Beaucoup Spookoo retweetledi
Beaucoup Spookoo
564 posts

Beaucoup Spookoo
@BSpookoo
Life: Now brought to you in dog years
Katılım Mart 2020
157 Takip Edilen147 Takipçiler
Beaucoup Spookoo retweetledi
Beaucoup Spookoo retweetledi
Beaucoup Spookoo retweetledi

@KevinClimate @PaulRoundy1 @Jumpsteady @lucas_chancel @PikettyLeMonde @JKSteinberger To be honest I find this entire exchange off the mark. Debating 2.7 or 3 or 4 C is quite irrelevant, as we have no evidence that we can handle anything above 2 C, that already 1.5 C likely triggers tipping points, and 1 C is boundary for Justice
English

@KaiHeron These are the sounds of system in self preservation. All it wants is to sustain itself.
English
Beaucoup Spookoo retweetledi

@chrisedmond If the inflation driving profit margins are in inelastic goods, such as groceries, energy as well as debt repayments (banks, coles/Woolies etc)… demand/supply may be constant and prices could be raised under the false flag of “inflation”, could it not?
English

Two quick points on this:
1) It is impossible to distinguish between theories of inflation by looking at national accounts data like this. These are accounting identities which hold by definition, regardless of the actual determinants of inflation.
theguardian.com/business/2023/…
English
Beaucoup Spookoo retweetledi

“We don’t just need a planet roughly the same size and temperature as Earth; we need a planet that spent billions of years evolving with us. We depend completely on the billions of organisms that make up Earth’s biosphere. Without them, we cannot survive.” aeon.co/essays/we-will…
English
Beaucoup Spookoo retweetledi
Beaucoup Spookoo retweetledi

So, we need to ask why it is that we are failing to act on the scientific warnings.
This is what @IsakStoddard et al. do in a fantastic review in @AnnualReviews.
Their conclusion?: It's about political power! 7/n
annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.114…

English

What questions do you need answered for your lineup in Week 2? REPLY BELOW with #FFNOW!
English
Beaucoup Spookoo retweetledi

@_HannahRitchie @OurWorldInData @_HannahRitchie so, safe to say conventional cotton clothing is more environmentally friendly than organic cotton?
And the biggest factor is always going to be pace/size of production...?
English

@OurWorldInData My meta point is definitely not that organic cotton bags = bad.
In fact, my point is that bags (if managed properly – not littered in the ocean) are not a big deal in the bigger picture.
Fine to be conscious, but it's not what we should be losing sleep over.
/end
English

I’ve seen various (very valid) critiques of the “20,000 uses of an organic cotton bag to equal a plastic bag” stat over the last few days.
I’ve updated our chart at @OurWorldinData to provide more nuance to these numbers 👇
What’s going on? A short thread 🧵

English
Beaucoup Spookoo retweetledi

Weekend reminder that SimCity's creators couldn't accurately reflect the scale of urban parking lots because if they did the game fell apart.
theatlantic.com/technology/arc…

English
Beaucoup Spookoo retweetledi
Beaucoup Spookoo retweetledi

Interesting study on whether hopeful messages on climate are effective or not:
"A cautionary note about messages of hope: Focusing on progress in reducing carbon emissions weakens mitigation motivation [ie the urge to take action]"
It says:
1/n 🧵
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
English
Beaucoup Spookoo retweetledi

🗞️Hot off the press @NatureComms📢:
Americans think a minority in the US are worried about climate change & support climate policy—it's really a super majority.
This “False Social Reality” is near-universal in the US & fully inverts the true norm: nature.com/articles/s4146… 1/3
English
Beaucoup Spookoo retweetledi

Social change happens very slowly, and then all at once, because there are tipping points in social beliefs. This paper found that when 25% of people shared a new norm, this could trigger a tipping point to change the consensus of the entire population. science.org/doi/10.1126/sc…


English

@paulkrugman It's great to see.
But unfortunately there's more to our environmental catastrophe than just C02.
Rampant material use, land use, agricultural sprawl and pollution are all degrading the planetary systems we rely on (biodiversity/top soil loss etc)
I'd stick to economics mate.
English














