Laurentiu

My AI trading agent is amazing! In June it bought $RKLB Now it's 100% up! But how did it find it? Let's break it down

@rauchg Hosted on Vercel ofc

@rauchg Select.supply An aggregator of cool products that I personally curated

Show me the thing you’ve built with AI you’re most proud of. Reply with a working product URL and what model / agent you primarily used.

@juniorkingpp For sure you don't want to become the water boy of your security team

Maybe I’m weird but if the world is ending I’m not going to try to “survive”. Like literally what’s the point.

@zuess05 Literally no one did that

Serious question. We spent the last decade listening to podcasts telling us to wake up at 5 AM and grind for 12 hours a day to be successful. Now a 19-year-old is using Claude to build a massive software business from his couch while literally sleeping in. What exactly are people bragging about when they say they "work 80 hours a week" in 2026?

@DanielSmidstrup Founders the new keyword for unemployed spammers

X is full of Founders Reddit is full of bot LinkedIn is full of ...

@guilhermeotina @ForrestPKnight What 15 years of shipping sir? All his apps are vibe coded slop. Tell me one single app that is useful.

With all due respect, I don’t think it is interesting. If it were a top SWE at a company that doesn’t have anything to do with AI… now that would be interesting. But an indie hacker using AI to exclusively write their code is completely expected. I really, really want folks to identify the difference between how indie hackers use AI and how big corps outside of AI use AI - complete opposite ends of the spectrum.

@bassbasedrk @guigotgit @ForrestPKnight @levelsio Even login does not work for some

@guigotgit @ForrestPKnight @levelsio How is this "reductive"? That guy has not built anything of actual value in his entire life. All his "apps" are literal slop.

@ForrestPKnight Claude Code makes simple mistakes on my live projects. It is excellent for supporting tools or dashboards, but for app running in prod is not great. Imagine what job it does on legacy apps...

@EndorsiVal @trekedge I am throwing haymakers at my screen now

What will the mathematicians do now that AI is taking their jobs

@GoldenGoosebruh @ashleevance You will pay for them while the companies collect the profit all the while property prices skyrocket, construction of new single family houses will be banned and eating out will cost $150 per person and you will be happy about it.

@ashleevance Let’s act like we couldn’t desalinate oceans and that drinking water is some how a sacred cow. Also sometimes contractors hit the water main. They can repair it you know…

If America isn't even allowed to manufacture data, what's left?

@dieworkwear Has e/acc in title... do you really expect a smart person?

@dieworkwear Men?? You mean bots?

why do so many men feel like they have to wear a watch now, even if they're not into watches?

Not even in 50 years will AI be able to produce such a perfect ad like the one from Omega youtu.be/4ygaLJBiYhc?is…

@designcoursecom Anti-ai hater means the opposite

My teenage daughters have a strong distaste towards AI. I asked them, "have you actually used it to build or create anything?" "No!" And there you have it. This sums up the average anti-AI hater.

@JulieLovesFluff Lol showcasing two individuals and then comparing with a whole generation is wild

My Dad is a Boomer, he took two tins of sardines, a sleeve of saltines and hot sauce to his job as a carpenter for 40 years. My husband's Dad is Gen X, he took a can of soup to work every day making modular homes in a factory. My husband is a Millennial and eats turkey sandwiches or leftovers. Zoomers are so soft and entitled, I'm tired of them pretending like they're the first generation to have it hard.

@michael_mzl If they were that good, they would not seek employment.

imagine ur a new grad rn competing with 8000 ex-meta 10x devs for a role 😂

@Cloudflare Clankers already took control of your social media...

Passwords are a pain. Are you fully onboard with Passkeys yet or are you still holding onto your password manager for dear life? #CloudflareChat

@damoosmann @DJ_CURFEW You almost swallowed that boot

@DJ_CURFEW Everyone will cry in the comments. But this is the right move if you want your company to succeed. The hard reality is that most people will not be able to keep up with AI. We need a UBI within the next two years.

