Binker

@infraa_ @Jake__Wujastyk Right. More aptly named: Project Bullshit, Project Markets Open, Project Narrative Control. Project Appear In Charge.

@Jake__Wujastyk Well it’s not like we’re providing actual escorts so why would they do anything?

Anyone wanna guess what Iran does about it? The word has the letters “othing” in it and starts with “N”

@start9labs Where can I buy your new Router?

@w_s_bitcoin We learned that BIP-110 actually stands for Bitcoin Incel Proposal 110 due to their regular outward anger at everyone, self-isolation principles, and upcoming failure.

What did we learn from this BIP-110 node sybil attack?

@Beautyon_ Time to face the real music: BIP-110 MASF = Complete nothingburger. BIP-110 UASF = Self-isolation Ghost chain with a cadre of angry men pointing fingers, much akin to the Incel movement where young men self-isolate and spit vitriol because no women want to partner with them.

The problem here is the mischaracterizing and overestimating of the Bitcoin Cult. Even in the Bitcoin Cult context, accounts like "MrHodl" are not significant or influential in the big "rest of the world" picture where bitcoin is destined to thrive. It really doesn't matter what "Mr. Hodl" has to say about anything; nothing he claims or says can or will change the direction of bitcoin. That's a fact. Shinobi, who is a provably extremely intelligent, very well versed and knowledgeable person has more influence than "Mr. Hodl", and has risen from scintillating "phone it in appearances" on YouTube Bitcoin shows where he wiped the floor with big blocker anti-Bitcoiners to gaining a seat on Bitcoin Magazine's staff. By dint of this, he has bigger reach; this is unarguable. His manner on X however, as a matter of effective persuasion, completely destroys his "arguments", on top of the fallacious, teenage, "Pics or it didn't happen" discourse that no one takes seriously. Adam Back is the most powerful of the three, with a reputation spanning decades, a history of very sound ideas, a company actually offering real and useful services to Bitcoin users rather than skulking in the shadows as an rutardid "anon". Everyone took him seriously because he was clearly a very serious, logical, philosophically aligned genius level thinker, and major and effective contributor to the Bitcoin business ecosystem with Blockstream's products, tools and services. Those are "Bona Fides" by any rational measure. No argument against him can be mounted in these areas. That's why people are so shocked by his profound change in particular, because through being effective, he actually mattered. The corruption of Bitcoin means less to Shinobi and "Mr. Hodl", who are not as invested in every way like Adam Back is. If Bitcoin vanished tomorrow, what would "Mr. Hodl" lose? Nothing. He's just an anon on X. Shinobi loses his writing gig at Bitcoin Magazine. Neither employ anyone, serve anyone with tools. Nothing of value to others is lost. On the other hand, Adam Back loses the the culmination of a life-times work in a field where he is an expert to the level where he is cited in the venerated "White Paper". He has more to lose than any intemperate autist or silly 4Channish weather-vane turning Backstreet Boys fangirl level Anon. The fact of the matter is that Bitcoin is bigger than all of these people; even Adam Back. This is not controversial. The telephone as an idea was bigger than Edison. After Edison died, and his Patents expired, telephone networks grew and spanned and changed the entire world. Adam Back is not Satoshi; his company is one of many that are building on Bitcoin, all of which are owned by people who will eventually fade away. And Bitcoin will grow to engulf the entire world...right? The noise you hear on X is not bitcoin. The people you worship are not Bitcoin. Bitcoin is much bigger than what is said on X, and infinitely bigger than the miniscule and fleeting reputations of Bitcoin Cult members who switch off their brains when they go to conferences and pack halls to the rafters to hear the High Priest of Bitcoin whine on stage to a pounding music intro. No matter what happens, bitcoin will survive all of these people, and it will continue to do what it does one way or another. Hopefully it is one way. The weakest part of the ecosystem are the brain dead men and women who don't know why bitcoin was written, and the brain dead men and women who know why it was written but who are pulling up the ladder and the brain dead men and women who think Bitcoin is a threat of some kind. If these people did not exist, bitcoin could continue indefinitely. But you don't live in that world. You should therefore be prepared to believe that you will be smeared, attacked, and harassed by people you made the mistake of venerating if you try to exit the Cult. Hodlnaut, because he was counted amongst the victims of Craig "Faketoshi" Wright was on the surface, a deep Cult "Made Man" at a minimum. That he has broken ranks in such an effective and serious way, using his assumed high level cult member status to destroy the priesthood is the greatest of blasphemies. Hodlnaut and Adam Back were in the same Hight Court being attacked by Faketoshi. Hodlnaut has the credibility as a wrongly perceived insider, by mere association, to detonate Bitcoin Core from the inside. That's why they hate him so much. He broke ranks. None of these people attacking Hodlnaut (or very few of them) are actually interested in the truth or in Bitcoin; it's just another grift, gig and club to be in. The low level cult members who are too timid or dumb or anti-social to do what Adam Back has done move from one position to another because that's where their maximum value is; they have nothing actionable to offer, nothing to buy or use; its just hot air, swearing, positioning, and lazer eyes. The cult tenets of "don't trust, verify" and decentralization mantras were nothing more than sentiments provided to the Cult from the priest class as symbols and coordinating messages to get plebs in line, mobilize them into an army and control them. The Cult Priesthood don't believe any of it; if they did, they would not be reacting the way they've reacted to BIP110 Hodlnaut and Luke's client. They would never have done or supported "Use Cases" or pollution on Layer 1, or anything that caused what has happened to happen. Of course they don't care about "don't trust, verify" and decentralization. Everyone can see this now, and it may explain why they're so furious; they can't use the religious texts they've been using to enlist and control and manipulate users. They've been disempowered. It's over for them. That they're retreating to intemperate bursts of schoolboy profanity laced anger, ridiculous Appeals to Authority, Ad Hominem and other fallacious arguments, shaming, smears....and a point blank refusal to engage with the shocking revelations of the articles shows they're completely destroyed and haven't got a leg to stand on. It's really over for them. What's more interesting is that they believe that railing against Hodlnaut's exposé will discredit his work, make it go away or diminish its impact. Haven't they heard of the Streisand Effect? The more furiously they explode against him the more people read the articles and share them, just like this: citadel21.com/the-lever And they can't all be doing this because they're "compromised" and being "Blackmailed because Epstein". They're doing this because they believe in it; they believe in "use cases" and want Bitcoin to be polluted on Layer 1. That's beyond dispute. They want the corrupt management of Bitcoin Core and the Reference Client to continue unchallenged. All of this is a logical conclusion. Once again. The current generation of Bitcoiners, Bitcoin users, Bitcoin businesses and everyone tangential to it is not eternal; new people will come to it with (unfortunately) "their own ideas" and they will try to corrupt it. Whether they succeed or not is up to the people who run the nodes and who are aligned with bitcoin's ends, unlike the Three Stooges Hodlnaut references. Bitcoin's central flaw is that it requires a large number of aligned people for it to run in a protected state. In 2026, this is harder than ever to put in place, because you're dealing with mentally ill people who don't even believe that there can be truth at all. Still, does this mean you should give up and "go back to fiat". Obviously not. What you should do is begin to behave in a rational manner; stop being and acting like a cult member and imitating other people. You are going to get burned again and again by your heroes; so, don't have any. Be in Bitcoin for it's purpose, not the "culture". The culture is toxic and a dead end...but if you like death then... Rock on, and perish with it!

