Bodhizafa

If you’re an overweight blowjob hater your ex isn’t coming back to you.

@MalcangiSarah A reporter huh? You should report to the kitchen and make a man a sandwich

If you’re an Anti Semite Jew hater Jesus isn’t coming back for you.

@Schwalm5132 @wayofftheres @joekent16jan19 Strength & Honor

Things I have in common with @joekent16jan19 * Joined the Army * Volunteered for Airborne School * Attended Special Forces Assessment and Selection * Was selected for Special Forces * Graduated Special Forces Qualification Course * Passed SERE school(s) * Served in 5th Special Forces Group (Airborne) * Fought in Iraq * *Multiple combat tours * Served in multiple countries across the Middle East * Attended funerals and memorials for the same fallen soldiers * Completed Special Forces Warrant Officer Training * Led Special Forces teams * Received additional training above and beyond the basic SF course * Served in a higher-tier units * Retired after 20+ years in the Army Things I have in common with commenters on X: * We are both on X. Commenters: “I guess you SF guys just stick together…” “Brotherhood makes you stupid I guess…” “You should listen to me over him…” If I were to dump Joe just because a bunch of politicians, podcasters, and random people on X told me to, that would say a lot more about me than it does about joe. There is a brotherhood that is forged through shared pain and suffering....and yes, it matters. When you give up time with your family, put your life on the line multiple times in service to this nation, you earn a level of respect and credibility from those who did the same. I still talk to friends on both sides of the political aisle who were right there beside me, getting shot at and blown up together. None of us were thinking about politics when pieces of the wall we were hiding behind were getting blown off by enemy fire. I never stopped to ask, “Are you a liberal?” when a chunk of shrapnel the size of a football screamed past us like a runaway generator. My first radio call after six daisy-chained artillery shells turned our convoy into a dust cloud wasn’t, “Is every conservative okay?” Going through hell together builds real respect. It means when one of us says, “I have a serious concern about something,” I’m going to listen over almost anyone else. What kind of man would I be if I turned my back on Joe after everything we’ve been through, just because some politician who never experienced even 1% of what we did told me to? There’s one particular snake in the grass out there saying “Joe has no honor.” That same individual has been slithering around Washington D.C. for decades while Joe and I were out there putting everything on the line for America, no questions asked. Follow me or don’t. I don’t care. I’m not the disloyal type who abandons a brother at the first sign of trouble after we bled together. I'm better than that. Some of you need to go look in the mirror and watch yourself say "I trust politicians" and see if you can say it with a straight face. Joe tried politics and failed. In all honesty, that's a better quality than for him to succeed as far as I'm concerned.

@BozzTheRedeemed @MichaelFranzese Have you ever considered that the CIA actually wants to divest themselves from Israeli influence & they’re using him to do so?

@MichaelFranzese Not certain I trust or believe Kirakou. He claimed Rudy Giuliani shook him down for millions of dollars. Maybe, maybe not. He pops into podcasts, sows doubt, leaves. Feel like he never left CIA in spite of his story.

I thought I understood Epstein, Israel, and the war in Iran… until this conversation. In this sit down, CIA whistleblower John Kiriakou walks me through why he believes Epstein was working as an access agent, how Israel and Mossad might sit at the center of more than we think, why the Kennedy files still aren’t fully released 60 years later, and what’s really behind the Iran war and Trump’s decisions. I don’t say this lightly: this one actually made me rethink some things.

@RealSamRogers @Weedy275B

@Weedy275B I'm a leg nobody cares what I think

Never tempt the 82nd leadership with a mustard stain. - Plato

@dustoff_1sg Oh look. It’s another low GT (R)etard who doesn’t know who the Bolsheviks were

The United States of America is a republic with a Constitution. If you have allegiance to anything else or any other country you should leave. We the people don’t want socialism, Marxism, communism or Islam (Sharia Law) here.

