BJW

21.2K posts

BJW banner
BJW

BJW

@Bas648

Retired ex public sector.

South East, United Kingdom Katılım Aralık 2018
253 Takip Edilen936 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
BJW
BJW@Bas648·
@DerylLynn Far from it, totally misguided, the socialists will be after you if you are a - Pensioner Saver Investor Landlord Small business man Any profit making org. Private school Be prepared, they're coming
English
3
3
69
2.7K
BJW
BJW@Bas648·
@ClarkeMicah @timothy_stanley Anybody told China, India , USA, EU, Russia and Brazil?together responsible for 63% of global greenhouse gas emissions, China & India increase annually btw. Meanwhile UK = 1%.
English
1
0
0
61
BJW retweetledi
Robert Jenrick
Robert Jenrick@RobertJenrick·
Here is a Labour MP linking the appalling Berlin Pride attack on Reform UK. It’s simply unhinged. The Left will do literally anything to avoid confronting the Islamist threat.
Robert Jenrick tweet media
English
430
1.7K
9.9K
163.1K
BJW retweetledi
Jahanzib Wesa
Jahanzib Wesa@jahanzibwesa·
Another shocking incident in Takhar. This video shows Taliban fighters beating and threatening women, preventing them from even returning to their homes. This is the painful reality for Afghan women under Taliban regime. #FreeAfghanistan #WomenRights #Freedom
English
51
307
735
94.3K
BJW retweetledi
Nigel Farage
Nigel Farage@Nigel_Farage·
Good to see that John Healey wants to buy British when it comes to defence. As EU members we would not be allowed to do that.
English
803
1.1K
9K
403.6K
BJW
BJW@Bas648·
@georgegalloway China is a one party authoritarian state. Political opposition is prohibited. Step out of line and you're in big trouble. No thanks George, how much do they pay you btw?
English
0
0
0
19
George Galloway
George Galloway@georgegalloway·
It’s hard to describe just how far out in front of us is China 2026. Luckily record numbers are checking out for themselves. Increasingly visa-free travel makes it easier than it’s ever been. I’ve just been on a “High-speed train” which description fails to do justice. It travels like the wind. If you closed your eyes you wouldn’t know you were moving. China has 50,000 miles of it. It links cities so far better than ours it brings me to tears. Clean. Crime free. The cops don’t carry guns and their cars don’t have sirens, only flashing lights. Prices are so cheap I’m scared to tell you. A slap up lunch £2.50. Shirts £12. Deluxe taxis (BMW electric) £4. And this in a Tier 1 City (Beijing Shanghai Guangzhou Shenzen). It’s cheaper elsewhere! The shops are tumbling with goods from the west (at Chinese prices - western goods are of course mainly made in China) from the east often Russia and from a home manufacturing base easily the biggest in the whole world. Nobody litters or jaywalks, nobody lays in shop doorways, nobody begs. Vertiginous towers of bewildering variety arise everywhere. At night these cities don’t even look real. I have a young wife. When she was born Shenzen was a one-horse town nobody outside had ever heard of. Today it is a Wonder of the World. One of dozens. If you deny it, you’re a fool. George Galloway
George Galloway tweet mediaGeorge Galloway tweet media
English
758
1.5K
9.2K
1.1M
BJW
BJW@Bas648·
@ivan_8848 No dust No political opposition No free speech No free press No independent judiciary No peaceful demonstration No reliable Internet No dissent from state narrative No thanks
English
0
0
5
47
Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil
🇮🇹🇷🇺 The father of an Italian guy, who lives in Moscow, came to visit his son and took a ride on our metro. He was surprised that it's clean and there's no dust.
English
103
367
2.2K
73.5K
BJW retweetledi
Katie Lam
Katie Lam@Katie_Lam_MP·
The Home Office has decided that the Islamic Centre of England, a registered "charity" caught selling Hezbollah trinkets, should be able to sponsor visas for imams. This is obviously disgraceful, and puts the public at risk. Will the Home Secretary overturn it?
GB Politics@GBPolitcs

🚨NEW: The Home Office has given the ‘Islamic Centre of England’ powers to sponsor visas for “skilled workers” and religious ministers This charity is an alleged outpost of the Iranian regime in London [@Telegraph]