@AnchorWatch Was disappointed you were apparently gated inside Pro/Whale Pass-only area of BTC Conference. Wanted to confer with you guys in person. Will you be at Bitcoin Is For Everyone?

Every Trident Vault comes with recovery. Your custody, your way.

@GlennOnrampBTC @BackslashBTC @OnrampBitcoin So based on this your take is that the B- is overlevied then? Should be lower?

It is relevant because credit analysis is about cashflow. They can’t sell the bitcoin, because that’s the collateral, and Saylor never sells. So they have to get the cash to pay the dividends from somewhere. And it isn’t the software business. So on a cash basis, how creditworthy are they if they get the cash by issuing securities?

The structural analysis of Digital Credit is live. The Simpler Trade: The 20/80 BTC + Treasuries alternative that beats STRC on every metric that matters. 17-page brief & 77-page report. Links below...

@GlennOnrampBTC @BackslashBTC @OnrampBitcoin Let me ask you this though Glenn - because you mention it many places. Do you really believe Strategy's B- Credit rating is accurate representation - or is that just the Old School doing their best to not give them proper facility for purposeful reasons?

@BackslashBTC @BTCOrangehead @OnrampBitcoin Bitcoin is money designed for enemies. We are meant to have an adversarial mindset. How does the Byzantine General’s problem work with perpetual preferreds again?

@future42org @stevemur Washington State sucks

Olympia Democrats cut $580,000 from the WA DNR Park's Maintenance budget this session and the results are multiple campground closures, washed out trails, broken toilets, and no trash pickup. In case you are wondering why they cut this small amount from an $80 Billion budget for such a popular thing that tens of millions of people use; its because they want the public to feel pain up to next session. That way, they can ram through more tax increases without too much complaint. @JackieKentNews | @komonews 'Campgrounds shutter: DNR slashes recreation services, cutting access to state parks' Article: komonews.com/news/local/was…

@OnrampBitcoin Is Onramp or Early Riders going to be in Vegas this week?

What happens to your bitcoin when you're gone? Most holders don't have an answer. Onramp Inheritance is built into every account from day one. Named beneficiaries. Direct support for your family. Legal title and possession handled. Step-up in cost basis included. Generational wealth requires generational planning.