@DeTocqueville14 @jtitus81 Who would do such a thing..

Anyone else ever get the feeling that there are group of people who know that the ship is sinking and they are stealing everything that isn't nailed down as they load up the life rafts for themselves??

@TheQuartering Joe Kent committed, in the humble opinion of someone who once walked the same halls, one of the greatest acts of selfless service in modern history His words, imprinted in the minds of mothers & wives nationwide who’ll reconsider sending their sons & daughters to die for Israel.

Nobody in the real world gives a fuck about Joe Kent.

@joethe_duck @VigilantFox Oh no.. Not a sovereign nation using proxies to fight off hostile nuclear nations who’ve spent the last 70 years invading & wholesale slaughtering their neighbors under completely false pretenses…

Kent's argument only works because he's redefining "attack" so narrowly it's meaningless. Iran didn't go direct this term, but they never stopped using proxies or applying pressure to our forces or interests. It's how they operate, so saying they're "not aggressive" is dishonest and misleading. They follow an escalation ladder, but that's not restraint. It's controlled to stay below the threshold of full retaliation. Let's not even get into their ballistic program or uranium enrichment. Kent knows all this

Mark Levin abruptly cuts to a commercial break after telling Joe Kent to “talk more slowly” and focus on “one point at a time.” JOE KENT: “Secretary Rubio said there was no imminent threat coming from Iran against the Americans.” MARK LEVIN: “He corrected that.” JOE KENT: “There was an imminent threat coming from the Israelis, who were going to attack [Iran].” MARK LEVIN: “Hold on, hold on. We’re going to do it honestly. One point at a time.” JOE KENT: “The Iranians had observed an escalation ladder. They hadn’t attacked us under President Trump.” MARK LEVIN: “Can you do me a favor, and I don’t mean to be rude. Can you talk a little more slowly? I’m having trouble hearing. Take your time. Go ahead.” JOE KENT: “Sure. When President Trump came into office, the Iranians knew that President Trump wanted to get a deal.” “They observed the escalatory ladder very carefully.” “They stopped having our proxies attack us like they were attacking us under the Biden administration.” “And they got to the negotiating table with us about the nuclear agenda.” “When the 12 Day War kicked off, and the Israelis started that, the Iranians still didn’t attack us.” MARK LEVIN: “We have to take a break.”

@Tanya88270082 @wayofftheres @HeatherKaiserWA Spoken like a woman who contracted HPV from a SOPC washout behind the dumpster at O’Donnells. #TheGiftThatKeepsGiving

@wayofftheres @HeatherKaiserWA The veterans i talk to hate him. Go figure. 🤔 Nobody gaf about his disgusting wife either. Traitor he is.

If you go after a man’s wife, especially a Saint like @HeatherKaiserWA , who has done so much for a man and his children, reeling from the tragic combat death of a wife and mother….. Heather has been incredible, one in a million to let Joe continue honoring his late wife Shannon, killed in action fighting the enemies of our nation, and being a stable mother for their sons. Taking a cheap shot at her, or their relationship, is the definition of “without honor”. You have to be a special kind of shitbag to even contemplate that line of attack @realDonaldTrump Signed, Medically retired SF guy One that buried a lot of friends across the GWOT

@RobVet2020 @wayofftheres @JustTheTweets17 @HeatherKaiserWA Cool story retard

@wayofftheres @JustTheTweets17 @HeatherKaiserWA Respect works both ways 🤷‍♂️, you don’t humiliate your boss in public when he gave you the greatest job as the NCTC Director. Signed, U.S. Army Combat vet, 3 tours 🇮🇶 Iraq.

@SwipeWright @TheMilkBarTV Cool story fa99ot

If I actually discovered compelling evidence that Israel k!lled Charlie Kirk, the last person I'd seek out and cozy up to is Candace Owens. In fact, I would distance myself from her as much as possible because nothing could be more instantly delegitimizing.