English
356
3.3K
13.3K
179.6K
BJW
BJW@Bas648·
@JChimirie66677 The result of pursuing local autonomous county & city forces (39). A national force is long overdue. Same rules, policies, communications, records, vehicles, training, uniform, administration etc. Every cop would know what was expected wherever they served.
English
0
0
1
28
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677·
A Year After The Supreme Court Ruling, Staffordshire Police Force Still Can't Say What Sex Means In April 2025, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that sex under the Equality Act means biological sex. Staffordshire Police read that judgment and then drafted new custody guidance in response to it. The result still commits to housing detainees "consistent with their gender identity" and lets people "self-identify their gender" in force records. This was not a policy written before the law was settled and simply never updated. It was written after, with the ruling fully in view, and it still lands on self-identification as the operating principle. The document's own internal contradiction shows this isn't confusion so much as evasion. One clause states plainly that intimate searches "should be carried out by police officers and staff of the same biological sex as the detained person," a clear, lawful standard. The next section states that a detainee holding a full Gender Recognition Certificate has their "sex" become "that of a woman," directly undercutting the rule stated a few lines earlier. Asked to clarify which version actually governs, the force said a GRC doesn't "automatically" determine the outcome, retreating to "case-by-case" assessment rather than naming a rule at all. That's the same move seen elsewhere in British institutions caught contradicting themselves: state the correct principle, quietly undercut it in the next clause, then hide behind individual circumstances when someone asks which one actually applies. The starkest detail sits in the National Police Chiefs' Council guidance underneath Staffordshire's policy, not in Staffordshire's document itself. It states that an officer who refuses to search someone of the opposite biological sex "will not suffer a detriment to their career." That sentence only needs writing if the institutional default already runs the other way, if officers who decline are the exception requiring formal protection rather than officers who comply. The guidance doesn't protect neutrality. It protects dissent from a presumed norm, which tells you plainly what that norm is. Cathy Larkman, a retired police superintendent now with the Women's Rights Network, called it what it is: a failure that "indicates a level of ignorance with the law and a disregard for the rights of women." Terence Stock, formerly on the force's own Independent Advisory Group, went further, calling the continued use of self-ID "unforgivable" given the Supreme Court's judgment and the plain same-sex requirement already written into the Police and Criminal Evidence Act. Neither of these are outside critics unfamiliar with policing. Both know the institution from within, and both are describing the same thing documented across the CPS, Hampshire, Sussex and Surrey: a written rule stating the correct legal standard, sitting beside operational guidance that quietly does something else. None of this happened in a vacuum. The Equality and Human Rights Commission's code of practice, the document meant to give police forces exactly the clarity Staffordshire's policy lacks, sat with Bridget Phillipson, the minister responsible for issuing it, for eight months before she finally laid it before Parliament in May. Even now, two months on, it still isn't in force. Individual forces have been left to draft their own interpretations in that gap, and Staffordshire shows precisely what fills it when no binding national guidance exists: not caution, but a continuation of self-ID, formalised in a new document that can now be pointed to as evidence of compliance. Staffordshire Police says its officers act "in accordance with applicable legislation, national policing guidance and force policy." All three currently disagree with each other, and the force's own document proves it in a single contradictory paragraph. This wasn't a force struggling with an unclear ruling. It read a clear one and wrote around it. Bridget Phillipson
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
51
273
622
13.1K
BJW
BJW@Bas648·
@afneil No chance with A Burnham then.
English
0
0
0
2
Andrew Neil
Andrew Neil@afneil·
Yes. I subjected B Johnson to a very robust prime-time interview when he ran for the Tory leadership in the summer of 2019. So much so that when it came to the general election in December of that year he, alone among party leaders, refused to give me an interview during the campaign. Next question?
English
34
64
1.4K
124K
BJW
BJW@Bas648·
@afneil Another new word Kakistocracy I'm getting more knowledgeable everyday
English
0
0
0
45
Andrew Neil
Andrew Neil@afneil·
If Scotland fails to rebuild Mackintosh’s Glasgow School of Art, restoring its world-class architecture to all its former glory, it will merely confirm what many have long suspected: Scotland is in the grip of a kakistocracy.
Malcolm Clark@TwisterFilm

I've known Pat Kane for decades and the pretentious trans-ally (🤣) & all-round fake has been unfailingly wrong on every issue. This bloviating hypocrite even avoided paying taxes for years. The fact @thoughtland (the name🤣)opposes Mack restoration only proves it's a good idea.

