Beryl Amedee

🚨 WE THE PEOPLE DID THIS, TEXAS! CONGRESSMAN KEITH SELF LAUNCHES THE “SHARIA FREE AMERICA” CAUCUS AND DECLARES TEXAS GROUND ZERO TEXAS. WE MADE OUR LEADERS HEAR US! THANK YOU! Congressman Keith Self just went public with what millions of Texans - alongside me and RAIR Foundation USA - have been fighting to expose and sound the alarm on for years, launching the Sharia Free America Caucus and declaring what we already know: “Texas is ground zero in this fight.” Let’s be crystal clear: This didn’t come from think tanks. It didn’t come from paid white-paper writers. It didn’t come from people who get grants to discuss the threat “theoretically.” This came from the people and from grassroots Texans who refused to be silenced. And it comes from investigative work that RAIR Foundation USA has been showing you every day—exposing the networks, tactics, developments, and institutional capture happening in real time. Self didn’t sugarcoat it. He called Sharia what it is: a culture of violence and domination, incompatible with the Constitution, American liberty, and our way of life. And he backed it up with what’s unfolding right now in Texas: 🔺Muslim-only housing developments expanding and advancing, including The Meadows and EPIC City 🔺EPIC City now under investigation by the State of Texas 🔺escalating incidents of Islamic intimidation and enforcement behavior 🔺 and even unauthorized Quran distribution inside a taxpayer-funded high school That last one should stop every parent cold. 🚨Self also urged Texans to vote for the March 3 proposition to ban Sharia, warning: “As Texas goes, so goes the nation and as the nation goes, so goes the world.” And the movement is growing fast: ✅ 33 members of Congress ✅ 18 states This is what happens when citizens refuse to surrender. We Did This - YOU DID THIS! YES, TEXAS! Washington is finally being forced to respond. IT IS WE THE PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING TO SAVE AMERICA! HARD WORK ALWAYS PAYS OFF!

Trump should preemptively pardon every American citizen who’s lived here more than 10 years for NOT paying federal taxes in 2026… Force congress to balance THAT BUDGET

What if I told you that federal welfare programs are actually unconstitutional? Buckle up: First, where does the federal government get the power to spend money on welfare? It's not in any of the enumerated powers in Article I, Section 8. Congress can, of course, spend money under the Necessary and Proper Clause in furtherance of its own enumerated powers. So it can pay government salaries, pay for postal roads, pay for an army and navy, etc. But where does it say, "create a welfare program," the spending for which would be necessary and proper? The *modern-day* answer, given to us by the New Deal Supreme Court, is the first clause in Article I, Section 8: Congress, it is often said, has the power to "spend for the general welfare," and that covers welfare programs. But that's not what the clause actually says! Here it is: "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; . . . " Although this clause is commonly believed today to be two powers--a taxing power ("Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes...") and a spending power ("to pay the Debts and provide for...the general Welfare")--read it again. It's actually only a SINGLE POWER: the power to tax for national purposes. Think about it. The power to pay the debts would be unnecessary to specify because Congress has the power to borrow, which necessarily includes the power (indeed obligation) to repay. The final clause (uniformity of taxes) is a modification of the taxing power. It would be strange if that came after an entirely different power. There's also no reason why "provide for" would be limited to "spending" if it really were a separate power. Yet no one took that view at the Founding. Albert Gallatin famously said that Gouverneur Morris at the Constitutional Convention tried to change the comma before the words "to pay" to a semi-colon, to create a separate, independent power to provide for the general welfare. (A near-final draft of the Constitution actually included the semi-colon.) The ever watchful Roger Sherman caught him in the act and had it reverted to a comma--to indicate, as he did all along, that it was merely a power to tax for national purposes. For many years, Congress acted on the view that it was only a power to tax. There is some contrary evidence: Hamilton famously took the view it was an independent power to spend. Eventually Congress thought it had the power to fund "internal improvements," but many of those could be justified under other powers (post roads, military routes, removing obstructions to or facilitating commerce). It wasn't until 1936 that the Supreme Court held there was an independent power to spend for the "general welfare." There is a lot more to say about this. So are federal welfare programs unconstitutional? Probably yes, under the best original meaning of the Constitution. Is the alternative plausible? Perhaps. But given the constitutionally dubious foundation for such federal programs, maybe we should take the opportunity of this crazy and endemic welfare fraud to rethink the federal government's role altogether.

The CDC’s foremost duty is to protect the American people from infectious disease. Dr. Abraham recognizes that responsibility. He brings the integrity, courage, and decades of medical experience required to restore the CDC’s standing as the world’s most trusted defender of public health.