@Anton__BTC @mineshop_eu Right, which mechanism was purposely designed because the lowered-to 55% MASF was never going to happen. Unfortunately September is the point we get to see how angry and venomous BIP-110 folks actually can be.

@BTCOrangehead @mineshop_eu Binker, we disagree and that's OK. BIP110 activates September 1st.

185 troops. 363 recruits on the front line. Combined firepower: 2.44 PH/s. Best shot fired: 970G difficulty share. One target. 3.125 BTC. 0% fee. Anonymous. EU. The block doesn't stand a chance. 🎯 solo.mineshop.eu #Bitcoin #SoloMining #BitAxe

@Anton__BTC @mineshop_eu I have no ill will towards you Anton, and I agree with many points counter to Core - but the sooner you start facing reality the sooner we can get an actual working alternative to BIP-110. You're wasting time and mindshare. It's toast, wake up.

@BTCOrangehead @mineshop_eu The amount of ignorance in this ↑ reply.

@Anton__BTC @mineshop_eu Not every Bitcoin node will accept BIP-110 blocks. 😂 Only the small percentage of nodes actually running your enforcement patch will. The vast majority of nodes (Core nodes) will continue rejecting BIP-110 blocks as invalid under the current rules. Class in session, brotha.

Binker, bad analogy. BIP110 nodes aren’t isolated. Quite the contrary. Every single Bitcoin node will accept BIP110 blocks, while app 20% of nodes will cause enough friction, rejecting non BIP110 blocks, for miners to learn once again, who controls the network. Welcome to the class. Lecturing starts September 1st.

@Anton__BTC @mineshop_eu Imagine if a bunch of angry men decided they were going to be celibate and unilaterally moved to an island to isolate themselves from society while spewing vitriol about those who weren't coming with 😂😂😂 BIM-110. Bitcoin Incel Movement.

@mineshop_eu Core 29.3 makes you the enemy of BIP110. Plebs running BIP110 nodes will reject your block, once BIP110 activities. September 1st Tic Toc 😉

@Pledditor It will only get worse and worse as they all finally come to terms with the fact that they somehow were duped into thinking it was actually going to be successful. None of them are addressing reality, and its hard to reason with humans in that state of mind.

I can't believe I have to address this, but this is the same @Pledditor who has always owned this account. I haven't sold it, I am not under NDA, I am not being blackmailed or anything ridiculous nonsense like that. The Knots cult keeps making up lies about me, because I'm not participating in their suicide pact ritual in September, where all their bitcoin nodes will fork off the network at once and create an altcoin. Just like a cult, they are trying to tar and feather anyone who dares to leave it.

@stephjenks941 @1914ad @_Knotzi Ah, so BIP-110 nodes won't actually split off in September to play a separate game individually with themselves while regular BTC hums on? How long you think it will take between blocks over there? Interesting how many folks have convinced themselves this will be a success.

@BTCOrangehead @1914ad @_Knotzi Bip110 will likely activate & anyone wanting to spam the nodes will be the one that has to hard fork, as the entire network would accept blocks w stricter rules, but not vice versa. Going to be interesting to watch the people that don’t get this be surprised.

“zero support” “cOnFiScAtiOn” “virtue signaling” “lmao” “DOA” “but But BUT LUKE!!1!” Uh oh. Time to think about the inevitability of Bitcoin returned to its sole purpose as money. 🧡

@1914ad @_Knotzi Just denotes the higher amount of nodes that are going to disappear from network in a few months, no? Lol. And what percentage are you figuring to be Sybil/Tor? Does that matter to you, or you just like seeing number go up?

@BTCOrangehead @_Knotzi Said at 1%, said at 2%, said at 3%, said at 4%, said at 5%, said… 🤡

@BeccaAmilee @AnchorWatch I'd love to know more about your MiC.

Today, @AnchorWatch can do the following: *Institutional Infrastructure (wallet rails, custody as a service) *Shared Custody (you hold 1 or 3 keys, we hold keys) *Multi-institutional Custody *Custody insurance is optional, $250K-$100M *Qualified Custodian (next month) *Custom commercial insurance policies *Kidnap & Ransom policies *E&O, D&O, Fund Manager Liability *Inheritance *Custody & Insure Bitcoin backed loans Book time to sit down with me in person in Vegas next week! Tuesday and Wednesday slots.

@BeccaAmilee Yeah, I feel you on the 80s vibe. We're about the same age. Several of their sweatshirts I hace owned have had seam issues, but they are comfortable. Will wear one next week and come say hello. :)

@BTCOrangehead I'm not that worried about value, I've accepted that brands have value. I just like the preschool-like colors, very 80s. It might be expensive fabric, I don't know without seeing the specs, but I don't like it! Even washed and dried.

Aviator Nation sweats look so good but wear so bad. 🫤 Kinda bad fabric, kinda bad specs.