English
72
271
1.5K
105.6K
BJW
BJW@Bas648·
@KonstantinKisin Words, at the moment just words, mouthed by someone with (undoubtedly) a tad more charisma than the last incumbent. But it's actions that count and whether those actions will do some good. Immigration? Boat people? Economic growth? National debt? Too early to be impressed.
English
0
0
0
9
Konstantin Kisin
Konstantin Kisin@KonstantinKisin·
Burnham has announced more transformative policies in a week than the Tories did in 14 years. You can agree with the policies or hate them (I'm a mixture of the two) but it's impressive nonetheless. Anyone who denies this is just a cope merchant.
English
1.1K
114
2.9K
364.7K
BJW
BJW@Bas648·
@daniellismore We would be self sufficient if industry were allowed to take advantage of reserves in the north sea, and we would have a comfortable sovereign wealth fund to boot.
English
0
0
1
7
Daniel Lismore
Daniel Lismore@daniellismore·
In Thatchers own words “privatisation of the energy industry will make us the envy of Europe” Thanks Margaret, you made a few people very rich and the rest of us much poorer.
Daniel Lismore tweet media
English
723
3.1K
9.7K
269K
BJW retweetledi
David Buik
David Buik@truemagic68·
Wes Streeting, Defence Secretary very articulate talking to BBC'S Roger Johnson, but again like most Labour Minister dodges questions 1) Does he trust President Trump? 2) Will he get 3% of GDP for Defence spending? Simple questions? What we got was delightful waffle!
English
18
24
143
4.8K
BJW
BJW@Bas648·
@ArmandoMema There is no moral high ground for Russia. You know it, I know it, the world knows it. Russia invaded Ukraine, the Ukrainians are defending their homeland.
English
0
0
0
25
Armando Mema
Armando Mema@ArmandoMema·
Ukrainian drones backed by western allies continue to kill civilians in Russia. I want to express my highest indignation for such deliberate attacks among defenseless civilians and for the silence of the European leaders over such attacks. For years we have heard moral lessons of western values from EU leaders, but now they are openly closing their eyes over direct attacks on civilians. Among the victims a 3 years old boy, killed in his appartment from a drone. Despite this, The EU leaders continue to remain silent and send more money for drones to Ukraine. There will not be any Diplomacy between the EU and Russia if Europe remain silent over such war crimes and continue to send weapons to Ukraine. The EU double standards on International Law are an obstacle to Peace.
English
200
110
419
9.5K
BJW retweetledi
David Buik
David Buik@truemagic68·
PM BURNHAM has blamed 40 years of neoliberalsism, with Thatcher in the vanguard, for the demise of the UK economy and its social instability. I have news from the front. Between 2008 & 2015 GDP per capita, grew by 8.7%. In the preceding, post-Thatcher era, it had grown by 43%
English
31
105
403
13.9K
BJW retweetledi
Anton Gerashchenko
Anton Gerashchenko@Gerashchenko_en·
President Zelenskyy on upcoming mobilization in Russia: We have solid intelligence reports on Russian plans for the fall. What is not there – in the Russian plans – is peace. Unfortunately. Not yet. Putin is preparing the conditions for expanding mobilization. The figures for his losses speak for themselves. In less than seven months of this year, 221,000 people have joined the ranks of the Russian armed forces. While the losses of the Russians in the same period amounted to almost 225,500, and of them 131,000 killed, almost 93,000 wounded. A significant number of injuries are serious, because the Russians have totally poor front-line medicine. Putin is simply preparing to take new Russians to the war. He masks it with other words, signals, but he is preparing. It is important that we and our partners can put enough pressure on Russia so that thoughts about stopping this aggression begin to dominate – thoughts about peace, not about additional Russian mobilization. Our long-range operations, our mid-range strikes contribute to this. More and more Russians are noticing Putin’s war and losing from it and think that the war should not be dragged out. We see this. We also see Russia’s cooperation with North Korea. Russia wants to receive another 30,000 soldiers from North Korea: since June, preparations have been underway in the Voronezh region to receive them. North Korea is also preparing to transfer new ballistic missile launchers to Russia. This is a threat not only to Ukraine. Russia is helping North Korea learn war, improving their weapons – giving them experience in the real use of weapons. All this is a threat to everyone in Asia who is within the range of North Korean missiles. We will counteract it.
Anton Gerashchenko@Gerashchenko_en

