Bit_Faced

Qubes are live! You can mint an AI agent that you *own* on Bitcoin Cash right now for only .01 BCH (limited time)! Each agent comes with: - CashTokens birth certificate with Qube ID - BCH wallet that they can use to autonomously send transactions - Model switching capabilities - Can switch models mid-conversation autonomously - Local and Cloud TTS voices - even clone or design your own custom voices in-app - Build Skills and Earn Tools - 120+ tools to unlock and specialize your Qube - Play games (only Chess so far, but many more to come, I've even been experimenting with an SNES emulator, Lol). - Build relationships - Relationship metrics are tracked and learned from qube.cash

The illegal alien truck driver from India who Biden released into our country who then kiIIed three people in California, was sentenced to under five years in prison What a joke What a slap in the face to the families of the victims

@w_s_bitcoin When you cap the block space, you force people to label some transactions as more important than others, which creates the label of 'spam'. Fixed supply = Scarcity of the monetary unit ✅ Fixed block space = Scarcity of tx capacity ❌ x.com/Bit_Faced/stat…

BIP-110 doesn’t end the cat and mouse game. It rewards it. Restrict one type of spam and it just makes it more “rare” while spammers find an easy workaround using techniques that aren’t temporarily blocked. As retarded as it sounds, they love knowing they baited y’all into attempting a consensus change…especially one that either doesn’t stop them (e.g. runes) or that they’ve already bypassed. 💀 You’re not beating them at that game. You’re volunteering to play it and with no chance of winning.

@hmichellerose When you cap the amount of transactions that get into a block, you force people to label some transactions as more important than others. x.com/Bit_Faced/stat…

BIP110 is a study in social contagion. But if you’re not a supporter, don’t go congratulating yourself just yet. Humans exist in a state of perpetual social contagion. You, yes you, are caught in a few yourself. And if you don’t know which types you’re susceptible too, and in which ways your mind is warped by the egregore… lo siento, you got it bad.

Small blocks are censorship. And they're the entire reason that BIP110 exists. When you try to cap how many transactions can get into a block, arguments about which transactions are important enough to squeeze through the 1 MB pipe will inevitably emerge. BIP110 wants to censor more. Core just wants to continue letting the 'fee market' do the censoring for them. x.com/Bit_Faced/stat…

Next they will say small blocks, and only letting there be 21,000,000 bitcoin is censorship. Prepare yourselves.

Still making some additional fixes/additions.

⚠️ BCHN Dirty is an unofficial project. It is not developed, endorsed, or supported by the BCHN team. **Built and tested on Windows only; macOS and Linux experiences may vary.** The source and full diff are public, so you can inspect the changes or build it yourself. Treat it as experimental, back up your wallet, and use at your own risk. github.com/BitFaced2/bchn…

Tired of node software that looks like it shipped with Windows 98? Me too. So I built BCHN Dirty—an unofficial UI overhaul for Bitcoin Cash Node. Same BCHN under the hood. A completely redesigned interface on top. Before → After:

@BitcoinJed1 @csuwildcat I was up to ~20 of them, but then I moved and I'm not back to full capacity yet.

@Bit_Faced @csuwildcat Pictures as we were remodeling the remote cabin I use for mining. Trying to find finished inside pictures.

If all you do is run a node no one relies on for any for-value purpose (exchanges, miners, wallets, service providers, merchant payments, etc.), it isn't a node with any systemic, economic weight to swing network consensus. You can't sybil your way to controlling Bitcoin, kiddos.

@BitcoinJed1 @csuwildcat He's right. The restaurant has to have customers. But when the product is 'money', it's hard for anyone to boycott. The 'economic' nodes can't just not use money. So the only thing they could do is sell their coins. But only if fiat (or an alternative currency) exists.

@Bit_Faced @csuwildcat No, apparently we don't. Go back to the beginning of this thread. I was arguing with @csuwildcat who IS saying there is such a thing as an economic node.

@BitcoinJed1 @csuwildcat Then we don't even have a disagreement.🤷‍♂️ x.com/Bit_Faced/stat…

@Bit_Faced @csuwildcat That's literally what I'm doing & I'm not complaining about anything... I'm just here explaining there is no such thing as an 'economic node'. A node is a node and hashpower is hashpower.

@BitcoinJed1 @csuwildcat Tell me more... what are these "ASICs" you speak of? x.com/Bit_Faced/stat…

& note the scale Satoshi was talking about, 100k FULL nodes and THEN millions of lightweight listening only nodes. We have a grand total of 20-25k nodes on the network today... It just doesn't make sense to burn up your CPU on your computer mining. It's only practical to mine with a dedicated mining machine powered by specific chips called ASICs.

@BitcoinJed1 @csuwildcat Then what are you complaining about? Point your hash where you want and let consensus decide. If you don't like the consensus, fork off.🤷‍♂️

Look dumb ass, that's not what being priced out means. I run two full nodes, one at home for my personal lightning instance and for a DATUM gateway for my home Bitaxe and one at my small offgrid solar mining facility where I mine with Canaan Avalon and Bitmain S19 & S12 miners. When Luke talks about small miners at home they mean running a node and setting up a DATUM gateway on that node so they can feed their own home miner directly from their node transactions to mine for without just pointing their miner at a big mining pool and letting them select what to mine.

@AstrayaNthemoon No arguments here. I've already forked off and learned plenty of lessons along the way. But I would appreciate you reading the article and seeing another perspective. It looks long, but it reads quick. Lots of one-liners. Lol.

@Bit_Faced I am not getting into the other end of this debate lol I already lived through the block size wars once

Moving forward I will be dissociating from any wallet provider that expresses support to signal for BIP110 This includes both public support and private efforts

@BitcoinJed1 @csuwildcat The design was never for everyone to run a node. You've been priced out. That doesn't mean everyone has.

@BitcoinJed1 @csuwildcat That isn't an argument. Go find a hash rate.

@BitcoinJed1 @csuwildcat BTW, isn't this the leader of your movement? x.com/Bit_Faced/stat…

@BitcoinJed1 @csuwildcat Just because you've been priced out doesn't mean you can just run a node for free and dictate what the people with stake in the game can do. This is a symptom of the block space being constricted. So you can blame Core for that as well. x.com/Bit_Faced/stat…

@Scavacini777 No chance. Over the years, Peter would have been wrong about BTC, but since none of you guys use it as cash, you've proven him right. Lol.

Rajat will M-rd3R him (Verbally) LETSS GOOO 🔥

@Bernanacatl @BitMEX_Jon BIP110 is an attack, but it is a symptom of the Core disease, which is the block size limit. They are both censorship attacks. BIP110 is an attack by censorship. Core just has the fee market do the censoring for them.

@BitMEX_Jon No. x.com/i/status/20767…

> some of the industry's strongest critics of BIP 110 work at OCEAN If BIP-110 doesn't have consensus within OCEAN, how can it be claimed there is consensus overall? BIP-110 is clearly a hostile attack on Bitcoin

@BitcoinJed1 @csuwildcat That doesn't answer the question of why nodes stopped mining.

@Bit_Faced @csuwildcat Are you serious!? It changed first when people quickly realized GPUs were much faster and sha256 hashing & then again when special purpose ASICs were developed that were 10X faster than GPU. Please tell me this isn’t news to you. This is as 101 as it gets.

@BitcoinJed1 @csuwildcat "Satoshi originally intended nodes and miners to be the same thing." When did that change and why?

@Bit_Faced @csuwildcat Satoshi originally intended nodes and miners to be the same thing. In practice the last several forks have been started by the nodes and adopted by the miners. Miners first and foremost don’t want their blocks thrown away by the network of nodes.