ابو عبيدة

@_hazzee @mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid @DisputesOf You must be 13

Questions for @mohammed_hijab 1. Anyone who makes takfir of Abu Bakr/Omar/Usman RA is a Kafir? 2. Anyone who makes takfir of Aishah RA is a Kafir? 3. Anyone who deems Ali RA superior to Ibrahim/Musa/Isa AS is a Kafir? Please answer specifically. Yes/No?

@mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid @DisputesOf What an eloquent way to divert attention from talking about the rafidha

We both know that is not your position. If MIAW was alive today do you think that he would tolerate the building of a Hindu temple if he killed people for much less? Answer the question. Do you, or do you not, hold the rulers of the Gulf to be kāfir by the literalist, ultra-hardline principles you preach? You know your answer and so do I, so why do you keep running from it and lying to the public about it? You have no difficulty hurling takfīr at Iran. You did it loudly, endlessly, for the whole world to hear. So be a man of one standard, not two. But you will not, will you? And spare me the line that this is a view you cannot share or that you are not a 'mufti' although you made plain takfir of Daniel without so much as being able to read the Quran in a proper way. It is not that you have no view. You have a fierce one. It is only that your courage deserts you the instant honesty would cost you something. With Iran the words poured out without end. With Saudi, with the Emirates, with the whole of the Gulf, nothing but silence. A man whose hardline severity runs freely in one direction and dries up in the other is not a free man. He is owned. He files down his takfīr to flatter the Arab secularist nationalists who hate him more than I do and consider him not worthy to get them a cup of coffee. The ones whose approval he is begging for, and then calls his servility discretion. And here is the deeper thing, the part you have never been willing to face. Where does this literalism end? Where does the ultra-hardline takfīr finally arrive, the readiness to read every text at its harshest and to excuse no man his ignorance? It arrives at the takfiri groups. It arrives at the very people who slaughter in the name of purity. I know you are not one of them. I know you despise them, and that you stand against every form of extremism, and I believe that of you sincerely. But that is exactly the contradiction at the heart of your worldview. You loathe the destination while championing the road that leads to it. You recoil from the fruit while watering the tree. A methodology is judged by where it ends, not by where its gentler advocates wish it would halt.

@YasinKa64213494 @doctor_rahmeh @TorahJews Not really the Quran doesn’t have genocidal verses whereas the bible doesn’t.

@doctor_rahmeh @TorahJews I completely agree with your points regarding Zionism. However, the problematic theological practices you mentioned can be found in any religion.

Can't sharpen a pencil during Shabbat but can bomb Gaza and invade Lebanon.

@mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid Not really, yours is.

@MrAdnanRashid Has the cat got your tongue, Adnan? You were the one who initiated this exchange, yet now you seem determined to avoid the very question everyone is asking. At this point, your silence is speaking louder than any answer could. I assure you, your reputation is on the line.

@mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid maybe start by answering his 3 questions, what would ibn taymiyyahs answer be?

Let me be precise here, for this is the point most often abused. To say that a belief or an act is disbelief in the abstract is one thing; to pronounce a specific, named person a disbeliever is another matter entirely. The latter, takfīr al-muʿayyan, is no verdict for a layman to hand down. It requires that the conditions of takfīr be established and its impediments lifted, that the proof be made plain and that ignorance, misinterpretation, and compulsion be ruled out, and that is the office of qualified scholars and judges, a restraint that Ibn Taymiyyah himself was at pains to observe. So when you pronounced Daniel a disbeliever, you did so as a layman with no authority to do so. You are not qualified to make takfīr of a muʿayyan as you have not studied islamic studies properly and make mistakes when reading juz Amma from the mushaf Now that ive answered your question please answer mine, do you consider the Gulf leaders to be disbelievers on your manhaj or not. Give the same answer you gave me in person otherwise we will both know you do not have the nerve to do so.

@mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid adnan is asking you about 12vers, why are you asking him about rulers of the gulf, you know fully if he answered you they way you say he will will result in him not being able to travel, do umrah etc. dont be malicious bro.

@syedumar353190 @mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid Yasir qadhi is pakistani, im holding accountable yawm a qiyama

@BaneNoname @mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid Yasir qadhi went from a najdi to a liberal, hijab was never a najdi nor a liberal you bootlicker

@mannnyboyy @mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid go beat yourself you rafidhi dog

@BaneNoname @mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid Fear Allah stop fearing Zionist and yahuudi plants lil bro

@mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid Are you going to threaten him the same way you did to sh Muhammad Tarawneh.

