguish prompts providing requirements or specifications and prompts providing feedback. Those providing requirements are keepers, the feedback prompts may be of little value in 5 years or earlier.
English
2
0
1
13
Rolf Wilms 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
Agentic coding compiles English into programs. Treating prompts as disposable is like shipping binaries while throwing away the source.
English
1
0
2
78
Arthur Barrett
Arthur Barrett@Ayyyyybeeeee·
@jimmy_wales The cost of IT illiteracy is skyrocketing. As IT professionals I think we need to accept much of the blame here. IT as a mechanism to support freedom and access to education is at risk of becoming a failed ideology. AI companies beware they face the same future.
English
0
1
4
691
Jimmy Wales
Jimmy Wales@jimmy_wales·
I asked this week on a parent's Whatsapp group here in London: how many of you have your chidren's phones set up as "child phones"? The first answer I got was "I didn't know that was possible." If you care about child safety, this is what you should be doing in government: promoting the use of sensible and easy to use tools for parents, as opposed to crazy nonsense about wrongly teaching kids that VPNs are bad and asking children to upload face scans to Roblox.
English
9
96
514
62.1K
Jimmy Wales
Jimmy Wales@jimmy_wales·
Are you a UK Member of Parliament who follows me? Are you a UK journalist covering Internet child safety issues? Please read this carefully and do get in touch with me. There's a better way and you are sleep walking into a disaster.
Mullvad.net@mullvadnet

Mass surveillance and censorship are escalating in many countries right now. There is a global attack on secure encrypted communication. Often, authorities, politicians, and tech companies work together to push for new laws. One example: when Ashton Kutcher (yes, the actor), through his tech company Thorn, tried to introduce total surveillance of all EU citizens through undemocratic and corrupt methods. First, Ashton Kutcher convinced the EU Commission that they could scan everything on an EU citizen’s phone or computer (messages, photos, emails, phone calls, all of it) for child sexual abuse material without, at the same time, looking at the content of other types of communication. And then? And then EU Commissioner Ylva Johansson presented the legislative proposal called Chat Control, which aimed to scan everything on all EU citizens' phones and computers (including conversations in end-to-end-encrypted messaging services). The message from the Commission was: we will only search for child sexual abuse material (CSAM). And then? And then experts from all over the world explained to her that the kind of scanning she was talking about (as Ylva described it: a drug-sniffing dog that can detect illegal content in a message without reading the message) simply cannot be done safely, and that Chat Control would mean the end of privacy and pose a security threat to all Europeans. Ylva responded with: “what about the children?” And then? And then it was revealed that Thorn, the organization founded by Ashton Kutcher and which had been lobbying for Chat Control from the beginning, was selling the kind of scanning technology that could be used for Chat Control – despite being registered as a charity organization in the EU’s lobbying registry. And then? And then it was revealed that Thorn, together with the EU Commission, had also started and funded “children’s rights organizations” that had supported the proposal. What appeared publicly to be charitable organizations were in fact lobby groups. And then? And then it was revealed that Europol wanted unlimited access and wanted to use the scanning for more than just child abuse crimes, saying that all data – also unfiltered and innocent material – should be stored because it “could at some point be useful to law enforcement”. And then? And then it was revealed that employees at Europol had joined Thorn, to lobby their old colleagues. And then? And then politicians in Brussels wanted to exempt themselves from the scanning. And then? And then the European Parliament, in an almost historic consensus, voted against the proposal and called Chat Control nothing but mass surveillance. As one of the members of the parliament said: “The Commission wasn’t focusing on protecting children but wanted mass surveillance.” And then? And then The Council of the EU (law proposals must go through both the Parliament and the Council), after three years of negotiation, finally reached a common position on Chat Control. The requirement for mandatory scanning (including end-to-end encrypted messaging services) was removed, which is a major victory, but several problematic elements remain in the Council's position. For instance, the Council wants to demand ID Control to use messaging services (including end-to-end encrypted). And then? And then, in 2026 the final negotiations began, between the European Commission, the European Parliament, and the Council of the EU. At the same time, the European Commission is working on a Plan B, through the initiative Going Dark/ProtectEU, where they once again try to force total surveillance (this time organized crime is the excuse) on the citizens of the EU. And then? youtube.com/watch?v=fPzvUW…

English
14
47
238
23.6K
Arthur Barrett
Arthur Barrett@Ayyyyybeeeee·
@DeffGeff I’m guessing it was a lot less expensive than credit card debt though? It’s all relative. If you can wait until you have the positive bank balance to buy things, great - but sometimes the interest costs are significantly less than the opportunity cost.
English
0
0
1
39
Geoff A
Geoff A@DeffGeff·
I started this loan in 1997, it was for £500 which I then kept extending. So I've had a loan repayment every month for 29 years . DON'T DO IT!!!!!
Geoff A tweet media
English
1
0
4
446