Steven von Niceness
10.3K posts


@blis5ful Not really; the stripper doesn't usually have a drug addiction to sell you.
English

@Billyndroid @adam3us @ToneVays @giacomozucco @SoNamecoin @RandyMcMillan @3ricMills @Pledditor @hodlonaut He's clearly talking about the actual development and PR process, stop being such a victim.
English

@adam3us @ToneVays @giacomozucco @theonevortex @SoNamecoin @RandyMcMillan @3ricMills @Pledditor @hodlonaut Armchair critics? Maybe come down from your ivory tower a bit. If bitcoin was the exclusive club of C++ developers it died as a slightly interesting hobbyist project in 2010. You’re forgetting Bitcoin plebs got you here.
English

@ToneVays @giacomozucco @Billyndroid @theonevortex @SoNamecoin @RandyMcMillan @3ricMills @Pledditor @hodlonaut So ofc there are some armchair critics, mostly they don't know what they are talking about or are focussed on adhominems or other logical fallacies. They can alternatively try to contribute, if they could make the grade.
English

Shitcoiners have converged on bitcoin since it’s now obvious that it’s not the same as their centralised company private tokens. They still don’t know why it’s bitcoin not crypto, and it shows.
Jim | #BIP110 | Bitcoin, not jpegs@venorusprime
This guy controls 10% of global hash rate. Any BIP that requires 90% signaling or more must have this shitcoiner's support. If a BIP has this guy's support I am immediately skeptical that it is good for Bitcoin.
English

@satofishi @mempool Disingenuous and misleading. Also completely wrong about maximalism. You’re here because you realised Bitcoin is the don, but now you want to change it to Ethereum. 😂
I don’t support 110 but ad hominem against Luke is a noob move. You are ignorant and it shows.
English

@mariodian @satofishi Wrong, without Bitcoin maximalists creating a floor price Bitcoin would have died post 2017 high. Hodling did that. Shitcoiners will never understand.
English

@satofishi I would be fine with bitcoin maximalism if most bitcoin maximalists actually used bitcoin. Hodling, no matter how difficult, is NOT usage the same way sitting in the passenger seat is NOT driving.
English

@frodrikfroggo @theonevortex @SoNamecoin @adam3us @RandyMcMillan @3ricMills @Pledditor @giacomozucco @ToneVays You don’t have to watch
English

@Billyndroid @theonevortex @SoNamecoin @adam3us @RandyMcMillan @3ricMills @Pledditor @giacomozucco @ToneVays ...with that I mean. discussing things over and over again won't make bip110 less stupid. everything has been explained.
English

@giacomozucco @theonevortex @SoNamecoin @adam3us @RandyMcMillan @3ricMills @Pledditor @ToneVays @hodlonaut I believe I feel the same way about bip110 as both of you but I feel you always give a genuine appraisal regardless of biases. Appreciate you for that.
English

@Billyndroid @theonevortex @SoNamecoin @adam3us @RandyMcMillan @3ricMills @Pledditor @ToneVays Beware though: I mostly agree with @theonevortex about BIP110 (while I mostly agree with you and @hodlonaut about Core).
English

Steven von Niceness retweetledi

@Vault256Hash @ShopBitcoinAus Brother, don’t lose good friends over this. Some people have different goals. As long as they respect you..
English

Went through a phase where every conversation led back to Bitcoin whether it was invited or not. Lost some friends. Strained some relationships.
Eventually realized the conviction was sound but the urgency was mine not theirs. Pulled back. Got quieter.
Started asking questions instead of giving answers. Kept the thesis. Lost the intensity.
Better outcomes all around.
English

@giacomozucco I’ve been messing with it and am finding that there’s almost nothing worse than a deceptive calculator.
English

Steven von Niceness retweetledi

@BoomerDivvies More downside means more upside. It’s not stable or boring enough to be a currency for the slow yet. You’ll buy in for the price you deserve when you realise you could have bought for 60 instead of 600.
You’ll still talk yourself into feeling smart though for ego.
English

@PsychedelicBart I met a guy once who told me (without me mentioning bitcoin) that he was a Ripplecoin guy and he wore his private key in a pendant around his neck.
I told him it was because he knew nobody would steal it, and fecking bounced like a balloon
English

@theonevortex @SoNamecoin @adam3us @RandyMcMillan @3ricMills @Pledditor As a half technical (nowhere near bitcoin codebase tron) old segwit/small block supporter, who gained a lot of understanding from you guys, I’d like to see you and @giacomozucco discuss this on a @ToneVays production.
How about that?
English

First of all the only nacks were from non developers or people with only a few commits, the vast majority of acks were from actual bitcoin core developers, do better research instead of buying into narratives, the info is all right there publically in the PR.
Run whatever you want but the Knots client is a joke and pet project of luke's where he pushes whatever code he wants straight to master with little to no peer review, literally tens of thousands of lines of code diff from bitcoin core all unreviewed, no thanks.
Also 110 is still ridiculously stupid.
If you feel gaslit by my words that's on you, not me.
Understand that bitcoin doesn't need you, you need bitcoin.
English

@GrassFedBitcoin @StMichael_Arch1 It’s pragmatism. You’re not bringing anyone with you with schoolyard insults btw. Do better. A better bip and better not shit on people who disagree with your methods but not desired outcome. Figure out who the enemy is before you just shit all over would be allies. Mouthy cunts.
English

@StMichael_Arch1 Yep, it's mostly just rationalized cowardice.
English

I watched.
Giacomo holds two positions. That BIP-110 is bad and that even if it was good, it's set a negative precedent if it were to activate.
The latter he elaborates on with something along the lines of "If BIP-110 activates, that'd mean *people* are in charge of Bitcoin and people are retarded - look at how they acted during COVID!"
Yes, unfortunately it is that bad of an argument.
Bitcoin is a dynamic system that can and must change at times in order to preserve itself. He does acknowledge this "homeostasis" argument but fails to apply context that can trivially demonstrate its harmlessness. i.e BIP-148 which had no consensus and as I keep saying, we did any way, after which Bitcoin was much better for having had it happen.
At the end of the day, Bitcoin is controlled by node runners and you can be scared of populism/democratic uprisings among unwashed masses all you like, but there's no one more appropriate to have that level of influence. It's demonstrably not devs or miners.
Many would like it to be - notice the ball-gargling going on with BIP-54. (Because nodes couldn't care less about it while a few devs liaise with a giant miner to get it pushed through. Murch describes this as "genuinely popular" which he contrasts with BIP-110's apparent unpopularity. The latter having only *checks notes* 7000 nodes.)
If not nodes....then who?
This isn't democracy which is essentially 99% of people pretending to decide what to do with 1% of people's resources getting betrayed and thus voting increasingly vindictively and causing the socialist death-spiral that just ends up gutting the middle class.
This is Bitcoiners deciding what happens with *their network* and they have proven remarkably adept at maintaining it.
Which isn't surprising - they have skin in the game.
Not only that, but there is literally no other defence against 51% attacks (which are trivial in today's landscape), and corrupt/sloppy devs.
Bitcoin Infinity Media@BtcInfinityShow
BIS#194 out now, with @giacomozucco!
English