@MrAdnanRashid Adnan, I know what you really think about the Arab Gulf rulers according to your principles of takfir based on our conversations and I also know a lot more. Please hold your tongue and stop provoking me.

@mohammed_hijab @MrAdnanRashid Is it worth burning bridges with all these sunni brothers and siding with a rafidhi. I certainly dont think so.

"Hijab himself becomes a kafir if..." If you hold such strong views based on your strict adherence to the dawah that you follow, why did you refuse my on-camera offer for a face-to-face discussion in Malawi? Why remain cordial in person or on the phone, yet make extreme hypothetical chains of takfir publicly? And if I become a kafir for this, do you make takfir of the Arab leaders who allowed Hindu temples to be built in their country? Answer directly

No. The true people of Tawheed (Ahl ut-Tawheed) are defined by their absolute sincerity to Allah alone, their rejection of Shirk, and their adherence to the Sunnah. Their identity is not defined by a blanket desire to never perform Takfir. If a Muslim upon Tawheed, see’s another person in his actions or beliefs abusing Allah’s Oneness, it is from his very Tawheed and gheerah of Allah’s Lordship that he disassociates himself from that person.

🧵 𝐌𝐞𝐠𝐚 𝐓𝐡𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝: 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐑𝐚𝐦𝐩𝐚𝐧𝐭 𝐖𝐚𝐬 𝐒𝐡𝐢𝐫𝐤 𝐈𝐧 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐀𝐫𝐚𝐛𝐢𝐚𝐧 𝐏𝐞𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐬𝐮𝐥𝐚? 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐖𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐬𝐩𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐝 𝐓𝐞𝐬𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐲 A thread containing over 90 different sources, exposing the rampant practice of shirk, superstition and irreligiosity within the Muslim world before, during and after the time of Muḥammad Ibn ʿAbd al-Wahhāb. [1] European explorers [2] Muslim scholars, historians & travellers [3] Opponents of Wahhābism [4] Wahhābī testimonies

This rock is older than the religion of Shias.

@5amrevival When you binge watched Sally in Morroco sipping mint tea

There was a time

هذه المرة يرد عليكم مؤسس حماس الشيخ أحمد ياسين وليس بلال البخاري 🌹

perhaps jewish people should stop carving the Star of David into Palestinian people's faces or selling stolen Palestinian land out of synagogues if they want people to not associate zionism with judaism

‘Uqbah ibn al-Ḥārith said: “I saw Abu Bakr — may Allah be pleased with him — carrying Al-Hasan ibn Ali while saying: ‘May my father be sacrificed for him — he resembles the Prophet, not Ali ibn Abi Talib.’ And Ali was laughing.” [Sahih al-Bukhari 3750]

@abuibrahim_mm x.com/KieraDiss/stat… its true 😂

There's no way that ReformUK is running a candidate called "Muhammed Sharia". Can someone verify this? I couldn't find anything through a google search.

British Jews will literally support the genocide of your family with their money and their influence and then have you arrested if you dare speak out against it and actually “name the Jew.” This is the fallacy/psyop that is “anti-Zionism.” Because the second you “conflate Zionism with Judaism” and actually call out the ideological powerhouse behind Zionism, which is Jewish supremacy, the most powerful Jewish organizations on the planet will flex their muscle and destroy your life. Like… have you ever really thought about the mindfuck that is “Zionism” that we’re all expected to navigate? It’s “the Jewish state” In “the Jewish ancestral homeland” That uses the “Jewish language” Under a banner of the “Jewish Star” Butttttt…. It’s not Judaism/Jewishness… it’s “Zionism” which literally means “movement for Jews to return to have their own country” But that still doesn’t mean Jews. And if you conflate the two you’re an antisemite according to “anti-Zionists.” But if you don’t agree with Zionism you’re an antisemite according to “Zionists.” And if you say that Zionism is actually just Jewish supremacy you’re an antisemite according to both Zionists and anti-Zionists. And they will literally debate the nuances of this preposterous conundrum while people are getting slaughtered by the thousands and still have the gall to have you arrested for merely speaking out of tone and turn about the whole thing.