
BIW
6.8K posts

BIW
@BIWinCA
Thinking is difficult. That's why most people judge.













🇮🇷🇺🇸🇬🇧 Iran just proved its missiles can reach far beyond the Middle East Iran fired two intermediate-range ballistic missiles at Diego Garcia, a joint U.S.-UK military base sitting 4,000 kilometers away in the middle of the Indian Ocean. Neither hit the base, but the message landed harder than any warhead could. Tehran has always publicly claimed its missile range tops out at 2,000 km. This strike attempt doubles that number overnight. The Khorramshahr-4 that likely carried out the attack can also deliver cluster warheads, the same munitions that have been devastating Israeli cities for three weeks. Look at the map. A 4,000 km range from Tehran draws a circle that reaches Paris, London, and most of Europe. Every NATO capital that thought this war was a distant Middle Eastern problem just realized Iranian missiles could theoretically reach their doorstep. Source: @sentdefender WSJ

𝗜𝗥𝗔𝗡 𝗙𝗜𝗥𝗘𝗗 𝗕𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗜𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗖 𝗠𝗜𝗦𝗦𝗜𝗟𝗘𝗦 𝗔𝗧 𝗗𝗜𝗘𝗚𝗢 𝗚𝗔𝗥𝗖𝗜𝗔. 𝗡𝗢𝗪 𝗥𝗘𝗠𝗘𝗠𝗕𝗘𝗥 𝗪𝗛𝗔𝗧 𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗬 𝗧𝗢𝗟𝗗 𝗨𝗦 𝗟𝗔𝗦𝗧 𝗠𝗢𝗡𝗧𝗛. Iran fired two intermediate-range ballistic missiles at Diego Garcia — the joint U.S.-UK military base in the Indian Ocean. Neither hit the base. One failed in flight while a U.S. warship fired an SM-3 interceptor at the other. Now here is the critical detail your post asked about. Diego Garcia lies roughly 4,000 kilometers from Iran. Last month, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi stated publicly that Iran had deliberately limited its ballistic missile range to 2,000 kilometers. 𝗛𝗮𝗹𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲. 𝗗𝗼𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗱. Diego Garcia hosts U.S. bombers, nuclear submarines, and guided-missile destroyers — one of the most strategically significant bases in the entire Indo-Pacific. That is what Iran was targeting. Not a symbolic gesture. The platform from which American long-range strike aircraft operate across two oceans. This marked the longest-ranging missile attack from Tehran since the war began — and it came hours after Britain authorized the U.S. to use its bases for strikes against Iranian missile sites attacking Hormuz shipping. Iran's Foreign Minister had explicitly warned that Britain was putting itself in Iran's crosshairs. He wasn't bluffing. 𝗕𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝗱 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗯𝗹𝘂𝗳𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗲𝗹𝘀𝗲. The same regime that told the world its missiles couldn't reach beyond 2,000 kilometers just fired at a target 4,000 kilometers away. The same regime that signed the fatwa against nuclear weapons was enriching uranium to 60%. The same regime whose foreign minister promised restraint was plotting to ass∗ss∗nate foreign leaders and sending operatives to British nuclear submarine bases. This is who the anti-war commentators wanted America to negotiate with. This is who the Biden administration unfroze assets for. This is who the State Department was urging caution about provoking. Military experts confirmed that the range of these missiles exceeded the known capability of Iran's ballistic missiles — a significant intelligence revelation about what Iran actually had versus what it publicly admitted to having. Every arms control agreement, every diplomatic assurance, every intelligence assessment built on Iran's declared capabilities just became less reliable. If their "self-imposed" 2,000km limit was fiction, what else was fiction? 𝗜𝗿𝗮𝗻 𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲. 𝗜𝘁 𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗻𝘂𝗰𝗹𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁. 𝗜𝘁 𝗹𝗶𝗲𝗱 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘁. 𝗡𝗼 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗯𝗲 𝘁𝗿𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗱. 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗷𝗼𝗯. nypost.com/2026/03/21/wor…







🇮🇷🇺🇸 How Iran hit the "unhittable" jet The F-35 is invisible to radar. It was never invisible to heat. Iran likely used infrared tracking systems that detect engine exhaust instead of radar signatures. Because these systems emit no energy, the F-35's warning systems never alerted the pilot he was being targeted. The suspected weapon: Iran's 358 missile, a hybrid between a loitering drone and a surface-to-air missile that hunts using optical and infrared sensors, bypassing stealth entirely. Stealth dominates radar. Physics doesn't care. Source: AiTelly




A senior administration official tells FOX, Joe Kent was: -a known leaker and he was cut out of POTUS intelligence briefings months ago. -the WH told DNI Tulsi Gabbard he should be fired for suspected leaks but she never did. -he has not been part of any Iran planning discussions or briefings at all.













