Derek Foley

@otto_maddux @Blueshirts_2 I was the same way for decades. But the truth is its almost impossible. In the end globalization caused wars, and now it means we live under US influence or give the world to the Chinese.

@BetweenThieves7 @Blueshirts_2 I want the world to hate us for minding our own business. I'm an isolationist.

How do ppl seriously not understand. Mind boggling

@mark_petereit @Daniel7Prinsloo @Rothbard1776 *Guy throws a bullet across the courtroom." You really expect us to believe this bullet could travel two football fields and through the skull of the victim?

@Daniel7Prinsloo @Rothbard1776 It’s 2026 and people still don’t comprehend VAST differences in velocity and mass.

It's 2026 and people really belive a plane took down the towers. Wild

@GeorgeRichards Anybody with a hangnail needs to sit.

Paul Maurice said Anton Lundell may be out longterm with a rib injury. Could be 2-6 weeks, no surgery.

You have to instead view it historically: Since we started "policing the world" we have interfered in local conflicts so they dont become a powder keg for world wars. We had two back to back and the toll was 105,000,000 deaths, and 160,000,000 casualties. Not to mention the exploded art, and architecture and history, human suffering etc. These wars were only 20 years apart. The US paying so much to stay powerful has made it so smaller skirmishes have stopped millions and millions and millions and millions of deaths. We have problems. No problems that are anything like the next world war.

@Blueshirts_2 I get the reasons. I am just fatigued with constantly being the police officer the world. It's expensive and every country hates us anyway. I wish we put the same energy into fixing our own problems.

@usuallypregnant Of course he does

Does a husband HAVE the right or NOT?

@AdrianF20571694 Problem is Benning is just too small to be a defenseman in the NHL in the playoffs. If he was 6'3 he would be a star. But reach matters and he gets pushed around a lot. Trade for a pick.

WHOS at the top????? also i can’t believe benning is actually a player he’s insane

@eatlivingbread Thank you. For letting us all know you are a child of the devil. The Lord rebuke you.

Worshipping the Eucharist, even if done poorly, is still 1000% better than worshipping the Bible as a false idol.

@AdrianF20571694 We need Greer and Gadjovich and Nosek. That 4th line isnt good enough for playoff hockey and they arent identity players. Trade mackie and the rest and picks and get Brady.

excluding the potential top 10 pick this any trade or new goalies this toster can 100% win the cup: erod-barkov-reinhart verheaghe-bennett-tkachuk losutarinen-lundell-marchand vilmanis-schwindt-hinostroza ekblad-forsling mikkola-jones kulikov- benning bob tarasov

@redeemed_zoomer lol. no.

I believe Mainline Protestantism (a formal global communion of over 300 Million Christians) is the true Church, properly speaking, and that all other Christians are separated brethren

@counseloftrent Boring argument. The table of contents doesnt disprove Shakespeare decided which plays to write. Or that without the index you cant recognize Shakespeare. Or know his writings. 🤷‍♂️

The Canon of the Bible DISPROVES Sola Scriptura! Watch the full debate here: youtu.be/_J1xk13NSUs

@Mandoman12 Im sorry, but winning these games is the stupidest thing ever. Bench everyone, pull the goalie if you have to. This is just bad management. Bothers me like you wouldnt believe.

LA Kings lost in a SO in Calgary. Cats end the night outside of the 10 Lottery odds with 12 to play. The Panthers are 0.0003 points percentage points better than the Kings. That's ten-thousanths percentage points, for all you nerds out there. #TimeToHunt

@KanerRocket17 Idk what the admins are thinking. Cut the rest of the starters. Winning this game was a stupid decision.

Panthers/Kraken is a very important matchup for the tank

@AGBRSports Literally said this. Brady wants here. Most non top 5 picks are a mixed bag. Brady is a team changer. He plays Panthers hockey.

FLORIDA PANTHERS FANS: I saw a conversation floating online that said if we get a top 5 pick we should flip it to Ottawa in a trade for Brady Tkachuk Would you want Brady? Would you rather McKenna, Verhoeff, Stenberg, or Reid instead ???

@Mandoman12 @PuckPedia Be cool for Gadjo and Greer to come back and rough house teams to remind them their time is short.

Florida had $729K in cap space (per @PuckPedia) prior, either D Niko Mikkola or Uvis Balinskis will be going on LTIR. Mikkola already on IR, but his cap hit can't come off unless he is on LTIR. His $2.5M that could come off also gives room for F Jonah Gadjovich to return.

@JamesonCoop I say reverse the lines. Give depth top line minutes and see how they respond out there. If starters still play - let them give the depth guys a little rest and not vice versa.

Here's my guess at lines for tonight vs. SEA 👇 Luostarinen – Rodrigues – Boqvist Verhaeghe – Bennett – Tkachuk Reinhardt – Nosek – Hinostroza Foote – Kunin – Gregor Forsling – Ekblad Kulikov – Jones Sebrango – Benning Bobrovsky Tarasov

@TomorrowsWar Nah, we just wont use your "pronouns" Pagan, idolators.

