Benjamin Loken

172 posts

Benjamin Loken banner
Benjamin Loken

Benjamin Loken

@BenjaminLoken

twitter was acting up on my 2022 account, so Im back to my OG account

Katılım Mart 2015
59 Takip Edilen27 Takipçiler
Benjamin Loken retweetledi
Jarrin Jackson 🌲🪓
Jarrin Jackson 🌲🪓@JarrinJackson·
more attorneys using (AI) fake junk
Rob Freund@RobertFreundLaw

More lawyers in trouble for AI misuse today: Attorney represented a criminal defendant and filed an application to reopen an appeal. The application alleged prosecutorial misconduct and cited quotes attributed to the prosecutor. Only problem was the quotes were completely made up. "The page Appellant cites to on page 4 for the 'legally inflammatory' statement by the prosecutor- is, in fact, the court reporter’s signature page, with no statements of any type by the prosecutor." The fake quotes came from ChatGPT. A paralegal uploaded case materials to ChatGPT and pasted the output into the application. The lawyer didn't catch it. But it gets worse: after the application was denied, the lawyer appealed the denial to the Ohio Supreme Court anyway. And when he submitted his firms "AI Policy" to show he was taking corrective action, the court determined that the policy itself was AI-generated and was incomplete. "The proffering of an AI-generated AI policy as a remedial measure in a case involving the submission of AI-generated fabrications to this court is, at best, ironic." And two months after the sanctions hearing in this case, the attorney did it again, in another case. He submitted a filing with the ChatGPT prompt embedded in the filing itself: "Would you like me to draft the next argument section (e.g., argument 1 – B on the 'nature of the charge' omission) in the same tone and format so your brief reads as a seamless multi-print memorandum?" Sanctions: -$2,000 fine -Referral to Ohio Office of Disciplinary Counsel -Must serve copy of judgment on judge of every court in which he makes an appearance, for 2 years -Must include certification that all cases are real and verified, for 2 years -6 hours mandatory CLE about AI ethics -Must write apology letters to prosecutor, trial judge, trial defense counsel, and prior appellate counsel who were defamed by fake quotes.

English
1
3
4
318
Benjamin Loken retweetledi
TenthAmendmentCenter
TenthAmendmentCenter@TenthAmendment·
there is not a single person from the founding era, federalist or anti-federalist, who anyone can cite who said the president can unilaterally decide the question of peace or war. It’s literally made up out of thin air, “living, breathing” constitutionalism. Basically, FDR and Woodrow Wilson on steroids. And James Madison hammered the founders' view home when he said that the president does not have the power to determine whether a war ought to be "commenced, continued, or concluded" this is why we call Trump, Levin, Graham, Cruz and the rest, a Trojan horse. Leftists who just pretend to oppose the left.
English
14
52
166
1.6K
Summer Cook
Summer Cook@gdaughtermorris·
When the people realize exactly what the founders meant by “necessary and proper”. In article 1 section 8 of the constitution it’s gonna make them ponder all those things they have done that haven’t been . And those two words don’t mean what we think it means . They are two words with very distinct an strict meanings that offer no discretion like some of them think. Necessary and proper are two words in this provision that must be used together although many times they have tried to separate and leave out the word proper when it is not just a redundant word but used with purpose and is perhaps the most important word out of the two . However. Within the provision the grant has to fulfill both necessary and proper or it’s a no go. Ok , so what does necessary and proper mean then. “Necessary” means with a defined goal and purpose and fit between executory laws and valid governemnt ends , but this word does not mean indispensable. “Proper” means it must hold a constitutional purpose by requiring executory laws to be within congresses domain and jurisdiction. That is ,by requiring that such laws do not usurp or expand the constitutional powers of any federal institution or infringe on the retained rights of the state or of the people. Article 1 section 8 was strategically laid out with expressed grants over limited subject matter jurisdiction meaning that only those expressed things congress had the power over and only within its boundaries granted by the constitution. This article was a precursors to the 9th and 10th amendments that further declare that the enumeration of rights in the federal constitution and other unenumerated rights that were retained by the states and to the people were out of their jurisdiction giving no discretion over things that were not expressly written within the federal constitution. Likewise, in all the states the same form and jurisdiction was set and established within state constitution over what limited powers the state government had expressly written and anything not written is not a grant of jurisdiction given to them. This is why we always point people to the state constitutions. If it’s not written it’s a power they don’t have that was retained to the people. Read all 51 of your constitutions.
Summer Cook tweet media
English
8
26
47
865
Benjamin Loken retweetledi
TenthAmendmentCenter
TenthAmendmentCenter@TenthAmendment·
Rights Are Not Gifts from Government They don't come from the Constitution, the Bill of Rights - or any document, either. The Founders held that your natural rights come from your creator - and you have them at birth. PODCAST 👇🇺🇸 blog.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2024/12/rights…
English
2
8
30
310
Benjamin Loken retweetledi
Being Libertarian
Being Libertarian@beinlibertarian·
Remember Pelosi explaining the “wrap up smear”? Now take this into consideration when discussing Joe Kent.
English
11
258
990
19.9K
IRSMEDIC | Anthony E. Parent, Esq.
Since McCullough v Maryland, the Supreme Court has claimed it possess the sole power to determine what is "necessary and proper" for Congress to enact. Fascinating claim. As McCullough v Maryland found the Constitutional authority for a privately-owned central bank. The Supreme Court felt that a central bank was an implied power found in the penumbras of express powers. Because, of course. Fascinating claim as it directs contradicts the text, structure, and historical context of the Constitution. And McCullough v Maryland is actually taught in law school as a good thing.
English
4
0
5
70
Dan Bongino
Dan Bongino@dbongino·
Joe Kent has disgraced himself. Joe is lying to advance a personal grievance agenda. Joe is a liar. FACT.
English
14.3K
9.5K
55.3K
2.1M
Avengers Updates
Avengers Updates@AvengersUpdated·
Kathryn Newton on accidentally spoiling her return in ‘AVENGERS: DOOMSDAY’ “I don’t know anything. I recently went to Disneyland, and it’s always fun to go see Ant-Man over there.” (via @ComicBook)
Avengers Updates tweet mediaAvengers Updates tweet media
English
11
82
2.5K
60.2K
Culture Crave 🍿
Culture Crave 🍿@CultureCrave·
Mario gifts Peach her parasol in new clip from 'The Super Mario Galaxy Movie' 🌂
English
55
721
8.7K
223K
Benjamin Loken retweetledi
MasterCraftsman
MasterCraftsman@BruceJohns23678·
@MichaelARothman At the Same time they need to clean up the missing Language that Protects State Sovereignty for the simple FACT once a (forgiven) is allowed the process gets abused. The way I look at it for the state of Nevada the S.O.S. is in Maladministration for not validating every voter.
MasterCraftsman tweet media
English
0
1
5
70
Benjamin Loken
Benjamin Loken@BenjaminLoken·
@awakenedslavex Dude, read your Bill of Rights or Declaration of Rights seen in your State Constitution.... if you won't even do that, im gonna block you since you've been wasting my time
English
1
0
0
16
Jarrin Jackson 🌲🪓
Jarrin Jackson 🌲🪓@JarrinJackson·
The great wisdom of a written constitution requiring Congress to declare war is that the emotional appeals caused by narratives are irrelevant. If no congressional declaration of war, then the war is unconstitutional. No emotion. Plain text. We have a beautiful constitution.
English
4
10
25
404