Russian propagandist Dugin openly says that Russia needs a mobilization and that Putin must make the decision to go through with it. A new large-scale mobilization campaign in Russia in the fall of 2026 has not yet been announced. However, the likelihood that mobilization will be announced in late September or October is very high. It is clear that the Russian authorities will not announce this in advance so as not to trigger a mass exodus and a decline in loyalty on the eve of the parliamentary elections. If the campaign is being prepared, it will logically be concealed until the administrative system is ready and opportunities to leave the country are as limited as possible. Therefore, it's necessary to see whether Russia's individual actions are coming together into a unified mobilization configuration. ◾️ First, independent Russian media outlets with sources in regional administrations and the military recruitment system report that a new mobilization is being discussed at various levels of government. October (after the State Duma elections) is cited as a possible date. ◾️ Second, Russia is facing an increasingly severe shortage of manpower. Regions are increasing payments to contract soldiers and expanding recruitment among debtors, prisoners, the unemployed, foreigners, and socially vulnerable groups. At the same time, recruitment numbers are declining, while the need for monthly replenishment is estimated at tens of thousands of people. This means that the voluntary-monetary model is approaching its limits. ◾️ Third, military enlistment offices are not just updating their databases. Since the beginning of 2026, reports have been coming in from various regions that mobilization orders are being affixed to military ID cards during summonses, ostensibly for "data update." Such an order predetermines where a person must report on their own once mobilization measures are in effect. ◾️ Fourth, the state has established an e-infrastructure that it did not have in September 2022. A summons is considered served once it is entered into the registry, and a travel ban can take effect as soon as it is uploaded, regardless of whether the citizen has seen it. If a person fails to appear, the system allows for additional restrictions to be imposed. This means that the Kremlin no longer needs to publicly announce a general border closure: it is sufficient to simultaneously enter the required number of people into the registry and forward the data to the border service. ◾️ Fifth, one of the potential ways for circumventing Russian control has already been closed. Belarus has confirmed that Russians prohibited from leaving Russia due to a military summons will not be able to leave Belarusian territory either. Thus, the restriction effectively applies to both countries. ◾️ Sixth, the tightening of border control, consultations with neighboring countries on closing borders to Russians, changes to transport links, and growing interest among Russians in leaving Russia coincide with the worsening of military conscription. ◾️ Seventh, the calendar follows a political logic. Before the election, it is not in the government's interest to stir up widespread anxiety. After the vote, the political cost drops sharply. That is why September may be the final month of administrative preparations, and October - a convenient time for mobilization. The available indicators are sufficient to assess that the risk of a new mobilization this fall is high. It may not be called a mobilization. It could take the form of mass "data update," reservist assemblies, mobilization orders, forced enlistment, regional quotas, or phased travel restrictions. For someone who will ultimately be sent to war, the legal name of the mechanism will not matter. What should those who do not want to participate in the war do: 🔹 Don't wait for an official mobilization announcement. Once a draft notice is entered into the electronic registry, the travel ban may take effect automatically. The moment when mobilization is publicly acknowledged may come only after opportunities to leave the country have effectively been closed off. 🔹 Leave in advance and only via legal routes. Belarus should not be viewed as a way to circumvent Russian restrictions, as the Belarusian border system may enforce Russia's travel bans. 🔹 Don't consider Europe as the primary relocation destination. Russian citizens will face visa restrictions there, stricter checks on the source of funds, banks' refusal to open or maintain accounts, difficulties with money transfers from Russia, and restrictions on transactions with Russian banks, payment and cryptocurrency services. 🔹 Use Central Asia primarily as a quick transit zone. Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, or Uzbekistan may be options for an initial departure, temporary stay, and planning the next route. At the same time, these countries should not be considered guaranteed safe havens for deserters, anti-war activists, or people wanted by Russia, due to the cooperation between local law enforcement agencies and Moscow. After the initial departure, potential relocation destinations may include: ▪️ countries in Latin America, specifically Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay, Chile, Mexico, or countries in Central America; ▪️ countries in South and Southeast Asia; ▪️ Türkiye as a temporary transport and relocation hub; ▪️ certain countries in the Middle East, Africa, or the Caribbean; ▪️ other countries where legal entry, long-term stay, study, work, or a residence permit are available. A practical strategy should consist of two stages: first, a quick, legal departure through an accessible country in Central Asia, the Caucasus, Türkiye, or another open route; then, travel to a country in Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, Africa, or another region where long-term legalization is possible. Waiting for full documentary confirmation of mobilization in this situation means risking that the decision will be confirmed only after it will no longer be possible to cross the border.

English
32
524
2K
94.5K
Martin Knight
Martin Knight@MartinKnight_·
Don Arden, music mogul & father of Sharon Osborne, was concerned that his young London Mod pop group The Small Faces weren’t getting a chart breakthrough & he rang Kenny Lynch. “Write something catchy like Doh Wah Diddy,” he ordered. Arden was persuasive. Kenny came up with Sha La La Lee in record time. His writing partner Mort Shuman thought it was shit & asked Kenny not to put his name on the writing credits. Steve Marriott & the boys weren’t keen on it either. A week after release the record was racing towards the top three. Kenny rang Mort & told him. “You know I was only joking about not putting me on the writing credits …”
Martin Knight tweet mediaMartin Knight tweet media
English
22
17
205
12.5K
BJW retweetledi
Jake Wallis Simons
Jake Wallis Simons@JakeWSimons·
So the appropriately named Andy Slaughter, Burnham’s new solicitor general, hung out with Hamas jihadis and posed for pictures. Absolute state of this. Laughing stock, only not funny. telegraph.co.uk/politics/2026/…
English
35
591
1.6K
53.7K