@barkmeta @FloridaPopulist Hmm. Hmmm.. I wonder…

Let me explain what just happened 👇 5 minutes before the President announced a halt to attacks on Iran… someone placed a $1.5 BILLION bet on stocks going up and dumped $192 million in oil. 5 minutes… These trades were 4 to 6 times larger than anything else in the entire market. Whoever did this wasn’t guessing. You don’t risk $1.5 billion on a hunch. There was zero public indication this announcement was coming. No leaks. No press. Nothing. The only people who knew were in the room when the decision was made. Someone in that room picked up a phone. And within minutes they made more money than most Americans will earn in a thousand lifetimes. In a single trade. On a war that cost you $4+ a gallon gas and $16 billion in tax dollars. American citizens funded this war. Politicians are profiting from it. This is not the first time. Every major announcement from this administration has had massive suspicious trades right before it dropped. Tariff reversals. Policy shifts. War decisions. This is the most blatant insider trading operation in the history of American politics. It’s not even close. And it’s happening over and over in broad daylight. You would go to federal prison for trading on a tip from your cousin. These people are front running war decisions with billion dollar bets and nobody will ever ask a single question. Nobody will be investigated. Nobody will be charged. By tomorrow this will be buried under the next satisfying headline. Just like last time. And the time before that. The game is rigged. And they’re not even trying to hide it anymore…

@lecternleader @TrevorSheatz

@TrevorSheatz I keep seeing everyone gang up on this guy. Hopefully, she can help him through the process.

My wife was formerly promiscuous. I was a virgin. She was then radically born-again. Committed to church, evangelized constantly, Puritan books in her bedroom, prayer journals, grief over past sexual sin, etc. We got to know each other well for over a year, dated for four months, engaged for two and a half, and didn't sin sexually with one another. Our first kiss with each other was at the altar on our wedding day (reaction pic attached!). We've been married for over five years now, and she's been the most wonderful and godly wife, mother to our three children, and homemaker you could imagine. She's more pure than most virgins, as biblical purity has less to with past sins (though they certainly matter) and more to do with one's current posture of the heart and daily decisions to honor the Lord (Matt. 5:8). We're far too quick to forget the story of the woman labeled as a known "sinner" (likely a prostitute) in Luke 7:36-50 who was washing Jesus' feet with her tears while kissing them too. The Pharisees were shocked that Jesus let a public sinner do this. Jesus responded with a parable about debts being forgiven and ended with this powerful conclusion: "Her many sins have been forgiven; that’s why she loved much. But the one who is forgiven little, loves little" (Luke 7:47). Everyone seems to highlight the benefits of virginity, and it certainly is a blessing. But we forget to highlight the benefits of being forgiven much as well. My wife knows the depths of Jesus' forgiveness more than most people, enabling her to more easily live out a life of passionate love for her Savior. A woman or man's past sexual sin matters. But what matters far more when it comes to deciding who to marry is if the person is truly born again, if their repentance is real, if they truly have a heart for Christ, if they truly follow Jesus and obey his commands. "God has chosen what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen what is weak in the world to shame the strong. God has chosen what is insignificant and despised in the world ​— ​what is viewed as nothing ​— ​to bring to nothing what is viewed as something, so that no one may boast in his presence. It is from him that you are in Christ Jesus, who became wisdom from God for us ​— ​our righteousness, sanctification, and redemption, — in order that, as it is written: 'Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.'" (1 Cor. 1:27-31) "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come!" (2 Cor. 5:17)

@yabhisheky @zerohedge Cool story, kike.

@zerohedge He’s the ultimate feminist, made women financially independent and built the most revenue-efficient company in the world.

ONLYFANS OWNER LEONID RADVINSKY HAS DIED AT 43

@RonSCantor Hmmm. Would they approve of PornHub, OnlyFans, opioids & endless wars?