There aren't a hundred Protestants in America who actually understand Catholic teaching

I noticed several errors in Dr. Taylor Marshall's letter to Protestants. So I offer a corrected version below, addressed to Catholics. Dear Catholics, Your Bible contains 7 non-canonical books, added by the Council of Trent in 1546 over the objections of your own best bible scholar. Marshall says Jerome "changed his mind" about the deuterocanonical books around 402 AD in obedience to Pope Damasus. I've read Jerome's prefaces. This doesn't hold up. Damasus died in 384. Jerome wrote his famous Prologus Galeatus in 391. It excluded the deuterocanonicals as part of the canon. He labels these books as apocrypha. That's 7 years after Damasus was gone. That's not obedience to a living pope. The quote Marshall uses from Against Rufinus, which reads "What sin have I committed if I followed the judgment of the churches?", isn't about the canon. It's about Jerome's decision to translate from the Hebrew instead of the Septuagint. Rufinus attacked him for it. Jerome defended himself. In context, he's talking about translation method, not about which books belong in the Bible. And Jerome didn't stop his take. I've quoted these before, but here he is for the next 24 years of his life: 391: "Whatever is outside of these is set aside among the apocrypha." 398: The Church reads Tobit and the Maccabees "not for the authoritative confirmation of ecclesiastical doctrines." 405: Tobit is excluded from "the catalogue of Divine Scriptures." Judith is "considered among the apocrypha." 406: Cites the Book of Wisdom with "if one wishes to accept this book." 415: Still distinguishing Wisdom ("lest you gainsay this volume") from Ecclesiastes ("about which there can be no doubt"). This is one of his last works. Gallagher, a top scholar on Jerome on the canon, explains, "All of our evidence indicates that he always considered them outside the canon." Jerome never retracted. He never published a revised list. Never wrote "I was wrong." He translated Tobit and Judith under pressure, finished each in a single day, and attached prefaces denying them canonical status. That's not submission. That's a scholar doing what he's told while making sure everyone knows what he thinks. Dear Catholics, please drop the fan fiction that Jerome submitted to Rome on the canon. He held the same position from 391 until he died in 420. And Trent overruled him 15 centuries later by a vote of 24(Y)-15(N)-16(A). It passed by 44%. Not exactly a passing grade. Surely not one I'd write letters to Protestants about.

@TrevorSheatz This. If she is in Christ, she is a new creature. Period. Enjoy.

My wife was formerly promiscuous. I was a virgin. She was then radically born-again. Committed to church, evangelized constantly, Puritan books in her bedroom, prayer journals, grief over past sexual sin, etc. We got to know each other well for over a year, dated for four months, engaged for two and a half, and didn't sin sexually with one another. Our first kiss with each other was at the altar on our wedding day (reaction pic attached!). We've been married for over five years now, and she's been the most wonderful and godly wife, mother to our three children, and homemaker you could imagine. She's more pure than most virgins, as biblical purity has less to with past sins (though they certainly matter) and more to do with one's current posture of the heart and daily decisions to honor the Lord (Matt. 5:8). We're far too quick to forget the story of the woman labeled as a known "sinner" (likely a prostitute) in Luke 7:36-50 who was washing Jesus' feet with her tears while kissing them too. The Pharisees were shocked that Jesus let a public sinner do this. Jesus responded with a parable about debts being forgiven and ended with this powerful conclusion: "Her many sins have been forgiven; that’s why she loved much. But the one who is forgiven little, loves little" (Luke 7:47). Everyone seems to highlight the benefits of virginity, and it certainly is a blessing. But we forget to highlight the benefits of being forgiven much as well. My wife knows the depths of Jesus' forgiveness more than most people, enabling her to more easily live out a life of passionate love for her Savior. A woman or man's past sexual sin matters. But what matters far more when it comes to deciding who to marry is if the person is truly born again, if their repentance is real, if they truly have a heart for Christ, if they truly follow Jesus and obey his commands. "God has chosen what is foolish in the world to shame the wise, and God has chosen what is weak in the world to shame the strong. God has chosen what is insignificant and despised in the world ​— ​what is viewed as nothing ​— ​to bring to nothing what is viewed as something, so that no one may boast in his presence. It is from him that you are in Christ Jesus, who became wisdom from God for us ​— ​our righteousness, sanctification, and redemption, — in order that, as it is written: 'Let the one who boasts, boast in the Lord.'" (1 Cor. 1:27-31) "Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has passed away, and see, the new has come!" (2 Cor. 5:17)

@CatholicDrip___ His name means "pebble" (Petros) and Jesus says on this "Petra" (Large Foundational Rock) I will build my church. You dont build churches on pebbles, you build them on foundations.

If Peter isn’t the Rock, then Jesus accidentally gave him the most misleading nickname in history Peter literally means Rock Cope Anti-Catholics💧

@PantherPourri Excellent. Probably should run an all-depth team and see who shines.

Could be as many as 10 absences from tomorrow night’s game vs Seattle