Bitcoin Bim 🟧

- You: “Is inflation bad?” - Government: “Very bad. We fight it every day.” - You: “So the goal is 0%?” - Government: “No, the goal is 2%.” - You: “So the goal is… inflation?” - Government: “The goal is stable inflation.” - You: “Stable loss of my money?” - Government: “You’re not an economist.”

@PunterJeff I like your bullish optimism I'm also a perma-bull, but don't see us getting back to 100k until Q4 2027 High conviction that we get there, but on the longer time frame

If Bitcoin ends the year at $100,000, And Strategy purchases zero additional Bitcoin, Strategy would post nearly a $30 Billion Net Income for H2, 2026 , and be sitting on an $86B + balance sheet. The $MSTR market cap today is $36 Billion.

@IronTime17 💯

Overly domesticated. Need Government’s buy in/ approval before they can take a shit. If it doesn’t carry the label “Regulated by the FCA” or “protected by the FSCS”, they’re not interested. They’re reinforcing the government owning the means of monetary production. They’re under a Communist Fiat spell.

Why is every normie in the UK so fucking risk averse ?

The collision of AI and bitcoin will fuel the next bull market cycle Ignition in 2027 Hot in 2028 Raging inferno 2029

Rome ran on silver for four centuries, and the discipline of that metal built an empire. Then politicians discovered they could clip it, and the empire started dying. That sequence tells you almost everything you need to know about money. Picture yourself in the Roman Forum around 211 BC. The Republic has just introduced the denarius, a silver coin weighing roughly 4.5 grams, worth ten bronze asses. You could hold it, bite it, weigh it. Nobody printed it into existence. A miner dug the silver out of the ground in Spain, a smith struck it, and its value came from the metal itself, not from a senator's promise. Commodity money, pure and simple. The market chose silver because silver is scarce, divisible, and doesn't rot in your saddlebag. Banking existed, and it looked more honest than what you deal with today. The argentarii set up tables (the word "bank" comes from banca, the bench they sat on) in the Forum and took deposits, made loans, and changed foreign coins for a fee. When you deposited coins for safekeeping, that was a bailment: the banker held your specific coins and you paid him. When you wanted interest, you handed over a loan, and the banker put your silver to work. The Romans understood the difference between storing money and lending it. Try getting that distinction out of a modern banker. Interest rates floated freely. Legal ceilings existed (the Twelve Tables capped rates), and Romans routinely ignored them, lending at whatever the market demanded. Brutus, the noble assassin of Caesar, charged 48 percent on a loan to the city of Salamis. So much for republican virtue. The rot came from the state, as it always does. Emperors after the Republic debased the denarius relentlessly. Nero shaved the silver content in 64 AD. By the reign of Gallienus in the 260s AD, the coin was a bronze slug with a silver wash worth under 5 percent of the original. Prices exploded. Diocletian responded in 301 AD with price controls, and merchants did what merchants do: they stopped selling. Sound money made Rome. Debased money helped bury it.

Introducing the Bitcoin Bank Adoption Index. Adoption of Bitcoin and the related digital asset ecosystem across major banks and financial institutions is accelerating, but still early at 32%. Methodology and updates to follow. Institutions with questions, corrections, or additional public information: ir@strategy.com.

Strategy has increased its USD Reserve by $450 million. As of 7/12/2026, we hodl ₿843,775 in our BTC Reserves and $3.0 billion in our USD Reserves. $MSTR $STRC strategy.com/press/strategy…

💪

Orange dots tell only part of the story.

This image alone is incredibly powerful.

Someone sent me sats via Lightning on Strike (using Wallet of Satoshi). Now Strike is demanding I provide the sender’s full name and surname, or they’ll send the funds back. How am I supposed to know the sender’s real name on a Lightning payment? This is ridiculous. It’s Bitcoin, for god sake. Why is the platform forcing me to identify the sender or lose the sats? Has anyone else dealt with this on Strike? Is there better options in the UK that respect privacy and don’t treat every $5 transaction like a compliance investigation?

it’s really that simple.

JUST IN: $2.3 trillion bank Barclays just initiated Strategy $MSTR with a Buy rating and $130 price target — categorizing it alongside giants Visa and Matercard. Wall Street stopped calling $MSTR a 'crypto proxy' and now calls it 'fintech.' 🔥

Digital Credit is transparent because the principal market risk factor is Bitcoin, an observable, homogeneous asset. Analysts can assess BTC-related credit risk continuously, and investors can apply their own statistical models to inform valuation and trading decisions. $STRC

After a decade of blockspace fears and non-monetary-use panics, Bitcoin still has no spam problem. Fees are 1 sat/vB: anyone can move any amount globally with immediate processing for ~$0.30. The free market has always solved Bitcoin’s blockspace challenges. $BTC

Two countries split from the same colonial body in 1965. One picked economic freedom. The other picked handouts and racial spoils. You already know how this ended. Singapore had no oil, no farmland, no hinterland. Just a swamp and a port. Lee Kuan Yew looked at that and trusted trade, low taxes, and hard money. Central planners hate what he did. Malaysia went the other way. In 1971 Kuala Lumpur launched the New Economic Policy, a state program handing quotas, contracts, and university seats to ethnic Malays. Politicians decided who got what. A commissar fantasy dressed in liberal language. Now let's look at the numbers. In 1965 both places sat around $500 per capita. Today Singapore clears $84,000. Malaysia sits near $13,000. Same climate, same starting line, one sixth the result. The Singapore dollar holds its value because the Monetary Authority of Singapore manages it against a currency basket and refuses to print its way out of trouble. The ringgit has lost roughly two thirds of its value against the Singapore dollar since 1981. You cannot subsidize your way to wealth. You cannot redistribute what you never let people produce. Every ringgit funneled through a quota is a ringgit some bureaucrat spent on his own vision instead of a customer's. Malaysia bet on planners deciding outcomes. Singapore bet on people deciding for themselves. The gap between $84,000 and $13,000 is your answer.

$BTC is Digital Capital. $STRC is Digital Credit. $MSTR is Digital Equity. Different instruments for different investors. One Bitcoin Strategy.

Translation for noobs ... Time to man up and buy

The 4-year cycle. #Bitcoin