People say God rejected Israel because a small group of them rejected Jesus 2000 years ago. Have you considered the thousands of Jews who followed him 2000 years ago?

Brass. Balls.

@BrianCox_RLTW Dr Cox for Brains is way out of his depth.

Hi there, Rep. Khanna. Retired Army JAG here & current prof of int'l law. And you are way out of your depth. You should consider sticking to legislating & leaving #LOAC commentary to actual specialists. Like me. Allow me to explain. First off, if a power plant is "dual use," then attacking it is, by definition, NOT an "indiscriminate bombing." Here's why. As DoD Law of War Manual notes, this term is often "used to describe objects that are used by both the armed forces and the civilian population, such as power stations" (pic 1). The Manual also correctly points out this term has no legal significance. Either something qualifies as a military objective such that directing an attack against it is permitted, or it's a civilian object such that it may not be made the object of attack. See the problem yet? That's right! If something is "dual-use," it qualifies as a military objective...and directing an attack against a military objective is, by definition, NOT "indiscriminate" (pic 2). Back to pic 1, the Manual also notes that when attacking "dual-use" objects, "it will be appropriate to consider in applying the principle of proportionality the harm to the civilian population expected to result from the attack on such a military objective." You might notice I emphasized "proportionality" & "expected" there, and I did so because it's a preview to your next massive error. Here's what you claim about proportionality in your 🧵: "Proportionality forbids attacks where expected incidental civilian harm including effects like loss of hospital power, water pumps failing, food spoilage or extreme heat or cold exposure. This is excessive compared to the concrete military gain per Article 51(5)(b)." We'll get to your selection of source (AP I) later. For now, let's focus on how badly you botched the proportionality rule. To describe what the actual rule is supposed to look like, let's go back to the Manual. As it observes, personnel engaged in hostilities "must refrain from attacks in which the expected loss of civilian life, injury to civilians, and damage to civilian objects incidental to the attack would be excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage expected to be gained" (pic 3). Now, I added bold text to the "expected" at the beginning & end because this highlights your next mistake. Yes you correctly note expected incidental harm is part of the equation, but you left out "expected" on the military advantage component. This is a massive error because you need to be able to tell what the expected incidental harm is & the expected (or anticipated) concrete & direct military advantage is for each attack in order to assess whether the former was "excessive in relation to" the latter. And, do you have any intel indicating what degree of incidental harm AND concrete & direct military advantage is for each attack you purport to be addressing? No, of course you don't. As such, you're not conducting a legitimate proportionality assessment. Which, is easy if you don't properly articulate law. Hell, you can make pretty much anything seem illegal if you can come up with any bullshit articulation of the legal standard you feel like fabricating. But we're not allowed to do that in actual practice. And so, you shouldn't either in public discourse, or else you're creating a false impression that potentially lawful conduct is illegal. And another thing - I noticed you left off the direct part of "concrete & direct military advantage" in your bullshit version of proportionality. That matters because remote harms need not be factored (pic 4). Some prospective harms you mentioned probably are direct enough, but others...not so much. Finally, I also noticed you claim AP I binds 🇺🇸 "as customary international law." But not all of AP I is customary, which is why I draw from the Manual instead. I'll finish off with a simple pro tip: stay in your lane. Leave LOAC analysis to @DeptofWar. And actual experts...like me.

@JohnPaulDetriot @Weedy275B @pr1izzL3 You this Marine Barracks Bombing?

@Weedy275B @pr1izzL3 I can hardly wait to see the American Flag and the USMC Flag flying over the "Crown Jewel" Kharg Island. PAYBACK BITCH for the Marine Barracks Lebanon. When Marines show up shit gets broke and people die.

19 February 1945...Imagine the suprise as a Marine on the way to assualt Iwo Jima the ships you see in the distance are Japanese oil tankers that FDR allows through the blockade. Now we can ask 31st MEU the question as they will see Iranian tankers sailing East per Trumps orders