Today we reduced headcount by 22%. The business is the strongest it's ever been. So I think it's important to be direct about what I'm seeing and why. First, I made this decision and I own it. I did it because the way to operate at the highest level of productivity is changing, and to win the future, ClickUp needs to change with it. Second, this wasn't about cutting costs. Most savings from this change will flow directly back into the people who stay. We'll be introducing million-dollar salary bands. If you create outsized impact using AI, you'll be paid outside of traditional bands. Most importantly, I have the deepest gratitude for those affected. We're doing this from a position of strength specifically so we can take care of people properly. Everyone affected receives a package aimed at honoring their contributions and easing the transition. I only see two options: wait for this to play out gradually in the market or be honest about what I'm seeing and act proactively. THE 100X ORGANIZATION The primary change is that we're restructuring around what I call 100x org. The goal is 100x output. The roles required to build at the highest level are fundamentally different than they were a year ago. Incremental improvements to existing systems won't get us there. We need new ones. That means creating enough disruption to rebuild rather than iterate on what's already broken. The common narrative is that AI makes everyone more productive. It doesn't. Many of the workflows of today, if left unchanged, create bottlenecks in AI systems. These roles will evolve. But waiting for that to happen naturally means falling behind now. The 100x org is actually heavily dependent on people - infinitely more than today. This is only possible with 10x people that have embraced and adopted new ways of working. THE BUILDERS, AGENT MANAGERS, AND FRONT-LINERS — THE BUILDERS: 10X ENGINEERS I don't think most companies have internalized what's actually happening with AI in engineering. The common narrative is that AI makes all engineers more productive. That may be true in isolation, but at an organization level - that is the farthest thing from reality. Here's what we've validated recently at ClickUp: the great engineers, the ones who can orchestrate, architect, and review, are becoming 100x engineers. They're not writing code. They're directing agents that write code. The skill is judgment. AI makes the best engineers wildly more productive, and everyone else using AI slows these engineers down. Think about it - the bottlenecks are (1) orchestration - telling AI what to do, and (2) reviewing - what AI did. Everything is leapfrogged and no longer needed. So who do you want orchestrating and reviewing code? And how do you want your best engineers to spend their time? If your best engineers are spending time reviewing other people's code, then this is inherently an inefficient bottleneck. These engineers can review their agent's code much faster than reviewing human code. The new world is about enabling your 10x engineers to become 100x. The wrong strategy is to push every engineer to use infinite tokens. Companies doing this are celebrating 500% more pull requests. But customer outcomes don't match the volume of code being generated. I call this the great reckoning of AI coding, and every company will face this soon if not already. More code is just another bottleneck to the best engineers, and ultimately to your company's impact as well. — THE BUILDERS: 10X PRODUCT MANAGERS Product management and design roles are merging. Designers that have customer focus, become more like product managers. And product managers that have intuition for UX become more like designers. The bottleneck of user research is gone. It takes us just one mention of an agent to kickoff research and analyze results. The bottleneck of product <> design iteration is also gone. The product builder iterates on their own, along with agents and skills that ensure alignment with quality and strategy. Also controversial today - I believe that the wrong strategy is to have your PMs shipping code - that just introduces another bottleneck that the best engineers will waste their time on. To be clear, PMs should be coding but they should do this in a playground to iterate, validate, and scope. That code should not go to production. Everything outside of managing systems, orchestrating AI, and reviewing output becomes a bottleneck. That's why the other roles that are critical along with these are the systems managers (to reduce bottlenecks) along with a bottleneck you can't replace - customer meeting time. — THE SYSTEM MANAGERS Ironically, the people that automate their jobs with AI will always have a job. They become owners of the AI systems - agent managers. We have many examples of these people at ClickUp. The underlying systems in which we operate are absolutely critical to get right. I think most companies are delusional to think they can iterate on existing systems and compete in this new world. You must create enough disruption so that old systems are deprecated entirely. If there's any definition for 'AI native' that's what it is. — THE FRONT-LINERS In a world that will become saturated with AI communication, the human touch will matter more than anything to customers. This is a bottleneck that you shouldn't replace - even when agents are high enough quality to do video meetings. One-on-one meeting time with customers is something that shouldn't be automated. The systems around the meetings should be - so that front-liners spend nearly 100% of their time with customers. REWARDING 100X IMPACT In a world where companies are able to do so much more with less, where does that excess money go? In our case, much of the savings in this new operating model will flow directly back to those that enabled it. We must reward people that create productivity accordingly. This aligns incentives on both sides. Plus, in a world where your best people create 100x impact, you can't afford to lose them. You should aim to retain these employees for decades. The context they have and their ability to efficiently orchestrate and review will be nearly impossible to replace. Compensation bands of today should be thrown out the door. We're introducing $1 million cash/year salary bands with a path available to nearly everyone in the company if they produce 100x impact by creating or managing AI systems. THE FUTURE Nearly every company will make changes like these. The ones that do it proactively will define what comes next. The future is not fewer people. It's different work, new roles, and better rewards for those who embrace it. We're already seeing entirely new roles emerge, like Agent Managers, that didn't exist a year ago. ClickUp is positioning to lead this shift, not just internally, but for our customers too. I've never been more certain about where we're headed.

@nickclement Cloudflare

Name me a company you dislike more than Meta.

@eastdakota So Americans are measurers and cheap h1b visa holders are builders and sellers?

AI isn’t going to take all jobs. But it will fulfill the prophesy of Peter Drucker from 71 years ago: more builders, more sellers, fewer measurers. wsj.com/opinion/how-i-…