BetweenBreaths
79 posts

BetweenBreaths
@BetweenBreths22
Living between breaths and breathing on purpose
Katılım Temmuz 2025
1.1K Takip Edilen83 Takipçiler
BetweenBreaths retweetledi
BetweenBreaths retweetledi
BetweenBreaths retweetledi
BetweenBreaths retweetledi

Hey @Grok, completely unrelated to the Hantavirus, what does the word "Hanta" mean in Israeli? Very concise.
English
BetweenBreaths retweetledi
BetweenBreaths retweetledi

They call them “data centers” because calling them “mass surveillance centers” would cause a national uprising.
The government and Big Tech don’t build billion-dollar facilities in the middle of nowhere just to store your family photos.
They are building the infrastructure for a surveillance state— one capable of monitoring your speech, mapping your behavior, tracking your movements, analyzing your purchases, harvesting your biometrics, and building a real-time digital profile of your entire life.
And they package it all under buzzwords like “AI,” “security,” and “innovation” so the public blindly applauds the expansion of the very system being built to monitor them.
WAKE UP BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE.
English
BetweenBreaths retweetledi
BetweenBreaths retweetledi

@MiStormChasers If one mfing data center proposal shows up for Mio.
English

⚠️MASSIVE wildfire ongoing now near Mio. We’re unsure if there are structures involved, or just wildfire related (or both), but this was speculated to be started by a downed power line from high winds. Evacuations are underway along camp 10 road west of Mio!
MULTIPLE fires are breaking out across northern Michigan. Scanner feeds across many counties indicate high volume of fire calls.
📸Rylan S. - May 4th, 2026
English
BetweenBreaths retweetledi
BetweenBreaths retweetledi

Another conspiracy theory turned fact.
Department of War CTO@DoWCTO
Directed energy weapons are a fine addition to our arsenal... 🇺🇸
English
BetweenBreaths retweetledi
BetweenBreaths retweetledi
BetweenBreaths retweetledi
BetweenBreaths retweetledi

I oppose any laws requiring cars to have technology that shuts them down if the driver is drunk. The reason I oppose them is that I utterly reject the moral logic on which they are based.
The moral logic for these laws is that they will kill some innocent people, but they will save more people than they kill. Sure, there will be the person who was drugged by someone trying to harm them and whose car doesn't let them flee, and there will be the person who is trying to rush an injured person to the hospital whose demeanor will cause their car not to work. But there will be lots more people who tried to drive drunk who will be stopped. And innocent people they would have crashed into will be saved.
But we don't get to actually kill innocent people to save other people. Suppose there was a doctor would save a dozen of innocent people every year because he's the best doctor there is, but in exchange he demands the right to kill one innocent person every year who would otherwise have lived. We would be moral monsters if we hired such a doctor. We don't get to play god like that.
This law will actively kill some innocent people every year. We shouldn't pass laws that actively kill innocent people, even to save a greater number of other innocent people.
English
BetweenBreaths retweetledi
BetweenBreaths retweetledi
BetweenBreaths retweetledi

A potato "going bad" is just a potato remembering that it is alive.
Ryan Moulton@moultano
I admire the strength of desire that potatoes have to live.
English


















